Woman, 38, cries describing finally wanting kids after swearing off marriage

Article | Archive

A 38-year-old woman said she felt “betrayed by feminism” as the terror of wanting a family but ending up alone and childless hit hit home.

A woman said she felt “betrayed by feminism” after deciding she wanted to settle down, have a family and a husband as she approached 39th birthday.
At one point during the interview with Fox News Digital, she broke down crying describing how she feared she would end up alone and childless.

Melissa Persling recently wrote an essay for Business Insider titled, “I’m 38 and single, and I recently realised I want a child. I’m terrified I’ve missed my opportunity.” She said after it went viral in November, hate began to pour in from men telling her that she’s lived a selfish life. Persling has a much different account of her story.

When Persling was 22, she married a traditional man and moved to a rural community in Idaho, where she grew up.
“He wanted a simple life with children and home-cooked meals,” she said. However, Persling – despite coming from a religious Christian background – made it clear to her husband-to-be that she did not want children.

“At that time I felt very strongly I did not want children, that I wasn’t going to be like the traditional housewife. I knew I did want to pursue a career,” she told Fox News Digital in an interview. “And I felt very strongly that that would never change. And I guess I was wrong.”

Persling said both her and her ex thought that love could conquer everything, but after 10 years, it was clear their differences in life goals were irreconcilable. Persling said she became resentful when he would ask for dinner or for his laundry to be done.
“I did little to hide my disdain for our small-town life. He was a good and hardworking man, but I don’t think I made him feel that way,” she said.

At 30, Persling and her ex divorced; she swore off the idea of marriage.

“I told my friends and family I’d never get married again. I needed independence, a fulfilling career, and space to chart my own course, and I didn’t think marriage fit into that vision. I was content to look toward a future without a husband, children, or the trappings of a ‘traditional’ life,‘” she wrote.

As she grew older, however, the fun, carefree lifestyle – being wined and dined, going to parties – began to get old. The pursuit of comfort and self became dull, she said.
When she turned 38, terror began to take over.

“I was panic-stricken. I really thought I’m going to be alone forever. It really scared me. I almost wrote [the article] as sort of a warning to other women. I don’t want people to miss out on the important things in life because they’re just enjoying themselves because I don’t think that that’s ever going to really make you happy,” she said.

She wrote in the article how she felt “urgency” to find a stable relationship and was rethinking about wanting marriage and children.

“I hardly recognised myself,” she wrote in the article. “I also began to feel selfish for spending so much time focusing solely on myself … My very existence started to feel shallow and hollow.”

In retrospect, Persling believed she had some self-discovery and work for herself to do, and it took time to sort through previous trauma. Her parents’ divorce, which she described as coming from “a broken home,” took time to heal and sort through to find out what she really wanted.

“I grew up in a fairly traditional family, but my parents were divorced. And I would say that probably had some effect on my feelings about having a family coming from a broken home certainly has its hardships,” she told Fox News Digital.

At one point, she recalled a man coming over to her in a coffee store who randomly told her not to lose hope – that God had a plan for her.
And then a happy turn to Persling’s story arrived, which she describes as the exception and not the rule for women in her age group. Shortly after penning the article, she dated a man who she previously befriended. They’re already talking about marriage and a future.

She dished on the details: “So it’s a guy that I’ve been friends with, and we’ve always just sort of stayed in touch. And we did go on one date about a year ago, and I told him, ‘I just want to be friends with you.‘”

After her epiphany that she wanted a traditional life – the realisation that he was “the one” hit her like “a ton of bricks.”

“This guy is the one that God’s been preparing for me,” she said.

“I’ve had these relationships since where there were so many butterflies and so many like, ‘Oh my gosh, checking my phone. Did he text?’ And I realised, that’s not love. That’s anxiety. I never knew where I stood with those people. I could never envision a future with those people.”

Persling said she is looking forward to a modest, meaningful and happy future.

“Moving into my future, I’m not going to be travelling. I’m not going to have a lot of extra money. I’m not going to be going out for fancy dinners and I’m OK with that,” she said. “I’m ready for that. I think that’s what’s really going to make me happy. Like I’m so done just making myself happy.”

“You think you’re happy when you’re doing all these things [when you’re single] to make yourself happy. I don’t think you really are. It’s the relationships that make you happy. It’s building something with another person. It’s creating a life with another person, having goals and plans with another person. It’s making other people happy. Making people you love happy. That’s happiness. I really don’t think I will know true happiness until I’m in that place.”

While Persling doesn’t consider herself a feminist, she attributed feminism – in part – as the reason she had thought negatively about marriage.

‘My giant baby did this to me’
“I feel unbelievably betrayed by feminism, and I don’t want to put it on the movement [entirely] because I believe you make your own choices … But I was constantly fed this idea that women can do everything. We don’t really need men … I kind of want to go back to some of those teachers and coaches and say, ‘What did you mean by that? Because we can’t do it all.’”

“I feel like I’m in such a different place now. And I’m so ready for that now. I understand what the sacrifice of marriage is and what the beauty of marriage is now, and I don’t think I appreciated what family means for a long time. I don’t think I truly understood,” she said during the interview. “I don’t care if I ever put on heels and go to a fancy dinner again. That stuff does not matter. I promise you young women it will never make you happy.”
 
>CAN I SAVE HER?
>Load up article
>See video of her talking
>She's not fat
>But her cranium is weirdly shaped
>She's almost bald
>Sorry but looks kinda manly
>But still at least she's not fat and could pop out one heir
>I legitimately can't tell if I could save her or not

View attachment 5560437
I'm gonna need a GENEROUS Dowry.
Her hairline is interesting, but I know from watching a lot of SAHM vloggers, this is usually the result of traction hair loss. She has very long hair and if you pull it back enough, you will end up with something like male pattern baldness. Part of why I try to avoid it unless I am cooking something

Not saying you should save her, just being informative, lol.
 
Dudes have a lot more time to have kids.
Al Pacino had a kid this year and he's 83 years old, women can't do that.
They actually don't though. Any adjusted woman would not want a 83 year old to father her children because children need their fathers. Yes, there is no guarantee if you fuck a 33 year old he will be around to raise your children 10 years from then, but you sure have a better fucking shot. Women who actively want such a thing should be treated with suspect.
 
Many such cases, unfortunately. Past, present, and future.

Dr. Drew did a short-lived podcast series called All About Women which I, of course, skipped based on the name and the fact that Drew, who I greatly respect, is also kind of a pussy. He later repurposed the episodes for one of his other podcasts, and I was glad he did. He interviewed a series of successful women, some of them CEOs, and he asked them a number of questions about their careers and lives.

The number one thing all of them said-all of them-was that they resented feminism for lying to them about being able to have it all: a career and a family and whatever else you want out of life. Most of them had at least one kid, but they paid dearly for them through in vitro fertilization.

All young women should be told the truth about biology and its limits. But I've come to see the "focus on your career" thing as older women directly sabotaging younger women as a form of intersexual competition. It won't change until feminism falls out of fashion.
 
What’s the use complaining now that you want kids? You had a chance to but you just never took it. I wouldn’t even blame feminism on something like this, this was just personal decisions. These types of articles are benign considering the state of the world we live in.
 
All young women should be told the truth about biology and its limits. But I've come to see the "focus on your career" thing as older women directly sabotaging younger women as a form of intersexual competition. It won't change until feminism falls out of fashion.
This is true. I just also wish I hadn't been married to a man who also bought wholesale into this. My choice, my failure, but I hate when men say it is all women's fault. I wanted what a lot of you wanted out of women and I was punished severely by men for it.
 
Dudes have a lot more time to have kids.
Al Pacino had a kid this year and he's 83 years old, women can't do that.


A narrow reproductive window is as good a reason as any to just randomly reproduce especially for women in the habit of poor decision making with a distinct lack of future-time orientation.

Nature gives women that jolt of baby crazy for last call.. but hey, a 120V magic wand gives a pretty good jolt back too.
 
Many of my acquaintances rushed into marriage and having kids because "what would the SOCIETY think", and now they're all fat, bald and depressed at the beautiful ages between 30 and 35.
I love this cope from the childless. "You just want children because SOCIETY told you to."

No, retard, people want children because it is their prime directive as an organism to reproduce.
 
"I just need to find myself"

"I just need time to deal with my trauma"

"I just need space right now"

"I'm just not feeling it"


These are all neat, ambiguous "life hack" excuses women use to get out of stable relationships guilt-free. They sound so benign, to say "no" to them would be cruel, right?

What they really mean is "You're 90% of what I wanted, I want 100%"

They are ways to not take a good thing for fear something "better" is just around the corner.

What if they say "yes" and have a kid? And then the very next day, an even BETTER man walks by? One they could have had?

So, they use these as copes to mask their selfishness. I'm not being picky, I'm not being arrogant, I'm not wasting time I don't have, I'm "dealing with TRAUMA and trying to sort out my FEELINGS"

Well, that cutesy excuse may fool your friends, your family, your prospective partners, into backing off as to not make you upset.

But nature doesn't give a fuck.

When the clock strikes 12, party's over.

You can't "but but but my TRUAMA" it.

Too many have been strung along by feminism in particular, but society in general, that they have all the time and options in the world.
 
Her hairline is interesting, but I know from watching a lot of SAHM vloggers, this is usually the result of traction hair loss. She has very long hair and if you pull it back enough, you will end up with something like male pattern baldness. Part of why I try to avoid it unless I am cooking something

Not saying you should save her, just being informative, lol.
I was really just thinking about who she reminds me of because it feels very reminicent of a pop culture character. Finally hit me BRIDGET JONES. And then I google image searched Bridget because I haven't heard about that movie in decades...
bridgetjones.jpg
Gen Z readers you want to know something that will blow your minds? This was considered FAT in 2001 America. In my Berenstein Bears universe Zellweger looked like Amberlynn Reid, that's how damn high American Beauty standards were that she was a joke to be looked down upon. I don't know if "Heroin chic" played a factor in this but I'm in awe how much society has changed.
 
I love this cope from the childless. "You just want children because SOCIETY told you to."

No, retard, people want children because it is their prime directive as an organism to reproduce.
There is also something fundamentally wrong about birth control. Sex is the most intimate experience you can have with another person. To disgrace it by saying it is only about me cooming is insulting and degrading.
 
Do dudes also enter a dick-crazy breeding mode around 40?
Asking for a friend.
Different for men. They get the impulse for sex at the start of puberty but it hits differently because men have much longer fertility windows than women. 80 year old men can still have kids,; it's impossible for 80 year old women.
 
Different for men. They get the impulse for sex at the start of puberty but it hits differently because men have much longer fertility windows than women. 80 year old men can still have kids,; it's impossible for 80 year old women.
A few have suggested, and it's worth at least a thought, that feminism's inability to not eventually start bashing men is a reflection of jealousy at this biological reality - that women have a "sell by" date when it comes to fertility while men are technically capable of producing viable sperm right up until death. And that withholding sex until the man is "perfect" or put your eggs in a freezer so you can still be a mother at 80, are ways to redress this "unfairness".
 
There is also something fundamentally wrong about birth control. Sex is the most intimate experience you can have with another person. To disgrace it by saying it is only about me cooming is insulting and degrading.
I feel that's the wonderful irony within Feminism, at the very least within this issue it psyop'd women into thinking more like men.

Everything you just wrote, that's bullshit from the male monkeybrain I can only imagine the most religious of men ever talking like that. We just want to COOM, cooming is how we go to sleep and blow off steam. It's the male sex that invents creations as vulgar as "Fifi-Bag" and Fleshlight. We want to spill our seed and leave, biologically that's what we were made to do. Men of history would inseminate, leave and probably die in a war. Do you think Genghis Khan cared about his HUNDREDS of children? Give me a break.

It's women who psychologically and biologically need to uphold sex as this holy rite of passage. At most the average mother only gets several chances to make new humans. This is why the female orgasm lasts way longer than men, because numbers wise the average man will COOM thousands of times before he even hits the age of 16, where a woman might only have sex two or three times in her life and that's all she needed because she had her children.

And all this radical mind fucking of human perspectives has just devastated us. We're all complex with ridiculous conflicting emotions. For men we want sex but we don't want to marry & reproduce with loose sluts, we love the game of having to tediously please a high maintenance pain in the ass until she gives up THE CHINA. And for women they love the power dynamic, how fun it is to make a hulking man insane as he tries to keep you content.

This post is getting too long and please send out the AUTISM and DEVIANT stickers. But really the point I want to make is 20th Century was too damn radical for its own good. They decided they needed to change human morals but they never considered that perhaps the morals were developed for a reason. And the backlash will come, hell there's a portion of feminist women who want that backlash. Look no further than The Handmaid's Tale where a ugly feminist tickles her clit while imagining she's turned into a breeding sow for backwards fundie Christians! :lit:
 
Back