Not Just Bikes / r/fuckcars / Urbanists / New Urbanism / Car-Free / Anti-Car - People and grifters who hate personal transport, freedom, cars, roads, suburbs, and are obsessed with city planning and urban design

View attachment 5529075
Ambulances would be a real issue, but don't yank cities have those red firehose outlets? "Motorcycle firefighters" could work as long as nobody ever needs a ladder.
Yes, there are plenty of fire hydrants. You still have to get the hundreds of pounds of hose there. And the fire fighters. And fire trucks have auxiliary pumps to boost the pressure because hydrants may be hundreds of feet from the fire and have fairly low water pressure relative to the amount you want for a fire. There's a reason fire trucks weigh tens of thousands of pounds, and some carry a bit of water to get started while the hoses are being hooked up. Also, giant ladders to get to the top of the apartment buildings they want us to live in, etc.
 
View attachment 5529075
Ambulances would be a real issue, but don't yank cities have those red firehose outlets? "Motorcycle firefighters" could work as long as nobody ever needs a ladder.
Speaking completely seriously, I guess you could integrate motorcycles as some sort of rapid deployment force in a fire brigade. You'd still need trucks for the heavy lifting, ladders like you said. That and fires where hydrants aren't.
 
They've finally acknowledged that cars are useful:
View attachment 5528763

I'd like to see them try hauling a drumkit around without a van. Not a Neil Peart-esque monster kit, mind you. A basic-ass kick/snare/hi-hat/2-3 toms and a couple of cymbals drumkit. I would pay to see them trying to get that shit into public transport or onto a bike trailer.

Musicians use tour buses for a reason.
 
Apparently driving makes your balls hot:
1701271243356.png
Article (Archive)
1701271296580.png
1701271306183.png
1701271315706.png
1701271337759.png
Someone posts an article showing that cyclists have reduced sperm counts. The response is nonsensical:
1701271375940.png
Article (Archive)
Hilarious words coming from people who repulse every woman they meet:
1701271471949.png
Source (Archive)
 
Apparently driving makes your balls hot:
View attachment 5529771
Article (Archive)
View attachment 5529773
View attachment 5529774
View attachment 5529775
View attachment 5529776
Someone posts an article showing that cyclists have reduced sperm counts. The response is nonsensical:
View attachment 5529777
Article (Archive)
Carballs. That's a new one. I'd like to see if there's multiple studies supporting this or just one guys thesis paper. I just want to get my science straight
Hilarious words coming from people who repulse every woman they meet:
View attachment 5529780
Source (Archive)
Pretty sure women like guys with cars lol. Always kind of have. Proves you can be relied upon
 
Pretty sure women like guys with cars lol. Always kind of have. Proves you can be relied upon
"Hanging out the passenger side of his best friend's ride" was a line in No Scrubs for a reason. Unless you live in NYC or something, having no car screams broke/jobless with a subprime credit score/mountainous debt, or multiple DUIs, or just a brainwashed loon who sold his car because his house is five minutes from work -- and I'll be expected to constantly truck his ass around.

I've met countless women who are such passenger princesses that they rarely drive and haven't filled up their own gas tank in years, because their boyfriends/husbands consider it the man's job. Not sure where fuckcars thinks these masses of panting, fertile bangmaids who admire their dogma will come from. Maybe a stray childfree weirdo or two, but the average woman is not going to be impressed by the idea that she will have to walk to the hospital while in labor to deliver her baby, which the subreddit parrots as a completely sensible option for everyone.
 
Carballs. That's a new one. I'd like to see if there's multiple studies supporting this or just one guys thesis paper. I just want to get my science straight

Pretty sure women like guys with cars lol. Always kind of have. Proves you can be relied upon
The virgin sterile cyclist scrote vs the chad carballs
 
Apparently driving makes your balls hot:
View attachment 5529771
Article (Archive)
View attachment 5529773
View attachment 5529774
View attachment 5529775
View attachment 5529776
Someone posts an article showing that cyclists have reduced sperm counts. The response is nonsensical:
View attachment 5529777
Article (Archive)
Hilarious words coming from people who repulse every woman they meet:
View attachment 5529780
Source (Archive)
Are they circlejerking about a publication from 2000? Cars have heated and ventilated seats now even in more budget oriented cars. The cooling is good enough to freeze your balls on a July afternoon in Arizona.
 
Someone posts an article showing that cyclists have reduced sperm counts. The response is nonsensical:
1701271375940.png
Very fitting that they run with the study that benefits their narrative and quickly dismiss a study that says something that doesn't. It's also funny the guy below doesn't acknowledge if you're on the bike you're the one breathing in all the said harmful chemicals since you're the one outside.

Though a lot of the fuckcars crowd are the same people I can imagine that promote being child free and had vasectomies "for the environment". So I don't think fertility should matter to them.
 

Apparently driving makes your balls hot:
View attachment 5529771
Article (Archive)
View attachment 5529773
View attachment 5529774
View attachment 5529775
View attachment 5529776
Someone posts an article showing that cyclists have reduced sperm counts. The response is nonsensical:
View attachment 5529777
Article (Archive)
Hilarious words coming from people who repulse every woman they meet:
View attachment 5529780
Source (Archive)
First, who the hell drives for two hours a day for a single journey?

Second, if you are driving for two hours a day one way, perhaps their are issues with your life that should be fixed before reproducing.
 
Winter weather is upon us. Let's see what the urbanists think about it:
1701313546433.png
1701313559785.png
1701313594878.png
1701313619148.png
The rain is fine, but the cold really sucks:
1701313652040.png
Source (Archive)

1701313689417.png
1701313768466.png
So much for the NJB take of "if Finish people (only applies to Helsinki city center residents) can bike in the winter, then you can too!":
1701313793798.png
They're not wearing masks because they're afraid of covid, but rather because they help to keep their face warm (have they never heard of a balaclava or scarf?):
1701314033260.png
They also discuss how to live a car-free life in a hot climates:
1701313751306.png
Source (Archive)
 
Winter weather is upon us. Let's see what the urbanists think about it:
1701313546433.png
1701313559785.png
1701313594878.png
1701314918251.png
I thought this interaction was kind of funny how their positions switch to whatever they feel is the higher ground. It's almost like a playground interaction.

"You're going to get wet anyway carbrain".
"I park inside a garage so I don't have to get wet"
"Oh yeah, well I like getting wet in the rain. Imagine not walking through the rain. Getting wet is actually a good thing"


1701315341042.png
It never ceases to amuse me with their obsession over what is considered manly to them. As if wanting to be needlessly inconvenienced is the epitome of manliness according to them. This is something akin to what a child would think. There's such thing as just choosing the smarter way to do something instead of trying to impress what some imaginary person thinks. Also there's an obvious contradiction in his own statement. "I'm annoyed by having my shoes wet, but I don't care that much". So which is it do you care or do you not care?

Reminds me of a somewhat unrelated story:
As a child I was going camping with my uncle who was a vet and as we're starting a campfire I noticed he was using newspaper as firestarter. I naively pointed out to him that isn't the way real men start a fire. He looked back at me and said, "well then we'll let those guys be whatever they want to be. I just want to get this damn fire started".
 
Last edited:
It never ceases to amuse me with their obsession over what is considered manly to them. As if wanting to be needlessly inconvenienced is the epitome of manliness according to them. This is something akin to what a child would think. There's such thing as just choosing the smarter way to do something instead of trying to impress what some imaginary person thinks. Also there's an obvious contradiction in his own statement. "I'm annoyed by having my shoes wet, but I don't care that much". So which is it do you care or do you not care?
As a rule, I don't generally take advice on manliness from people that uncritically believe a short haircut and a mastectomy makes a man. It's honestly sickening to watch these people try to callously use these concepts against you when they're trying to win an argument. Of all the 'manly' concepts they choose to co-opt, of course they choose the 'embrace the suck' mentality people use primarily as a coping mechanism. If they came across someone actually manly and not LARPing as a manly man with their manicured beards and $300 boots, they would probably call him a chud. They'll also try to subtly fat-shame you for not wanting to ride a bike to your job 30 miles away, but when some 300 lb broad cries because she has to buy an extra seat on the airline, they'll be right there with a post on how disgustingly fatphobic those dang dirty airline companies are.
 
Back