"Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions

CharliVince_PosterPrint_02_website.jpg

Josh has previously expressed admiration for the Borzoi so a Greyhound or other sighthound makes perfect sense. My original recommendation was the Silken Windhound. As an alternative I also recommended the Pudelpointer thinking Josh might appreciate the versatility of the breed as well as their ability to alert by pointing rather than barking.
 
Maybe I'm talking out of my ass, but I think dogs that are "intelligent"/easy to train tend to also be the dog that need way more stimulation/attention to prevent them doing destructive shit.
usually the most intelligent dogs were also bred for extremely high energy so they would actually sprint around all day working. obviously no dog is smart enough to know how to release pent up energy without being “destructive” when theyre trapped in an apartment.

highly trained herding dogs are absolutely incredible to watch. i went to a herding competition once and was blown away.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Coo Coo Bird
Since the gay men adopting babies convo is relevant atm I came across this the other day predditors just don't understand why people wouldn't be ok with this picture
View attachment 5546374
Nevermind the horror of two faggots buying a baby to then turn around and blatantly use that baby as a billboard is a whole extra layer of disgusting. The comments are full of predditors pretending to not understand how that onsesie is political which is hilarious.
I just don't see the horror in surrogacy and I think the discussion around it is straight-up retarded. If some woman is willing to carry the baby to term, I don't see why anyone would have an issue with it. It's not particularly dangerous and if you want to go down the exploitation line, there are plenty of jobs in America that pay much less and have a significantly higher risk of mortality or injury — aka law enforcement, security, or construction.

This retarded rhetoric about IVF being some abomination in the face of god is beyond fucking stupid. All it is is putting a sperm in an egg and putting in a bitch. This isn't some fucking Chinese dark arts eugenics where DNA is being edited to make super babies. As well as that modern medicine is literally almost entirely built on doing shit that flies in the face of nature.

If you don't want gays raising babies that's fine to take that opinion, but don't make up bullshit rhetoric to justify it.
 
If you don't want gays raising babies that's fine to take that opinion, but don't make up bullshit rhetoric to justify it.
If gays are so fucking homosex and they hate women and want to defy cultural norms biological imperative etc so they can get shit covered dicks then why do they need children? Think about it for half a second you fucking spez
Edit: being gay isn't natural and no matter what the propaganda says you're not born that way. They know this, we know this. If they want to be open hedonists and be gay as fuck then they can deal with the consequences. i.e. not having a family. Sucks to suck degenerate.
 
If gays are so fucking homosex and they hate women and want to defy cultural norms biological imperative etc so they can get shit covered dicks then why do they need children? Think about it for half a second you fucking spez
Edit: being gay isn't natural and no matter what the propaganda says you're not born that way. They know this, we know this. If they want to be open hedonists and be gay as fuck then they can deal with the consequences. i.e. not having a family. Sucks to suck degenerate.
Nigga are you fucking retarded? How the fuck can you argue that being gay isn't natural when there are literally gay fucking penguins as well as a host of other animals. If you want to say it's a mental illness — aka a deviation from the baseline standard of human behavior — that's a reasonable line of argument, but saying it isn't natural is just braindead.

Also how in the fuck are these people being open hedonists, they are literally doing the exact fucking opposite. These aren't some fags in a pride march sucking cock in dog masks. These are just dudes with normal ass jobs trying to raise a family and have a normal existence. Also, the very fucking fact that they are wanting/doing IVF means that they are following their biological imperative.

I know parroting shit without an ounce of rational thought is tempting — and clearly very easy — for you, but my guy, at least think about the shit you write.
 
I know parroting shit without an ounce of rational thought is tempting — and clearly very easy — for you, but my guy, at least think about the shit you write.
This you fucking retard.
Gays reproduce by raping kids.
Also thank you for confirming that gays are basically animals that only know the instinct to coom and will use any hole they can to do so very based of you.
 
Last edited:
I just don't see the horror in surrogacy and I think the discussion around it is straight-up retarded. If some woman is willing to carry the baby to term, I don't see why anyone would have an issue with it. It's not particularly dangerous and if you want to go down the exploitation line, there are plenty of jobs in America that pay much less and have a significantly higher risk of mortality or injury — aka law enforcement, security, or construction.

This retarded rhetoric about IVF being some abomination in the face of god is beyond fucking stupid. All it is is putting a sperm in an egg and putting in a bitch. This isn't some fucking Chinese dark arts eugenics where DNA is being edited to make super babies. As well as that modern medicine is literally almost entirely built on doing shit that flies in the face of nature.

If you don't want gays raising babies that's fine to take that opinion, but don't make up bullshit rhetoric to justify it.
i agree. being mad about ivf doesnt make sense. fags paying for surrogacy is the same as fags adopting, evil, but that doesnt mean surrogacy and adoption are evil in and of themselves.
 
Josh has previously expressed admiration for the Borzoi so a Greyhound or other sighthound makes perfect sense. My original recommendation was the Silken Windhound. As an alternative I also recommended the Pudelpointer thinking Josh might appreciate the versatility of the breed as well as their ability to alert by pointing rather than barking.
Not really too familiar with Pudelpointers or Silken Windhounds but a Borzoi wouldn't be a bad pick either. They shed more and need more attention paid to grooming, but they're also more suited to the colder climes than regular greyhounds. The ones I've met have had a similarly awesome temperament to greyhounds, and they're also just beautiful dogs.

I think the price and availability are a big plus for greyhounds, rehoming an existing dog for next to nothing compared to having to purchase a dog that someone has bred for profit is a massive plus, even if you're not doing it just because you want to do a good thing or whatever.

That all being said, I have no idea about the availability of greyhounds where Josh lives, it might actually be easier for him to get a Borzoi in Serbia or wherever he is now.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: I'm a Silly
i agree. being mad about ivf doesnt make sense. fags paying for surrogacy is the same as fags adopting, evil, but that doesnt mean surrogacy and adoption are evil in and of themselves.
I used to have this sentiment. But then I saw the Shane Dawson do IVF and it changed me. Something about them picking and choose embryos was dystopian.
The gays only have children because its the next step after marriage, in my eyes. I don't see what else a gay man would gain from witnessing the 9 month process of pregnancy and then caring for a newborn. If you want to be a father, adopt some kid.
I was sympathetic to women who can't carry to term but that sorta changed, too. I thought if they have enough money to rent a womb and afford IVF, they can probably adopt, right? Oh right, you get a random kid who isn't your flesh and blood and a newborn. So, surrogacy is rich people jumping through rings to get their happy fantasy life changing moment? I don't understand if the women value family so much why not just adopt some poor crack baby and Blindside the 51 out of them.
Same for the gay men except I feel as if its more about the hubris of creating your own being than anything with them, because gay men gonna be gay men. (I don't want to think about adopted children being molested but yeah acknowledged.)
Idk, all in all with 7 million people on the planet, seems selfish too create new ones when so many people are in foster care.
(Edited because my neighbors are being niggers and I couldn't focus)
 
Last edited:
Watching MATI just wanted to recommend Chihuahuas. Size of a cat with the personality of a dog and a 15-20 year lifespan. Great for alerting you to intruders with zero chance of it mauling children. I wasn’t a fan until I actually had one and can’t recommend them enough. Also they are one of the oldest dog breeds on Earth, being direct descendants of the Techichi.
IMG_3437.jpeg
 
Some interesting UK news for once: https://www.impartialreporter.com/n...ender-recognition-list-less-rigorous-systems/

Summary: The recent changes to the UK's gender recognition list involve removing certain countries and territories due to their less rigorous systems. These changes require individuals who have changed their gender and are coming from these countries to provide medical reports in order to obtain a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC) in the UK. The decision to revise the list, which was last updated in 2011, was described by Equalities Minister Kemi Badenoch as 'long overdue'. The rationale behind these revisions is grounded in fairness and the integrity of the process under the Gender Recognition Act. The new requirements are intended to ensure that those seeking gender recognition in the UK meet the country's criteria, which include being over 18, having a diagnosis of gender dysphoria in the UK, and living in their affirmed gender



Also seeing a lot of dog debate and dobermans are for sure the straightest, most based dog breed.
 
Idk, all in all with 7 million people on the planet, seems selfish too create new ones when so many people are in foster care.
this is what i disagree with. i think its perfectly natural to want your own flesh and blood over someone elses. if you want to adopt thats ok but saying its selfish to want your child to be related to you is ridiculous.

i think a husband and wife choosing surrogacy because the wife cannot carry is fine in the first world. however if its some brazilian third world uterus-mill then the exploitation is obviously wrong. that doesnt mean ivf as a whole is wrong. just like surrogacy, foster homes can be run by an evil person trying to siphon money from the government or a truly loving and generous person.

both scenarios can be good solutions for everyone involved and they can also be exploited by bad actors.

the inverse situation is a sperm bank and i dont think many people have an ethical bone to pick with those.
 
Back