polyester
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2020
I agree.As it’s so unusual for parental rights to be forcibly removed, even for far worse crimes, he must have either thought of this as some weird power play [...]
[...] it might have been him meaning to threaten to withhold his financial aid if Adrien didn’t do something he wanted.
For example, “If you marry PCJ, I won’t give you a dime for our daughter.”
Knowing how much of a stubborn fat wanker who still fights long lost battles with his toilet on twitter, I can imagine if she called him on a threat like that, he would see it through.
This dude's only idea of bargaining is "Give me 100% of what I want, or I go all-in on spite and obstruction no matter how self-destructive".
We saw this play out in his 2020-2021 court battle against the pests:
The judge explained to Pat that he could just remove Quasi from the list of defendants, and then proceed against the other defendants against whom he actually had some valid prima-facie "harassment" evidence.
He could have probably gotten quite far in that lawsuit - at the very least he could have doxed, humiliated, canceled, and inflicted legal fees on a whole bunch of pests.
But no, he absolutely had to keep his defendants list 100% intact, and being told to compromise on that point only made him more monomaniacally obsessed with "getting" Quasi.
To the point that he completely stopped pursuing the lawsuit against the more promising defendants, and instead spent all his SWFA money and lawyer's time on ineffectually tard-raging against the windmill that is the California privacy law (which prevented him from frivolously subpoenaing Quasi's private info).
All the while he was bragging (e.g. on the Josiah Tapes) that Quasi would fold any day now, under the crushing weight of this spite-driven lawfare.
Until the judge sanctioned Pat, the SFWA pulled out, and Pat suddenly found himself in debt with nothing to show for it.
He could have probably gotten quite far in that lawsuit - at the very least he could have doxed, humiliated, canceled, and inflicted legal fees on a whole bunch of pests.
But no, he absolutely had to keep his defendants list 100% intact, and being told to compromise on that point only made him more monomaniacally obsessed with "getting" Quasi.
To the point that he completely stopped pursuing the lawsuit against the more promising defendants, and instead spent all his SWFA money and lawyer's time on ineffectually tard-raging against the windmill that is the California privacy law (which prevented him from frivolously subpoenaing Quasi's private info).
All the while he was bragging (e.g. on the Josiah Tapes) that Quasi would fold any day now, under the crushing weight of this spite-driven lawfare.
Until the judge sanctioned Pat, the SFWA pulled out, and Pat suddenly found himself in debt with nothing to show for it.
While not much has become public about his 2011 divorce proceedings, I'd speculate that he pulled some similar shit there.
If e.g. Adrienne didn't immediately agree to the exact custody arrangement and unreasonable conditions he demanded, he absolutely would be spiteful enough to pursue termination of parental rights just because it would hurt Adrienne to think about how it might in the future hurt Annabelle.
He probably thought then, as well, that Adrienne would surely fold "any day now" - right up until the divorce was over and he found that he had only fucked himself.
TL;DR: Our piggy is considered a lolcow for a reason, and "self-destructive spite-driven pigheadedness" is part of that reason.
Last edited: