US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Informative
Reactions: ThisIsGonnaBeGood, The Shredder, ActualCracker and 120 others
Click to expand...
I'm surprised she didn't pull the "I'm a black woman therefore I have precedent on everything."

I know it's a stay but I don't know if it resets the clock. If it does, the MAL case gets priority, and the judge there looks like she's just trying to stop the DC court from getting in before the election. Maybe they'll try and speed up the NY and GA cases even though there's nothing there either, or their hail mary is make Trump take a plea on a misdemeanor just so they can say he's a criminal.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Cyber Floyd, The Nothingness and Vyse Inglebard
One of the most interesting theories I ever heard about JFK is Mossad killed him because he was cucking them out of nukes, and LBJ was happy to help them get it. It also segues into explaining the USS Liberty incident, as evidence around declassified memos and unusual movement of atom bombs and bombers being put in high alert BEFORE the attack happen point to LBJ and Israel having planned to frame Egypt for it as a way to enter the war (the US Embassy on Egypt got word to DFE and shut it down just as the attack happened, only to then be given a "lol false alarm guys also don't mention it to anyone")

It helps to remember that Israel and Jews in general are extremely tight on the whole "G-d's chosen goyim always second" so they would betray their allies on a whim if the opportunity was good enough. And Biden's annoying Department of State pressures towards Israel + the new wave of actual, honest-believe-the-propaganda progressives who are quick to side with the browns over Israel would make them turn on a whim.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: 6thRanger, MrJokerRager, Pig Cups and 9 others
mandatorylurk said:
I'm surprised she didn't pull the "I'm a black woman therefore I have precedent on everything."

I know it's a stay but I don't know if it resets the clock.
Click to expand...

Its a full clock stop. If the Supreme Court comes back and says they can proceed with the trial, then the clocks restart. So that initial date of March 4th is poofed, its gone, push it back however long it takes to resolve this issue.

Then push it back some more because there will be other ways to delay the DC trial, and have no doubt, the DC trial is the trial. The jury, the judge, and the appellate judges are all frothing with TDS and ready to execute, it is the nexus of their railroad plans and has a zero percent chance of going awry if allowed to proceed. Its also the trial that will tie Trump to Jan 6th, not legally - they haven't charged that - but enough in the media to make the smear stick.

The Uniparty is laser focused on the DC trial, everything else is in distant fourth priority to them.

mandatorylurk said:
If it does, the MAL case gets priority, and the judge there looks like she's just trying to stop the DC court from getting in before the election.
Click to expand...

The 'problem' with Judge Cannon is that she asks questions like "How many times have you filed two indictments, in two different venues, on one person in the span of a month?" and "How can you expect to go to trial with this much complicated discovery material, much of which is classified?" or "Nobody has ever tried charges like this before in history, and you want to speedrun it?" All of which throw major wrenches into the DOJ's plan over and over again as they trip over their feet to try and explain why they are breaking court rules and their own internal rules.

I don't think Judge Cannon is in the tank for Trump, I just think that when the political prosecution is this blatant even the most standard degree of judicial concern could be mistaken for bias. She is just asking basic questions that any judge should be asking, and holding the government to their standards while protecting the rights of the accused, which is the entire point of a legal inquiry.

Bottom line, Judge Cannon isn't going along with the DOJ, so they've put this case on the back burner. It isn't going anywhere soon.

mandatorylurk said:
Maybe they'll try and speed up the NY and GA cases even though there's nothing there either
Click to expand...

The essential problems with both the NY and GA criminal cases is that they are being spearheaded by dumb niggers. When I say that, I mean dumb even by pavement ape standards. You haven't heard anything about NY for months because that case is dead, simple as. Twerk'n Jerk Fanni is watching her case fall apart like a cheap weave, because she decided to try making this a RICO case with 19+ defendants, which even a competent prosecutor couldn't finish before Election day. Of 2026.

Both cases are nothing, nobody cares, not even the DOJ.

mandatorylurk said:
their hail mary is make Trump take a plea on a misdemeanor just so they can say he's a criminal.
Click to expand...

He would die first.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: 6thRanger, Dracula's Spirit Animal, Pig Cups and 9 others
Random Internet Person said:
View attachment 5562765


Click to expand...
Useful_Mistake said:
"Justices will review lower-court ruling on access to abortion pill"

"The Supreme Court on Wednesday morning agreed to review a ruling by a federal appeals court that would significantly restrict (but not eliminate altogether) access to a drug used in medication abortions, which account for over half of all abortions performed in the United States."

Click to expand...
That is concerning. They usually bundle to contentious topics together because they are going to do split decisions with one decision each going to the respective sides of the aisle. It confuses the media who report both so it makes everyone simultaneously happy in pissed and so the emotions just negate eachother. My gut reaction, which I hope is wrong, is that they will condemn the Capitol rioters while tossing the abortion pill out as a way to make the right less bitchy.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Horrifying
  • Like
Reactions: Confused Doggo, Pig Cups, Justa Grata Honoria and 9 others
WelfareNiggerQueen said:
Alright. How influential is Taylor Swift really? I'm not gay, I don't listen to modern country or whatever the fuck she does now.
She's clearly going to be the Democrat's (uniparty's) top shill during the General Elections.
Click to expand...
Really depends. Not all of her fame translates 1:1 to influence, there are a lot of women who are just dumb enough to think she's a real girl boss but still think her politics are dumb (though she manages to influence them in other ways like by convincing them childless lifestyle = happy). Sadly though there are fuckin millions of retarded people who think she walks on water or some shit and really do buy into her pouty whining about evil Blompf
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Justa Grata Honoria, Uranus Pink, The Nothingness and 2 others
Gehenna said:
That is concerning. They usually bundle to contentious topics together because they are going to do split decisions with one decision each going to the respective sides of the aisle. It confuses the media who report both so it makes everyone simultaneously happy in pissed and so the emotions just negate eachother. My gut reaction, which I hope is wrong, is that they will condemn the Capitol rioters while tossing the abortion pill out as a way to make the right less bitchy.
Click to expand...
I saw this and I think it might be the opposite, because its more good will to let 1/6 people get justice (and just push Trump past the election so the voter decides), and then the abortion pill is allowed so women can stop acting like they'll never be able to kill a baby ever again.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Netizennameless, naaaaiiiiillllll!!!, Pig Cups and 4 others
WelfareNiggerQueen said:
Alright. How influential is Taylor Swift really? I'm not gay, I don't listen to modern country or whatever the fuck she does now.
She's clearly going to be the Democrat's (uniparty's) top shill during the General Elections.
Click to expand...
How influential can Time Magazine’s Person of The Year really be? Most I’ve heard is that she really pushes young people to go register, and she practically has a cult of personality .
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: The Nothingness, Cyber Floyd, Vyse Inglebard and 1 other person
Random Internet Person said:
How influential can Time Magazine’s Person of The Year really be? Most I’ve heard is that she really pushes young people to go register, and she practically has a cult of personality .
Click to expand...
Probably a slight influence. She’s gonna convince a lot of teenage white girls to vote blue. However, the majority of her fanbase seem to not be terminally online and just listen to her for her music only.
If this was someone like Michelle Obama it would be a different story.
 
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: The Nothingness, Breadbassket, Lil Yappy and 1 other person
I don't see the names yet but i expect it's the same RINOs as always. Doesn't seem likely the house will stop it as they'll use the pointless impeachment vote as cover.
msedge_3LofYvQbyI.png

Edit:
It's a everyone you expected but also the people claimed to not be RINOs like Cruz.
Barrasso (R-WY)
Boozman (R-AR)
Britt (R-AL)
Budd (R-NC)
Capito (R-WV)
Cassidy (R-LA)
Collins (R-ME)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Cotton (R-AR)
Crapo (R-ID)
Cruz (R-TX)
Ernst (R-IA)
Fischer (R-NE)
Graham (R-SC)
Hyde-Smith (R-MS)
Kennedy (R-LA)
Lankford (R-OK)
McConnell (R-KY)
Moran (R-KS)
Mullin (R-OK)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Ricketts (R-NE)
Risch (R-ID)
Romney (R-UT)
Rounds (R-SD)
Rubio (R-FL)
Scott (R-SC)
Sullivan (R-AK)
Thune (R-SD)
Tillis (R-NC)
Wicker (R-MS)
Young (R-IN)
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
  • Lunacy
  • Informative
Reactions: argostug, JustSomeDong, AnitaSarsleezian and 7 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back