Jackie Singh / Jacqueline Singh / Jacqueline Anne Stokes / Jax / @find_evil / HackingButLegal / @HackingButLegal / piggytomlinson - Cybersecurity "expert," wannabe journoscum, former "hacker"; gunt guards Patrick Tomlinson, currently picking a fight with ONA Forums, GNAA Groupie

[JustStopDude]

KIWI FARMS PUT SOME KIND OF DROWNING DEVICE IN MY HOTEL ROOM

You laugh. I was commissioning a steel mill in Australia. I convinced the locals the reason US toilets have so much water in them is so we could wash our boots and babies in them

 

[Sir Dank-a-Lot]

I'm surprised she didn't think the toilet wasn't a nefarious brainwashing device. I'm pretty sure it's the first time she saw an indoor toilet.

A bidet would be a brain washing device for her.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

A bidet would be a brain washing device for her.

I doubt she's ever even wiped her arse, I doubt she would even know what that is.

 

[Piggle Rick]

I doubt she's ever even wiped her arse, I doubt she would even know what that is.

Severely obese people can’t reach to wipe their own asses.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Severely obese people can’t reach to wipe their own asses.

I'd ask if she uses a salaka, but her people stopped using those a long time ago.

 

[Battlecruiser3000ad]

All you coddled westoids insulting miss Jackie:
The street is not just the toilet but the toilet paper too

 

[Plaintiff is fat]

what being called fat and ugly does to a mf


what's with the quotation marks? does the schizo think Josh is a fake persona made up by Russia or something?

 

[Second Missing Primarch]

what being called fat and ugly does to a mf
View attachment 5496786

what's with the quotation marks? does the schizo think Josh is a fake persona made up by Russia or something?

It's all fun and games until they come for your opinions, Jackie. You won't be so pleased then.

 

[Sexy Senior Citizen]

Quick update on Jackie's keynote: OWASP uploaded the videos from their Singapore conference, which took place at the start of October. This means if Jackie's speech was recorded, it'll be uploaded either by the end of November or the beginning of December.

As an aside, the Singapore conference had a lot of people named "Singh" giving speeches. Coincidence?

what's with the quotation marks? does the schizo think Josh is a fake persona made up by Russia or something?

Everyone knows Joshua Moon's secret identity is Null the Slobberdoggo.

 

[DiggieSmalls]

Quick update on Jackie's keynote: OWASP uploaded the videos from their Singapore conference, which took place at the start of October. This means if Jackie's speech was recorded, it'll be uploaded either by the end of November or the beginning of December.

As an aside, the Singapore conference had a lot of people named "Singh" giving speeches. Coincidence?


Everyone knows Joshua Moon's secret identity is Null the Slobberdoggo.

I cant wait to clown on this bitch. OWASP is a shit organization in my eyes now.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

what being called fat and ugly does to a mf
View attachment 5496786

what's with the quotation marks? does the schizo think Josh is a fake persona made up by Russia or something?

A great company? Well she does know a thing or two about stealing money money from others as that's all Gogent is known for. All you'll see on their BBB page is customers who had literal thousands of dollars stolen from them.

Just one such complaint a year ago

I signed a contract with Cogent Communications over 4 years ago to provide Fiber internet to my office. For 4 years I paid every month on time. When it came up for my contract to expire I looked around a got quotes from different providers, and found that I was paying almost 4 times more than other providers were offering for less service. As per my original contract I submitted 30 day notice of termination of contract once the original contract expired and started service with a different provider. Cogent then told me their auto-renewed my contract for an additional 4 years and that I would have to pay them out the entire term of the contract, over $16,000! I advised them that I never received any notice via email or mail of a renewal which I know that through Assembly Bill 390, (which adds renewal reminder notice requirements and cancellation requirements to Californias already-demanding Automatic Renewal Law (ARL)) that they were required to do- they admitted they never sent me any notice of renewal. In fact they continued to auto draw from my bank account after the notice I gave them to cancel payments (this is probably illegal). They refuse to acknowledge this and continue to illegally send me invoices for the $16k

Criminals always support other criminals.

 

[Pedophobe]

Ever noticed that everyone who works in cybersecurity is either a nepobaby who wasn't technically-minded enough to become a technician let alone a coder and eventually transitions to management, or a shifty-eyed neckbeard who is way too into network protocols, just doesn't show up anymore one day and no one's allowed to ask why?

Imagine the conference smell.

 

[JustStopDude]

Jackie posted a new entry to her blog. She laments that international conspiracies, such as Russia, use lawsuits to silent critics. She never actually defines what a slap lawsuit is (you'd think she would explain it rather than just linking to the entire Wikipedia page for it), mentions any real vase examples, or explain what anti-SLAP laws are, or where they exist.

I think this is all part of her attempt to go hardcore into the left, anti-Trump, blue-anon crowd. I don't really understand how she is going to grift these grifters, but I guess it's better than getting a real job.

In the second paragraph, she shares here a new techno word she came up with.

"Strategic Attacks Against Public Participation (SAAPP),"

It's a madeup, bullshit term, the sort I expect to run into as an electrical engineer whenever someone above me thinks it's a grand idea for me to sitdown with one of the HR cat ladies.

Apparently SAAPP causes...

• Reputational Damage: Spreading misleading information to damage the victim's public persona, typically via social media, blogs, and other digital mediums. False reviews, messages to their allies, and wild accusations can be used. This aims to discredit their work or character, reducing their credibility.
• Social Isolation: Efforts to detach victims from their networks of support, including friends, colleagues, and allies. This is achieved by fostering mistrust and discord within these circles, often through the dissemination of rumors or false claims.
• Instigation of Self-Doubt: Targeted harassment aimed at instilling fear, anxiety, and self-questioning in the victim. The goal is to lead the individual to doubt their capabilities, beliefs, and value, culminating in their withdrawal from public activities.

This goes on an on. Near as I can tell, this is just a blog post of a notorious internet troll and irl terrible person complaining about the social reaction to her horrible behavior to family, friends, and random people online.

The pseudo jargon is just there to trick utterly brain dead morons from noticing that i guess.

 

[DiggieSmalls]

Ever noticed that everyone who works in cybersecurity is either a nepobaby who wasn't technically-minded enough to become a technician let alone a coder and eventually transitions to management, or a shifty-eyed neckbeard who is way too into network protocols, just doesn't show up anymore one day and no one's allowed to ask why?

Imagine the conference smell.

tbf, i have met some really slick pentesters. Some guys that have taught me things i find very valuable and very hard to find info about.

 

[Sexy Senior Citizen]

Jackie posted a new entry to her blog.

Link/Archive

In recent years, a proliferation of harmful behaviors and incidents in public spaces has challenged the traditional boundaries of discourse and engagement, yet these phenomena have not been adequately captured under existing terminologies which are widely understood and accessible to laypeople.

To bridge this gap, I propose the term "Strategic Attacks Against Public Participation (SAAPP)," a framework to help us grasp and address these evolving threats.

This new terminology reflects the changing dynamics of society, where public engagement and discourse increasingly fall prey to subtler, non-judicial forms of suppression and manipulation. This term encompasses a variety of tactics and strategies aimed at diminishing an individual's role in public life, a matter requiring distinct recognition and scrutiny in our digitally-connected society.

SAAPP attacks represent calculated efforts to diminish the victim's determination to remain active in public realms.

Contrasted with SLAPP suits, which primarily employ legal intimidation, SAAPP attacks deploy a wider spectrum of tactics, chiefly focusing on personal and social aggression.

SAAPP's primary objective lies not in securing a particular tangible victory, but in eroding the psychological and social resilience of the target, primarily to induce them to retract from public engagement. Victims endure a broad range of resultant harms, often in silence.
SAAPP attacks, while varied in their methods, share common strategies that are distinctly damaging. These attacks can be multifaceted, combining both online and offline strategies, and the tactics are not only diverse in nature but also insidiously crafted to undermine the victim's public and private spheres.

What follows is a delineation of some of the most prevalent tactics employed in SAAPP attacks, each uniquely contributing to the overarching goal of silencing and isolating the individual.

Reputational Damage: Spreading misleading information to damage the victim's public persona, typically via social media, blogs, and other digital mediums. False reviews, messages to their allies, and wild accusations can be used. This aims to discredit their work or character, reducing their credibility.

Social Isolation: Efforts to detach victims from their networks of support, including friends, colleagues, and allies. This is achieved by fostering mistrust and discord within these circles, often through the dissemination of rumors or false claims.

Instigation of Self-Doubt: Targeted harassment aimed at instilling fear, anxiety, and self-questioning in the victim. The goal is to lead the individual to doubt their capabilities, beliefs, and value, culminating in their withdrawal from public activities.

The impacts of SAAPP attacks can be profound and extensive.

Victims often endure significant mental health struggles, including stress and anxiety, alongside a possible sense of powerlessness. Professionally, their work may become discredited, and their capacity to collaborate and engage with others severely restricted. Their associates may start doubting them or avoid association to prevent becoming targets themselves.

SAAPP poses serious concerns regarding freedom of expression and the right to partake in public life. By fostering a hostile environment, these attacks can dampen public discourse, dissuading others from participation due to fear of similar retaliation.

Addressing SAAPP attacks can be arduous, given their secretive and dispersed nature.

Unlike legal confrontations in SLAPP lawsuits, SAAPP tactics are subtler and more challenging to trace to a singular origin, even when one exists. Moreover, distinguishing between legitimate criticism and malicious attacks can be difficult for casual observers, leading them to turn away from the target of such attacks without further investigation.

In conceptualizing SAAPP, I drew inspiration from the framework and characteristics of SLAPP.

Both SLAPP lawsuits and SAAPP tactics aim to undermine public engagement and silence criticism, albeit via different methods. SLAPP suits intimidate and financially burden critics through legal proceedings, often without intending to win. In contrast, SAAPP attacks seek to deplete the target's morale and reputation, leading to self-censorship, withdrawal from public discourse, and other negative impacts.

The common thread in both is their objective: to quell dissent and dominate public narratives.

SLAPP achieves this through legal threats and financial pressures, whereas SAAPP extends its strategy to include tactics like online harassment and disinformation.

Although SLAPP lawsuits are outlawed in numerous jurisdictions, this does not stop plaintiffs from bringing these types of cases.

Despite their illegality in many places, victims still face significant hurdles in countering them, especially when the plaintiffs are wealthy and powerful. These adversaries often possess the means to sustain lengthy and costly legal battles, placing disproportionate pressure on defendants who may lack similar resources.

This imbalance not only challenges the victims' ability to defend themselves but also underscores a broader issue of access to justice. Despite legal protections against SLAPPs, the reality is that fighting these cases often demands substantial financial and emotional resilience, making it difficult for many to stand against such tactics.

The use of SLAPP suits and SAAPP tactics by some law firms, particularly those representing influential and well-heeled clients like Russian oligarchs, is a disturbing development. These entities are now harnessing their considerable resources to run these strategies in tandem, turning them into not just personal attacks but threats to public discourse and democracy.

This combination of legal and extralegal methods represents a troubling shift towards suppressing dissent and free speech, intensifying the struggle for narrative control and raising serious concerns about power imbalances and individual rights in public dialogue.

SAAPP attacks pose a grave threat, not just to the well-being of those targeted, but to the integrity of public discourse.

By explicitly naming and defining these attacks, we take an essential first step in developing effective counterstrategies and safeguarding individuals' fundamental rights to participate in public life.

The entire article is her coping and seething over her inability to dox the ONA Brothermen. Much of her "examples" are drawn from Patrick's saga. In short, she can't dox ONA's users, so she's whining, hoping that someone influential (and better than her at doxing) can pick up the slack.

I also found this link. I present to you: Copium, the bio.

 

[JustStopDude]

In short, she can't dox ONA's users, so she's whining, hoping that someone influential (and better than her at doxing) can pick up the slack.

I honestly think it's even more simpler than that. She is trying to grift dumb boomers who are even less tech savvy than herself.

The article isn't for us. It's for the dummies that think it's a massive global conspiracy that their kids didn't invite them for Thanksgiving this year and not the simple fact they won't stop starting fights with everyone about January 6th.

 

[Meat Target]

To bridge this gap, I propose the term "Strategic Attacks Against Public Participation (SAAPP)," a framework to help us grasp and address these evolving threats.

It doesn't need a new term, Snax. This is called a Heckler's Veto. But now that terminally-online shitlibs are being criticized, mocked, trolled, and dunked on, we need a new name for it to make it sound like some horrible act of war.

 

[AnOminous]

Ever noticed that everyone who works in cybersecurity is either a nepobaby who wasn't technically-minded enough to become a technician let alone a coder and eventually transitions to management, or a shifty-eyed neckbeard who is way too into network protocols, just doesn't show up anymore one day and no one's allowed to ask why?

The best are turncoat black hats really. Unfortunately ones you can trust are rare.

 

[Hitlerswag420]

It's all fun and games until they come for your opinions, Jackie. You won't be so pleased then.

This is why niggers and women voting ruin every society. They all think like this. They have no capacity for long-term thinking or seeing things from a different perspective or testing their theories in different scenarios. They just think "X bad. Remove X." It always leads to mob rule and, well, literally every nonwhite country on the planet.

 

[JustStopDude]

This is why niggers and women voting ruin every society. They all think like this. They have no capacity for long-term thinking or seeing things from a different perspective or testing their theories in different scenarios. They just think "X bad. Remove X." It always leads to mob rule and, well, literally every nonwhite country on the planet.

Lol, right because chalkies don't do this same shit.