I still don't get why Return of The Jedi is considered lesser than A New Hope or Empire Strikes Back. Yes the Ewoks are a bit silly but for me a movie must have at least more than one flaw for me to dislike it.
Because it is when you look at it from more objective standpoints of plot construction and overall writing. There is a lot of "and then" writing rather than "because" writing that was more prevalent in the prior two films.
Its action is some of the best of the OT, but its held together with ducktape and glue. Here is just a short list of its problems.
-Han is reduced to a goofy caricature of himself and really doesn't have much to actually do in the film as Luke and Leia pretty much do everything.
-Luke just giving himself up to Vader is simply to enable the final fight between him, Vader and the emperor on the Death star 2.0 rather than any actual reason that would make sense.
-Its been said to death, but the Ewoks fighting and for a short time winning against an imperial battalion is fucking ridiculous.
-The empire just collapsing almost instantly when the emperor dies is just weird and nonsensical
-The rebel fleet surviving being surrounded by an armada of imperial ships even with the death star 2.0 gone is dumb.
-The Death star 2.0 being a thing is just lame and re-treading the same ground.
And I could go on and on. I like the film and think that despite its flaws its an incredibly enjoyable time and a satisfying conclusion to the OT, but I am not going to pretend it isn't heavily flawed and the weakest of the three films on more objective levels.