Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter

Guys I think yall might be missing the true hilarity of this latest antic

Someone is accusing fat of rick of being personally responsible for sending abusive/harassing messages without any real evidence and rick of fat is seething and sharting in rage at how unfair and unjust this is.

Just....let this fact sink in.

hippocrite.png
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Billy Bong, Caverlock, World Famous Quasi Payer and 27 others
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Blatant hypocrite, Caverlock, Bukke Bruse and 15 others
An automatic clown said:
Eta: he's still being a cunt to the girl who posted the spoofed contact form and she's getting fed up with it. Never change pig !
View attachment 5539916
Click to expand...
The Leslie-Test (the gold standard for measuring shits hitting the fan) is considered positive the instant he starts making demands.

And by the looks of it, it could happen any moment now.
Edit: Pat has disarmed the bomb. Credit where it is due: he was still being a cunt, but he did perform better this time.
Screenshot_20231203_182351_Brave.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Feels
Reactions: Billy Bong, Caverlock, World Famous Quasi Payer and 13 others
An automatic clown said:
As others stated, he just comes off like an insufferable cunt when trying to explain his situation.
Click to expand...

They both are dumbfucks. Asking for someone to prove a negative and Pat for not pointing out he's being asked to prove a negative. Neither party has enough technical chops but I look forward to Jackie posting how, based on the IP, Jackie figures out the post came from wherever.

Then she doubles down on demanding Patrtick somehow solve the issue of 3rd part impersonation. Exactly *HOW* is Patrick gonna do this? What a delusional woman thinking that by just mentioning a suspected crime to an 'investigator' means there will be somehow a trial? The dumb fucker's POV is not supported by actual fucking cops in Milwaukee. https://www.npr.org/2013/01/31/170727538/milwaukee-sheriff-advises-residents-to-arm-themselves Self-appointed political firebrand Patrick can't be even 1/9th assed to child her over her views of cops with what an elected MAGA cop had to say.

Not sure where one finds a list of thin-skinned reactionaries like her to bait but it *IS* the Internet and there are just so many baitable thin skinned reactionaries. With these reactionaries using sites like WIX where the contact forms are standardized I look forward to a scripted future of more of this kind of dumbfuckery.

Edit: Leslie test kits
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: Caverlock, Procrastinhater, DYLAN ‘DIELAWN’ VOLK and 12 others
AutoClownMaker said:
Asking for someone to prove a negative and Pat for not pointing out he's being asked to prove a negative.
Click to expand...
You can absolutely prove a negative claim.
In the first place you can use good old modus ponens: if P and Q are propositions and P is true and P implies that Q is false, then Q is false.

This might strike you as unfair because we're basically being handed the thing we want to prove. Instead we could assume that a proposition P is true and somehow show that this leads to a contradiction. (The method will depend on the details of what we're trying to prove.) This is a proof by contradiction of P being false.

Perhaps you meant that you can't prove a claim that something doesn't exist, but you can. For an easy example, note that every even number larger than two is not prime. Then obviously there are no even primes larger than two.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: deadtofaunus, Procrastinhater, TheGuntinator and 17 others
Your Favorite New Friend said:
You can absolutely prove a negative claim.
In the first place you can use good old modus ponens: if P and Q are propositions and P is true and P implies that Q is false, then Q is false.

This might strike you as unfair because we're basically being handed the thing we want to prove. Instead we could assume that a proposition P is true and somehow show that this leads to a contradiction. (The method will depend on the details of what we're trying to prove.) This is a proof by contradiction of P being false.

Perhaps you meant that you can't prove a claim that something doesn't exist, but you can. For an easy example, note that every even number larger than two is not prime. Then obviously there are no even primes larger than two.
Click to expand...
Correct, and thank you. You cannot prove a negative by induction, and that's an important distinction. For example, one could think that black swans didn't exist because one had seen only white swans...until one sees a black swan.

Negatives can be proven through deductive logic, but not by induction.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: A Random Lurker, Procrastinhater, Johnny Salami and 10 others
TheAmbiguousLurker said:
Gotta love the balancing act of 'These bloodthirsty masterminds are ruining our lives and spending every waking moment ensuring we're staring down the barrel of a gun!' and 'Pfft, my life is pretty great. These stalker child chuds are just ineffective weasels who can only wish they'd get one over on me.'
Click to expand...
The best part is that he tweets these too. No self awareness
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Procrastinhater, TheGuntinator, AirdropShitposts and 4 others
WelperHelper99 said:
I wish my asshole could send stalkers to prison. Pat should feel honored he has such a superpower
Click to expand...

How have I not done any of these yet?

Here's a few AI interpretations of my three favorite Twitter handles that harass Pat:

Screenshot_20231203-193903.png

Screenshot_20231203-195135.png

Screenshot_20231203-195242.png

Edit: Just noticed the bathroom sign. Oh well, Pat does say he's "into things".
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Raging Euphoria, Caverlock, Procrastinhater and 10 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back