ProTagMan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2023
And like what sense does bringing up tommy tallirico make outside of putting a target on your back?
it adds NOTHING to the conversation, and just flat-out annoying
hbomberguy / Harry "Harris" Brewis / Slazenger Rapemachine Whiteshaf - "Rational" SJW, former SA goon/LPer, sexual harassment apologist, raised $350K+ for child abuse cult
- Thread starter TheImportantFart
- Start date
it adds NOTHING to the conversation, and just flat-out annoying
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2023
exactly its like that faggot jacksfilms and skully G a literal puppet youtuber bitching some chinks reuploaded his content oh no a couple less people watched your puppet video get a job you bum instead of ruining the internet for a couple extra dollars theres no DMCA free video site but artists have endless options to make money GET A REAL JOB STOP MAKING YOUTUBE A JOB YOU BASTARD
if any autists here have enough spare time I want to see a breadtube style video but from a right wing perpective debunking or exposing HHbomberguy I think that would be funny
to be a contrarian why is plagerism bad? everyone took inspiration from others i believe mark twain onetime was asked about someone who plagerized him and he responded what you call plagerizm i call inspiration or something along those lines if we are calling out plagerism breadtubers and leftists literally copy each other tell me why is plagerism bad?
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2022
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2022
"downloading a video, and reuploading"
Yeah channels that literally operate by just reposting stuff with viral potential are so numerous that it just might be partly bot activity. Or at least run from some office in India.
Go and film good car crash now, post it anywhere and someone actually makes money with it. Some fucking pajeet most likely. Because their thousand channels repost 10000 thousand videos every day.
Yeah channels that literally operate by just reposting stuff with viral potential are so numerous that it just might be partly bot activity. Or at least run from some office in India.
Go and film good car crash now, post it anywhere and someone actually makes money with it. Some fucking pajeet most likely. Because their thousand channels repost 10000 thousand videos every day.
Last edited:
- Joined
- May 9, 2019
Have no clue who this guy is. But is it really worth my time to watch 4 hours of him talking?
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2022
Breadtubers are notorious for hours upon hours of autistic sperging that could easily be condensed into 30 minutes or less. So the answer is no.
Chainsaw Juggler
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2020
IH clearly plagiarized but I don't know that he was lying about it outside of the plagiaristic act itself and failure to at least cite the source. He's always struck me as a guy that doesn't want to show you much of what's under the hood, even his second channel keeps things pretty tight-lipped from what I have seen. He's also one of the rare few internet personalities that has kept his personal identity secret. I thought the bit in Hbomber's video on him was a slam dunk, but I still disagreed with Hbomber's interpretation that Internet Historian being dodgy with the facts meant he was being deceiving. There's this fucked up enduring belief in breadtube and other circles that twitter and other social media is a sufficient judge, jury and executioner and that failure to "tell all" is an indirect admission of guilt. This is a scandal that threatens his online career, running to social media and blabbing isn't always the right answer. Maybe owning it is the right answer now? But I hate the idea that having to stand up to a twitter mob is the default answer to anything.
At this point, I'd be clenching my buttcheeks if I were IH and hoping that this was the ever-popular excuse of a "rogue writer" and not a problem that went all the way to the top (him). Because if he has plagiarized elsewhere, it's gonna be found now. Even if there isn't any other plagiarism present, his comments section, twitter feed etc, are gonna be full of critics til the end of time, because he got caught.
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2023
I've had a hard time verbalizing how I feel about Hbomb but the thing that stands out about him most to me is how usually the premise and conclusion of his videos line up with reality while the actual steps he takes to get from premise to conclusion are baffling and nonsensical.
I don't know how to describe it, it's like he's always right, but he's only ever technically right.
I don't know how to describe it, it's like he's always right, but he's only ever technically right.
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2023
I’d forgotten hbomberguy existed. Now I’m reminded how I’d like to watch him waste away after being infected with some sort of super tranny AIDS and to linger on far after he’s started wishing for death’s sweet embrace.
Almost the entire of YouTube is based on stealing content so I don’t get the fuss over plagiarism.
The last plagiarism controversy I remember was Jacklyn Glenn, but she had great tits so was quickly forgiven.
Almost the entire of YouTube is based on stealing content so I don’t get the fuss over plagiarism.
The last plagiarism controversy I remember was Jacklyn Glenn, but she had great tits so was quickly forgiven.
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2020
Is his his plagiarism even illegal? The videos seem to be transformative enough.
Either way, lets assume it actually does count as plagiarism; I truly don't give a fuck, because I'm sorry, I'm just never gonna read a shortstory length article on a website I've never heard of.
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2015
Cannot stand the smug as fuck fake laughter "I'm so right it makes me smugly chuckle" thing he's clearly aping from John Oliver. Also what is wrong with this guys face? Eww.
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2022
On a platform with so many predators, pedo's, groomers, abusers etc, plagiarism is what needs to be taken down?
Seriously?
Seriously?
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2023
Taking inspiration from something and taking what someone else made and claiming "I made this" are different things.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2020
hbomberguy's video is too long, internet historian did nothing wrong :^)
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2016
It's not even stealing, he elaborated on what they found and made it much more entertaining and palatable. It isn't anything approaching plagiarism, it's just adding humorous insight and comedic talent to pre-established research. It's literally fair-use, and if IH wanted to be a dick, he could butt-fuck hbpmber for slander using the Australian court's incredibly aggressive precedent
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2023
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2019
Dude's got that DreamWorks smile.
Awhile back the Youtube algorithm recommended to me, and apparently a lot of other people, this channel that is literally just a pajeet bot reuploading hundreds upon hundreds of mostly American dashcam videos.
ProTagMan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2023
It reminds me more of caddicarus, the line delivery is VERY simeral.
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2023
'Cause one is taking credit for shit you didn't do. I don't feel like this is a hard concept to understand.
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
It is absolutely theft to convert a work from one medium to another. There was a supreme court case where a guy turned a painting into a sculpture, which wasn't a direct 1:1 copy but was a slight remix. It was not a meaningful change to the work, however, and it was infringement. Generally if you make something you reserve the right to sell it as a statue, and people cannot just take your work and do that and sell it without looping you in on the deal.
So, yes, it is legally theft to take someone's article and use it as a framework to build your video narration and animation off of.
If you want to say it shouldn't be, that's fine, but there is a reason that video did not go back up for months.