reddit General

Rosa D. Strohl said:
now i know r/persecutionfetish has been mentioned by this guy and few others here

but i think everyone itt haven't digged deep enough into the sub. holy shit, the sub is a bunch of seething and coping a-logs who are hell-bent on making seething at righties their entire goddamn lives. and trust me, this sub is a goldmine of lolcows.
View attachment 5510682
if you thought this shit is cringe then you are just scratching the tip of the iceberg.

here's them definitely not seething at us.
View attachment 5510685
link: https://www.reddit.com/r/Persecutio...ahhhhhh_i_cant_use_slurs_anymore_cause_times/

:story::story:
View attachment 5510692View attachment 5510694
https://www.reddit.com/r/Persecutio...tell_me_youre_racist_without_actually_saying/
like you can't make these shits up...

*seething alert*
View attachment 5510697
link: https://www.reddit.com/r/Persecutionfetish/comments/16qnvc0/pcm_is_absolutely_evil/
imagine getting so ass mad that you feel the need to rage over A FUCKING POLITICAL COMPASS MEME :story: . it's not even an offensive meme for god's sake. in fact, it's only mildly offensive.

man, for a community that act like a bunch of internet tough guys, they sure are a bunch of snowflakes.
Click to expand...
Still not as asshurt as r/antifastoness, that one takes the cake not only because they are projecting and seething but also because they can't meme for shit. Really makes you appreciate 'toss more when you compare his work with the imitators
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Outer Space Traveller, A Bit Concerning, Sicko Hunter and 11 others
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: indomitable snowman, Chao Garden, internet friend and 3 others
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Buttigieg2020, Ebonic Tutor, Haffhart and 10 others
Dire Dire Cocks said:
Redditors masturbate to videos of Russians dying in war. So much for "never glory violence".

From r/distressingmemes, a subreddit dedicated to memes that make you feel dispair.
View attachment 5504276 (L/A)
View attachment 5504293View attachment 5504296
View attachment 5504302
View attachment 5504303
View attachment 5504304
View attachment 5504306
View attachment 5504307
View attachment 5504309


Literally check the comments, they are almost all like this.
Click to expand...
These are the words of people who believe themselves to be on the "right side of history" and as such can do no wrong. Pure Horrorcow behavior.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Seafarer and Creative Username
Just saw this most reddit comment.
1700597835711.png

Anyone that starts a sentence with erm no is a faggot.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: St.Davis, A Bit Concerning, Seafarer and 16 others
Rosa D. Strohl said:
*seething alert*
1700549157652.png
link: https://www.reddit.com/r/Persecutionfetish/comments/16qnvc0/pcm_is_absolutely_evil/
imagine getting so ass mad that you feel the need to rage over A FUCKING POLITICAL COMPASS MEME :story: . it's not even an offensive meme for god's sake. in fact, it's only mildly offensive.
Click to expand...

Brother most redditors think PCM is literally /pol/ and a den of neonazis. No joke, some absurdly mild stuff that would have you called a faggot and a pussy in A&N for being too soft and liberal they consider to be the peak of hatred. Admins have quarantined and fucked with the mods there, AHS tried to false flag them with CP, but it only grew and now is too big to just ban without a very good excuse and they can't afford it due to collapsing revenue.

You could probably farm good content for the farms just looking for the reactions to the most popular posts in the usual suspect places.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Feels
Reactions: Outer Space Traveller, A Bit Concerning, Glowing In The Streets and 11 others
LOWERCASE LETTERS said:
View attachment 5512495

how do I shot flintlock
Click to expand...
By this peddit logic, the First Amendment doesn't apply to the Internet, or things printed on laser printers, because neither of them originally existed, and it says "the press," so only movable type mechanical printing presses would be protected. Also the Air Force would be unconstitutional since planes didn't exist at the time, so only the Army and Navy would be allowed.

I mean it's obvious why this pinhead is completely wrong, but it's just amazing how dumb and wrong this argument is.

Also it would be constitutional to punish counterfeiting by cutting your ears off, killing you, boiling you in oil, branding you with the letter C on the left cheek, etc. because those wouldn't be "cruel and unusual," as these were actually punishments used at the time in both colonial America and England.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: St.Davis, Kyria the Great, Buttigieg2020 and 17 others
LOWERCASE LETTERS said:
View attachment 5512495

how do I shot flintlock
Click to expand...
dense.jpg
And what kind of person would be a part of a militia? A militia is composed of regular people, not professional soldiers, and are usually only formed when they are needed, the requirement to be part of a militia to own a gun defeats the purpose of forming a militia at all, since militias are composed of (armed) citizens.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: A Bit Concerning, Putin Bot, Punished Magician and 7 others
LOWERCASE LETTERS said:
View attachment 5512495

how do I shot flintlock
Click to expand...
It’s a sad mark on humanity that the militia myth is still around. SCOTUS cases aside, the 2nd Amendment isn’t written unclearly.

2nd states as follows: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

Let’s break it down. “A well regulated Militia” is the start of a statement. “being necessary to the security of a free State” is a clarifying statement to statement one. “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” is continuation of the statement.

In other words, the amendment states that “A well regulated Militia, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” It identifies two things (historically intertwined) that shall not be infringed, and clarifies why it extends that protection to the first thing.

This is clear reading using the basic English skills. Alternative reading, which requires looking into how militias were used historically, would state that because Militias are needed for survival of USA, the right of the people to bear arms will not be denied.

In neither one of the statements, or indeed any rational reading of the amendment, is Militia the qualifying conditional statement.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Outer Space Traveller, A Bit Concerning, Seafarer and 11 others
smile.jpg said:
View attachment 5512703
And what kind of person would be a part of a militia? A militia is composed of regular people, not professional soldiers, and are usually only formed when they are needed, the requirement to be part of a militia to own a gun defeats the purpose of forming a militia at all, since militias are composed of (armed) citizens.
Click to expand...
And they were expected to bring their own weapons, the very weapons they'd be using if called up. That is to say, military weapons. That's another idiot argument they make.

Also, kind of autistic to notice but a trained shooter could get off 4 shots in a minute with a flintlock musket.
Useful_Mistake said:
In neither one of the statements, or indeed any rational reading of the amendment, is Militia the qualifying conditional statement.
Click to expand...
Militia as the Framers used it was, pursuant to the usage of the time, basically every able bodied man of military service age. That said, so far as I know, gun ownership by women was not prohibited, either.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: Haffhart, indomitable snowman, murph and 6 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back