Niggers Eating Cornstarch - And any other weird nigger food related shit

[AnOminous]

People do things besides fry it all the time, but fried chicken with black people remains an enduring stereotype despite attempts to characterize it as a racist one so that's what will come to mind first.

It's just a fact though, if you have a lot of fried chicken places in town, and just one of them has a line of black people outside the place, that's the best fried chicken in town and if you want some, get in line. It is a) the best in town and b) always right out of the fryer.

For some reason it's often run by Pakis.

 

[Active User]

I'm pretty sure that the majority of the stereotypically black foods have that association because they were southern or because they were cheap and as such easy for a lot of economically disenfranchised black people to purchase and consume. Think that was the case for how watermelon and grape soda picked up that association at least.

 

[AnOminous]

I'm pretty sure that the majority of the stereotypically black foods have that association because they were southern or because they were cheap and as such easy for a lot of economically disenfranchised black people to purchase and consume. Think that was the case for how watermelon and grape soda picked up that association at least.

I love watermelon too. Could live without grape soda, but probably not without grape Jolly Ranchers.

 

[glad vlad]

I’ve always wondered about the fried chicken-slavery claim. Chicken isn’t normally a particularly cheap meat in a homestead setting, you’d eat the spare roosters and the older layers. But older chicken is pretty stringy too modern palates, not good for frying. And chicken would be valuable for eggs, it wasn’t the cheap meat the way it is today.

And fat wasn’t as easy to come by. Presumably they fried in lard, so that means hogs, were they allowed to keep hogs?

So basically it seems to me more likely that fried chicken in a southern slavery context would have been a special meal you’d have rarely, never a staple. I’ve always wondered because people talk about magical black slave foodways and say things that seem very dubious, like the food equivalent of “they stuffed pillows with us!!!”

(I’m having a bad deja vu feeling, so sorry if I’ve sperged about this already.)

 

[teriyakiburns]

I’ve always wondered because people talk about magical black slave foodways and say things that seem very dubious, like the food equivalent of “they stuffed pillows with us!!!”

It's southern food. Most "black" culture is southern us culture. Aave is a blend of southern colloquialisms and a mishmash of southern accents. "Soul food" is mostly southern poverty food, which is made from ingredients that grow easily in the south, or are available in an agricultural setting because nobody else wants them.

 

[Xenomorph]

Lawd have mercy... the baby, the "woman" the kid in the background saying "DAS A GUD CRUNCH MOMMUH"

WITH THE GODDAMNED SMOKE DETECTOR LOW BATTERY CHIRP

https://www.tiktok.com/@nikkisavoy22/video/7150774189929073963

 

[Pim Fortuyn]

Lawd have mercy... the baby, the "woman" the kid in the background saying "DAS A GUD CRUNCH MOMMUH"

WITH THE GODDAMNED SMOKE DETECTOR LOW BATTERY CHIRP
View attachment 5577912

https://www.tiktok.com/@nikkisavoy22/video/7150774189929073963

Writing my thoughts about what I see in this video would probably get me arrested in multiple countries.

 

[Xenomorph]

Writing my thoughts about what I see in this video would probably get me arrested in multiple countries.

Everything about that video is wrong and that baby has something wrong with it..sheboon can barely hold onto the baby cause they need to shove that shit in her facehole. Im shocked she didnt dip the pacifier in cornstarch.

 

[Helvítis Túristi]

I get that. And I agree: if someone shows up at home, you at least offer them something light. Usually, the time for visit here is between 4pm and 6pm because at that time, we eat "lonche", a meal between lunch and dinner, often hot beverage (milk for kids) with bread (or cake, sandwich, whatever), and that's easier to share than a whole meal.

But what blacks in the discussions were implying is that if your kid shows up uninvited to your house, they should expect to be asked to stay for dinner and the family has some sort of obligation to feed them. The actual polite thing to do is to say you are leaving and wait to be invited to stay. Otherwise, go back home.

The discussion was started by this, I think:

View attachment 5575800

Of course, blacks jumped in to say how much wypipol can't cook and they don't share food unlike Africans.


She has a special diet, like soft chicken breast with mashed potatoes and something she feels awkward when she's eating different than others. It's fine when it's between the family, but not with other people who aren't close.

This honestly reads more like the niggers pulling a "gib me dat" and parasitizing off the Swedes.

 

[Pierre D'Olnique]

WITH THE GODDAMNED SMOKE DETECTOR LOW BATTERY CHIRP

I had to raise the volume to the max to hear it. Is it the barely audible noise at 0:30 and 0:31? Everything else is drowned out by the buzzing and the sheboon's crunching & wheezing.

Before you call me a nigger - privately installed smoke detectors, just like niggers, do not exist here. Only the filthy rich have them in their mansions.

 

[teriyakiburns]

Is it the barely audible noise at 0:30 and 0:31?

Yes, the ceiling bird is at 0:31. You nigger.

 

[Shadfan666xxx000]

I’ve always wondered about the fried chicken-slavery claim. Chicken isn’t normally a particularly cheap meat in a homestead setting, you’d eat the spare roosters and the older layers. But older chicken is pretty stringy too modern palates, not good for frying. And chicken would be valuable for eggs, it wasn’t the cheap meat the way it is today.

And fat wasn’t as easy to come by. Presumably they fried in lard, so that means hogs, were they allowed to keep hogs?

So basically it seems to me more likely that fried chicken in a southern slavery context would have been a special meal you’d have rarely, never a staple. I’ve always wondered because people talk about magical black slave foodways and say things that seem very dubious, like the food equivalent of “they stuffed pillows with us!!!”

(I’m having a bad deja vu feeling, so sorry if I’ve sperged about this already.)

Fried chicken was a common meal to both west Africa and the British isles when both groups ended up seeding the south. Also, it wasn't terribly common so much as a cultural delicacy. If you had fried chicken back then, it was a special occasion and reserved for prize guests until the 20th century came and new farming practices made chicken incredibly cheap.

 

[Wuhan Wet Market]

I'm American, but come from two Catholic European cultures, one of them being Mediterranean, and it's considered extremely rude to not offer your guest something to eat or drink when they come over because hospitality is paramount. More often than not, if a friend was over, we'd always ask if they could stay for dinner, but then it was their decision on whether or not to stay (with parental approval of course) with it being OK for them to refuse. That's obviously not the norm for the majority of America, though. I'd wager most normal, middle-class America has the attitude of "my house is your house" so that if you go to your friend's house enough and are good enough friends, they won't offer you food directly but the implication is you can take whatever you want in the fridge or cabinet (obviously nicer to ask than just take).

It also sounds very Protestant and Nordic to "not want strangers to watch her eat". Does she not eat at restaurants? Sounds more like a phobia she needs to work through.

As for blacks, just like with Muslims, everything they do to "be good" is really just a show. I think you could embarrass a black person by implying that they give you such hospitality, but whether or not they would actually offer it is another question. I'd say AFRICANS are hospitable, but niggers ain't.

In East Asia we feed our guests. I had to go see my landlord for paperwork and she gave me a bowl of oranges to eat while we talked. In Texas, I got fed every time I visited someone's house. It's hard to imagine having guests and not feed them.

 

[QuickHen]

Speaking of Swedengate, I am a swede and I can say that it is 50/50, my family always fed friends that were over (After it was pre‐decided between mine and friends parents, since some wanted thwir kids to eat at home instead of at a friends house). If I was at a friends house, it have only been once or twice I wasn't fed but I gotba snack since they were pretty poor so the only had enough for the family. Some parents might be stingy about feeding more mouths than they can afford, but in my 3xperience, it is rare unless you are poor or maybe it is a new friend and you don't know allergies or food restrictions.

 

[AnOminous]

In East Asia we feed our guests. I had to go see my landlord for paperwork and she gave me a bowl of oranges to eat while we talked. In Texas, I got fed every time I visited someone's house. It's hard to imagine having guests and not feed them.

It's a cultural thing, though. "Southern hospitality" is a real thing, and you almost have to save up your appetite not to insult your host by not eating what they offer you. I miss my old neighbors because we would actually just bring food over to each other. You'd wake up and have chili and its accompaniments and accoutrements.

I had a landlord who wrote cookbooks of rustic recipes and would just bring around chow (this was in the North too).

I think it's a really nice thing, and food is a really primal way for people to bond.

I just think it's an asshole move to try to turn this into some imperialist thing where cultures that don't do this are somehow evil. There are some environments where it doesn't make sense or there are different rules of etiquette. The polite thing to do is respect these differences.

Diversity is our strength, right? I mean other than fuck wypipo.

 

[TEA 3HF]

Re: the sperging about whitey not feedin' his gests n shiiiiiieeeeeeetttt.

When I was growing up in WASP America, it was considered polite to offer someone a snack i.e. a piece of fruit, some vegetables or some crackers and cheese. Meals, however, were strictly family events. Dinnertime in particular is when we discussed family matters like what we could afford over the next few weeks, what we needed to cut back on, how we were doing in school and of we needed help with something, etc. Between that and largely having the cheapest option for food (pork and potatoes, stews, chicken with dumplings) it was a private affair meant for family members of the household. Back in the day, if there was a person hiring a room in your house, they were welcome to some of the food, but not to the discussions being had.

In my head it is unimaginable that one of your guests should be entitled to a place at your dinner table by virtue of being invited to visit for the afternoon. Then again, this comes from a house where guests were supposed to stay in the more "public" areas of the house (sitting room, office, parlor, and maybe the dining room) and keep their shoes on so that they leave in a timely manner when asked to do so. Thus it is a bit baffling to me that there would be a cultural expectation of being included in family only events just for being a friend/friendly acquaintance.

 

[AnOminous]

Thus it is a bit baffling to me that there would be a cultural expectation of being included in family only events just for being a friend/friendly acquaintance.

It's the gibs me dat rule that only applies to a certain demographic.

 

[Shadfan666xxx000]

Re: the sperging about whitey not feedin' his gests n shiiiiiieeeeeeetttt.

When I was growing up in WASP America, it was considered polite to offer someone a snack i.e. a piece of fruit, some vegetables or some crackers and cheese. Meals, however, were strictly family events. Dinnertime in particular is when we discussed family matters like what we could afford over the next few weeks, what we needed to cut back on, how we were doing in school and of we needed help with something, etc. Between that and largely having the cheapest option for food (pork and potatoes, stews, chicken with dumplings) it was a private affair meant for family members of the household. Back in the day, if there was a person hiring a room in your house, they were welcome to some of the food, but not to the discussions being had.

In my head it is unimaginable that one of your guests should be entitled to a place at your dinner table by virtue of being invited to visit for the afternoon. Then again, this comes from a house where guests were supposed to stay in the more "public" areas of the house (sitting room, office, parlor, and maybe the dining room) and keep their shoes on so that they leave in a timely manner when asked to do so. Thus it is a bit baffling to me that there would be a cultural expectation of being included in family only events just for being a friend/friendly acquaintance.

Not everyone is either a Northern WASP or a nigger as was shown in this thread already. If you can't discuss it at the table around the guest and it feels rude to exclude them, then you can do it more privately after they leave. Few cultures are as inflexible as those which come from being buried in snow.

 

[FinnSven]

How much like ouzo is it? I kind of like that.

It’s pretty much the same thing.

Pernod is also damn similar, it’s just with added wormwood or something to make it green.

 

[NoReturn]

Not everyone is either a Northern WASP or a nigger as was shown in this thread already. If you can't discuss it at the table around the guest and it feels rude to exclude them, then you can do it more privately after they leave. Few cultures are as inflexible as those which come from being buried in snow.

Those rules come from millennia of natural selection which removed everyone who didn't follow them.