Is it gay for a male vampire to suck out another male’s blood?

[Useful_Mistake]

I mean, yeah, look, I get it, you need to suck to survive, but idk, man, seems kinda gay to me. You are literally sucking off another man.

 

[BirdUp]

no because it involves no ass-fucking or fellatio
however it does risk HIV

 

[WTBOnlineFather]

I thought most modern vampire lore implied this doesn't happen, i.e. it is gay?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

no because it involves no ass-fucking or fellatio
however it does risk HIV

I mean, why not do a little fellatio? I mean, all the blood rushes there, so that’s a very good biting target

 

[The Tall Man]

I mean, why not do a little fellatio? I mean, all the blood rushes there, so that’s a very good biting target

The only gay person is the one getting their dick drained.
It's like prison rules, the one doing it is always straight.

 

[DankSmoker]

Yes. If you want to be a proper vampire you keep a harem of big tiddy goth girls to feed on.

 

[CowPox]

Yeah, cannibalizing another male makes you a fag as well, including if you play ferry ball and crash your plane on a mountain somewhere etc.

 

[BirdUp]

I mean, why not do a little fellatio? I mean, all the blood rushes there, so that’s a very good biting target

dude thats gay

 

[dick brain]

Vampires are gay period.

 

[The King of Squats]

very thought provoking

i guess it depends on how you look at it.

 

[batterybee]

however it does risk HIV

This is something I've thought of tbh, Would vampires be like super spreaders of every possible STD, especially if they have been around for a couple hundred years.
Although, on the otherhand because they're technical dead would the desieses even be able to reproduce inside the vampire or would they just all die off?

 

[Onni Kalsarikännit]

I'm actually surprised that OP isn't BBL.

 

[vomitusdeux]

can vampires have HIV or do they only spread it. they can't die so do they just get really really sick, or is it like that episode of family guy where brian is a sentient herpes sore?

 

[Bondrewddidnothingwrong]

no because it involves no ass-fucking or fellatio
however it does risk HIV

so kissing another man or rubbing your dicks together is also not gay?

 

[KittyGremlin]

Only if he says

I AM HERE TO SUCK.

(your blood)

 

[BirdUp]

so kissing another man or rubbing your dicks together is also not gay?

do i have to list every homosexual act

 

[Bondrewddidnothingwrong]

do i have to list every homosexual act

yes

I know you know them all

 

[BirdUp]

yes

that is frankly absurd

 

[Schwarzwald]

It's been a long time since I've read Dracula, but there is absolutely a sexual connotation to vampirism in the novel in the realm of lust. It actually transcends undertones and borders on overtones, and it's something Stoker was clearly conscious of when laying out the story. It's likely, in terms of how it was written if not necessarily within the narrative world itself, why Dracula never actually 'turned' Renfield, Harker, or any other male character into a vampire, or expressed any genuine interest in doing so, despite the arguable convenience to his plans. He made Renfield into a servant, but it's notable that he never actually turned him or drank his blood. Dracula's brides on the other hand clearly made a target of Harker, to which Dracula expressed rage, furthering the parallels of relational fidelity and sexuality with the act of drinking blood. The existence of Dracula's brides, his fixation on Lucy and Mina, the promiscuity of Dracula's brides in targeting men, as well as Mina's change in personality upon being targeted, heavily suggest a sexual component.

Suffice to say, going back to Dracula in 1897, it is 100% considered a homosexual act for a male vampire to turn another male into a vampire, let alone suck another male's blood. It is also just as likely to spread AIDS as the act of bona fide sodomy. Stoker truly was a man nearly a century ahead of his time.

 

[Pierre D'Olnique]

Araki wants to know your location.