hbomberguy / Harry "Harris" Brewis / Slazenger Rapemachine Whiteshaf - "Rational" SJW, former SA goon/LPer, sexual harassment apologist, raised $350K+ for child abuse cult

[Tablet County]

Because IH didn't credit an article in this single video, he can never be forgiven. For his crimes he will be damned to Hell (reddit) for all of eternity.

 

[Null]

I'm sorry is IH supposed to go back in time and kill himself/his editor/his writer before he can plagiarize the article?

He should not have done it and instead of uploading an inferior knockoff of his original work he should have compensated the authors.

Notice my responses to these questions are not changing. There is no fallacy in what I'm saying.

How do you people get so defensive about your fucking e-daddies? Grow the fuck up.

Because IH didn't credit an article in this single video, he can never be forgiven. For his crimes he will be damned to Hell (reddit) for all of eternity.

Or he could just compensate the authors he ripped off.

 

[Tablet County]

Or he could just compensate the authors he ripped off.

How can you say that when you have yet to compensate Keffals for illegally hosting his fart porn video?

 

[Getting Sentimental]

Because IH didn't credit an article in this single video, he can never be forgiven. For his crimes he will be damned to Hell (reddit) for all of eternity.

You see, it doesn't matter if the content mill is fine with just being credited in the reupload, Null does not consent to the journalist letting people source his content, he must pay the big bucks to the content mill for his grevious sin at the request of Null specifically and no one else on the planet including the content mill itself.

How do you people get so defensive about your fucking e-daddies? Grow the fuck up.

Grow up bro he says as he refuses to confront when he's blatantly making shit up about things he has done no research on.

 

[Rimbaud's Bussy]

I know for a fact that even if the entire script is directly plagiarized from the article, it is still not "70 minutes of plagiarism", because there are multiple comedy skits

I think professional copyright lawyers call that the "That Guy With the Glasses Defence"

 

[luigismanslave]

maybe this is just null's troll's remorse arc

 

[LePigeon]

How hard must it be to credit the original authors in a video when you're ripping them off so blatantly people find it out...10 seconds talking about the authors and their work and encouraging people to look it up themselves.
Also buying the source material if it is possible, surely that's not going to be a huge hit to the bank account of a 4 million subscriber youtube channel who puts out videos hitting millions of views guaranteed and does sponsor segments.
As a person who enjoys watching his content it really puts a huge dent in someone reputation if you now know some of the writing is not original and the content creator is avoiding talking about it because he's a huge pussy who can't own up to shit.

 

[WelfareNiggerQueen]

How hard must it be to credit the original authors in a video when you're ripping them off so blatantly people find it out...10 seconds talking about the authors and their work and encouraging people to look it up themselves.
Also buying the source material if it is possible, surely that's not going to be a huge hit to the bank account of a 4 million subscriber youtube channel who puts out videos hitting millions of views guaranteed and does sponsor segments.
As a person who enjoys watching his content it really puts a huge dent in someone reputation if you now know some of the writing is not original and the content creator is avoiding talking about it because he's a huge pussy who can't own up to shit.

He's never cited anything for his videos. That's pretty gay and retarded, nobody does that. If you have to do that for everything you're talking about then your audience must be absolutely brain-dead.
The stuff everybody likes him for is the thing he's being crucified for right now so I really don't get the outrage.
Find absurd thing, animate it poorly and have his buddies VA for it.

 

[Fluoxetine Man]

Libtard physiognomy is real. I bet when he was a Metokur poster he had a head full of hair, but the exact moment he became a breadtuber he started norwooding. Now he's a fat slobjak and it will only get worse from here.

View attachment 5541553

View attachment 5541554

Hard to believe this guy is only 31, while the target of his soy vendetta, PJW is 10 years older with a head full of hair.

 

[Racist Trash]

Is anyone able to get ahold of the original book "Trapped!: The story of the struggle to rescue Floyd Collins from a Kentucky cave in 1925"?

 

[TherapyMan]

Gonna have to enter this thread into the Olympics for all the expert mental gymnastics going on here.

 

[Tablet County]

How hard must it be to credit the original authors in a video when you're ripping them off so blatantly people find it out...10 seconds talking about the authors and their work and encouraging people to look it up themselves.
Also buying the source material if it is possible, surely that's not going to be a huge hit to the bank account of a 4 million subscriber youtube channel who puts out videos hitting millions of views guaranteed and does sponsor segments.
As a person who enjoys watching his content it really puts a huge dent in someone reputation if you now know some of the writing is not original and the content creator is avoiding talking about it because he's a huge pussy who can't own up to shit.

I don't know why people seem to think that all of this would be a-okay if IH just paid off the original author. At the end of the day the only thing greasing palms would've changed is that Dear Feeder would be appeased and there would not be an autistic argument in this thread.

 

[LawTwitter is Dumb]

Someone sure likes playing with what could've happened but we can't change that nor can IH, either way this shits sad its still even being discussed in that manner as IH has already resolved whatever problem there was months ago. HBB is a retard breadtuber bringing up dead nothing burgers.

 

[Pseudo Apollodorus]

it sure would be sad if hbomberguy got in a car accident

Harris "H. Bomber Guy" Brewis will be annihilated in a t-bone collision with one of the gay little minicabs the English call cars.

 

[BlackDragoons]

Someone sure likes playing with what could've happened but we can't change that nor can IH, either way this shits sad its still even being discussed in that manner as IH has already resolved whatever problem there was months ago. HBB is a retard breadtuber bringing up dead nothing burgers.

Its a huge fucking nothing burger, he only did it to take pot shots at IH. I don't know why? Maybe because he is jealous of his fans or something IDK.

He should have dedicated time to Hasan Piker. Faggot just sits there and does nothing with content.

 

[Golly Bo-Bolly]

This fallout from HBomber's video will result in either Video essayists and hours long reviews dying out since now there's packs of uptight manics acting like college professers combing every sentence in Google for plagiarism, or having those tubers actually be original and write original stuff.

Or maybe video essays will mutate like Commentary or reaction channels did between the 2010's and 2020.

 

[Pseudo Apollodorus]

Is his his plagiarism even illegal? The videos seem to be transformative enough.

Objectively, no. Adding animations, a voiceover, rephrasing some parts, and adding your jokes and visual gags is clearly transformative. That's not Hnorwoodguy's issue, though. The problem is that he took a well-researched and well-written article and used it as the basis for a video for his enormously popular YouTube channel without any credit being given to the original author. Legally fine, but morally wrong.

I am immensely saddened by the fact that this will inevitably make every spergy 15 year old screech about plagiarism for the next 6 months or so.

 

[Sumdood Too]

(we) Shouldn't have to work around other people's mental illness. We used to be able to just laugh at retards.

He made a good point and too many retards are just going to ignore his good point because they literally cannot put aside personal opinions of the people involved long enough to be objective. Old Kiwi Farms probably could have.

>inb4 "newfag" but I really miss old kiwi farms. This is the last proper forum standing and every year it slips further away from feeling like the Old Internet website that it used to.
---
You are all coping about your precious internet historian. Guy stole some shit, got called out for it, and you retards are getting angry at the messenger, as usual. It doesn't matter how repulsive the messenger is, if he is correct.

 

[Dead Gay Muppet Gangbang]

This fallout from HBomber's video will result in either Video essayists and hours long reviews dying out since now there's packs of uptight manics acting like college professers combing every sentence in Google for plagiarism, or having those tubers actually be original and write original stuff.

Or maybe video essays will mutate like Commentary or reaction channels did between the 2010's and 2020.

Objectively, no. Adding animations, a voiceover, rephrasing some parts, and adding your jokes and visual gags is clearly transformative. That's not Hnorwoodguy's issue, though. The problem is that he took a well-researched and well-written article and used it as the basis for a video for his enormously popular YouTube channel without any credit being given to the original author. Legally fine, but morally wrong.

I am immensely saddened by the fact that this will inevitably make every spergy 15 year old screech about plagiarism for the next 6 months or so.

call me crazy but my gut tells me that nobody's going to give a shit about this in 2 weeks, including Dear Feeder and all the other spergs in this thread

 

[Null]

Objectively, no. Adding animations, a voiceover, rephrasing some parts, and adding your jokes and visual gags is clearly transformative.

That's not true.

Imagine that someone writes a script for a movie and publishes it online as part of their online resume`. Then someone finds the script and actually produces that movie. Do you believe that by adding value to the script they have not stolen the script? Obviously not! That movie is the reserved market of the scriptwriter and he is entitled to compensation for his work.

If someone writes an article and someone narrates it and adds a cheap animation to it for a video that serves the same exact purpose of the article (which is telling the story of the cave diver), then it is not transformative. The animation and narration of the script is a reserved market for the original authors.


Criticism is inherently more transformative than a faithful adaptation. If someone took a very bad script and narrated it crudely with animations mocking the original author and his story, that's a different market than the original. Criticism and ridicule are protected forms of speech.

This is one of the most important and least understood parts of fair use. What really matters is the market: who consumes the end product.