Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Strix454]

I REALLY wonder who told the Rage Twig he’s got expertise in male/female relationship dynamics, especially considering he wifed the first girl who saw his pee-pee. The fact that nobody in his life has corrected him on this tells you that everyone is just trying not to trigger another one of his seething tantrums.

He came up with this himself I think. He has always had this thing where he wanted to involve himself in other people's relationships. Particularly the relationships of E-THOTs. But I've always tended to think its more out of a voyeurism desire than an interest in actually helping anyone.

Last winter, he started incorporating this idea that he wanted to save men from becoming incels and "redpil". That men needed to realize that there were all these great women out there waiting for them. I never could figure that one out. Especially given his support for MIGTOW drexel. He eventually invented a gaslight narrative that Drexel was a "reformed" redpill guy who told stories of his past to help young men escape what happened to him.

Even more recently, he realized the disconnect between his virgin marriage to the first woman who looked at him and claiming to be a relationship expert. So we got another gaslight story.

By buying drinks for random strangers at gay90s and presumably elsewhere, he was able to get people to hit on either him or his wife. They would play along and then turn them down. As he has explained it, doing that has given him tremendous and perhaps unique insight into modern relationship dynamics.

I don't know what motivates him in this direction. Anytime he tries to do relationship content on streams, the results are horrible. I suppose its perfect content for the "wine moms".

 

[RotPockets]

I posted one a while back, it might be it

Post it clean without the spoiler and add this.

https://files.catbox.moe/kmf0mb.mp3

 

[MudPeople]

I don't know what motivates him in this direction. Anytime he tries to do relationship content on streams, the results are horrible. I suppose its perfect content for the "wine moms".

I can really imagine Rekieta sipping wine in a an afternoon erotic bookclub of wine moms. He has the time, since he's a non-practicing lawyer.

 

[miss ethanol]

By buying drinks for random strangers at gay90s and presumably elsewhere, he was able to get people to hit on either him or his wife. They would play along and then turn them down. As he has explained it, doing that has given him tremendous and perhaps unique insight into modern relationship dynamics.

This is something that irritates me. Before, Nick said that he had no clue how modern dating works and Drexel said that Nick was lucky to not be out looking for someone, now Nick, the guy that was a virgin with rage and married the first woman that touched his balldo, suddenly knows how to flirt and has women and couples hitting on him every time he goes out. This is cope for being a loser in highschool and college.

I can really imagine Rekieta sipping wine in a an afternoon erotic bookclub of wine moms. He has the time, since he's a non-practicing lawyer.

Well you will be happy to know that he actually and unironically did a review of fifty shades of gray and praised the use of food as a metaphor for some shit.

 

[Strix454]

At about 2:10 Nick starts talking about there being a whole bunch of different "levels" and "steps" to "the whole beyond monogamy thing". To Nick, an "open marriage" is really extreme and out there and are not a good thing. Meaning of course that those "steps and levels" not mentioned are probably better and ok.

He specifically only mentions "tee hee we get drunk and..." as being one of those "steps and levels". He also avoided really explaining what made "open marriage" somehow worse to him than swinging or being a cuck.

 

[JackoVerde]

At about 2:10 Nick starts talking about there being a whole bunch of different "levels" and "steps" to "the whole beyond monogamy thing". To Nick, an "open marriage" is really extreme and out there and are not a good thing. Meaning of course that those "steps and levels" not mentioned are probably better and ok.

He specifically only mentions "tee hee we get drunk and..." as being one of those "steps and levels". He also avoided really explaining what made "open marriage" somehow worse to him than swinging or being a cuck.

Nick: see see see, null these farmers are pozloading my negholep, but nothing is happening, cant i make a joke, they say i do swinging with my wife, we are 100% monogamous and always have been.
by the way, i love you null and want you to have all the success and make a trillion dollars.
also don't ban anybody, i dont want anybody to be banned, i just want you to know people are breaking the rules.

 

[Averagest Redditor]

Even my Youtube home screen is memeing on the big-nosed, alcoholic retard. The algorithm is on to you, son.

 

[Pomniman]

I’ve always loved this kind of thinking because it’s usually a sign that someone misunderstood what the theory is and is trying to be a nihilist with their analysis.
While death of the author is a theory that suggests the author’s background and intent should not factor into an interpretation of a work, it does not ignore textual evidence or cultural relevance.
Like, using Nick’s American Beauty interpretation. There is quite literally zero evidence that Lester was “bettering himself” as in the context of the film, his life and reputation are utterly destroyed, and Lester himself is very clearly an unreliable narrator. There’s also the cultural relevance. While our society has degraded quite a bit since the movie was made, we are still not at a point where society deems any of those things as “bettering.” Death of the Author encourages you to have your own interpretation, but it does not encourage you to ignore society and cultural norms, in fact you’re supposed to keep them very much in mind when forming an analysis.

We also have Nick’s “most beautiful part of the movie.” The scene that he believes is the thesis of the movie. “In the end, he made sure that she would be alright without him, which is what every father does.” This fails the textual context requirement almost immediately as at no point in the movie is Lester concerned with how his daughter will be with or without him, and at no point in the movie are we shown steps taken to prepare her for a life without him. Rather, his downward spiral is starting because she’s no longer as active in his life as he once was. It would be more correct to say he was making himself alright without her then the other way around. It would also again, force us to assume that everything Lester shows us as the narrator is reliably, which it most certainly isn’t, or that his death within the context of the film is something they can be seen as redeeming.

Unironically, Dick’s joke of “if he fucked that girl he wouldn’t have died” is a better death of the author interpretation than anything Nick has ever said about the film, and it wasn’t even intended to be an interpretation.

You could call it nihilistic in a limited sense, but it's more of a self-serving kind of sophistry to use the theory in that specific way where everything can be overridden. It's not that they're truly ignoring society or the text itself so much as using the theory to declare themselves the ultimate arbiters of morality and culture to the point where their individual subjective viewpoint dominates all other considerations; in a way that's more philosophically Satanic or Luciferian than strictly nihilistic because the will of the individual becomes their new moral system (this of course leads to depravity, but that's beside the point). Nicki sometimes likes to pretend he's a libertarian and in that context "self-improvement" can be defined as attaining the means to defeat "the system" (when Kevin Spacey uses the threat of a fake sexual harassment claim to "stick it to the man") through assertive outside-the-box thinking. To someone like Nicki who views society as the ultimate form of evil being able to leverage its own mechanisms against it is interpreted as heroic and any price the "hero" later pays for taking such transgressions too far can be retroactively rationalized as the "enemy" known as society being more insidious and wily than the "hero" could've anticipated.

These are obviously extremely delusional thoughts to set against the backdrop of a movie about a cuck who tries to have sex with his daughter's teen classmate and gets killed by a closet fag, but you can work out how Nicki got there through his particular brand of retardation.

 

[Nod Flenders]

At about 2:10 Nick starts talking about there being a whole bunch of different "levels" and "steps" to "the whole beyond monogamy thing". To Nick, an "open marriage" is really extreme and out there and are not a good thing. Meaning of course that those "steps and levels" not mentioned are probably better and ok.

He specifically only mentions "tee hee we get drunk and..." as being one of those "steps and levels". He also avoided really explaining what made "open marriage" somehow worse to him than swinging or being a cuck.

Laugh all you want, Nick. Your divorce is inevitable.

 

[JackoVerde]

Laugh all you want, Nick. Your divorce is inevitable.

Kayla doesn't want to be a single mom of five kids. so she's tolerating nick because she doesn't have a lot of options as a single mom of five kids.

 

[Fools Idol]

I’ve always loved this kind of thinking because it’s usually a sign that someone misunderstood what the theory is and is trying to be a nihilist with their analysis.
While death of the author is a theory that suggests the author’s background and intent should not factor into an interpretation of a work, it does not ignore textual evidence or cultural relevance.
Like, using Nick’s American Beauty interpretation. There is quite literally zero evidence that Lester was “bettering himself” as in the context of the film, his life and reputation are utterly destroyed, and Lester himself is very clearly an unreliable narrator. There’s also the cultural relevance. While our society has degraded quite a bit since the movie was made, we are still not at a point where society deems any of those things as “bettering.” Death of the Author encourages you to have your own interpretation, but it does not encourage you to ignore society and cultural norms, in fact you’re supposed to keep them very much in mind when forming an analysis.

We also have Nick’s “most beautiful part of the movie.” The scene that he believes is the thesis of the movie. “In the end, he made sure that she would be alright without him, which is what every father does.” This fails the textual context requirement almost immediately as at no point in the movie is Lester concerned with how his daughter will be with or without him, and at no point in the movie are we shown steps taken to prepare her for a life without him. Rather, his downward spiral is starting because she’s no longer as active in his life as he once was. It would be more correct to say he was making himself alright without her then the other way around. It would also again, force us to assume that everything Lester shows us as the narrator is reliably, which it most certainly isn’t, or that his death within the context of the film is something they can be seen as redeeming.

Unironically, Dick’s joke of “if he fucked that girl he wouldn’t have died” is a better death of the author interpretation than anything Nick has ever said about the film, and it wasn’t even intended to be an interpretation.

Nick clearly connects with the character in the worst ways possible. To Nick, Lester isn't just unformattable relatable but rather someone to emulate. His interpretation makes a lot of sense when you factor in that Nick is a depressed alcoholic going through a mid life crisis who feels resentful of the family obligations that stole his youth.

The "bettering himself" comment is interesting and very telling of where Nick is at right now. To Nick, Lester choosing to be selfish dipshit is him bettering himself. Nick is going down the same self destructive path. Nick is so lost right now that he can't even being to understand how someone actually betters themselves. I mean the guy is drinking and starving himself to death because he wants to be thinner.

Nick's position on the end of the film is weird. I assume Nick's point is that Lester's fuck ups have prepared his daughter for life by showing how stupid and retarded everything can be. That's not only not in the film it also isn't how real life works. People raised by poor parents often end up repeating the same mistakes mom and dad did. You teach kids by doing not telling. Nick has taught his kids that success doesn't come from hard work but rather by getting drunk and streaming yourself being an embarrassment.

I've never thought Nick was stupid but this last year or so has really changed my mind.

 

[Associate Rick]

Kayla doesn't want to be a single mom of five kids. so she's tolerating nick because she doesn't have a lot of options as a single mom of five kids.

She won't be alone though, it'll be Kayla and 'Uncle ' Drexel.

 

[Strix454]

I assume Nick's point is that Lester's fuck ups have prepared his daughter for life by showing how stupid and retarded everything can be.

Thats an amazing conclusion considering that the daughter (16) is planning at the end of the film to run away to New York with a high school drug dealer to live on his $40,000 drug fortune. Yeah. Two dumb suburban 16 year old kids with no education living in New York as runaways with just a little bit of money.
How can anyone see that kind of thought process representing someone who is "prepared for life"?


----------------------
RICKY
If I had to go to New York. To live.
Tonight. Would you come with me?

JANE
Yes.

ANGELA
You guys can't be serious.
(to Jane)
You're just a kid. And he's like, a
mental case. You'll end up living in a
box on the street.

JANE
I'm no more a kid than you are!
( to Ricky)
We can use my plastic surgery money.

RICKY
We won't have to. I have over forty
thousand dollars. And I know people in
the city who can help us get set up.

ANGELA
What, other drug dealers?

RICKY
Yes.

ANGELA
Jane, you'd be out of your mind to go
with him.

JANE
Why do you even care?

ANGELA
Because you're my friend!

RICKY
She's not your friend. She's somebody you
use to feel better about yourself.

ANGELA
Go fuck yourself, psycho!

JANE
You shut up, bitch!

ANGELA
Jane! He is a freak!

JANE
Well, then so am I! And we'll always be
freaks and we'll never be like other
people. And you'll never be a freak
because you're just too perfect.

ANGELA
Oh, yeah? Well, at least I'm not ugly.

RICKY
Yes, you are. And you're boring. And
you're totally ordinary. And you know it.


ANGELA
You two deserve each other.

 

[JackoVerde]

She won't be alone though, it'll be Kayla and 'Uncle ' Drexel.

with drexels track record, when the first daughter turns 18, it'll be son inlaw drexel

 

[4stardaysbahbe]

with drexels track record, when the first daughter turns 18, it'll be son inlaw drexel

With drexels track record it'll be the first son in a skirt when he hits 18. He wants those trannies too

 

[Mordecai "3 Finger" Brown]

I'm sorry, this is only very tangentially Nick related, but wasn't sure where else to post this.

Was watching a YT clip from Stuttering Craig's Sidescrollers podcast with Razorfist discussing Jirard The Completionist's response vid to his charity fraud allegations.

Stuttering Craig brought up a tweet ragging on Jirard simps from CAMELCAST OFFICIAL, referring to the tweet being from "Camelot's booking agent".



CAMELCAST OFFICIAL Twitter

There's no way Camelot actually employs a "booking agent" is there?

I'm assuming this is a joke right or a business front?

Or is this some sort of Twitter ban evasion ploy like EVS used to continue tweeting from a "business" account?

The account's from 2014 which seems old for a sock.

There's also some stupid clip on his recent timeline showing a German shepherd, which I've assuming might be his dog?

 

[elb]

Or is this some sort of Twitter ban evasion ploy like EVS used to continue tweeting from a "business" account?

That’s my understanding

 

[Fools Idol]

Thats an amazing conclusion considering that the daughter (16) is planning at the end of the film to run away to New York with a high school drug dealer to live on his $40,000 drug fortune. Yeah. Two dumb suburban 16 year old kids with no education living in New York as runaways with just a little bit of money.
How can anyone see that kind of thought process representing someone who is "prepared for life"?

It's the only thing that sort of makes sense. There's this weird thing that stupid alcoholics do where they romanticise their poor decisions by saying it's all life experience or some shit and you should take their life as an example of what not to do. It doesn't work like that with children, kid often just end up like their parents and the best way to prepare them for the future is to be a good morally upstanding person.

It's hard to describe but if you've ever met a person like this you'd know what I'm mean. They act like stupid irresponsible retards and just assume that their kids are going to be better than them.

 

[Hot Dog]

Since the thread kept bringing it up I sat down and watched the movie for the first time. It comes across as oscar bait nonsense and mildly entertaining at points but all of the characters in the movie are parody and horrible people. Perfect for english major drama student retards like Balldo. If he sees his family even remotely how the family is portrayed in the movie he's fucked, especially being stuck as Lester. The only redeeming thing Lester bothered to do was not bang the girl at the end, when he stopped being a dejected fuck up for 5 seconds to wake the fuck up and be an adult for a change, but by then it was too late.

Did Nick have his own asparagus plate dinner where he rebelled against the family unit to show what a big man he is? Is that why they don't eat dinner together anymore? All this drinking and stupid shit so Nick can fawn over a drama bait movie from the late 90s and say "wow man that's so me dood like fuck the social construct maaaannnn".

His kids probably do hate him like Lester's did because he's a weak asshole, and everyone is so ungrateful to him over all of the sacrifices he (and by he I mean his mommy and daddy) made for them. You put yourself there, genius. Same as Lester did.

 

[Pippa's Greasy KB]

The only redeeming thing Lester bothered to do was not bang the girl at the end, when he stopped being a dejected fuck up for 5 seconds to wake the fuck up and be an adult for a change, but by then it was too late.

Remember, Nick said to Dick that had he fucked the girl, Lester would have lived. Does that mean Nick believes that would have been the right move? Cause to some people to live in degeneracy is better than die with honor.