Have you taken the Conspiracy Test? - Subject yourself to the shameless strawmanning of your academic superiors!

I don't trust OP. I have never seen this guy in any thread before. Account is not even one year old. 1500 posts? Yeah, that could be fake posts just so he better fits in and everyone thinks he's just a normal sperg. No way I'm clicking this IP grabbing link and have some feds knocking at my door then.
Lmao, get a look at this conspiratard. Next you're going to tell me the government is run by sociopathic pedophiles.
 
js.png
I'm skeptical about JavaScript. I do not trust this website.
I assume my autism score is 1776.
 
The funniest part about this is it is exactly how modern analysts work in order to ensure their data is always in agreement with their original hypotheses. The empirical method for acquiring information has been completely reversed.

(i.e., Data tampering temperature records made decades prior to coincide with temperature records today in order to prove Global Warming is real.)
Just as Emmanuel Goldstein/O'Brien intended: "if the facts don't fit the narrative, then change the facts".
 
>Make a choice
>Alien scolds me about my thought process being wrong
Fucking space niggers, man
That's no nigger ... that's a space kike!

It's quite obvious that Princess Diana was murdered, so I chose that conspiracy theory. To try and talk me out of it, the spacekike started spewing this drivel about, "Don't you know how many people would have to be in on it?" That argument doesn't even apply to the Princess Di case. It doesn't even tailor its explanations to the conspiracy you suggest. Absolute laziness. Somebody gave them a lot of funding for digital animations and they did a piss-poor job of the rest of it. Fuck these spacekikes. I hope they go get COVID Lethal Injection boosters and die.
 
Wow, what a completely worthless site...

"How many people would need to be involved and keep their mouths shut?"

Way, way fewer than one would think.


Happened in 1962, didn't become public knowledge until 2001, with James Bamford's excellent book Body of Secrets.

Or how about this one?


An illegal CIA mind control program that ran for TWENTY YEARS, and was only brought to light to Congress in 1975, though the CIA tried to cover their asses by destroying documents, some were found and released to the public in 2001.

And nobody will ever convince me that the Israeli Mossad didn't at least have foreknowledge of 9/11, if not a direct hand in planning and perpetraing the attacks. I've never heard a satisfactory explanation for the Five Dancing Israelis, or the Israelis who were detained near the Brooklyn bridge, one of whom had a boxcutter and $4700 in his sock.

I'll take those puzzle pieces now...
 
What makes this all even more hiliarious is, they seemingly should know about how debates actually work since they created a microsite that supposedly addressed logical fallacies called "yourfallacy.is"

But nobody in their field had the propensity to say, "Maybe we shouldn't paint other peoples' beliefs and reasoning as some space chameleon who talks like that news anchor from Futurama..."

Like Meat Target said: they are utterly unable to do self reflection and apply their standards to themselves.

And nobody will ever convince me that the Israeli Mossad didn't at least have foreknowledge of 9/11, if not a direct hand in planning and perpetraing the attacks. I've never heard a satisfactory explanation for the Five Dancing Israelis, or the Israelis who were detained near the Brooklyn bridge, one of whom had a boxcutter and $4700 in his sock.

Fun fact: During the 1990s many Israeli agents infiltrated the USA and it's universities as "art students" to do spying on them, along with countering pro-palestine sentiments on college campuses. Even better: there was actual mainstream reporting of these spies once it was found out, and there was even mainstream coverage of this. In the last few months of the Clinton admin a literal Mossad glownigger was caught doing shit in the White House, and right after 9/11 none other than Fox fucking News had a explosive report where the host straight up said "they may have known things they didn't tell us before 9/11" and was shut down so fucking hard it is barely remembered.

 
I don't trust OP. I have never seen this guy in any thread before. Account is not even one year old. 1500 posts? Yeah, that could be fake posts just so he better fits in and everyone thinks he's just a normal sperg. No way I'm clicking this IP grabbing link and have some feds knocking at my door then.
He's a notable woman hater
 
Do they shit on conspiracy theories like Russian tampering in 2016 US elections? Or "institutional racism"? After all, how many people would have to be involved in it and keep secrets for those to work? stupid goys.
 
Do they shit on conspiracy theories like Russian tampering in 2016 US elections? Or "institutional racism"? After all, how many people would have to be involved in it and keep secrets for those to work? stupid goys.

Unfortunately, everything about this is slated in one direction, as some have noticed. This is how these supposed "analysts" work and it's how they believe data collection works in general.

They slate everything according to the data that supports their hypothesis and ignore data that would potentially compromise it. It's why you cannot, fundamentally, reason with any these people. The very fact that their final FAQ is to say, "No" in response to any messages trying to explain a position tells you everything you need to know.

The entire project might as well be saying, "Don't bother us with the facts. Our minds are made up."
 
Last edited:
Do they shit on conspiracy theories like Russian tampering in 2016 US elections? Or "institutional racism"? After all, how many people would have to be involved in it and keep secrets for those to work? stupid goys.
Nah, "conspiracy theories" are things chuds and those icky people from Flyoverland believe in not things esteemed journalists at CNN and the WaPo publish.
 
LOL this shit wants your information.

E:
The 9/11 one just look at The FBI’s Investigation of Zacarias Moussaoui.
Their whole cases for it were "But A LOT OF PEOPLE would have to be silent on 9/11 for it to happen."

No, you fucking niggers.

They just have to not act to stop them and they succeed. Which is exactly what they did.
They had agents issue reports of "Hey these dudes are learning to fly planes, but not taking landing lessons. Its like they want to do terrorism by crashing a plane."
All it takes is someone putting that report in a desk and shrugging.
That's it.

And then it was brought to light in 2006 that they knew. So their case of "People would be silent" Guess that's not true cause it came out.
 
>trying to get me to put in my info
Nice try, glowniggers.

And goddamn, that one section that tried to convince me "YoU'd nEeD sO mAnY pEoPlE tO kEeP qUiET" just pisses me off. I dunno man, how many people needed to keep quiet about the Waco Siege? The feds pissed and moaned when the Texas Rangers attempted to perform their own investigation, and when they finally acquiesced, pieces of evidence ended up mysteriously going missing. A reefer truck storing the bodies of the victims just so happened to fail, ruining any chance at autopsy. The bullet-ridden front door that would have proven the ATF retards shot first mysteriously went missing, something about a misfiling of evidence I wanna say. I realize the Waco Siege isn't much of a conspiracy theory, but not for lack of trying on the part of the glowboys. And even though basically everybody that isn't retarded knows damn well the ATF murdered women and children without just cause on that day, they got exactly what they wanted: to not get investigated and sent back to shoveling shit by Congress for their bungling of Ruby Ridge.

Hell, I have a simpler one for you. How many people would have needed to be in on Epstein's Island? Forget the high-profile guys for a second, how many low-level support guys would have needed to be in on it for an operation that size to keep humming for 20 years?
 
Back