Drew Chadwick DeVault / ddevault / SirCmpwn - Opinionated white-male-guilt-ridden software developer. Cancelled Hyprland and slandered it as "toxic" and transphobic. Hates X11 users and Hacker News. Lolicon.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
The best part about Kiwi Farms threads on new lolcows is when cows learn about their thread here. I am patiently waiting for when he finds out he has a thread now.

Anyway, tangent to the topic of this bowling ball-headed sperg, I have found out that there is a Copr repository for Hyprland and its adjacent software for Fedora. You may find it here. You can see some discussion about the repository in Hyprland discussions here. I have been unable to compile stuff like xdg-desktop-portal-hyprland or hyprshot, whereas the repository works great and now I am able to do stuff like screensharing through Pipewire.

Hot recommend for Hyprland. I can see why Drew is obsessed with it. He is just jealous because he cannot make a project as good as it.
 
In June 2023 a few comments from Drew on hacker news caught my eye, mentioning someone he knew reported getting slurs carved into their pubic mound. These comments were later deleted.
20231123_19h13m06s.png
 
In June 2023 a few comments from Drew on hacker news caught my eye, mentioning someone he knew reported getting slurs carved into their pubic mound. These comments were later deleted.
View attachment 5516918
If he has that much evidence against somebody then why not name them? That's perhaps the most frustrating part of his post. He will moan on about how there are bad people in the hacker community, ok great, fucking name them then!

Meanwhile, here's an annoying American claiming the "faschists" [sic] won ~25% of the Dutch parliament. This is incorrect, because Geert Wilders is not a fascist and the Party for Freedom are not made of fascists.
faschists.png
source (a)

Here's Drew talking about how it's appropriate to give women compliments except when "it's weaponized because the speaker wants sex from the recipient." How can one tell? According to him, "it's incredibly obvious".
compliments.png
source (a)
 
Last edited:
If he has that much evidence against somebody then why not name them? That's perhaps the most frustrating part of his post. He will moan on about how there are bad people in the hacker community, ok great, fucking name them then!

Meanwhile, here's an annoying American claiming the "faschists" [sic] won ~25% of the Dutch parliament. This is incorrect, because Geert Wilders is not a fascist and the Party for Freedom are not made of fascists.
View attachment 5516996
source (a)

Here's Drew talking about how it's appropriate to give women compliments except when "it's weaponized because the speaker wants sex from the recipient." How can one tell? According to him, "it's incredibly obvious".
View attachment 5517021
source (a)
Ghostarchive is shitting the bed but the text is still in the HTML on archive.today.
Screenshot_20231123_210230.png
>as a cis person

Hmm... :thinking:
It's okay Drew, some day you'll be brave enough to admit it publicly.

Also, I'm not sure how this fits in with his "Who should lead us?" blog post (https://drewdevault.com/2023/04/24/2023-04-24-Who-leads-us.html, https://archive.is/ZjcCw). "Alyssa humbles me with [his] exceptional talent and dedication" is okay, presumably.
 
Why are our modern totalitarians who have no qualms about directing everyone else to live in every manner so pathetic? Where's our Lenin? Hell, where's our Stalin and Mao? No no, where's our Brezhnev? Guys like Drew would have a panic attack and start passively aggressively having people murdered rather than just strut out with a bunch of unearned medals in a room full of actual war heroes then give a six hour droning speech about irrelevant nonsense that everyone has to applaud and praise:
1700802106219.png
 
Also, I'm not sure how this fits in with his "Who should lead us?" blog post (https://drewdevault.com/2023/04/24/2023-04-24-Who-leads-us.html, https://archive.is/ZjcCw). "Alyssa humbles me with [his] exceptional talent and dedication" is okay, presumably.
I think I figured it out, he doesn't want men to compliment women but it's OK for men in dresses to behave much more creepily to them on threat of being ostracized as transphobes for not giving a "validating experience".
validating.png
source (a)
 
I think I figured it out, he doesn't want men to compliment women but it's OK for men in dresses to behave much more creepily to them on threat of being ostracized as transphobes for not giving a "validating experience".
View attachment 5518223
source (a)
Eragon is Samuel Van Zuijlen, a French compsci student. His homepage gives both his real name and links to his trans-flag adorned Fediverse account, so they 100% already know of his fetishes. Good old autist opsec.
His female friends were probably laughing at him and he didn't realize.
 
Drew thinks that politics are not in free software any more even though they most certainly are, no thanks to people like him:
political.png
source (a)

He also has Covid.
covid.png
source (a)

He links to a blog post made by a faggot whining about coming out as bisexual (or ""omnisexual"" since "bi" isn't inclusive enough).
eben.png
source (a)
link in post (a)
The story is long and autistic, but this stems from a legal case ongoing since 2017 over a trademark between the Software Freedom Conservancy and the Software Freedom Law Center (which itself seems to be frivolous and retarded to me, but that's another story).

Bradley Kuhn (the blog post author) alleges that Eben Moglen (founder of SFLC) is trying to conduct Kuhn's deposition as a form of "harassment" to embarrass him about being bi. Even though nobody fucking cares that you're a flaming faggot.
Also his evidence that he has PTSD from Moglen is from his sex therapist (no I'm not making this up).
In any case, they managed to get the protective order preventing Moglen from attending the deposition granted, so whatever.
 
Drew thinks that politics are not in free software any more even though they most certainly are, no thanks to people like him:
View attachment 5519071
source (a)

He also has Covid.
View attachment 5519072
source (a)

He links to a blog post made by a faggot whining about coming out as bisexual (or ""omnisexual"" since "bi" isn't inclusive enough).
View attachment 5519073
source (a)
link in post (a)
The story is long and autistic, but this stems from a legal case ongoing since 2017 over a trademark between the Software Freedom Conservancy and the Software Freedom Law Center (which itself seems to be frivolous and retarded to me, but that's another story).

Bradley Kuhn (the blog post author) alleges that Eben Moglen (founder of SFLC) is trying to conduct Kuhn's deposition as a form of "harassment" to embarrass him about being bi. Even though nobody fucking cares that you're a flaming faggot.
Also his evidence that he has PTSD from Moglen is from his sex therapist (no I'm not making this up).
In any case, they managed to get the protective order preventing Moglen from attending the deposition granted, so whatever.
I'm glad you read that so I didn't have to. I'm not nearly drunk enough to be able to face that Drew-related wall of text.

Is @Cringemaster Supreme Drew's alt? Actually, he'd probably be autistic enough to use SirCmpwn on here, wouldn't he?
 
"Bring back politics to software! Free software was always political."

I hate this retarded Reddit NPC meme so much. Yeah, because fighting back against outdated copyright and patent law as it relates to software is obviously the same as policing people who say mean words about you on the Internet. It's such an insult to all the astounding things that the GNU Project, Free Software Foundation, Electronic Frontier Foundation, and many other organisations have secured for not just nerds but the Internet. Those people are doing exactly what megacorporations want them to do, while they are so fucking retarded that they think they are actually revolting against them. Completely brain-dead. Will there be anyone after Richard Stallman who gives a shit about the actual goal of free software?
 
Drew thinks that politics are not in free software any more even though they most certainly are, no thanks to people like him:
View attachment 5519071
source (a)
I saw this on my feed and as soon as he posted this people started dunking on him. He only replied to some dude about CSS, other than that he is not engaging at all. He must be aware of this thread, as the politisperging is somewhat reduced these days.
 
"Bring back politics to software! Free software was always political."

I hate this retarded Reddit NPC meme so much. Yeah, because fighting back against outdated copyright and patent law as it relates to software is obviously the same as policing people who say mean words about you on the Internet. It's such an insult to all the astounding things that the GNU Project, Free Software Foundation, Electronic Frontier Foundation, and many other organisations have secured for not just nerds but the Internet. Those people are doing exactly what megacorporations want them to do, while they are so fucking retarded that they think they are actually revolting against them. Completely brain-dead. Will there be anyone after Richard Stallman who gives a shit about the actual goal of free software?
These people don't make a distinction between politics that's necessary because of circumstance (EFF) and politics you deliberately choose to engage in (policing language and establishing codes of conduct) the first group often is "doing politics" because of the second group. A lot of the second group also has this weird idea that voluntarily cooperating in any way is political because blah blah blah systematic exclusion blah blah accessibility blah blah. I suspect many of them can't conceive of people doing things without an ulterior motive against perceived enemies, hence why they accuse others of this all the time or Cringemaster Supreme does sticker genocide of beloved handsome Kiwi Farms posters. Most of their "politics" engagement is uncritically gobbling up slogans like "everything is political" or "there's no ethical consumption under capitalism" or "Make America Great Again" or "power to the people" that are only ever justifications for doing whatever they want.
 
These people don't make a distinction between politics that's necessary because of circumstance (EFF) and politics you deliberately choose to engage in (policing language and establishing codes of conduct) the first group often is "doing politics" because of the second group. A lot of the second group also has this weird idea that voluntarily cooperating in any way is political because blah blah blah systematic exclusion blah blah accessibility blah blah. I suspect many of them can't conceive of people doing things without an ulterior motive against perceived enemies, hence why they accuse others of this all the time or Cringemaster Supreme does sticker genocide of beloved handsome Kiwi Farms posters. Most of their "politics" engagement is uncritically gobbling up slogans like "everything is political" or "there's no ethical consumption under capitalism" or "Make America Great Again" or "power to the people" that are only ever justifications for doing whatever they want.
It's intersectionality again. Everything has to be about everything else, all of the time.

They don't seem to grasp that, as an example, it's expected for the EFF to have an opinion about software patents. It's not expected for them to have an opinion about Black Lives Matter.
 

Attachments

  • dd vs rms.png
    dd vs rms.png
    34.4 KB · Views: 81
https://mastodon.nl/@drewdevault@fosstodon.org/111473367508520523 (https://archive.is/AhMOa)

It is time to whore for attention, trying to outshine the master. Honestly, looking how RMS got praised in this thread, and we have something like this dropping on his blog.. the more I am convinced he is reading this thread (Hi Drew! 👋).

The blog post hasn't dropped as far as I could tell at the time of writing.
cp.png
What the fuck is he talking about?
I'll take him in good faith when he addresses the many trannies that were found guilty of possessing child pornography.
source (a)
 
What the fuck is he talking about?
Stallman has some... eccentric... opinions that follow from his principles as an ungodly lolbert/communist hybrid. Fortunately, he does not shit up every single PR discussion with these opinions, because he keeps them to himself like a respectable human being. He simply opts to only politisperg on raw HTML pages in a clearly-marked section of his personal site. If Drew did this, he would not have a thread here.
 
What the fuck is he talking about?

As far as the porn and bestiality, pProbably the sort of whinging advanced by people like Jennifer Riggins at NewStack. The original URL from April 2021 now has an editor’s note stating "This post has been temporarily pulled offline pending further editor review." Apparently two and a half years isn't enough time to do a review, but maybe they have other priorities. Or they're just incredibly thorough in their fact-checking. Or, since archive snapshots still have the full article all through October 2022, until the October 2023 snapshot shows it removed and replaced with the editor's note, they left it up as long as possible. It didn't take long for this stuff to spread when mainstream tools like Steven J. Vaughn-Nichols were eagerly repeating and amplifying it. (Nichols had already echoed a number of people in saying that Stallman "defended Jeffery Epstein's behavior".)

Archive of original article

Intro and salient points:

Advocates of open source inclusiveness felt sidelined this March when the Free Software Foundation (FSF) reelected Richard Stallman to its board of directors. And this week, the FSF doubled down on this controversial decision in a statement on the election of Stallman.

This move echoes a lot of the issues that the open source community continues to reckon with, including a toxic environment toward women and an overall lack of transparency.

In this piece, we chronicle the response over the last three weeks of the tech community to this decision and talk about the very large steps the open source world still has to take to improve its governance, inclusion and openness.

Stallman has posted comments on his website, in which he criticizes laws against child pornography, necromancy, bestiality and incest, throws around inaccurate terms for child rape like “voluntarily pedophilia” and writes at length disputing legal ages of consent, and has dehumanized both disabled and trans people in his writing.

And his public behavior has been equally worrisome. According to dozens of witnesses, Stallman actively sexually harassed women students and faculty at MIT, for 30 or more years. To the point that women have passed down RMS-specific avoidance tactics like he hates plants so faculty should fill their offices with them or “If RMS hits on you, just say ‘I’m a vi user’ even if it’s not true.”

It had allegedly reached the point that he was asked so many times to stop asking out colleagues and students that he decided to create and hand out a business card to non-verbally harass.

Much of the horror stories from alleged victims of Stallman have been gathered by a Geek Feminism Wiki, by MIT grad Selam G. in two Medium posts from 2019, and within a Twitter thread by Sage Sharp, senior director of diversity and inclusion at the Software Freedom Conservancy, as well as accusations in public forums dating back over a decade.

It goes on to shill "Coraline Ada Ehmke, founder of the Organization for Ethical Source" and pushing the "Contributor Covenant".

I don't recall offhand any of Stallman's comments regarding eugenics, but I'm sure those have been given the same fair and balanced analysis as all of the above.
 
Not so long ago it was announced Stallman has cancer and this cunt does this?
It's been known for years now that RMS has a tendency for spergouts that are very easy to take out of context and twist into le bad speech.
But Drew decided to cancel him now, when the old guy has probably the worst time of his life?
What a human cockroach, I have no words.
 
Back