hbomberguy / Harry "Harris" Brewis / Slazenger Rapemachine Whiteshaf - "Rational" SJW, former SA goon/LPer, sexual harassment apologist, raised $350K+ for child abuse cult

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
HBomberGuy is right about Internet Historian, but he is a smug faggot BreadTuber who can't help himself

Pretty much. Although I wish there was a bit more talk about how Harris covered Somerton.

Around 3:25:00 Harris basically says he is going to give the money his video makes to all the people Somerton stole from. But then, he mentions the one conservative person who was never actually stolen from so, just as a jab to conservatives, he basically says he doesn't owe that guy anything. This undercuts everything he spent the last three hours building up.

Harris is just taking opportune shots at political ideologues he doesn't like while simultaneously making a video that is supposed to be about plagiarism. See what he's doing here? He's trying to get your brain to align itself with bad behavior = bad (i.e., conservative) political ideology.

The guy wants to be concise, but pisses almost a full hour away on nothing just so he can dunk on IH while saying "republican bad."

And then after he has made his dunk, he quickly segues into something else, just so your brain can't think about it for too long. Right after talking about Somerton, he talks about some other content creator nobody has ever heard of, but says, "I like this guy because he talks about things that I like."

Harris undercuts himself by "joking" about Hasan not being in his chair, showing an immense bias for people he likes. Then, he constantly pegs right-wingers, further undercutting whatever his "message" is and is all designed just to get people to associate plagiarism with people Harris dislikes.
 
Last edited:
Do you think when people posts memes without the consent of the original creator or give them credit, it's comparable to theft?
I feel like there is a clear difference between a meme image to a heavily researched/edited piece of historical writing published with a financial incentive. Even though I doubt it would ever hold up in a court or be worthwhile to litigate in the first place, there could potentially be an argument made. I think it's a bit silly to compare something intended to be shared and reposted for free to a professionally released article that the author or website is hoping to receive some form of revenue from.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Hubelublub
I think the IH shit is just a poisoning the well attack, character assassination, whichever fits better.
People who watch him don't seem to care and are confused at the moral outrage because that's what he has always been doing and is what made him popular (every mainstream popular person on the Internet does the same shit but with much less effort).
People who don't watch him see him attached to the poisonous literal who faggots along with poisonous language being used so they see him as a nigger faggot too.

My main concerns is the Grift Wars side of things. This was politically motivated because Harris and his types don't want to share virtual space with these types of people. Harris can say it isn't about the monies and that he's giving to charity and all that. But keep in mind this guy, somehow, also has a line to AOC.

IH and Somerton are bleeding subs, not to mention anyone else Harris talked about. Meanwhile Harris has gained a massive amount of subs and his followers are now on attack mode.

All this does is let up and coming YouTubers know what the playing field is like. If you're just one hit-piece away from losing a chunk of your revenue, what are you going to do? Are you going to trust the Tik Tok brained monkeys are going to be on your side when the dominoes fall?
 
No enemies to the right.

IH may have done something wrong but the last people he should have to answer to are bad-faith left-wing subversives like HBomberCuck and his ilk. As has been repeatedly pointed out, he doesn't care about the principle of the issue even if he is technically correct as evidenced by his continued roach-guarding for Hasan. Smartest thing IH could do is ignore these subhuman termites, which he seems to have been doing.

Null seems like he has brain damage from eating low quality European slop. I hope the soft-eyed negative nancy is taking is vitamin D.

Nobody cares about the Somerton faggot DFE because he's boring, thats why IH is the focus.
Looks like the bunfight is picking up more steam. Guess when you saddle up that high horse of virtue you might want to check that you're not actually sat on a knackered donkey fit only for glue in a state of terrified state of panic as Cenk approaches.

See, Somerton is hemorrhaging subs and the e-grifters only want to talk about IH. And this is somehow indicative of the forum being too political? Null please get help you're developing Mike Stoklasa levels of paranoid dementia.
 
Harris' interminable smugness and his opinions on Dark Souls II mean I can't side with him, even when he's factually correct. Last time I saw that fag he had hair though -- is his Max Payne 3 cosplay look just a cope for balding?
I love Dark Souls 2 as well and it really sucks that this guy made the only really prominent video defending it.
 
The funniest part about this IMO is that HBomberGuy commits repeated copyright violations across his video. He is creating a commercial product, and he is repeatedly using other people's intellectual property without paying a license. Not even just from the YouTuber's he's referencing, but 3rd party material like clips from The Wizard of OZ and Avatar the Last Airbender.

"But he's using them in fair use" No he isn't. Some of his clips may be in fair use, but 'fair use' requires directly critiquing the work, and using it in a transformative manner. I jumped to a random part of the video (~2;47:10) to find an example. Literally, first place I landed. He uses an example of a woman named 'Becky' who was cancelled for writing gay characters as a straight woman - and to show her distress, he plays a clip of her looking distressed during an interview.

He doesn't own that clip. He didn't get a license of that interview. He didn't need to use that specific video to depict her being distraught. He committed copyright theft. He stole from the person who did the leg work to film that video, and then he used it without their permission and left it in uncredited. If the copyright owner of that video took him to court today and said "your honor, this man stole my video", he would win.

I'm not making this comment to say I'm a massive fucking dweeb and I love the US Copyright System. I am saying to not hold others to standards you yourself would not stand up to.
 
Not quite it's more like
> He may be right about ih but it's an old already resolved issue that most people just honestly don't see as a big deal considering even the person it effected does not seem to care

But yes breadtuber is still a faggot
Why does anyone focus on it being "resolved"? That wasn't the point of his segment. It was just an example as I described above to help illustrate how much of a evil nonce John Winterton was and still is.
 
No enemies to the right.

IH may have done something wrong but the last people he should have to answer to are bad-faith left-wing subversives like HBomberCuck and his ilk. As has been repeatedly pointed out, he doesn't care about the principle of the issue even if he is technically correct as evidenced by his continued roach-guarding for Hasan. Smartest thing IH could do is ignore these subhuman termites, which he seems to have been doing.

Null seems like he has brain damage from eating low quality European slop. I hope the soft-eyed negative nancy is taking is vitamin D.

Nobody cares about the Somerton faggot DFE because he's boring, thats why IH is the focus.

See, Somerton is hemorrhaging subs and the e-grifters only want to talk about IH. And this is somehow indicative of the forum being too political? Null please get help you're developing Mike Stoklasa levels of paranoid dementia.

Null's stance is and always has been that IH did plagiarism and it doesn't matter if pasty balding faggot called him out on it because pasty blading faggot is technically correct about that.

That's the long and short of it. It's probably the most objective stance on this thread.
 
Null's stance is and always has been that IH did plagiarism and it doesn't matter if pasty balding faggot called him out on it because pasty blading faggot is technically correct about that.

That's the long and short of it. It's probably the most objective stance on this thread.
I understand that, what I don't understand is what dear feeder thinks IH should do about it now. He can't go back in time and pay the content mill for use of their article retroactively, so what exactly is Null's point about the here and now? That he should suck Harris's dick on camera? Apologize to a Twitter cancel mob? Doing something like this is gay and retarded and strategically foolish.

What I'm saying is that nobody should answer to bad-faith actors who have only called you out because they want to ratfuck you. Whether or not IH should address the controversy to his fans and supporters is a different debate.
 
I understand that, what I don't understand is what dear feeder thinks IH should do about it now. He can't go back in time and pay the content mill for use of their article retroactively, so what exactly is Null's point about the here and now? That he should suck Harris's dick on camera? Apologize to a Twitter cancel mob? Doing something like this is gay and retarded and strategically foolish.

What I'm saying is that nobody should answer to bad-faith actors who have only called you out because they want to ratfuck you. Whether or not IH should address the controversy to his fans and supporters is a different debate.

IH isn't obligated to do anything. It doesn't really matter what Null thinks he should or should not do at this point since Mental Floss isn't calling for blood anyway.

Null has said very little about Harris in this regard except to note Harris is faggot who does faggot things in his video.

Null doesn't exist to pull reactionary favors from other people on his forums. He probably has a ton of his own opinions on the matter, but at least he's humble enough not to continually endorse them as if his matter more than others.
 
Last edited:
He's trying to get your brain to align itself with bad behavior = bad (i.e., conservative) political ideology.
This is fucking hilarious because it shows how much of a midwit he really is. People do that naturally, all they need is a gentle prod in that overall direction. Because breadtoids think that people are dumb, nigger brings the sledgehammer to the court instead, ensuring that nobody will take his "conservative bad" jabs seriously or even care about what he has to say about IH in the long run.

More than a fair share of people who've just been introduced to him via this video are probably repulsed by that blatant bullshit and by his personality. Congratulations Harry, you're as retarded as someone like Sargon is. You just bat for team red as opposed to team blue. :story:
 
IH isn't obligated to do anything. It doesn't really matter what Null thinks he should or should not do at this point since Steel Wool isn't calling for blood anyway.

Null has said very little about Harris in this regard except to note Harris is faggot who does faggot things in his video.

Null doesn't exist to pull reactionary favors from other people on his forums. He probably has a ton of his own opinions on the matter, but at least he's humble enough not to continually endorse them as if his matter more than others.
Yeah no shit it doesn't matter what he thinks. But I've read every page in this thread since the feature and Null has been here throughout implying that IH should do something in response but never stating what. Idk what thread you've been in where you give his conduct such a generous read. Personally I think he switched into trolling mode after people started to attack his character over his stance.
Because breadtoids think that people are dumb,
And they're right
 
Why does anyone focus on it being "resolved"? That wasn't the point of his segment. It was just an example as I described above to help illustrate how much of a evil nonce John Winterton was and still is.
Because that's all there really is to it

Hes not done it multiple times. And no one it effects is upset.
 
The entire section on Somerton is kind of hard to watch, having to listen to plagiarized queer theory recited by a mendacious faggot gave me a headache. The hbomberguy video must have severely rustled Somerton's jimmies since the mendacious faggot deleted his Twitter, his Patreon and disabled comments on his Youtube content. I really don't like hbomberrguy but this outcome was worth amazing.

As a side benefit I imagine a bunch of people were exposed to the degenerate concepts perpetuated by queer theory. Hopefully at least some of the people thus exposed will see it for what it is and start pushing back against it. I know, I know, optimistic, but let a man dream.
 
Looks like the bunfight is picking up more steam. Guess when you saddle up that high horse of virtue you might want to check that you're not actually sat on a knackered donkey fit only for glue in a state of terrified state of panic as Cenk approaches.

They essentially call him out on not calling out Hasan Piker and sucking up to him. I somewhat doubt that Harris will ever acknowledge this as he never acknowledges criticism publicly. You can see it with Mauler's videos where he showed DMs with Harris where he acknowledged that he pointed out issues with the original video. Never mentioned those on his channel though.
 
Back