hbomberguy / Harry "Harris" Brewis / Slazenger Rapemachine Whiteshaf - "Rational" SJW, former SA goon/LPer, sexual harassment apologist, raised $350K+ for child abuse cult

Aside from his seething about Republicans gunning down niggers in the streets and putting troons in deathcamps (apparently), it's a decent video.
God help these fools. I wish the right was actually what the Left thought it was. Instead of just being a slightly different flavour of globohomo. Tranny death camps are just what we need at this point.

Also Hbomberguy is fat, ugly and malding like a tranny. He's probably one of those millennials who guzzle a diet of spaghetti hoops and Monster Energy Drink.
 
So IH gets hit with a real copyright strike, takes down the video, makes adjustments to make it more transformative + gives both in video and description credit to the original author... And there's still an issue?
He's not a scholar or an academic, he's a Youtuber making videos to entertain and the problem Hbomberguy complains about have already been resolved, interpreting his silence on the matter to be indicative of malice because he didn't make a massive hullabaloo about it.
Sorry, but this is seriously not worth a "cancel" (whatever that word even means).
No it's until IH agrees to the Smug Brit's terms and conditions that he shall be redeemed.
 
Internet cahntent is not academic research.
It is art, and art has always been "plagiarized" without anyone giving a shit. Composers taking melodies from others and doing their own spin on it has been happening for hundreds of years, same in painting.
That's how styles even developed.

Gay leftist is only one step away from copyright and DMCA bitches, who have made the internet worse for decades.
Rule 1 of Plagiarism Club, don't get caught

as if, the beauty lies always in getting away with it
 
It's very obvious what he tried to do here, he started with some completely inexcusable well documented cases like Mucin to give himself credibility to try and go after people he hates and try and act like their minor quibbles were as bad or worse.
Only complete retards like his fanbase would fall for this type of manipulative tactic
His example before Mucin was Ellison's successful lawsuit, his last example (before the main subject, Somerton), was Internet Historian. I think Harris has a legitimate point against IH, however it is kinda sullied by the fact that Man in Cave was taken down and reuploaded with proper credit. I noticed that while Harris did compliment the animation of Man in Cave, he attributed the work to IH's team, not IH himself. I don't think he made that distinction with the other examples, then again he didn't compliment them either. That plus the irrelevant dig at his right-leaning audience and dashcon amused me, can't escape the culture war. Regardless, I'm enjoying the video.
fag.jpeg
Sorry it won't let me quote the poster of this.
"This channel has come under target from a significantly larger creator". Always deflecting. Well, technically I guess you're under target. You're being targeted because you're being accused of plagiarism, what a crybully. boohoo a larger creator targeted me! I'm just a little underdog with 320k subscribers!
 

Attachments

  • fag.jpeg
    fag.jpeg
    139.2 KB · Views: 51
Internet Historian's new wine tasting video posted today is going about as well as you'd expect in the comments section. Just sort "new" if you want to watch the sparks fly.

View attachment 5539977
All of the accounts rushing to make these comments are some combination of genderqueer tranny furry pedo communist scandinigerian
 
>IH may have stolen someone else's hard work and made money with it, and then did his best to hide that fact, showing he himself thought he was doing something immoral, but I like his content...
>Ah, it was exposed by a breadtuber and anyway why doesn't he make videos on bigger problems? He hasn't even criticized literally everyone else who does anything wrong on the entire internet first either.
>Phew, for a second I thought I had to engage with information that makes me uncomfortable.
 
You can't make me watch this annoying piece of shit, so I will just read the comments here. The only even remotely interesting or surprising factor here would be Internet Historian's section and it seems to largely be a nothingburger
BTW if he or his paypigs are reading this, kill yourselves. Your shitty videos have been filling up my feed for years and I am never watching them.
 
Even on a day where hbomberguy makes an okay and informative video, it still makes one really question “Who even asked you?” in regards to IH‘s plagiarism accusations. I’ve never thought you needed to make a 4 hour long video which almost looks and sounds like mental masturbation over something that will possibly be forgotten about in less than two weeks tops.
 
Do we know IH is even plagurism? Do we know he got it from that article? Do we know he did not just take it doen and edit because that was easier than fighting over the issue?
It was definitely plafiarism as there were parts that were exactly the same as the article
He did already change it and added the source so I dont see the point of bringing it now tbh.
 
Back