Do you think the left will assassinate Trump if they have to?

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Dr. David Kelly was almost certainly assassinated by "our" side. For those for whom its a bit before their time he was one of the lead weapons inspectors looking for WMD in Iraq. He had leaked to the Guardian that he'd found insufficient evidence and once he was exposed as the source, his card was marked. The reason being that the entire legal basis for the UK attacking Iraq depended on WMD. His testimony could have actually derailed the UK case for war. It is absurd to think that the same people who will knowingly take a course of action leading to hundreds of thousands of deaths in a foreign country on a pretext they know is false, would suddenly balk at one more body. Seth Rich certainly assassinated. Epstein, obviously. It's purely a matter of practicality and necessity.

So lets assess it in such terms. I'd say there is a qualified possibility. The qualified is that I don't think "Left" is a good term for this. We're talking specifically the entrenched Establishment which is not quite the same as the "Left" is, just as "Progressives" are not wholly the same thing as the Left.

That qualification out of the way I'd say it has a low but real chance. I think the play they will try to stick with is lawfare. Imprison him, try to ruin him financially, personal attacks and social exclusion to try and put pressure on his family and home life... IF that doesn't work and he looks like he's heading for candidacy as president there is still the play to "fortify" the electoral process again. That is high risk, especially after last time. But it is probably still less risky than actually trying to kill him which is a huge gamble. Not least because he still I presume has Secret Service protection and those guys are the best there is. I don't think easily suborned either, hopefully.

But in the scenario where all these measures have failed and he is going to be president unless they target him physically, yes, I wouldn't wholly rule it out. And for the comments about this being an age of media, PR fall-out, etc., it's also an age of incredibly sophisticated medical knowledge and technology. There are numerous ways they can kill someone that are very hard to detect. Hell, there's numerous ways you they can just shatter someone's health to the point someone is no longer fit for the role.

But on the downside (for them), the risk is through the roof. Try and fail, you've just handed him the election and also made his number one priority - and that of the US public - to root out the people behind the attempt. Try successfully, and nobody will believe natural causes.

There's also the decreasing faith that the Establishment can protect the assassins. With Seth Rich, whoever killed him could have fairly high confidence that the Clintons could prevent him being investigated or even found. Now, much more is up in the air and there's less certainty that those promising "it's okay, we'll protect you," actually can.

However, these downsides are balanced by necessity. If Trump gets in he's going to tear down a lot of their entrenched powerbase, derail a lot of their plans, he's a wrecking ball for them. A disaster. He was constrained last time by not knowing how Washington worked up close, by needing to play nice to get a second term, by trusting the wrong people. This time he'll go full Augean Stables with DC. And they fear that greatly.

Summary of my take: They have other measures which may work and it may not get to this point. If it did, I'd still only give it 1 in 3. So... I think there could be an attempt, but probably wont be.

They'll assassinate the American economy instead. They are already playing hot potato with the economy for the last 4 years, if Trump wins they just detonate it and blame him for the fallout. Same way they remove his economic achievement through COVID.
Well yes, there's a massive shift in the US economy on its way. It's in the plans. It's quite plausible that they would prefer to hand the giant mess over to the Republicans this term and let them take the fall-out. BUT, they want a uniparty Republican in place. Like a Desantis who will take the hit nobly and follow the gameplan for dealing with the exploding economy. If the storm hits (which it's going to) and Trump is at the helm, who knows what he might do to deal with it. Not the Democrats, that's for sure.
 
Well yes, there's a massive shift in the US economy on its way. It's in the plans. It's quite plausible that they would prefer to hand the giant mess over to the Republicans this term and let them take the fall-out. BUT, they want a uniparty Republican in place. Like a Desantis who will take the hit nobly and follow the gameplan for dealing with the exploding economy. If the storm hits (which it's going to) and Trump is at the helm, who knows what he might do to deal with it. Not the Democrats, that's for sure.
I don't think Trump would do any big changes. He is pretty establishment economy wise, with his only big changes is being more antagonistic with China. Plus an economic disaster would go over multiple years, and prevent discussion over other topics.

I generally can't see Trump doing any of the cool shit people expect him to do. In the end he is basically a Democrat from the 2000 in Clown World.
 
I don't think Trump would do any big changes. He is pretty establishment economy wise, with his only big changes is being more antagonistic with China. Plus an economic disaster would go over multiple years, and prevent discussion over other topics.

I generally can't see Trump doing any of the cool shit people expect him to do. In the end he is basically a Democrat from the 2000 in Clown World.
I agree, kind of. But I think they will want to do some radical changes economy-wise. Gold-seizures, a CBDC, some kind of howling madness that would be restructuring America's own debt, and God only knows what else. Trump wont want to do any of those things, like you say. Where we differ is I'm paranoid enough to think "they" do. Everyone can see the ship is sinking. And they'll want to blame that on the other team. But I think they still want a captain who'll be on their side when the lifeboats get allocated.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Some Dumb Faggot
I don't trust the secret service. No way they're not anymore compromised than the DOJ or the FBI or any other law enforcement agency.
Well I have no personal experience, obviously. The vetting they go through and the safeguards must be extraordinary for their role, though. I'm talking the presidential and related security part. And from what I'd read they took their work extremely seriously. In the event of the assassination of one of their charges investigations if one of them were complicit it could be pretty hard to hide. And you'd need to have a number of them compromised not just one or the unusual behaviour of that one would probably be picked up by the others.

I don't know. I think they're probably quite solid.
 
If they were gonna, he would have been Epstein'd over the Jan 6 thing when they had him in jail and court earlier this year or whatever.

Like what, hes too high profile. You dont do it to the big guy and you dont do it in public.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: frozen_runner
I'm kinda surprised they haven't already assassinated him...

.... Is what I would say, but then it occured to me the reason they wouldn't: because it would make Trump a martyr and probably be the thing that finally triggers the right into full rebellion mode. I mean people already rioted after he just lost an election.

EDIT: Although putting it that way, maybe the right should assassinate Trump and make it look like the left did it.
 
I agree, kind of. But I think they will want to do some radical changes economy-wise. Gold-seizures, a CBDC, some kind of howling madness that would be restructuring America's own debt, and God only knows what else. Trump wont want to do any of those things, like you say. Where we differ is I'm paranoid enough to think "they" do. Everyone can see the ship is sinking. And they'll want to blame that on the other team. But I think they still want a captain who'll be on their side when the lifeboats get allocated.
COVID let them already do the wealth transfer they had in mind. I don't see any other ways to get more money of the civilians without going too far into tyranny, which is a double edged sword.

Honestly I don't see how the USA will fall. "Billions must die" is a funny meme, but people blackpill way too much. But what can happen is some of the elites packing their shit to some island until the economy goes back to track.
 
I wouldn't be surprised if they have the Secret Service do it and pose his body in the most embarrassing way possible.
Choke him out and then hang his nude body and spread a bunch of kiddie porn/ gay porn around.
 
A couple years ago they were meming the idea of "stochastic terrorism" hard. At the time, I assumed it was only an attack on the First Amendment. If someone uses free speech to criticize X, and a person commits a terrorism against X, then the problem is free speech. But now I remember the left always projects, their accusations are always confessions. If they were making noise about stochastic terrorism, it's because they intend to do a stochastic terrorism. So Leftist institutions won't try to assassinate Trump, but they're going to talk about it and hope it happens.
 
No chance in hell. Nobody on the left has the balls to be the next Gavrilo Princips.

It's one thing to sneak up on someone undetected and smack them on the head with a bike lock when surrounded by fellow retards. It's quite another thing to actually kill President Trump by yourself.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: frozen_runner
No, fed approved schizos only go after children and religious services.

It's very rare that one slips the leash like the guy that shot up that baseball game of politicians (and didnt even kill anyone).
 
you mean these votes? I don't think these type of votes go for orange man sadly.


View attachment 5545635
Trump is completely capable of winning an election fair and square - he already did. Don’t cry like a baby until you need to do so and make shit up that hasn’t happened.

Hilary lost by a slim margin; Biden won by a large margin; and in 2024 whoever wins, wins. I’m not rehashing old election fraud shit with anyone.

Just win it fair and square. Get the votes. Not imaginary fake votes for the other guy.

If anyone gets killed then that’s really sad. But I wouldn’t mind if Trump
Proves how tough he is by wrestling a salt water crocodile while wearing lead weights.
 
Trump is completely capable of winning an election fair and square - he already did. Don’t cry like a baby until you need to do so and make shit up that hasn’t happened.

Hilary lost by a slim margin; Biden won by a large margin; and in 2024 whoever wins, wins. I’m not rehashing old election fraud shit with anyone.

Just win it fair and square. Get the votes. Not imaginary fake votes for the other guy.

If anyone gets killed then that’s really sad. But I wouldn’t mind if Trump
Proves how tough he is by wrestling a salt water crocodile while wearing lead weights.
1701878561956.png

"fair and square" lol
 
Well I have no personal experience, obviously. The vetting they go through and the safeguards must be extraordinary for their role, though. I'm talking the presidential and related security part. And from what I'd read they took their work extremely seriously. In the event of the assassination of one of their charges investigations if one of them were complicit it could be pretty hard to hide. And you'd need to have a number of them compromised not just one or the unusual behaviour of that one would probably be picked up by the others.

I don't know. I think they're probably quite solid.
Maybe you're right, but I just think it's incredibly naive to point your finger at the Secret Service and assume they're the last bastion of angels in a sea of demons, that they're the "good ones".

They could totally be weaponized just like the IRS.
 
Back