Russian Special Military Operation in the Ukraine - Mark IV: The Partitioning of Discussion

1700682780346.png
Article / Archive
Growing worries that the EU will fall short of its pledge to supply a million artillery shells to Ukraine by March is forcing France to do an about-face on its earlier insistence that the ammunition should only be sourced in Europe.

However, before resorting to foreign suppliers, the EU needs to actually miss the March target, a senior French diplomat told POLITICO.

“As long as we haven't come to that conclusion, we won't do it [buy abroad], but if we have to adjust, we'll adjust," they said.

That’s a significant shift from France’s traditional position of encouraging national governments to buy European arms and ammunition.
The need to send vast amounts of ammunition to Ukraine is putting a huge strain on European stockpiles and shell production — designed for war plans that didn't take into account the massive artillery battles that are a hallmark of combat in Ukraine.

Earlier this year, Brussels came up with a plan to boost ammunition shipments to Ukraine by sending shells from existing stockpiles and reimbursing countries from the EU’s European Peace Facility, as well as a €1 billion plan for the joint procurement of ammunition by the European Defence Agency.

However, the shell effort ran into domestic concerns, as Internal Market Commissioner Thierry Breton, together with Germany and France, wouldn't agree to include ammunition produced outside the EU.

Now, calls for Europe to look abroad for shells to deliver to Kyiv are growing louder.

“We have advocated for a long time that if there is not enough ammunition, or there is not enough equipment in the EU, then let's buy it somewhere else and give it to Ukraine,” Latvian President Edgars Rinkēvičs told POLITICO earlier this month.

An EU diplomat from a third country — granted, like others in this piece, anonymity to speak freely — underlined that the priority is ensuring Ukraine has enough shells to fend off Russian attacks, not to protect European industries.
What every realist expected is happening, EU won't meet the target for promised shells by March 2024.
Of course it's the Baltic Chihuahuas advocating someone else to procure the munitions since they produce jack shit themselves. Where would they even purchase some shells? No Western country produces in quantity anymore. South Korea's stores got already bought and Israel is off the table.

Oh and my earlier post showed Krauts promising 20k more shells than previously promised, even though they won't even fill the original promise.
 
1700686486031.png
Article / Archive
PAVLOHRAD, Ukraine, Nov 22 (Reuters) - After more than a thousand of its workers went to fight Russia's invasion, a coal mining enterprise in eastern Ukraine suffered a huge staff shortage. Its answer was to allow women to work underground for the first time in its history.

Over a hundred took up the offer.

"I took this job because the war started and there were no other jobs," 22-year-old Krystyna said.
*snip*
I though that Russia's industry was running out of workers according to western media?
 
the NAFO niggers and their BROsint faggot friends are completely delusuonal. Ukraine can do no wrong and anything but 100% belief in victory makes you a Vatnik. They believe the Troon of Kiev speaks the truth

They're running into friction from real analysts, who are Pro-Ukraine but aren't on the Salami Ukraine train, who are making statements that contradict the NAFO crowd. Talks of stalemate or of a longer and harder war than anticipated reek of defeatism to the larp-ers

View attachment 5513257

This spat was between a prominent clout chasing NAFO boomer and real analysts who went to Kholholistan and a Ukrainian military officer who claimed (and then later proved) the Russian Ka-52 fleet is still operational and a viable threat.

It's turning into a fucking parody of itself at this point
View attachment 5513260
Not only was that helmet not a russian military helmet, nor even remotely similar to one, its as was pointed out a canadian army helmet. Note that canada has been providing military equipment to ukraine that includes a large supply of helmets

In other words, if it came from the front it came from a dead ukrainian soldier who received it from canadian imports

 
The most likely option is he bought it on ebay and concocted a story around it that sounded good in his brain. It's the secular version of Muslim Taqqiya or whatever it's called.

No shame in lying as long as it's in the service of your cause. For Muslims that's Islam. For secular atheists it's "the science", or "trans rights", or "we're winning in Ukraine".
 


Took no longer than a day after Russians started actually using cluster munitions in full force before Ukrainian supporters started complaining about them.
This is your daily life now after opening that can of worms.
 
The most recent notable thing is the FPV drones appear to be fitted with FLIR cameras, something that is a bit crazy considering how expensive FLIR is reported to be. Using them for suicide drones indicates that Russia has a stable production line up for these things and can afford the cost.
Bear in mind "Flir" is a brand name. It's true you can't get a Flir for under $250, but a no-name 1080p IR camera can be had for under $50.
 
Making an IR camera is as simple as getting just about any digital camera, disassembling it, removing the infrared filter, and installing a new filter that blocks the visible spectrum instead.
In fact chances are you can demo this with your cellphone right now. Grab an IR remote control and the phone, step into a dark room, open the camera app, point the remote at the camera, and mash buttons. You'll see it light up like a flashlight on the display, but stay dark outside the display (or at least very nearly dark, you can usually see a little bit of red light if the room is dark enough since it's more expensive to make an actual IR diode than to just make an IR-to-red diode and then putting a visible spectrum filter over it).
That light is what little IR leaks through your phone's IR filter. If you were to remove the filter it would be bright enough to light the room by.
 
Took no longer than a day after Russians started actually using cluster munitions in full force before Ukrainian supporters started complaining about them.
This is your daily life now after opening that can of worms.
Legitimizing the use of cluster munition was a huge error by the west. :-(

On a different note. I am impressed by how the Ukes took cheap, mass-produced consumer drones and turned them into a viable weapon in a conflict where both sides have semi-modern equipment. And they did not just work but turned out both viable and also very potent and successful (as far as I can tell).
This is innovation that will change the future of warfare and will last much longer than this particular conflict.
Necessity breeds innovation I guess.

Now that this door is opened and it is proven to even be viable in a modern battlefield, I wonder how long until we see terrorists adopting.
 
Last edited:
Making an IR camera is as simple as getting just about any digital camera, disassembling it, removing the infrared filter, and installing a new filter that blocks the visible spectrum instead.
In fact chances are you can demo this with your cellphone right now. Grab an IR remote control and the phone, step into a dark room, open the camera app, point the remote at the camera, and mash buttons. You'll see it light up like a flashlight on the display, but stay dark outside the display (or at least very nearly dark, you can usually see a little bit of red light if the room is dark enough since it's more expensive to make an actual IR diode than to just make an IR-to-red diode and then putting a visible spectrum filter over it).
That light is what little IR leaks through your phone's IR filter. If you were to remove the filter it would be bright enough to light the room by.
Different wavelength IR, I'm afraid. Way more expensive.
 
Okay, someone explain this to me? How can you escalate a conflict by refusing to escalate the conflict?

Its similar to explaining how a person like Andrew Perpetua whose expertise is in American Baseball Sport Statistical analysis and playing the Video Game Red Orchestra has somehow become an international expert on modern warfare.

He has a youtube channel where he does videos about the conflict and he just comes across as utterly stupid.

What Andrew Perpetua mostly does is repeat the talking points of others without really understanding them or even expressing them correctly.
 
Back