š• / Twitter / X, the Social Media Platform Formerly Known as Twitter / "MUSK OWNS TWITTER"

  • šŸ• I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
I read it as the Martian term "grok" from Robert Heinlein's "Stranger in a Strange Land".
It’s a fairly established word in the nerd world:

Honestly I thought it was a unix term first which escaped into other usages but it’s the other way around, it was Heinlein’s first, thanks for that learning.
 
Maybe instead of restricting speech, people should be told not to believe everything they see on social media
I agree, maybe focus on spreading social media literacy instead of censoring users, maybe push established media for the facts and social media for speculation and the every mans voice.

Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world.ā€ —Nelson Mandela.
 
What did Elon mean by this?

photo_2023-11-27_10-00-33.jpg
 
if all those extra black babies went straight to child military units instead of kindergarten, option B would be pretty appealing.
No, it wouldn't, because a bunch of them would come home alive with combat experience under their belt, which means instead of 1 Dallas Sniper you get 50. That, or you accept even more race cucking in every day life, and even then, you'd still get spree killers.

If you look at the history of the (((civil rights))) movement it becomes obvious that the US military was and will always be the #1 platform for black acceptance and women's rights.

One of the #1 priorities of the Writers' War Board during World War II was making sure that content creators like comic book writers and artists portrayed niggers in a positive light, and like every other "temporary" World War II era government program, it has probably persisted in some form to the present day.

Dwight D. Eisenhower used the ARMY to enforce school busing in 1957, a decade before MLK and all his honeyed words.

Rosie the Riveter, women's suffrage getting its legs soon after World War I let women run the country for several years, I could go on.
 
No, it wouldn't, because a bunch of them would come home alive with combat experience under their belt, which means instead of 1 Dallas Sniper you get 50. That, or you accept even more race cucking in every day life, and even then, you'd still get spree killers.

If you look at the history of the (((civil rights))) movement it becomes obvious that the US military was and will always be the #1 platform for black acceptance and women's rights.

One of the #1 priorities of the Writers' War Board during World War II was making sure that content creators like comic book writers and artists portrayed niggers in a positive light, and like every other "temporary" World War II era government program, it has probably persisted in some form to the present day.

Dwight D. Eisenhower used the ARMY to enforce school busing in 1957, a decade before MLK and all his honeyed words.

Rosie the Riveter, women's suffrage getting its legs soon after World War I let women run the country for several years, I could go on.
Wow, so insightful. It’s almost as if the emancipation of slaves was a real thing and the country had a vested interest in assimilating freed negroes into collective society.

That didn’t exactly work out, so the programs continued.

This is the sort of narrow-minded take that comes through looking at everything through a modern-day lens where ā€˜helping’ black people is just a way to get votes and control people. Yeah, it’s hard to think that people could actually want to help blacks for altruistic reasons nowadays, but that actually did exist.
 
Wow, so insightful. It’s almost as if the emancipation of slaves was a real thing and the country had a vested interest in assimilating freed negroes into collective society.

That didn’t exactly work out, so the programs continued.

This is the sort of narrow-minded take that comes through looking at everything through a modern-day lens where ā€˜helping’ black people is just a way to get votes and control people. Yeah, it’s hard to think that people could actually want to help blacks for altruistic reasons nowadays, but that actually did exist.
It was naive and misguided then, and it's naive and misguided now.
 
It was naive and misguided then, and it's naive and misguided now.
What exactly is your alternative plan?

We need legal, but not mandatory, segregation. Those who don't want to interact with other races/genders shouldn't be forced to; doing so creates a ton of tension. However, those who want to interact with other races/genders should be free to do so as well. if you can put up a sign saying "no guns", you should be able to put up a sign that says "no niggers/crackers/men/women" as well.

This would only apply to private entities, as all races and both genders pay taxes.
 
We need legal, but not mandatory, segregation. Those who don't want to interact with other races/genders shouldn't be forced to; doing so creates a ton of tension. However, those who want to interact with other races/genders should be free to do so as well. if you can put up a sign saying "no guns", you should be able to put up a sign that says "no niggers/crackers/men/women" as well.

This would only apply to private entities, as all races and both genders pay taxes.
I don't have an issue with freedom of association but it has limits. You can't deny people access to necessary goods or equal access to critical services like health care and education.

For that matter, I've had a lot more problems with poor white trash than I've ever had with blacks. How can I segregate myself from them? I sure as hell don't feel any solidarity with them based on their skin color, that's just ludicrous.
 
I don't have an issue with freedom of association but it has limits. You can't deny people access to necessary goods or equal access to critical services like health care and education.
Agreed on this, with the exception of private schools that don't accept public funds.
For that matter, I've had a lot more problems with poor white trash than I've ever had with blacks. How can I segregate myself from them? I sure as hell don't feel any solidarity with them based on their skin color, that's just ludicrous.
make your sign say "Drug test required"
 
We need legal, but not mandatory, segregation. Those who don't want to interact with other races/genders shouldn't be forced to; doing so creates a ton of tension. However, those who want to interact with other races/genders should be free to do so as well. if you can put up a sign saying "no guns", you should be able to put up a sign that says "no niggers/crackers/men/women" as well.

This would only apply to private entities, as all races and both genders pay taxes.
That's just freedom of association and the US used to have it, until the Amerim*tts amended the Constitution.
Or something
Imagine not having freedom of association yet parading as a "free country" and daring to mock other countries as bigoted
 
Agreed on this, with the exception of private schools that don't accept public funds.

make your sign say "Drug test required"
That’s just it. It’s not really about skin color, or at least not entirely about skin color. There’s a difference between the segregation in the South and the West Coast. I’m not Southern, so I can’t comment on that much, but I know for certain that the West Coast segregation was about keeping poor people away from everyone else. If you were black and had enough money, the segregation measures would be quietly ignored.

It’s why the left hasn’t stopped since racial discrimination was outlawed. They want to take away any kind of discrimination whatsoever, like discriminating against income, education, whether you have been in prison, etc. Remember when you could find information about crime, schools, and even commute time from sites like Trulia? All that shit’s gone now. The only site that is left is neighborhood vibes.
 
Back