Exactly what I'm saying. The entire world need not cater to a disgusting fetish. A fetish that constantly tries to spread to the rest of the world like a plague.
Oh, I'm the pervert. Lol! Sailor Moon for decades has been fap material of neckbeards worldwide
Sorry, I made the mistake of thinking you were interested in actual discourse, but clearly intelligence and thought are alien concepts to you. My bad.
And that is your opinion and you have no scientific data to back it up. Making hyperbolic, verbose personal statements doesn't make you come across grand or moral, just unhinged.
This I will say is inaccurate. Many do see gun ownership as immoral, as they consider guns themselves as some kind of inherent evil and anyone who owns one is not trustworthy.
That's the incorrect way of looking at his statement. His statement is being made in opposition to the assertion that looking at violent or sexual media will make someone more violent or sexual. That is the assertion, and it is one that is not backed up by scientific evidence (and scientists have extensively studied the subject). So, no, the body of scientific evidence actually supports his statement, that partaking in violent or sexual media doesn't not influence someone to become more violent or sexual themselves.
We aren't talking about child pornography, we are talking about lolicon/shotacon, which isn't child pornography because no actual children are involved in its creation.
Which is functionally no different than what the other guy said. And the natural counter argument is that finding something personally disgusting is not sufficient enough to ban it.
So what's it make someone fapping to loli?
So like I said, you're defending it. If you don't like hearing that, don't do it.
Jaywalking is banned, it's not causing serial killers to go uncaught.
Stop beating around the bush and quote me in context, here. If anyone requires a medically necessary abortion, I support it, be the person 10 or somehow 100. Simple as that, you retarded faggot.
There's nothing extreme about avoiding the unnecessary killing of unborn babies, in fact there's something extreme about the opposite.
Your have my condolences, it must be hard losing your reading comprehension. I'm here for you if you need anything.
What is it that I think which should not be allowed, that you support? I don't expect you to be specific, hence your current vaguery.
How many children were killed by the mob?
Fair enough. I liked Power Rangers, and the Blue Ranger in one season was a kid who aged up when he transformed (he was by far my least favorite character though).
To be fair, that freak is dressed up as Sailor Moon, not the loli one.
This site is my data pool. Vito the Pedo. Giggly Goonclown. Meigh the horse. must I continue? All of them are disgusting wretched people without exception.
Hes still a prime example of the fan base
I don't need to justify calling a obscenity obscene when I see it. It shouldn't exist. Morality governs the world. Unless you want a lawless world where people kill eachother willy nilly. It's disgusting, it adds no value to the world. Get rid of it.
Yeah but nothing indicates he's a pedophile per se, although I would not be surprised.
While he's exaggerating how bad the former is and indirectly downplaying the harm of the latter, at least he's taking morality into consideration. A moral society is necessary, so even though the impact is worlds apart, both have a negative effect on society (albeit to staggeringly different degrees).
You’re dumb as a doorknob for saying that ‘science hasn’t proved X’ means ‘science supports Y’. He has made the positive assertion that art is incapable of affecting a change in a person. A positive statement requires justification, particularly one which flies against all common understanding (specifically that the purpose of art is to affect change).
I believe that it is child pornography and it is legally classified as such by the authorities where I live. Why not address the broader point instead of quibbling over semantics?
I have emphasised the word personally in your statement. It’s not about what I personally think, it’s about the objective fact that most of society finds them repugnant and allowing such conversations to take place in public is contrary to the public interest.
Did I ever say people fapping to loli weren't pedophiles? Did I?
Oh look, you're playing the conflation game again.
Hey, speaking of wretched people, you revealed yourself to be religious on the previous page, right?
Still lower than school teachers by a significant margin fedora tipper. And i know youd like me to be your Frolo, but i just like Anime for fights, story, and memes.Hey, speaking of wretched people, you revealed yourself to be religious on the previous page, right?
What have churches become notorious for again?
I've been suspecting for awhile that the hostility and focus on lolicon is two factors:
First, secret enjoyment mixed with shame, sort of like Frollo in Hunchback of Notre Dame and how he kept blaming Esmerelda for his boner.
Second, probably a bit of seething resentment that--while the quality of Japanese output can be debated--pop culture still largely prefers Japan's stuff to homegrown American work. And then when America last tried to prove it could compete with Japan on an even keel, what we instead got were Avatar the Last Airbender and Teen Titans, shallow cases of "monkey see monkey do." The last time America's own output was genuinely better than Japan's was in the 1980s.
Jealousy is an ugly thing in a grown man....
Had your dumb ass never watched Sailor Moon? She tries to "have" him when she is turned into Black Lady
I think atleast two of these had girl try to date older guy while aged up. Hell, I heard that from girl who watched all the normal magical girl stuff made.
So... during the period where she's aged-up and magically corrupted by an evil wizard.
Probably a wise idea. It would be more constructive to go and play some Quake.
The mental gymnastics they go through to claim they're not pedos is quite amusing.
The assertion is that looking at violence/sexual media makes one more violent/sexual. Science has tested this hypothesis and failed to actually prove a causal connection, ergo science ostensibly supports the idea that looking at such media does not cause one to become more like such media. Science can't prove a negative (that watching such content has no effect), only a positive relationship, just like the onus is on the prosecutor in a case to prove guilt, not on the guilty to prove innocence.
No, his assertion was that such media can't override your own personality and personal morality to the point where you will suddenly discard morality and simply act out what you see in media.
And, as I said, his positive statement is backed up by the existing scientific research. And while art maybe trying to effect some form of change (i.e. propaganda), its actual ability to effect our personalities and morals is, based on current scientific research, limited.
Because in this debate, the semantics actually matters. I don't know what jurisdiction you live in, it maybe Canada for all I know, but its hardly relevant. Not all jurisdiction recognize it as child porn and there is a reason for this. Because Child pornography is pornography made with actual children, and lolicon/shotacon doesn't meet this definition.
"Most" of society? Have you polled most of society to determine this? No. Its your personal moral repugnancy that drives your feelings, not some greater feeling of society. More than likely, most of society could care less for loli/sho, or at best don't like it, but don't really care is someone else does, as long as they keep it away from them. You don't speak for society, stop acting like you do.
Go talk about it in public under your real name if you think people expressing disgust don’t speak for all of society. You’re disgusting.
This is simply not true. Again, playing a video games or watching dirty harry is worlds away from getting off to child porn. Again, there’s no evidence that studies of video games have any relevance to watching child porn.
Not all jurisdictions prohibit is as illegal child pornography, some consider it to be legal child pornography. No jurisdiction says it isn’t child porn.
Nobody talks about porn in public, regardless of whether or not the general public finds that type of porn disgusting. Its just not polite to do.
Once again, we are not talking about child porn. Just because you keep using that terminology, doesn't mean that I'm going to accept it. And no, there are no scientific studies linking the watching of lolicon/shotacon to real pedophilia either.
That's bullshit and you know it. No matter how much you try, you are not going to bend the world to your will just because you keep trying to misuse words and make them fit your definition. Its legal in jurisdictions that don't recognize it as child porn at all. Regardless of what you think. In fact, nobody gives a shit what you think. It isn't child porn.
Hey that doesn't sound like a bad idea then you remember that most people would gladly force computers to follow the CURRENT YEAR rules with extreme prejudice. I'd rather a government that has names and address tbh.
Welcome to the Internet, no one actually believes in things, they just wear them like skin-suits to achieve their goals. Many such cases, very sad.
