Drew Chadwick DeVault / ddevault / SirCmpwn - Opinionated white-male-guilt-ridden software developer. Cancelled Hyprland and slandered it as "toxic" and transphobic. Hates X11 users and Hacker News. Lolicon.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
sallowhal said:
when a tranny says a child can consent to sex and cutting off their reproductive organs, do you consider they might be turbo autists? or do you (rightfully) respond with "die pedo die"

i'm sorry this pedo happens to be your internet daddy but fuck him and fuck you.
Click to expand...
Does stallman have people in the government pushing FOSS on young children? Do you even know what people are accusing stallman of?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Kiwi2Shoes, GhastlyGhost, Doctor Neo Cortex and 3 others
Alright, I'll respond to this:

Richard Stallman, the founder of the Free Software Foundation, has been subject to numerous allegations of misconduct.
Click to expand...

Drew Chadwick DeVault, the founder of SourceHut, is soon about to find out how he has also been subject to numerous allegations of misconduct.​

He stepped down in 2019, and following his re-instatement in 2021, a famous open letter was published in which numerous organizations and individuals from throughout the Free Software ecosystem called for his removal from the Free Software Foundation.
Click to expand...
It helps that he founded it.
Content warning: This article discusses sexual abuse, sexual assault, sexual harassment, and all of the above with respect to minors, as well as the systemic normalization of abuse, and directly quotes statements which participate in the normalization of abuse.
Click to expand...
Remember when Drew was talking about child sex change operations in the Hyprland GitHub discussions? Kiwi Farms remembers:
Screenshot_20230920_153622.png
The failure of the Free Software community to account for Richard Stallman’s behavior has a chilling effect. The norms set by our leadership influence the norms of our broader community, and many members of the Free Software community look to Stallman as a ideological and political leader.
Click to expand...
The Free Software movement has a leader wholly dedicated to the cause.
The norms Stallman endorses are harmful and deeply confronting and alienating to many people, in particular women and children. Should these norms be adopted by our movement, we risk creating a community which enables the exploitation of vulnerable people.
Click to expand...
I think the women care more about the men skinwalking as them, and children won't care. The community is mostly men who agree with him. Furthermore, the only exploitation of vulnerable people I see anywhere near here is the exploitation of open source programmers by corporations, but I suppose this is too relevant.
Stallman’s doubling-down here is consistent with the supposition that Stallman maintains the view that minors can have sexual relationships with adults of any age, provided that they aren’t “children” – in other words, provided they’re at least 13 or 14 years old.
Click to expand...
Again, Drew Chadwick DeVault supports the chemical castration and mutilation of children.

Jesus Christ, most of this article is bland picking apart of Stallman's words, without even much commentary.
Stallman has also sought to normalize adult attraction to minors, literally describing it as “normal” in September 2018:
Click to expand...
Gee, don't be a bigot, Drew, that position will be mainstream soon enough.
Stallman appears to have little to no understanding of the role of power dynamics in sexual harassment, assault, and rape.
Click to expand...
Drew Chadwick DeVault appears to have little to no understanding of the role of power dynamics in sexual harassment, grooming, and induction into a cult.
This is most obviously evidenced by his statements regarding the sexual abuse of minors; most people understand that minors cannot consent to sex even if they “appear willing”, in particular because an adult in this situation is exploiting a difference in experience and maturity to manipulate the child into sexually satisfying them – in other words, a power differential.
Click to expand...
Need I continue to draw comparisons?
At these events, in these private homes, he may be afforded many opportunities to privacy with vulnerable people, including minors that, in his view, can consent to having sex with adults.
Click to expand...
Fuck off, Drew.
The open letter calling for Stallman’s removal received 3,000 signatures; the counter-letter in support of Stallman received 6,876 before it stopped accepting submissions.
Click to expand...
Yeah, and I signed the counter-letter. For some reason, democracy doesn't matter here. It has to do with more of those wrong opinions.
However, one’s political qualifications to speak about free software does not make one qualified to address matters of sex; in this respect Stallman’s persistence presents as dangerous incompetence.
Click to expand...
He's not called to speak on anything except Free Software.
When we analyze the dangerous patterns in this discourse, we have to conclude that he is not fit for purpose in his leadership role, and we must acknowledge the shadow that our legitimization of his discourse casts on our community.
Click to expand...
I'd like Drew to cast a shadow, on his floor, hanging from the ceiling.
 
Last edited:
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Chris Konon, Drama keen, Kiwi2Shoes and 25 others
sallowhal said:
pedophiles and their advocates should hang, don't care if they know how to code
Click to expand...
He's not a paedophile advocate, though. In 2006, he proposed a thought experiment in which he claimed that voluntary sexual activity by young teens with older partners would not be damaging, but did not condone or support such activity and did not advocate lowering the age of consent. By 2016 at the latest, he had changed his mind to say it would be extremely harmful. Paedo advocates don't change their mind and do everything they can to lower the age of consent.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Kiwi2Shoes, 820㎌Cap, Hall of Cost Payer and 13 others
sallowhal said:
i'm sorry this pedo happens to be your internet daddy but fuck him and fuck you.
Click to expand...
On one hand, I can understand this knee-jerk reaction because 99.9% of the time that any arguments pertaining to children being able to consent come up, it is always part of a fantasy to rape kids. It's almost always said by a troon or some other creep, I get that.

On the other hand, you are an extremely dumb nigger to assume that we have even a single thread on Kiwi Farms, out of all forums on the Internet, dedicated to defending any pedophiles. If we had any reason to believe Richard Stallman was actually arguing for fucking kids, we would not be defending him against the moronic shit spewed by Drew and his fellow Redditors. It is obvious you don't know what you are talking about.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Lord Xenu, 820㎌Cap, 6thRanger and 10 others
1701090779335.png

I found this exchange funny, this random dude asking for clarification got nothing except a smug "search it urself lole." He still won't have enough context to know what Drew means by "talking about Richard Stallman"
1701090991651.png

Last minute edit, the guy also edited his post and added a /sneed sarcasm indicator, which makes me confused on why drew replied with a duckduckgo link, did he not get the memo on tone indicators?
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
Reactions: Lord Xenu, Instant_Pot_User, 6thRanger and 6 others
Oliver Onions said:
Precisely how many opportunities to rape does hacking facilitate? It's not exactly an in-the-field kind of activity.
Click to expand...
Well troons are continually accusing each other of raping them, so that must be where the rape culture is coming from. It's a total sausage fest even when they cut it off, so troon culture IS rape culture.
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Lord Xenu, Doctor Neo Cortex, UERISIMILITUDO and 4 others
ShooterOfCum said:
If we had any reason to believe Richard Stallman was actually arguing for fucking kids, we would not be defending him against the moronic shit spewed by Drew and his fellow Redditors. It is obvious you don't know what you are talking about.
Click to expand...
slap a wig on him and put him in a dress. now tell me you would still defend him when he says children (who he defines as 12 and under) are not harmed by having sex with adults.

point to any troon you'd give the benefit of the doubt after they said some shit like that. that you'd say, "well actually, it was a thought experiment and he's not really a pedo he's just autistic"

again, sorry this guy happens to be your internet daddy. i've never heard of him before the community happening about him. you think it's impossible that you might have a blind spot for le ebin computer autist? i don't think it's impossible.

give me more trashcans and top hats, doesn't change the fact that this dude is at very least a pedophile apologist.
 
  • Dumb
  • Autistic
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: GhastlyGhost, i440BX, RepeatedMeme and 9 others
sallowhal said:
slap a wig on him and put him in a dress.
Click to expand...
Ok, so now he's a terminal coomer and highly deviant degenerate who hates women and is determined to mutilate his body to live out a disgusting sex fantasy.

That's however not who Stallman really is (with the possible exception of "degenerate"), so your point falls flat.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Doctor Neo Cortex, 306h4Ge5eJUJ, Kees H and 4 others
sallowhal said:
i've never heard of him before the community happening about him.
Click to expand...
So you admit to coming to a thread, making no effort on informing yourself on its topic, and then make stupid as fuck posts based on a few sentences you read in it out of context. Great content. You don't have to post. You can simply choose to not write anything, instead of making yourself look like a retard on the Internet (which you are).

Markass the Worst said:
Now Drew wants GNU Guix (a NixOS-like OS but GNU) to dissociate from GNU and go to the Software Freedom Conservancy.
Click to expand...
I read your summary and the attached screenshots multiple times, and it hurts my brain. Let me get this straight: he wants a GNU operating system, but without GNU Project's involvement. In other words, he wants to make another Linux distribution. However, it is not good enough for him to make yet another Linux distribution. It also has to be part of a bitter and spiteful crusade against Richard Stallman. Am I getting this right? Is this what this squirming little fuck is aiming for?
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Wright, ditto, 6thRanger and 10 others
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Lunacy
Reactions: 6thRanger, Edict of Expulsion, Doctor Neo Cortex and 8 others
Rusty Metal Skull Gun said:
https://octodon.social/@jalefkowit/111484026038565037, https://archive.is/Ub6fN
View attachment 5525801

I think it's actually a combination of the word "rape" being taboo, and the influence of a certain variety of feminism that wants to make it seem far more widespread than it actually is. But whatever.
Wanting to know the truth before judging someone is now bigotry, apparently.
Click to expand...
The quotes in this article suggest a dimension of ickiness that hadn't occurred to me before.
Click to expand...
None of these people write like adults.
What he doesn't seem to understand is that the vagueness is on purpose.
Click to expand...
Yes, we know. This is really saying the quiet part out loud isn't it?
It allows society to prosecute abuses without the victims of those abuses having the sordid details of their
victimization raked over constantly in the public square.
Click to expand...
Yeah, who needs details in prosecutions? Those little details just happen to show how, usually, it was consensual or silly little things like that.
Stallman says he can't fairly evaluate a charge of sexual abuse or sexual assault without knowing all the details. Evaluating these charges isn't his job, of course; it's the job of the justice system.
Click to expand...
No shit.
But he's appointed himself to the role anyway.
Click to expand...
These pests haven't?
Which means you have to give him all the sordid details, you see. Because he NEEDS them.
Click to expand...
Fuck off, Jason.
I don't know what to say about this interest other than that to me, an outsider, it feels unhealthy.
Click to expand...
Bullying a charitable old man who has cancer to me, an insider, feels unhealthy.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: GhastlyGhost, ditto, ShooterOfCum and 5 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back