hbomberguy / Harry "Harris" Brewis / Slazenger Rapemachine Whiteshaf - "Rational" SJW, former SA goon/LPer, sexual harassment apologist, raised $350K+ for child abuse cult

Woah wee, plagiarism, like 99% of YouTube is plagiarism. IH already had this figured out after a copyright strike and adjusted it.
The whole issue with IH is just not the word for word copy of the article for his script but his behind the scenes dealings to resolve the strike and the poor attempt at citing his sources. That's what got the people curious, or "disappointed", if you will (lmao, you're a fucking retard if a comedy youtuber is your hero).

Mind you, we don't know really know how it was solved nor the terms of the deal struck between IH and Minute Media, the company that filled the copyright claim. I'm guessing that hbomberguy might be blowing things out of proportion since the new Cave video only contains small alterations, which is mostly consists of changing a few scenes and adding the original article as a source in the form of a footnote in a some scenes, which you can see in the IH section of the Anglo's video. Overall, these small changes seemed to be sufficient for the party that put up the copyright strike since they haven't sent another strike.

It's fun to speculate on it but until we get the details of it this matter is up to the court of public opinion.
 
It's really not hard to credit shit when even "lowly internet tranny hate forum threads (.net)" can do it.

He was clearly the main focus, but barely anyone is talking about him. In that sense the video is a failure. It would have been better to split this into two videos.
"Barely anyone is talking about him in this thread", if you look at the video's comments and the million views on a three-hour-long piece, it's a success.
It's basically 2-3 people fanboying over the ethics in plagiarism in this thread. Give it time for that to blow over.

The fact I tolerated a faggot bong leftoid for 3 hours was already a success. I can't stand these political grifters, left or right. His dumb politics still annoyed me.
James Somerton seems like a huge lolcow. I wonder if he has his own thread.

IH could have just came out, admitted to plagiarism, apologised and moved on, it would have saved him a lot of time and money. He should have just made it into a collaboration to begin with. The easy way out is too hard for egotistical youtube tards.
 
I think HBomb makes some very interesting points, but since his trademark presentation style makes it sound like I'm being talked down to by the fattest blue-haired asexual in my sociology 101 class, I'm choosing to ignore everything he has to say! Fuck you HBomb! I want to like you sometimes, but you just can't help yourself from reminding everyone that you hate people like me every time you open your mouth.
 
Did you watch any of the video? Do you know what a hit piece is? Why did this guy bother to mention IH's efforts to "fix" his video then? He could have just left all of that out and conveyed the exact same point. If anything, he was fairer to IH than he should have been. James Somerton was clearly the main focus and the bulk of this video, everyone else was there leading up to his exposé.
Why was Hbomberguy bringing up irrelevant "culture war" shit with regards to Internet Historian, talking about his DashCon vid and how "right-wing" his audience is and what have you, if he was even close to trying to be "fairer than he should have been"? The controversy had already been resolved, so as far as I see it, Hbomberguy is just trying to restart drama that has already been dealt with to farm e-celeb clout, rile up internet mobs, etc.

This love of relitigating already resolved conflicts is part of why the Internet in the current day is so shit now.

This is just dumb. He straight out called that Somerton sodomite guy a misogynist and claimed he's "erasing queer people". You can't get anymore politically charged than that.
I'd file that into "typical leftist infighting".
 
Last edited:
IH could have just came out, admitted to plagiarism, apologised and moved on, it would have saved him a lot of time and money.
I would say "he shouldn't have to" but if settling issues quietly without making a huge performative fuss out of it makes you look shady then I guess that's the realpolitik thing to do.
 
I would say "he shouldn't have to" but if settling issues quietly without making a huge performative fuss out of it makes you look shady then I guess that's the realpolitik thing to do.
You forget HH is a retard leftist who craves attention and he views the world through that lens. The fact IH didn't prostate himself and tries to remain anonymous online is a huge no no for the bong leftist.
 
If IH did make a big deal out of apologising, I guarantee his critics would now be whinging about how he capitulated and showed weakness.

Dude fucked up, but whatever he did behind the scenes was obviously good enough for the wronged party. We don't need to see everyone involved weeping tears of remorse and/or gratitude.
 
this is my introduction to the guy, and I almost finished the video as it's quite interesting, but in the end I was ground down by how fucking insufferably smug he is.
Hbomberguy is an old SA goon who, like many SA goons, became social justice goons. So imagine a plate of smug faggot, now dump a whole cannister of Morton's Moral Indignation Salt on top of it. That's how you get a breadtuber. Their homosexual behavior has not changed, the only difference is that it's socially acceptable and applauded because of a change in target. They are still all smug faggots who need to be thrown off a bridge for tainting our beautiful internet.
 
This point, and the point Harry made in his video about this was dumb.

It's not plagiarism to state that a guy went into a cave with a lantern, or that a guy was pinned between a rock and sharp cave walls when those are the actual facts that occurred. Claiming that the fixed video isn't fixed because there are still common elements based on actual facts is fucking retarded.

He was clearly the main focus, but barely anyone is talking about him. In that sense the video is a failure. It would have been better to split this into two videos.

You fucking retard. He didn't just state the facts about this dude who went into the cave. He slightly reworded the plagiarism. This wasn't just a wikipedia page with historical facts, it was a complete piece, with deliberate structure/ emotional parts to try to get the audience interested and read the whole thing. Nobody publishes articles like these by only listing the facts, because nobody would read that.

He didn't just copy the historical facts, he copied the entirety of how it was presented. You're fucking retarded if you think that taking out a couple small sentences (like he took a lamp to a cave) and ignoring the whole body of work proves that it's not stealing. Or you are the most boring fucker that masturbates to spreadsheets if you don't understand that presentation matters in a historical article.
 
lmao ok nigger.
Absolutely wild how you will say "Copyright is bad, if you can't make money off of something you deserve to have it stolen" and then mald like a faggot over someone doing what is essentially the same thing because some balding British breadtuber told you it is heccin' bad, and now stealing someone's intellectual property is bad. Or something, you kind of changed gears to complain about how KiwiFarms sucks now because nobody else noticed anything about Somerton but you... When @BestFriendsAnimalSociety already did.
 
You fucking retard. He didn't just state the facts about this dude who went into the cave. He slightly reworded the plagiarism. This wasn't just a wikipedia page with historical facts, it was a complete piece, with deliberate structure/ emotional parts to try to get the audience interested and read the whole thing. Nobody publishes articles like these by only listing the facts, because nobody would read that.

He didn't just copy the historical facts, he copied the entirety of how it was presented. You're fucking retarded if you think that taking out a couple small sentences (like he took a lamp to a cave) and ignoring the whole body of work proves that it's not stealing. Or you are the most boring fucker that masturbates to spreadsheets if you don't understand that presentation matters in a historical article.
I was talking about the reupload because it seemed like you were talking about it in that point and the next. Most of Hbomberguy's arguments about the rephrasing were in regards to the reupload as well. The structure of the reupload is different from the reuploaded video itself, and it is clear that the issues were fixed between both parties.
 
On the topic of Illiminaughti, it really seems like both sides of the issue are incredibly autistic. Grown men throwing out the term grooming in regard to themselves, dilution of the term 'gaslighting', and it's just like, lmao, you're all just awful.
 
If IH did make a big deal out of apologising, I guarantee his critics would now be whinging about how he capitulated and showed weakness.

Either that or saying that his apology was obviously insincere. If IH made a public apology, he would still be in this video and he'd be presented as an evil right-wing youtuber whose apology can't be trusted.
 
Firefox_Screenshot_2023-12-04T00-22-30.307Z.png
 
Back