IBM Diversity Efforts Targeted by Stephen Miller’s Legal Group


  • America First Legal seeks EEOC probe of IBM DEI practices
  • Legal group claims IBM discriminates against White men
Former Trump adviser Stephen Miller’s America First Legal has requested the nation’s top federal civil rights agency investigate IBM Corp. over diversity-focused employment and executive pay policies that the conservative group says comprise illegal sex and race discrimination.
In a letter to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission on Tuesday, AFL cited video footage of IBM’s CEO Arvind Krishna and IBM subsidiary Red Hat Inc. CEO Paul Cormier’s statements connecting executive pay to advancing diversity, equity, and inclusion practices as proof for its claims of violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
The complaint adds to the nearly two dozen inquiries on various companies that AFL has sent to the EEOC, which has yet to respond to the group’s allegations that DEI efforts violate Title VII’s ban against race discrimination. The AFL letters, which have often focused on DEI programs’ overall legality rather than highlighting executives’ roles, have previously targeted high profile companies and organizations including NASCAR, Macy’s Inc., Major League Baseball, Morgan Stanley, and Starbucks Corp.
The work of Miller’s AFL to challenge policies in areas from immigration to LGBTQ+ rights to DEI is widely viewed as helping to lay the groundwork for the legal work of a second Trump administration.
The video cited by AFL of Krishna and Cormier discussing diversity was posted online to X, formerly known as Twitter, on Monday by O’Keefe Media Group CEO James O’Keefe, former head of conservative media organization Project Veritas.
Krishna says in the video that corporate executives’ bonuses can be affected if they don’t meet DEI goals.
Cormier said there were “multiple leaders over the last year plus that were held accountable to the point that they’re no longer here at Red Hat because they weren’t willing to live up to the standards we set in this space.”
AFL requested that the EEOC use its discretionary powers to file a “commissioner charge” against IBM and Red Hat. Such charges can be filed by any of the five members of the agency’s leadership panel and don’t require employees or applicants to submit a discrimination charge to the agency.
Commissioner charges are still relatively unusual, though that may be changing. There were a total of 29 filed in fiscal year 2022, a jump from the three filed in 2021.
In addition to the video posted to X, AFL in its letter also pointed to IBM’s 2022 ESG report which includes an “annual incentive program” intending to “continue to include a diversity modifier” affirming management’s commitment to DEI practices to “close the gap in executive representation,” which it claims is proof of IBM’s use of illegal quotas.
“Rarely do you have such extreme, blatant statements on video documenting the extent to which this is happening everywhere. Apparently, based on the video and the publicly available material on its website, the senior leadership at IBM is wholly committed to discriminating against Americans as a matter of formal corporate policy. This cannot stand,“ Gene Hamilton, AFL’s Vice President and General Counsel said in a statement emailed to Bloomberg Law.
AFL also sent a letter to the chairman of the board and board of directors at IBM, “reminding them of their fiduciary duties and waste of corporate assets to propel this illegal, racially discriminatory agenda.”
A representative for IBM didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

The video in question

 
I worked at a place not long ago where the HR team asked me to filter white males out of a list of candidates I was going through to hire someone. I said that sounded illegal and they shut up, but they acted real strange to me after that.

There's a lot of talk that ESG is going away, but it's getting way way worse like they're doubling down on it now.
 
There's a lot of talk that ESG is going away, but it's getting way way worse like they're doubling down on it now.
They're likely to double, triple and qaudruple down now that the shit is getting fed and judicial challenges. shovel as much die coal into the grifter boiler before its regulated away. grift baby grift full steam!
 
They're likely to double, triple and qaudruple down now that the shit is getting fed and judicial challenges. shovel as much die coal into the grifter boiler before its regulated away. grift baby grift full steam!
I'm sure there are a fair amount of grifters caught up in the mix, but you'd be surprised how many people honestly want to be "change agents" in a world and society that they've been trained (and in some cases groomed, unfortunately) to see as intrinsically and fundamentally wrong, all due to "systemic" issues that can all be fixed if just the right policies are implemented and all the bad people are made to go away.
 
I'm sure there are a fair amount of grifters caught up in the mix, but you'd be surprised how many people honestly want to be "change agents" in a world and society that they've been trained (and in some cases groomed, unfortunately) to see as intrinsically and fundamentally wrong, all due to "systemic" issues that can all be fixed if just the right policies are implemented and all the bad people are made to go away.
Especially in the corporate world, they don't even have to believe in what they're doing to want to be a prominent "change agent" - they just want something they can hang their hat on at the end of the year when reviews and bonuses are being considered.
 
Today's IBM is nothing more than a Indian consulting firm. It's hard to imagine that it's the same company that popularized both the mainframe and the personal computer.
Unfortunately true. They aren't the same company that got us to the moon or made the cell processor that powered a entire console generation. Outsourcing has killed their innovation
 
Today's IBM is nothing more than a Indian consulting firm. It's hard to imagine that it's the same company that popularized both the mainframe and the personal computer.
Bizarre that at one point they had the opportunity to buy both Intel and Microsoft -- both companies went hat in hand to IBM in the early 1980s -- and turned them both down. The issue may have been antitrust, but I suppose idiocy in management can't be ruled out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Buttigieg2020
I'm sure there are a fair amount of grifters caught up in the mix, but you'd be surprised how many people honestly want to be "change agents" in a world and society that they've been trained (and in some cases groomed, unfortunately) to see as intrinsically and fundamentally wrong, all due to "systemic" issues that can all be fixed if just the right policies are implemented and all the bad people are made to go away.
i dont know anyone who does that shit for free on their own time. even the unpaid volunteers at ngos are doing it for the resume with the hope of becoming a 6 figure salary director one day.
 
Today's IBM is nothing more than a Indian consulting firm. It's hard to imagine that it's the same company that popularized both the mainframe and the personal computer.
When you hire pajeets in management or hiring positions, they only hire other pajeets. Same situation is happening or beginning to happen with every other tech company.
 
i dont know anyone who does that shit for free on their own time. even the unpaid volunteers at ngos are doing it for the resume with the hope of becoming a 6 figure salary director one day.
Revolutionaries would--people who have been told throughout their formative years that this is their time, that the world is ripe for an upheaval that they can be a part of, and even if their efforts aren't appreciated or understood in their day, at least they're on the right side of history (which is moving inevitably towards one inevitable outcome; Karl Marx called Communism "the riddle of history, solved").
 
Back