Disaster Victoria’s Secret Faces Boycott After Apologizing To Trans-Identified Male Who Complained About “Mistreatment” In Changing Room - Very unfortunate looking tranny within.


Untitled-design-118.jpgUntitled-design-117-1392x783.jpg
Women on social media are calling for a boycott of Victoria’s Secret after the famous undergarment company responded to a trans-identified male complaining of his experience in the changing room. While the user has now hidden his profile, many became distressed after learning he was producing graphic pornography of himself and questioned his intentions for using a women’s changing area.

On November 28, a post on X (formerly Twitter) by transgender user @Microdragons1 began to circulate in which he complained about an incident of alleged mistreatment at a local Victoria’s Secret store while bra shopping.

“I went through a thoroughly dehumanizing experience today at Victoria’s Secret due to my status as a trans woman,” the user wrote, going on to outline an experience in which he says staff had allowed him to use the changing rooms but only after female customers had finished. He was then permitted to use the changing rooms on his own, with staff reportedly waiting to allow new female customers inside until he was done.

@Microdragons1 then stated he had called in to complain about the behavior of the employees, and a store manager had said they were looking into “better ways of managing the changing rooms.”

After the post began to pick up traction, the official X account for Victoria’s Secret responded to @Microdragons1 with an apology and invited him to contact their corporate office. Many women were left disappointed by the response from Victoria’s Secret, praising the store employees for what they felt was the right move to protect female clientele.

“I hope you will not make the mistake of prioritizing the demands of a paraphilic man over the safety, privacy, and dignity of women,” one user responded to Victoria’s Secret.

“Hello Victoria’s Secret. Women appreciate sex-based segregation for the purpose of keeping the fairer sex safe from creeps, sex pests, peeping Toms, fetishistic transvestites, rapists, men’s rights activists and the like,” lesbian activist Gaye Chapman replied. “Not every male person fits that description, however they are disproportionately represented by those who want single sex spaces. Respect women, or our money will go elsewhere.” The concerns amplified after some internet sleuths uncovered the graphic pornography @Microdragons1 had made, fetishizing his transition and identity as a “woman.”

While he has now set his account to “private,” thus limiting the ability for people to view his tweets, @Microdragons1 had posted a number of disturbing images over the past few months, including images of himself nude and in BDSM wear. The images sparked additional comments, with many women voicing added concerns about having him in a women’s space.

“This man does not belong in any changing room near women much less one where women are trying on underwear,” ICONS co-founder Kim Shasby-Jones wrote.

“Look at who you are letting into the intimate spaces of women, in your stores. What if tomorrow, I decide that I want to be a peeping Tom and declare myself a woman? Do I get to come into the changing room. Your business should be fighting for women. Not doing this,” a man by the name of Leonard Clinton-Williams said.

Following the invitation by Victoria’s Secret to call their main line, @Microdragons1 reportedly contacted the corporate number, which told him that “the behavior of the store was being corrected.”

Reduxx reached out to the press office for Victoria’s Secret to learn what the “corrections” entailed, but did not hear back in time for publication.

This is not the first time in recent months that controversy has erupted following a trans-identified male’s demand to use a women’s changing room.

In August, a trans-identified male in the United Kingdom prompted backlash after he complained about his lack of access to the women’s changing rooms at a Sheffield hotel. Anne Coombes, 65, first made headlines after he slammed a worker at the Mercure Hotel for giving him a changing room pass for the unisex facilities instead of the women-only area.

But shortly after, information began to circulate demonstrating that Coombes had an apparent “breastfeeding” fetish, and had interacted with accounts eroticizing motherhood and lactation.
 
Troons are more radioactive for modern brands then saying "nigger" it feels like.

Between Target, Bud Lite, Victoria's Secret and Disney anytime a Troon sticks his chopped off cock or zipper tits into a corporation's advertising it ends up with billions in lost revenue.
Go troon, lose dubloon(s)

Also :story: at "women" on social media. We all know it's dudes in dresses having their usual spergout over this weeks microagression.
 
The people I feel most sorry for are the employees at the store. You just know they're going to get fired at the very least, if not doxed and harassed all across social media, all because they exercised a duty of care to protect the safety of their other customers.
 
The people I feel most sorry for are the employees at the store. You just know they're going to get fired at the very least, if not doxed and harassed all across social media, all because they exercised a duty of care to protect the safety of their other customers.
It's an impossible situation for those poor fuckers.
 
As long as they focus on their job, which is making a girl's tits and ass look good, they will be fine.

Just like bud light would have been fine I they just focused on their job...making beer

These companies only suffer financially the same way literally everyone else does. Not doing your job.

The thing is literally, do your job. Don't get into things that aren't your job. Make beer, make tits look nice, make burgers.
 
I love it when trannies get called out for their disgusting public porn photoshoots, because we're not fucking stupid, we KNOW that you take pictures of yourselves and feel "euphoric" when you're in womens' dressing rooms changing amongst us.

You hope that we "accidentally" catch a glance at you and then suddenly it's a "transbian" porno fantasy come true because somehow a woman getting one look at you suddenly means we're "into you" in your disgusting minds. And then when we call you out for this, when people take the time to take that possible situation from "happening" from you, then suddenly it's about how we're transphobic and are focusing on the wrong things. How dare us for NOT just begrudgingly accept your fetishisms. Every. Single. Fucking. Time.

We're fucking TIRED of it. Stay the fuck away from us and our dressing rooms.
 
So what? Trannies will
Boycott Victoria’s Secret? Sounds like a win-win.

And any actual real
Woman supporting a boycott would
No doubt not fit into their clothing anyways.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: AssistantWeasel
It seems like businesses learned nothing from the Hogwarts or Bud Lite boycotts. Ignoring Trans complaints results in absolutely nothing negative happening, while giving into them kills your business.

It's also common sense to keep men out of women's dressing rooms. No woman should be made to feel uncomfortable, because a store insists on humoring a pervert.
 
I've seen 2x4s from Loews that are curvier than this faggot. An ace bandage would be overkill for "support" for this dickhead. Buy a roll of ribbon from Jo-Ann's and you'd get the same result as any fitted bra this board could try on.
 
Back