Culture Conservatives Are Mad at Target Again, This Time Over Gay Christmas Decor

Link (Archive)

Conservatives Are Mad at Target Again, This Time Over Gay Christmas Decor​

7F1B49DC-C8F2-43DA-AD68-8E234E9FB68C.jpegE6A3D7EF-F02C-4E32-AE36-1968B40B22A3.jpeg
If you thought Pride month was the end of the rightwing freakout at Target carrying LGBTQ+ inclusive products, it turns out that was only the first installment. Now, with the holiday season, the sequel is here.

Conservatives, still fuming over this summer’s Target Pride displays, have found another reason to take aim at the retailer: inclusive Christmas products, especially its “Pride Christmas Nutcracker” and a figurine depicting Santa Claus as Black and in a wheelchair.

Fox News host Jesse Watters devoted a segment of his Thursday programming to the merch, which includes a nutcracker holding a progress Pride flag. Riley Gaines, host of Fox News’ OutKick (which, by the way, is totally a name better suited for a gay soccer league), stopped by Watters’ program to talk about the decorations, as well.

“Why do they keep pushing this?” Gaines asked. “Who are they trying to appeal to? Despite what the media portrays or how politicians are voting, this doesn’t represent the overwhelming majority of how this country, really how the world, feels on this issue.”

OK, now let’s break this down really quickly: Gaines and Watters are upset over gay nutcrackers. Meanwhile, though nutcrackers predate the ballet The Nutcracker (I mean, obvs, that’s what the piece is named after) they have become a Christmas staple because of The Nutcracker, written by Pyotr Tchaikovsky who was — you guessed it! — really, really gay.

Now she says that this product which, once again, is a nutcracker dressed up in a flag, doesn’t represent how Americans feel on this issue. What is the issue she is talking about? Nutcracker Christmas decorations? I doubt she has the data on that. But it’s certainly not LGBTQ+ rights, which the overwhelming majorityof Americans support. And similarly, by the way, polling has also found that most Americans want elected officials to leave trans people alone.

As far as the Santa Claus merch, I hate to break it to Gaines and her like-minded pals, but Father Christmas is — say it with me!!! — a fictional character who lives in the North Pole. Does it really ruin Christmas if he’s depicted as Black and disabled? Not at all!

What’s most embarrassing is that the Pride Nutcracker isn’t even new. The Miami Heraldwrote about it when it debuted (and went viral on TikTok) in 2021, but when you’re a right-wing talking head, making a huge thing about Pride flags on Target merch never goes out of style.

Target was the subject of conservative ire earlier this year after right-wing pundits falsely asserted that the company was selling “tuck-friendly” swimwear to children (a claim Politifact rated as untrue). They did sell swimwear optimized for people who are tucking, but those were designed for adults. After angry conservatives began destroying the store’s Pride displays, the retailer started moving those displays to the back of the store, taking them down altogether, and pulling products (made by queer creatives) from the shelves. Some of those LGBTQ+ makers spoke out about having their products removed from stores at the time.

The holidays can be such a stressful time of year, do we really need controversies over a nutcracker’s vestments or the ability status of a fake folkloric figure used to sell Coca-Cola? I think we should all just calm down and have a drink. Can I suggest a Bud Light?
 
Black Santa is meh. It's actually quite common to depict the characters from the nativity scene as different nationalities and ethnicities. No one has made a stink about that.

The wheelchair is fucking stupid. It's good to care for disabled people, but weakness is not a virtue, and disabled people do not need "representation."

The fag and troon shit is unforgivable. It's bad enough that Christmas is heavily commercialized, but even that we can ignore. We don't need another celebration of degenerate lifestyles. We don't need to affirm those who willingly spit in God's face, not on a day that commemorates the birth of the Messiah.
 
The hillarious thing is, none of this stuff sells.

It doesn't exist to be sold

It only exists to virtue signal.

Back during the pride month fiasco, a few progs who tried to go and actually buy the tuck-friendly swimsuits and such to "own the chuds" found that they had either never been put out on the floor or wouldn't ring up at register because the SKU's had never been put in the system.

Those in the system KNEW this shit was never gonna sell, that it had no demand, but that wasn't the point.

Target only wanted to be seen hiring the diverse and inclusive people to design and make ads for this stuff, they never really intended to make any money selling it directly, but rather, to sell "normal" wares to the people that surely the rainbow tuck-friendly baby diapers for trans toddlers would get in the door!

Target not only is losing millions in sales to boycotts, they can't even sell these political tokens as they're for display ONLY, yet it cost even millions more to hire the designers and ship it from China's goop factories... and after a week on the shelves, after it's been pulled due to "right wing outrage" it'll cost millions more to package up, send back to distributions centers, inventory, write-off, truck out and clog our landfills for decades to come.

It's only purpose was to generate the exact kind of articles OP wrote... "Target on right side of history and the RepubliKKKans are mad again! Tee hee!" to run up the company's DEI and online buzz scores.

THAT is the sad state of modern American business...... they're spending millions to create these disposable effigies of their political views for others to attack for wokie points and don't get why stockholders are raging mad at them and customers keep leaving for stores that actually sell stuff they want.

HOW can we be wrong? The RIGHT KIND OF PEOPLE ARE MAD AT US!!!!!

Losing money? Yeah, but, that's the price you pay to punch Nazis!
 
Last edited:
Wait, its just a black cripple santa and a fag flag nutcracker? After straight up making clothes specifically designed for 5 year old boys to tuck their shameful, beastly penises away, I was expecting a snow globe of santa shoving his yule log down rudolph's chimney with a zoophile flag. That the company is mandating glory holes on the bathroom at children's height. That they have actually deescalated the extremism a bit is shocking.
 
Black Santa is meh. It's actually quite common to depict the characters from the nativity scene as different nationalities and ethnicities. No one has made a stink about that.

The wheelchair is fucking stupid. It's good to care for disabled people, but weakness is not a virtue, and disabled people do not need "representation."

The fag and troon shit is unforgivable. It's bad enough that Christmas is heavily commercialized, but even that we can ignore. We don't need another celebration of degenerate lifestyles. We don't need to affirm those who willingly spit in God's face, not on a day that commemorates the birth of the Messiah.
That’s because one of the Three Kings, St. Balthazar, was black, and has always been known to be black. It has nothing to do with representation.

St. Nicholas was also a real person and was absolutely not black.
 
because it's making the decorations into something they're not inherently about. I'd say the same thing if Santa was holding a Black Lives Matter banner.
It makes about as much sense as scribbling on some Hindu symbology on then trying to pass it off as a Diwali themed Nutcracker; at least the black disabled Santa looks like some sort of parody, instead of shoehorning on an unrelated logo.

I mean it's a nutcracker ffs, at least a trans flag would have made more sense.
 
That’s because one of the Three Kings, St. Balthazar, was black, and has always been known to be black. It has nothing to do with representation.

St. Nicholas was also a real person and was absolutely not black.
He was not but the modern pop culture representation of Santa is pretty far divorced from St Nicholas.
 
That’s because one of the Three Kings, St. Balthazar, was black, and has always been known to be black. It has nothing to do with representation.
That's questionable. The magi are not identified by name in the canon nor are their appearances described; later legends are not consistent with one another and cannot be the basis for what "has always been known." Balthazar is a Babylonian name, not African. And all the magi came "from the East" (Matt 2:1). Africa is, for the most part, not east of Bethlehem.
 
Back