You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.
General query: if one were to rewrite the OP, what steps would one need to take? Is it just as simple as contacting @mindlessobserver or is there someone else to contact as well?
To rewrite an OP, just post the reworked OP in the thread as a regular post. If the thread regulars like it, contact a moderator or Null and they can make that post the first post.
Indeed, it could be quite long. Given the plethora of information/happenings the organization and prioritization of events is crucial. When creating the Drexel OP, I imagined people taking one look and thinking:
The distinction between those who want information chronologically or topically was a factor as well when it came to making all that information easier to find. I settled on three sections with a focus on why Drexel is a lolcow: his history, his beliefs, and his notable actions.
In Nick's case, his history prior to November 2022 serves to explain why he is a hypocrite, liar, and closeted degenerate. Everything afterward are examples/confirmation of these things. Areas of regular confusion on the thread, like who Kalea is and why we are all her (recommend including the DMs with Kalea and PerceptionChek as they provide great insight on Nick and how he copes with his own behavior to others), would be a good indicator of what people are interested in.
Basically, the best examples of Nick's lolcow traits get priority. If not everything is listed, don't worry as I'm sure there will be plenty more examples to come.
To avoid a scenario where plans are made and nothing happens, if no one calls dibs on leading this in about a week then I can step up and will begin reaching out to interested parties.
I was just watching the MATI clip from friday and the guy who made the timestaps sounded familiar. It was ninjabreadman8166. He was one of the timestampers from the Vic era, before Agrolith started doing them.
Yeah Clair’s & (her husband’s?) photos were actually posted here on KF. That fact only increased Nick’s smug attitude, regardless of the circumstances that she had been hacked & had not put them out on the internet herself.
Regarding Elissa, nothing to do with her was posted in Nick’s Locals or Discord & unless it’s something involving Nick v. Elissa directly or actions that he has explicitly co-signed, it doesn’t really matter & isn’t worthy of mention in an OP that is already so voluminous.
While the “wine-mom” influx & titty/ ass posting is worth mentioning, as it relates directly to Nick, all the petty female cat-fighting (not meaning Elissa specifically, but rather, the ankle biting bitches that surround) is so superfluous, confusing & most importantly, boring . The less of that the better. Esp since a lot of that stuff got moved out of the thread to wherever they were moved to.
Maybe some people are still interested in that but imo it is just noise that could be left out.
The locals crew in general & the parasocial ego boosting they gave Nick (& subsequent locals abandonment by nick & fall out/ turning of former die-hards) plus Nick seethe about the logger is a point that should be highlighted. Not sure how that would be done best but surely @Himedall All-seeing Waifu will know on that.
I actually started making a note last night before I went to sleep. I'm phonefagging for the next few days but I'll do what I can to assist, I nearly convinced myself to just take a lead on it and still might if nobody else wants the helm.
Regarding Elissa, nothing to do with her was posted in Nick’s Locals or Discord & unless it’s something involving Nick v. Elissa directly or actions that he has explicitly co-signed, it doesn’t really matter & isn’t worthy of mention in an OP that is already so volthemselves.
It was the Proboscican Guard (Nick fans) that posted her nudes to whiteknight for Nick. I cannot recall the server, but I am mostly sure it was Potentially Criminal's becuase it was swept up.
While the “wine-mom” influx & titty/ ass posting is worth mentioning, as it relates directly to Nick, all the petty female cat-fighting (not meaning Elissa specifically, but rather, the ankle biting bitches that surround) is so superfluous, confusing & most importantly, boring . The less of that the better. Esp since a lot of that stuff got moved out of the thread to wherever they were moved to.
Maybe some people are still interested in that but imo it is just noise that could be left out.
The locals crew in general & the parasocial ego boosting they gave Nick (& subsequent locals abandonment by nick & fall out/ turning of former die-hards) plus Nick seethe about the logger is a point that should be highlighted. Not sure how that would be done best but surely @Himedall All-seeing Waifu will know on that.
I suggest a general description of LOCALS, how it came to be Nick's monetary support platform du jure during his banning, the degenerate spiral of content, mockery on KF, introductions of the logger, and it's subsequent decline with a few musings on the reasons.
Perhaps a spoilers section with a few notables in the LOCALS, but that could easily be cut, or abbreviated by a link to my first log posting, and leave it at that.
Easily done in 2-3 paragraphs of tight copy.
In the story I would tell, LOCALS as thr F U to YT banning was the inflection point in Nick's fall intololcowdom. Rittenhouse and Depp were the upswing, he then went full-in on LOCALS, went to Hedonism, immediately after, and it all went downhill from there.
I actually started making a note last night before I went to sleep. I'm phonefagging for the next few days but I'll do what I can to assist, I nearly convinced myself to just take a lead on it and still might if nobody else wants the helm.
Nick’s birthday stream from last year
When Nick threw a tantrum about Jury reaction analysis and how he’d rather be getting a happy ending than doing trial streams.
I was just watching the MATI clip from friday and the guy who made the timestaps sounded familiar. It was ninjabreadman8166. He was one of the timestampers from the Vic era, before Agrolith started doing them. View attachment 5539935 View attachment 5539936
This is actually one of the saddest things related to Nick I have seen. Some guy who enthusiastically watched all of his streams, made them significantly more watchable for free and seemed to genuinely enjoy them just silently moved on and started the same work for the people who are destroying him.
He lost an actual fan who wrote "Hello, Nick!" out of the goodness of his heart and he will never regain that, that relationship is gone forever.
Some guy who enthusiastically watched all of his streams, made them significantly more watchable for free and seemed to genuinely enjoy them just silently moved on and started the same work for the people who are destroying him.
Even so, for the 7 items I could price up the total (which is cost + 15% and a flat $5 per item pharmacy fee) was a grand total of 77 bucks vs $300 for the Wellness Kit.
So I've got old VoDs of kino casino on and I'm listening to the rekieta segment where he talks about guys not caring about getting complimented about their achievements and instead want to be complimented on their looks and I think I've figured out why he said that. He doesn't care for compliments about his achievements because he has never, in his entire life, achieved anything. The entirety of his life is coasting off his trust fund.
I watched an Aydin Paladin video earlier (has a KF thread, was a Psych major, got kicked out of her grad program, had Nick on her podcast 18 months ago) that touched on the Narcissism Epidemic and whether the current day rise in narcissism in the culture is mostly limited to women.
I actually read the one of the book she was citing (The Narcissism Epidemic, Jean Twenge and Keith Campbell, 2009) around the time of its release that formed my personal understanding of all the narcissistic behaviour we are surrounded with today.
Paladin's video made me question whether some of my long-held beliefs are too binary (narcissists never lack self-esteem, are mostly a monolith, etc.).
Her argument was that narcissism can further be broken down into two subtypes:
- grandiose: male dominant, classic, delusions of grandeur without the secret doubt in their own value, post online about personal achievements like gym gains, etc
- vulnerable: female dominant (particularly land whales), still inflated sense of self but with secret insecurities, require much more positive affirmation to feed their confidence and egos, a lot more online attention seeking for this affirmation, less peacocking online about their own accomplishments, lots of delusional deathfats rating themselves 10/10 somehow in SMV
Bringing it full circle back to Nick and his tenet that men don't want compliments re: their accomplishments, but prefer affirmation re: their physique, Paladin's video suggests it's not true (at least in the normal pop, not just narcissists).
She cites research that women both give and receive 75% of compliments in general. She also cited data suggesting that men on average react less positively and are naturally suspicious of the minority of compliments regarding the compliments they do receive.
Extrapolating that to male narcissists, the data suggests they too experience more positive emotions to being lauded for what they did vs who they are.
I suggest a general description of LOCALS, how it came to be Nick's monetary support platform du jure during his banning, the degenerate spiral of content, mockery on KF, introductions of the logger, and it's subsequent decline with a few musings on the reasons.
I agree with @Anticipointment to a degree re: the OP being too voluminous to go into granular detail re: Locals and Discord drama and individual Nick spurned former fans of little interest to outsiders.
That being said, I would like to see some sort of compilation of "Nick hasn't changed/freeze peach absolutist/Nick doesn't care" compilation giving a brief rundown of how Nick was trying to quell dissent behind the scenes beginning in Nov/Dec '22 with the page 950 KF thread turn.
Some compilation of:
- hugbox detractors Cynthia and HydroPX banned for " harming his business" - "you husk of a human" copypasta
- Nick gaslighting critics during streams to "take it to private DMs" - PerceptionCheck, wishing death on Elissa
- nuking of his Discord over New Years '22/23
- dewrenching "We are Kalea" for a single quip about Ricardo & Romaine
- possibly gloating over the revenge porn leak with Claire's chudbuds.lol hack
I agree that the internecine details of each are individually of little interests to outsiders.
But I do believe in the importance of highlighting how petty and disingenuous Nick became from Day 1 of his degeneracy arc and how his public facing facade differed from his offscreen actions wrt criticism.
Of course remember many women's "compliments," especially to each other, are actually disguised insults. "Looks good on you though," although most women wouldn't be that blatant.
She also cited data suggesting that men on average react less positively and are naturally suspicious of the minority of compliments regarding the compliments they do receive.
Caught a little bit of Thomas Roilup's Inception-style stream reviewing Josh/MATi reviewing the Sean meltdown.
As @Himedall All-seeing Waifu described way back in the thread, Roilup is a minor cow himself, long-time Nick detractor and briefly appeared or interacted with Nick many years ago relating to comics stuff. Later they had a falling out. He can be found frequently in Elissa comments.
Anyways, Roilup opined on stream that Nick's "this was never a law channel" decree is actually a 4D chess legal strategy devised by Randazza to support Nick's "I was just joking" Montagraph legal defense. An attempt through repetition to reframe Nick's channel and his position as an internet celebrity as an opinion/entertainment venture rather than as a source for legal analysis. Similar to the infamous Fox News gambit often cited in one of their defamation cases.
I understand that this theory is completely unsourced and comes from a fellow Nick detractor weirdo.
But I'd never considered this angle and thought it was interesting.
Anyways, Roilup opined on stream that Nick's "this was never a law channel" decree is actually a 4D chess legal strategy devised by Randazza to support Nick's "I was just joking" Montagraph legal defense. An attempt through repetition to reframe Nick's channel and his position as an internet celebrity as an opinion/entertainment venture rather than as a source for legal analysis. Similar to the infamous Fox News gambit often cited in one of their defamation cases.
That's quite dumb. The channel's name is literally Rekieta LAW and he ain't chinese.
Also the fact that he had to clarify it's not a law channel implies that people DID think it is/was a law channel and if Randazza is stupid enough to try this shit, there's thousands of Nick's live streams as evidence and I'm pretty sure Nick is not desperate enough to delete 95+% of his channel's 'content' to win this lawsuit. Plus there's archives from everywhere. Roilup is just wildin.
Caught a little bit of Thomas Roilup's Inception-style stream reviewing Josh/MATi reviewing the Sean meltdown.
As @Himedall All-seeing Waifu described way back in the thread, Roilup is a minor cow himself, long-time Nick detractor and briefly appeared or interacted with Nick many years ago relating to comics stuff. Later they had a falling out. He can be found frequently in Elissa comments.
Anyways, Roilup opined on stream that Nick's "this was never a law channel" decree is actually a 4D chess legal strategy devised by Randazza to support Nick's "I was just joking" Montagraph legal defense. An attempt through repetition to reframe Nick's channel and his position as an internet celebrity as an opinion/entertainment venture rather than as a source for legal analysis. Similar to the infamous Fox News gambit often cited in one of their defamation cases.
I understand that this theory is completely unsourced and comes from a fellow Nick detractor weirdo.
But I'd never considered this angle and thought it was interesting.
I am not sure that a judge would be convinced by this... But DSP *did* manage to bamboozle the bankruptcy court, so I will not say it impossible... FFS, his channel's name is RekietaLAW! This variant of the Maddow Defence is austistically retarded.
I would be more inclined to think that Nick's doubling down and repetition of the statements are geared toward establishing the fact that he had a good faith belief that the statements were genuine in his reliance upon '10 years of online reputation'.
Seems like Nick has recovered from reeling from his own outburst with Sean and is back on Twitter...to be jealous of not being invited to do a ladyballers watch along with dick and pedo.