War Osama bin Laden’s ‘Letter to America’ Goes Viral 21 Years Later — on TikTok - The incendiary text was removed from the website of The Guardian after becoming a top-trending link


BY MILES KLEE
NOVEMBER 15, 2023

AS A FAMOUS @dril tweet noted of the terrorist group ISIS, “You do not, under any circumstances, ‘gotta hand it to them.'” Yet amid the continuing horrors of the war between Israel and Hamas militants, as people struggle to make sense of the violence and escalating rhetoric, more than a few people are willing to give al-Qaeda founder Osama bin Laden credit for his 2002 polemic against the United States, published as an explanation of the ideology that led him to orchestrate the attacks of 9/11.

“I need everyone to stop what they’re doing right now and go read — it’s literally two pages — go read ‘A Letter to America,'” said TikTok user Lynette Adkins in a video posted to the platform on Tuesday, referring to the title often given to the text by bin Laden. “Come back here and let me know what you think. Because I feel like I’m going through like an existential crisis right now, and a lot of people are. So I just need someone else to be feeling this too.”

Commenters felt similarly awestruck by the document. “Just read it.. my eyes have been opened,” wrote one. “Read our entire existence for filth and he did NOT miss,” another said of bin Laden’s criticisms of the U.S. The clip itself went viral, with other young TikTokers also sharing the letter approvingly, encouraging followers to read it. “We’ve been lied to our entire lives, I remember watching people cheer when Osama was found and killed,” wrote a 25-year-old user who posted the letter in full. “I was a child, and it confused me. It still confuses me today. The world deserves better than what this country has done to them.”


Writing a year after 9/11, bin Laden noted in his message that he was seeking to answer two questions that had occupied American media since that terrible day: “Why are we fighting and opposing you?” and “What are we calling you to, and what do we want from you?” The first section is surely the most relevant to the current humanitarian crisis in Gaza, as it denounces the U.S. for helping to establish and maintain a Jewish state in the Palestinian territories. “The creation and continuation of Israel is one of the greatest crimes, and you are the leaders of its criminals,” bin Laden argued. “Each and every person whose hands have become polluted in the contribution towards this crime must pay its price, and pay for it heavily.”

Bin Laden expounded further about how the oppression of Palestine had to be “revenged,” going on to impugn Western imperialism and hegemony in broader terms, before shifting into a justification for killing civilians in his jihad. “The American people are the ones who pay the taxes which fund the planes that bomb us in Afghanistan, the tanks that strike and destroy our homes in Palestine, the armies which occupy our lands in the Arabian Gulf, and the fleets which ensure the blockade of Iraq,” he wrote. “This is why the American people cannot be not innocent of all the crimes committed by the Americans and Jews against us.”

While some of bin Laden’s judgments would not have been out of place in mainstream American politics of the era — he takes the U.S. to task for not signing the Kyoto Protocol treaty on restricting emission of greenhouse gases, for example — the letter is also interspersed with antisemitic tropes and hate speech. He repeatedly wrote that the country was dominated by Jews who “control your policies, media and economy,” elsewhere condemning homosexuality and fornication as “immoral,” and accusing the U.S. of spreading AIDS, which he termed a “Satanic American Invention.” As for what al-Qaeda wanted, bin Laden said that the U.S. had to renounce its culture of “hypocrisy” and become an Islamic nation.

The top Google Search result for “Letter to America” directs to a page on the website of The Guardian, which published it in 2002. For a while on Wednesday, social media-driven interest in the text made it the publication’s top-trending story — but then the outlet removed the letter, and replaced it with a brief message: “This page previously displayed a document containing, in translation, the full text of Osama bin Laden’s “letter to the American people,” as reported in the Observer on Sunday 24 November 2002,” it reads. “The document, which was published here on the same day, was removed on 15 November 2023.” No other explanation is offered.


The deletion prompted even more discussion on TikTok and X (formerly Twitter), where people questioned the editorial decision and asked for other links to the document. “Thankfully they can’t wipe our memories, or undo our further radicalization,” wrote an X user who said it was “no coincidence” The Guardian took the article down after it made the rounds online. “They really want us to stay ignorant,” wrote another. A third reader argued that bin Laden “was not the bad guy.” But many were shocked to see sympathy for — or agreement with — the terrorist who masterminded 9/11. “These so-called TikTok leftists praising Osama Bin Laden now?” tweeted one person in apparent disbelief. “How do you get radicalized to be ridiculous?”

If nothing else, it must be a sign of how polarized and angry Americans have become over a Middle East conflict that has already claimed thousands of lives, and the role the U.S. has played in the region for decades. You know things are dire when, for some people engaged in the debate, an extremist mass murderer starts making sense.



The Guardian:
Nov 24, 2002: Full text: bin Laden's 'letter to America' | World news
Nov 15, 2023: Removed: document
This page previously displayed a document containing, in translation, the full text of Osama bin Laden’s “letter to the American people”, as reported in the Observer on Sunday 24 November 2002. The document, which was published here on the same day, was removed on 15 November 2023.
 
Last edited:
Thanks to politically correct WW2 video games like Battlefield V and Call of Duty Vanguard. There are people that think the axis was more racially diverse, less white and less racist than the Allie's.
God I hope that the zoomers developer scum were trying to brainwash end up biting their hand, forcing them to finally drop the "diversity" schtick.
 
You don't have negative stereotypes about Jews, you always have "tropes". You're never spreading malicious rumours or lies, you're spreading "canards".
Because there are Christians out there who view Jews as the early adopters of Abrahamic religion, and are thus chosen by God to lead humanity. They don’t see them as the infant mutilating, host desecrating, coin shaving, christ killing, nation wrecking parasites that they are.

Classic Graunaid garbage.

Go on X and you will find Zoomers liking and sharing the /pol/ meme of listing every broadcasting or government head with an Israel flag near it. Have seen “Hitler > Israel” posts. They aren’t too far from it. You have protestors screaming “gas the jews”. They aren’t too far off

Seeing Zoomers on TikTok reaching the same conclusion as people like Edward I, Hadrian, Ferdinand II of Aragon, Henry Ford, Kanye, Elijah Muhammad, Hitler, Martin Luther, and the Pharaohs says more about the Jews than it does about the Zoomers.

They’ve been kicked out 109 times.
Inshallah, the United States will be 110.
 
The man was very intelligent and a lot of his letter still rings true. That doesn't change the fact that he had a hateboner for the Twin Towers that cost 3000+ innocent people their lives.
It wasn't just the Twin Towers. He hit the Pentagon and there was supposedly a fourth plane aiming for the White House.
 
The Osama letter read like some incel terrorist manifesto. The kiwi mosque shooter had a more thought out manifesto.
Sorry for the autism contained here, but Brenton Tarrant's full title is the Facebook Christchurch Mosque Shooter. His video is merely archived here. He live streamed on Facebook Live. I believe his manifesto was released on 8 chan. He had nothing to do with Kiwi Farms.

Edit: of course, the other meaning of kiwi. I'm the idiot here. Please point and laugh on your way by.
 
Oh no the letter contained hate speech and condemnations of the US for pushing degeneracy and unconditionally supporting ONE state, for reasons nobody is allowed to talk about, or a nuclear bomb of ultrakvetching breaks loose.
Screenshot 2023-11-16 151728.png
 
The broken clock is right twice a day.

That being said, zoomies aren’t old enough to remember 9/11. For most of us the idea of celebrating a guy who orchestrated that is a little wonky. And unlike other historical kvetching events like the Holocaust and US slavery, there was legit documentation of murderous intent on behalf of Al Qaeda. Even in my country there was a pretty strong sentiment of him being a complete arsehole who justified killing people over taxes, taxes that if Americans don’t pay they’ll end up in jail over. They were causing general strife back home with terroristic shenanigans, and most of us were content in just killing them. I get the idea that if these kids had to live with the constant worry of one of these people blowing up a cafe, or had they, like most of us, watched the 9/11 events live, they wouldn’t be praising him nearly as much.

Anyway, it is utterly retarded that they’re censoring a historical document because some braindead kids agree with it. Censorship never works, it only increases interest. I can only hope that this leads to zoomies picking up a copy of the Green Book or Mien Kampf, or other books with legitimate and well founded arguments against the Jews.

There is a good bit of talk itt on my ideology, I’ll link a copy of the Green Book so you can check it out for yourself, it’s roughly 100 pages.

The Green Book
 
A lot of this stuff points to the idea that Zoomers are incredibly vulnerable to propaganda. They have no defenses against it.

When someone makes an elaborate manifesto that says "I killed these people because of the noble cause, listen to how noble my cause is," the Zoomers buy it.

There was an article here last week about how Zoomers fall for online scams even more than Boomers do.

Zoomers had very little history education outside of American history and maybe a little world history from the ancient world or the age of sail. They have often not been exposed to many (or any) primary source documents where people spoke in impassioned ways about causes that, upon passage of time, seem monstrous now.

They only know how to speak critically about white Europeans and their own culture. They've also been taught criticizing other cultures is bad and that their only duty is to listen uncritically when the oppressed speak. They have been taught to speak in idealistic platitudes about what the world should be, and not to criticize wild, impractical plans as long as it supports the cause.

I'm getting pretty worried, fam. All it would take for the Zoomers to elect an absolute tyrant that would make Stalin blush would be for him to have a sadboy manifesto about colonialism. They don't have any real capabilities to say "hm, he does say that, but he would say that, wouldn't he?"
 
A lot of this stuff points to the idea that Zoomers are incredibly vulnerable to propaganda. They have no defenses against it.

When someone makes an elaborate manifesto that says "I killed these people because of the noble cause, listen to how noble my cause is," the Zoomers buy it.

There was an article here last week about how Zoomers fall for online scams even more than Boomers do.

Zoomers had very little history education outside of American history and maybe a little world history from the ancient world or the age of sail. They have often not been exposed to many (or any) primary source documents where people spoke in impassioned ways about causes that, upon passage of time, seem monstrous now.

They only know how to speak critically about white Europeans and their own culture. They've also been taught criticizing other cultures is bad and that their only duty is to listen uncritically when the oppressed speak. They have been taught to speak in idealistic platitudes about what the world should be, and not to criticize wild, impractical plans as long as it supports the cause.

I'm getting pretty worried, fam. All it would take for the Zoomers to elect an absolute tyrant that would make Stalin blush would be for him to have a sadboy manifesto about colonialism. They don't have any real capabilities to say "hm, he does say that, but he would say that, wouldn't he?"
Let’s be real, the powers that be have invested a lot of time and effort into creating the most subservient generation as humanly possible. Zoomies and critical thinking are oil and water.

I remember being almost robbed in London a year or so ago by a Paki pretending to beg. I’m not retarded and told him to fuck off, only to be called racist by some young people sitting beside me. The fact that I had to explain to them that the poor brown was trying to distract me so he could nick my phone made me loose a little faith in humanity.
 
This reminds me of a certain quote, presented here for your edification and enjoyment:
The servants of Allah sacrificed their own lives and the lives of a few disciples of the Dollar. The aim of the servants of market economy is to murder the whole of Creation and mankind as soon as they can. The deep ecologist and protector of life, the guardian of the continuity of life, would certainly choose Allah when things get tough. Given the situation, the towers of the World Trade Center were the best target among all the buildings of the world, both symbolically and concretely. It was a magnificent, splendid choice.
-Can Life Prevail? (p. 166), Pentti Linkola (RIP)
 
A lot of this stuff points to the idea that Zoomers are incredibly vulnerable to propaganda. They have no defenses against it.

When someone makes an elaborate manifesto that says "I killed these people because of the noble cause, listen to how noble my cause is," the Zoomers buy it.

There was an article here last week about how Zoomers fall for online scams even more than Boomers do.

Zoomers had very little history education outside of American history and maybe a little world history from the ancient world or the age of sail. They have often not been exposed to many (or any) primary source documents where people spoke in impassioned ways about causes that, upon passage of time, seem monstrous now.

They only know how to speak critically about white Europeans and their own culture. They've also been taught criticizing other cultures is bad and that their only duty is to listen uncritically when the oppressed speak. They have been taught to speak in idealistic platitudes about what the world should be, and not to criticize wild, impractical plans as long as it supports the cause.

I'm getting pretty worried, fam. All it would take for the Zoomers to elect an absolute tyrant that would make Stalin blush would be for him to have a sadboy manifesto about colonialism. They don't have any real capabilities to say "hm, he does say that, but he would say that, wouldn't he?"

This is my biggest takeaway from it. World history has been effectively gutted and sterilized in the US education system. Primary sources have been basically blacklisted and instead students are told "this shit is bad because it will warp you if you read it." Aka it's now forbidden fruit.

I remember not actually being able to read Mein Kamph until the college level. It ended up being the underwhelming reeing of a shitty man that kept trying to use circular logic to justify madness. Not the effective book of power mysticism it has been hyped up to be in certain circles.

Gen Z and late millennials are not prepared for a well prepared argument for evil or propaganda and it shows. Evil is seductive, never forget that.
 
He.. he was based..
Dude was a megarich elite that ditched the limelight and luxury of Saudi royalty and went to fight in some god-forsaken mountains, on a steady diet of rice and tea and the occasional victim of rape goat.
There's a reason they dumped his body in the ocean and made sure to say he watched porn or w/e
 
Back