hbomberguy / Harry "Harris" Brewis / Slazenger Rapemachine Whiteshaf - "Rational" SJW, former SA goon/LPer, sexual harassment apologist, raised $350K+ for child abuse cult

[Dire Dire Cocks]

I'd love to see one of the targeted YouTubers use this excuse, because this is one of the absolute faggiest thing any of them could say. They all did things wrong, they all lied to their audiences, they can deal with getting called out for it.

"He didn't even contact me about his exposé video of me lying!"

 

[DagothUr]

A truly awful day when a smug communigger isn't wrong on something.

 

[Sprate Header]

Is it seriously too much to ask for him to remain on task and criticize the plagiarism without character assassinating IH for other shit?

Maybe I'm just more of an aggressive asshat than other kiwis, but I would do the exact same thing in his position - potshots are fun, especially when you attach them to legitimate points. The "audience responsibility" argument is retarded though, and he is being blatantly hypocritical with his own METOKUR past, but still; are we really going to criticize someone for being too mean?

 

[6MillionCoofs]

"He didn't even contact me about his exposé video of me lying!"

I mean, you know Harry would pull that shit if it was done in kind

 

[I'm Not Loying]

A truly awful day when a smug communigger isn't wrong on something.

"Jeffrey Epstein hated bad weather while flying"

 

[DHugo]

I see how easily Hbomberguy can be hated, with the shit-flinging anti-semitism and alt-right stuff, but the point were pretty easy to understand:

-Internet Historian stole the script for his video, word for word

-After that, sneakily didn't tell anyone what the problem was, and tried to reupload it by rephrasing some segments.

-None of the rephrasing made it not plagiarism, it was the most basic shit a high school student would do.

-Crediting on the reupload doesn't make it not stealing. You wouldn't want a person of socio-economics to steal your bike, even if he paints your name on it to give credit.

Fucking retards somehow still say that putting the credit in makes it not plagiarism when he just jacked that whole shit. That's not how citing things work.

 

[Would]

people are only interested in IH despite Somerton's plagiarism being 10x more egregious since a lot of his fans were under the impression he was some sort of intellectual film critic. His channel is dead in the water now.

IMO it's because there's more drama in IH, while Somerton is a fag who immediately apologized, then deleted all his social media and turned off the comments in every YT video he made. There's not much to extract other than he's a scared fag who's submits and runs away. What's next; a 20 minute apology video that starts with no music and a heavy sigh in three months?

 

[Michael Bluth]

Even in college when doing essay or research you always cite the source to be safe then sorry.

shit, one of my profs back then said I might've over cited

 

[Sprate Header]

I see how easily Hbomberguy can be hated, with the shit-flinging anti-semitism and alt-right stuff, but the point were pretty easy to understand:

-Internet Historian stole the script for his video, word for word

-After that, sneakily didn't tell anyone what the problem was, and tried to reupload it by rephrasing some segments.

-None of the rephrasing made it not plagiarism, it was the most basic shit a high school student would do.

-Crediting on the reupload doesn't make it not stealing. You wouldn't want a person of socio-economics to steal your bike, even if he paints your name on it to give credit.

Fucking retards somehow still say that putting the credit in makes it not plagiarism when he just jacked that whole shit. That's not how citing things work.

Niggas say they're anti-copyright but then do mental gymnastics to say plagiarism isn't plagiarism instead of just saying they don't care about plagiarism. E-daddy worship is a disease.

 

[Rotollo 2]

Maybe I'm just more of an aggressive asshat than other kiwis, but I would do the exact same thing in his position - potshots are fun, especially when you attach them to legitimate points. The "audience responsibility" argument is retarded though, and he is being blatantly hypocritical with his own METOKUR past, but still; are we really going to criticize someone for being too mean?

It in general feels like filler for a video that really did not need to be 4 hours, getting into minutia like that just makes me want it to get the fuck on with it. being British already makes him come off overly smug, waffling around like that just makes me feel like you are intentionally wasting the audience's time and trying to entertain yourself rather than your audience

 

[HodgePodgeRogerDodger]

When did rlm get accused of plagiarism? Did you just read that 4chan thread because that thread was just OP making shit up.

I legit only watched parts of the IH shit because I really couldn’t stand the Britoids voice.

 

[I'm Not Loying]

Niggas say they're anti-copyright but then do mental gymnastics to say plagiarism isn't plagiarism instead of just saying they don't care about plagiarism. E-daddy worship is a disease.

"Be gay do crimes" twitter suddenly very upset about things being stolen

 

[Ace888Ace]

We really are fucked as a society if "person I don't like made a valid criticism against a person I do like" causes this level of seething and braying from all sides.

Revolutionary take, I know, but it's just sad that people are so parasocially invested in these YouTubers and shit, like I saw fuckers in the comments like "I'm so sad I can't believe IH would do this". Motherfucker, you do not know him. He provides you with entertainment.

There isn't a YouTuber or Twitch streamer or suchlike in the world that doesn't have a skeleton in the closet. You're better off assuming they're all pedophile sex pests and suchlike. It prevents the inevitable disappointment

 

[Iwasamwillbe]

Never heard of this guy before, but YouTube keeps recommending this video to me.

---

Attention troglodytes who only visit featured threads: either watch some of the video or read some of the thread before leaving a reply. There is a 90% chance that what you want to say will already be said. The first thing that comes to mind is the first thing that gets posted after a thread is featured. Your sticker farming bullshit actively makes my website worse and makes featuring threads a painful thing for the people who routinely visit a thread. Hang yourself! Thanks.

My thoughts is that this whole video is essentially part-hitpiece, with the addition of "safe"/"decoy" targets (Illuminati, James Somerton, and the like) to "butter up" the hit against his "main" target (Internet Historian).

Internet Historian's "plagiarism" stuff was resolved months ago, and I'm 100% certain that the reason Hbomberguy is bringing him up now is because he's mad about Internet Historian's political opinions or continued friendship with JonTron or whatever, and is just using the plagiarism stuff so he doesn't look pathetically petty about screeching that a big YouTuber is a "chud".

 

[Love Machine]

Maybe I'm just more of an aggressive asshat than other kiwis, but I would do the exact same thing in his position - potshots are fun, especially when you attach them to legitimate points. The "audience responsibility" argument is retarded though, and he is being blatantly hypocritical with his own METOKUR past, but still; are we really going to criticize someone for being too mean?

Taking pot shots implying he is a heckin nazi makes people check out immediately. It's poison if you are trying to have your video taken seriously.

 

[Dire Dire Cocks]

Maybe I'm just more of an aggressive asshat than other kiwis, but I would do the exact same thing in his position - potshots are fun, especially when you attach them to legitimate points. The "audience responsibility" argument is retarded though, and he is being blatantly hypocritical with his own METOKUR past, but still; are we really going to criticize someone for being too mean?

This is like those fucking “I love dark humor!” guys sperging out whenever someone makes fun of Christianity

 

[Tablet County]

We really are fucked as a society if "person I don't like made a valid criticism against a person I do like" causes this level of seething and braying from all sides.

Revolutionary take, I know, but it's just sad that people are so parasocially invested in these YouTubers and shit

You're missing the point. Like I said before, it isn't about IH being in the right; it's obvious he isn't even if he did apparently try to make some sort of amends. It's about Harris being always wrong forever because he's a faggot.

 

[Dasjas Watanid Tabas]

Last time I heard about hbumminggoyim was 2019 and he was a balding, soy-guzzling, dimwitted faggot from a community of communist larpers. Fast forward 4 years and he still is a balding, soy-guzzling, dimwitted faggot from a community of communist larpers. Only difference is the community died in silence and every Soytuber is on his own.
How do people still watch him? That's the real question.

 

[VeteranOfTheRetardWars]

Broke: Plagiarism is le bad
Woke: IH made amends and what he did was transformative content that he unfortunately didn’t cite his sources for
Bespoke: Plagiarism is based because intellectual property is retarded and gay

 

[HodgePodgeRogerDodger]

I think the key issue people are missing is that the Internet Historian is an Australian. Theft is part and parcel of his culture.

Please understand he can’t help hisself, by judging him you are being a bigot.