UK Falkland Islands ‘undeniably’ British and ‘non-negotiable’, says Grant Shapps

Article Archive

Falkland Islands ‘undeniably’ British and ‘non-negotiable’, says Grant Shapps​

It is “non-negotiable and undeniable” that the Falkland Islands are British, Grant Shapps has insisted, in the wake of demands from Argentina’s president-elect for diplomatic talks.

Mr Shapps, the Defence Secretary, noted the Government had sent a new Royal Navy ship back to the islands, which were invaded by Argentina in 1982 before their liberation by British forces.

Javier Milei, who won a landslide victory in the Argentinian election on Sunday, has previouslyasserted his country’s sovereignty over the Falklands, arguing in the final television debate of the campaign that “every effort” must be made to reclaim the territory.

But in a tweet reasserting the Falklands’ status as a British overseas territory, Mr Shapps said:



IMG_6009.jpeg

Mr Shapps was referring to the results of a referendum in 2013 in which just three out of 1,516 islanders rejected remaining as an overseas territory of the United Kingdom.

The Ministry of Defence (MoD) confirmed on Monday that HMS Medway, a Royal Navy patrol ship, had completed its nine months in the Falklands and handed patrol duty back to HMS Forth, its sister ship.

HMS Forth, which has spent most of this year in Gibraltar, is central to the Falklands mission, which the MoD said was focused on “reassurance to and support for the island community”.

During the final television debate of the campaign, Mr Milei said: “What do I propose? Argentina’s sovereignty over the Malvinas Islands is non-negotiable. The Malvinas are Argentine.
“Now we have to see how we are going to get them back. It is clear that the war option is not a solution. We had a war - that we lost - and now we have to make every effort to recover the islands through diplomatic channels.”

The hardline position taken by Mr Milei is nonetheless less hostile than that of Alberto Fernandez, his Left-wing predecessor, who had called for immediate negotiations.

Mr Milei has insisted any transfer of power must be peaceful and has deemed it a lesser priority than the country’s return to economic growth.

The libertarian economist also argued on the election trail: “What we are proposing is to move towards a solution like the one England had with China over the Hong Kong issue and that, in this context, the position of the people who live on the islands cannot be ignored.”

In July, Rishi Sunak criticised the European Union for its “regrettable choice of words” after the bloc referred to the Falklands as Islas Malvinas, the name that Argentina claims is correct.

Mr Sunak’s spokesman said at the time: “Look, the Prime Minister’s view is that it would have been entirely unacceptable for the EU to question the Falkland islanders’ right to decide their own future. Let’s be clear – Falkland islanders are British.

“The EU has now rightly clarified that their position on the Falkland Islands has not changed after their regrettable choice of words. We will continue to defend the Falkland Islands’ right to determination.”
 
If Milei is intelligent, he will let this go.

Fighting for some useless islands is just not worth it anymore, they did that error once, and there is so much stakes to repeat that error again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tzeentch
1700658285100.png

it's like a shitish seaside town. they're desperate to be home, repatriate them.

britain never breezed it last time, they'd be stupid to defend it again.

then agan, they're being run by pakis and niggers, so you neva no
 
Milei will establish a gamer ethnostate in the Falklands where we will no longer be oppressed. The Brits can stay but we'll treat the like Israelis treat Palestinians.
Sounds like business as usual for the Brits, they demand that their government treat them that way already.
 
China also had a reasonably modern and large military. Argentina had the General Belgrano, which was a light cruiser the USA had put into service before WW2 and sold off to Argentina in 1951 on the cheap because she was already rendered completely obsolete with the invention of missile warfare. She was of course upgraded in the late 1960's with more modern radars and an absolute dogshit first-gen ATGM turned into a point defense weapon for warships, which of course meant that a little over ten years later she was nothing more than a giant target for the Bongs, and would meet her end at another piece of WW2 era surplus, this one a pair of British Mark VIII* torpedoes fired from a modern nuclear attack sub.
The Argentinan Navy in 1982 also had an operational aircraft carrier and operational subs

The Argentine military has done nothing since 1983 except degenerate.

The British also did but they still have nuclear attack subs and aircraft carriers and modern surface ships.
 
The Argentinan Navy in 1982 also had an operational aircraft carrier and operational subs
A modernized WW2 era light carrier flying early 1960's strike planes that the Argentines bungled flight ops on, and the subs were also modernized WW2 surplus, Santa Fe being a Balao-class. Those Type 42 destroyers the Bongs had sold the Argies in the 1970's were the biggest threats their navy had.
 
Argentina are a fucking embarrassment of a country. Imagine losing an island off your own coast to a handful of squaddies in a rubber dinghy. It would be like if we lost the Isle of Wight to a boatload of Yemeni fishermen.
Fuck the UK fuck the Satanic pedophiles Royals. I hope there is Falklands war 2.0 and the UK losses. Fucking faggot communist country is a disgrace to mankind.
I'm going to eat a whole tin of beans just to upset you.
 
Argentina are a fucking embarrassment of a country. Imagine losing an island off your own coast to a handful of squaddies in a rubber dinghy. It would be like if we lost the Isle of Wight to a boatload of Yemeni fishermen.

I'm going to eat a whole tin of beans just to upset you.
I'm half Brirish by my mom but don't delude yourself that the UK isn't an authoritarian shithole and yes that includes the commonwealth nations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IAmNotAlpharius
Argentina are a fucking embarrassment of a country. Imagine losing an island off your own coast to a handful of squaddies in a rubber dinghy. It would be like if we lost the Isle of Wight to a boatload of Yemeni fishermen.
So, about the Cod Wars you lost to Iceland...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Exterminatus
Off shore oil. Britain won't give up the rights to than for our shekel masters.
The smart thing would be to sign an agreement to turn Rio Gallegos into an oil & rig service center, in return for cheap oil and a massive boost to the local economy.

The tricky bit is finding smart Argentinians.

Edit:
So, about the Cod Wars you lost to Iceland...
To be fair, we did start sailing to within sight of their coast and stealing their fish. Even by British standards that's a bit cheeky.

What nailed it was Iceland's offer to withdraw from NATO if the US didn't tell us the fuck off. At which point the US told us to fuck off, and off was the direction in which we fucked.
 
Last edited:
yeah, let's fuck with the Argies again. They wanna go, let's have a dust up. We'll win, again. We'll fuck you yanks up too, if you fancy taking it. we'll fuck you all. fuck fuck fuck.
Calm down lad. Have another kebab.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CarlosDanger
Back