YouTube Historians/HistoryTube/PopHistory

I checked CH channel if he posted that video that is supposed to make or break his YouTube channel and no he didnt.
He just made video about Napoleon .
Screenshot_2023-11-29-15-51-52-836-edit_com.google.android.youtube.jpg
It sits on 23 k views after 12 days. Which is pretty bad for channel with 280k subs especially when there is big budget Napoleon movie in cinemas right now.

I also checked his merch. Lol just lol.
Screenshot_2023-11-29-15-18-49-374-edit_com.mi.globalbrowser.jpg
Merch worthy of guy with PhD. And not cringe thing that kids in elementary school do.

Speaking of his PhD he posted this half year ago.
Screenshot_2023-11-29-15-15-14-897-edit_com.google.android.youtube.jpg
Did he find job or is he still Neeting?
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Michael Jacks0n
Operation Iraqi Freedom series coming out from the best history channel

He did a overview of the causes of the war on his other channel which was really good. Covers the facts and the nuances of the political shit going on behind the scenes, without diving into conspiracy or political shitflinging.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Exterminatus
I'm a big fan of Drachinifel, even as someone who isn't really interested in naval history outside of his channel. He goes into so many different topics, from analysis of naval battles, individual ships, ship engineering in general, notable people and historical eras


I still need to finish his video on the history of naval warfare he released a few months back, but I absolutely loved his video on the Pacific Squadron you've already shared and the one on the British bombardment of the Dardanelles in WWI. His work is fantastic to listen to when working on something else or if you're playing something like Rule the Waves 3 or naval battles in War Thunder.

 
I'm a big fan of Drachinifel, even as someone who isn't really interested in naval history outside of his channel. He goes into so many different topics, from analysis of naval battles, individual ships, ship engineering in general, notable people and historical eras


Drachinifel's level of knowledge about naval history is pretty astounding, it's not just all pre video prep as he did a live Q&A on the Battleship New Jersey and he was able to get into an insane level of detail about relatively niche incidents.

However he's also got rose tinted glasses when it comes to the RN during WWII. He gives offers very generous interpretations of RN performance particularly when it comes to the Mediterranean theatre.

The historian Sir Max Hastings has been scathing of the RN during WWII. For example the fact that the Tirpitz was able to keep half a dozen capital ships in home waters right up until the end of 1944. In particular he criticised the way post war the RN Fleet Air Arm tried to turn the limited damage they inflicted on a stationary Bismarck which involved the use of 3 fleet carriers into some sort of military accomplishment.

There was the way the RN insisted on sending large submarines into the med where they often fell prey to mines or aircraft achieving very little. Or their use of heavy cruisers and battleships as little more than anti aircraft platforms. At the same time as the RN was being swept from the indian ocean.

Read up on the Indian ocean raid, and reflect on just how lucky the eastern fleet were that they didn't get the battle they were looking for with the Japanese combined fleet because it would have been a disaster.


My biggest criticism of Drachinifel though is that he keeps trying to push the idea that the italian Regia Marina was really some sort of threat. Italian destroyers, and special forces were good, but it was obvious by 1942 that their heavy units didn't have the desire or fuel to leave port on operations. The whole med campaign was a sideshow, but the RN suffered massive casualties for little real effect on the war. They didn't even manage to keep the suez canal open because the Luftwaffe made it impossible for ships to transit.

Then there was his video on Mers El Kebir which didn't use any french sources. It also didn't mention how the only ships the RN were able to sink were ones that hadn't got underway. Once the French ships started manouvering even at a few knots inside the harbor the RN scored precisely 0 hits.
 
Last edited:
Drach is pretty good. Yeah, he's got his biases but they're pretty easy to detect and account for. And he often has interesting guests over.

I don't think he'll ever live down his longest video for a long time being about an airplane instead of a ship, though.

My biggest criticism of Drachinifel though is that he keeps trying to push the idea that the italian Regia Marina was really some sort of threat. Italian destroyers, and special forces were good, but it was obvious by 1942 that their heavy units didn't have the desire or fuel to leave port on operations. The whole med campaign was a sideshow, but the RN suffered massive casualties for little real effect on the war. They didn't even manage to keep the suez canal open because the Luftwaffe made it impossible for ships to transit.
I always took it as him talking about what the people at the time thought about it. Because it's very easy for us to understand in hindsight that the Regia Marina was mostly irrelevant, but the British took it seriously enough. And even despite this criticism, Drach loves sniping the RM on the quality (or lack thereof) of their shells.
 
A really interesting discussion on a frankly bizarre paper written a few months ago and how retarded the establishment is for defending it, plus the lame hand-wringing about muh culture warriors, every time an academic attacks a commie-brain rot article and some sound bits of advice about being a public intellectual.
 
A really interesting discussion on a frankly bizarre paper written a few months ago and how retarded the establishment is for defending it, plus the lame hand-wringing about muh culture warriors, every time an academic attacks a commie-brain rot article and some sound bits of advice about being a public intellectual.
The internet age really kicked it into high gear particularly in niche topics. If you check the wikipedia for the Christian Front of Boston, there's a claim with 4 citations that they had BARs and military training. They were serious threats and Nazis guys, not American isolationists who, according to the FBI, entire arms cache was 1 saber and trapdoor rifle. All four citations (1 being Rachel Maddow's podcast lol) point to one book, Nazis of Copley Square: The Forgotten Story of the Christian Front, which from what I can find lists the source as "Declassified FBI documents".

Now, I'm 95 percent sure I know EXACTLY which document he's referencing and it says nothing like that. It is an insane leap of logic to even assume those BARs were missing, much less ended up with the Christian front. But even if I was willing to give thirty bucks to the Jesuits and comb 450 pages just to disprove one claim, it's in a book now. It's a minor knitpick but so egregious it should call the whole thing into question. But who gives a fuck about a nuanced view of a isolationist party from the 30s everyone forgot? Frustrating.
 
Now, I'm 95 percent sure I know EXACTLY which document he's referencing and it says nothing like that. It is an insane leap of logic to even assume those BARs were missing, much less ended up with the Christian front. But even if I was willing to give thirty bucks to the Jesuits and comb 450 pages just to disprove one claim, it's in a book now. It's a minor knitpick but so egregious it should call the whole thing into question. But who gives a fuck about a nuanced view of a isolationist party from the 30s everyone forgot? Frustrating.
Yeah this is why I support Howes proposal of an Open Primary Source repository for all academic publications to make such BS easier to find and debunk.
 
Quick addendum to the aviation disaster history channels. It has come to my attention that the britbong behind Disaster Breakdown is a troon. Sad, but not surprising.
I just watched a couple videos of his and didn't remember this thread... and then he shows himself in pancake clown make-up and a horrendous orange dress, and that was the end of that. It was a shame I liked his voice and he seemed intelligent, but if someone thinks that a hormone imbalance and amputation of their genitals will magically turn them into the opposite sex, it very much discredits anything else that they have to say.
 
AlternateHistoryhub is starting a new series of videos

View attachment 5537159
That's interesting and generally welcome news. Personally, I thought he was slowly moving away from history/alt-history stuff (too much political drama, monetization issues, and actual historians with YouTube channels competing). This is more of a hunch I got from listening to his brother Tyler's livestreams (I need to find timestamps, but several years ago Shadiversity got into an autistic fight about swords with the Franklin brothers and Tyler has a low-key grudge against him). This is why Cody is doing so much with his PointlessHub channel -- making silly videos about pop-culture is much more fun and safe than history-adjacent content.

I didn't see it posted, but Cody uploaded a video about if Quebec had voted to leave Canada. It felt a little phoned-in to me. Also, he seems very dismissive towards any kind of secession (trying hard not to politisperg, but the west has a downright hypocritical/schizo attitude towards secession -- it's good for Kosovo and South Sudan but bad for Quebec, Scotland, Catalonia, the largely Russian speaking parts of Ukraine and Georgia and MAYBE okay for Biafra and West Papua? Not even touching the Israel/Palestine quagmire):

 
I always took it as him talking about what the people at the time thought about it. Because it's very easy for us to understand in hindsight that the Regia Marina was mostly irrelevant, but the British took it seriously enough. And even despite this criticism, Drach loves sniping the RM on the quality (or lack thereof) of their shells.
What they didn't take serious was the way the Japanese swept the RN from the pacific and Indian oceans. This was a war the RN had supposedly been preparing for during the 1930's yet when it came they just bent over and grabbed their ankles. Letting the US take the brunt of the fighting.

RN Submarines designed for long range operations in the Pacific were instead sunk in the Med where they weren't able to dive deep enough to avoid visual detection. They achieved the sum total of fuck all, other than force the US to fight in a theater that they knew was completely irrelevant. The British forced the US in Op Torch even though an invasion of southern France, Norway or even Denmark was feasible in 1943.
 
Back