Total Retard War: Lessons of War - Taking the tactics of Honeycomb.io's Field CTO Liz Fong-Jones and making them available to everyone.

[Null]

In Current Year Clown World, people can be pressured or compelled by law to play along with a fetish, in opposition to free speech.

maybe in some shitholes but the US is not.

We are being crushed by private enterprise which has formed this sort of amalgamation with education and government. We've been deprived of rights because a few companies are empowered to do whatever they want. It's so dystopian.

 

[mindlessobserver]

Question for the class. I've not paid attention to how Wikipedia structures things. How did Fong get editor status with Wikipedia? Does this position confer some sort of Agency liability? One of Wikipedias biggest defenses is its a platform where all users (which can be anyone with an internet connection) can edit pages.

Meaning nothing in Wikipedia is necessarily the Wikipedia Foundation saying it.

Are editors a kind of super user who are given official authority by the Foundation? Or is it more a kind of "blue check mark" on Twitter?

 

[Pitbull Victim]

From what I've deduced, Elliot had or has a sockpuppet network stemming from his "ByteOr" account, which got found out and banned a while ago.

Is there evidence linking Dong Gone and ByteOr - I only ask because Dong Gone seems to be a crafty piece of shit while ByteOr appears legitimately deranged. There's a page for all of ByteOr's socks and the user contributions from them are fucking bizarre, a recurring theme is a massive fixation on the movie "Turning Red" for some reason.

He very clearly hates Kiwi Farms, but his contributions are dumb and blunt like this (his sentence structure also leads me to believe he isn't a native English speaker):





Dong Gone characterizes ByteOr as someone trying to fuck with him:



This is Tamzin, by the way, if anyone is wondering what the average Wikipedia poweruser is like:

 

[WelperHelper99]

Is there evidence linking Dong Gone and ByteOr - I only ask because Dong Gone seems to be a crafty piece of shit while ByteOr appears legitimately deranged. There's a page for all of ByteOr's socks and the user contributions from them are fucking bizarre, a recurring theme is a massive fixation on the movie "Turning Red" for some reason.

He very clearly hates Kiwi Farms, but his contributions are dumb and blunt like this (his sentence structure also leads me to believe he isn't a native English speaker):

View attachment 5582528

View attachment 5582550

Dong Gone characterizes ByteOr as someone trying to fuck with him:

View attachment 5582536

ByteOr sounds a bit autistic, leftist edition. Hmm. Could be useful...

This is Tamzin, by the way, if anyone is wondering what the average Wikipedia poweruser is like:

View attachment 5582537

I have no words

 

[Artificial Stupidity]

This is Tamzin, by the way, if anyone is wondering what the average Wikipedia poweruser is like:

View attachment 5582537

Amazing the jokes write themselves.

It's very doompilling to see how captured Wikipedia is even more when Elliot is using it as a true statement to drive the narritive and his version.

I doubt he's socking he is probably delegating to a group in IRC or something.

All these Wikipedia activists are disgusting and I personally wish a good investigative journalist just showed up one day and buried them.

During the COVID shit I'm sure people got told to check Wikipedia.

 

[Null]

Question for the class. I've not paid attention to how Wikipedia structures things. How did Fong get editor status with Wikipedia? Does this position confer some sort of Agency liability? One of Wikipedias biggest defenses is its a platform where all users (which can be anyone with an internet connection) can edit pages.

Meaning nothing in Wikipedia is necessarily the Wikipedia Foundation saying it.

Are editors a kind of super user who are given official authority by the Foundation? Or is it more a kind of "blue check mark" on Twitter?

Theoretically it's open to edit but their rules are absurd. If you create an account and try to edit almost any page while using a VPN, you're automatically banned. You also generally need clout. If you try to register to Wikipedia and just edit a page, especially a page of any living person or contemporary organization, your edits will be under immediate scrutiny and you will likely find yourself banned immediately and your edits reverted.

I've even had incidents where there was clearly a mistake, and I went up the chain to find admins relevant to that article active in that project. They will literally revert your comment off their talk page like you're some sort of insect to be discarded and they won't dignify you with a reply.

So on its face it's open, but in reality there's an incredibly sophisticated bureaucratic web of trust that means you don't get shit and go fuck yourself.

Wikimedia as a whole needs to be utterly destroyed.

 

[mindlessobserver]

Theoretically it's open to edit but their rules are absurd. If you create an account and try to edit almost any page while using a VPN, you're automatically banned. You also generally need clout. If you try to register to Wikipedia and just edit a page, especially a page of any living person or contemporary organization, your edits will be under immediate scrutiny and you will likely find yourself banned immediately and your edits reverted. I've even had incidents where there was clearly a mistake, and I went up the chain to find admins relevant to that article active in that project. They will literally revert your comment off their talk page like you're some sort of insect to be discarded and they won't dignify you with a reply. So on its face it's open, but in reality there's an incredibly sophisticated bureaucratic web of trust that means you don't get shit and go fuck yourself. Wikimedia as a whole needs to be utterly destroyed.

Never forget that wikipedias mods said that if the Consensus was the Earth was flat, then that is what Wikipedia would publish.

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/the-great-twitter-meltdown-of-2021.93623/post-12204434

 

[Monopoly Supporter]

Is there evidence linking Dong Gone and ByteOr - I only ask because Dong Gone seems to be a crafty piece of shit while ByteOr appears legitimately deranged. There's a page for all of ByteOr's socks and the user contributions from them are fucking bizarre, a recurring theme is a massive fixation on the movie "Turning Red" for some reason.

He very clearly hates Kiwi Farms, but his contributions are dumb and blunt like this (his sentence structure also leads me to believe he isn't a native English speaker):

View attachment 5582528

View attachment 5582550

Dong Gone characterizes ByteOr as someone trying to fuck with him:

View attachment 5582536

This is Tamzin, by the way, if anyone is wondering what the average Wikipedia poweruser is like:

View attachment 5582537

Mr. Enter????

 

[Lou Sassle]

Crazy idea time.

What if null came out as a trans woman of indigenous color who was previously molested in a consent accident by long dong fong.

Then cogent would be unfairly punishing a victim.

 

[murph]

Fuck troons. I'm going between TOR and Clearnet back and forth with absolute ease (OMG I have to use alt tab). I feel like a slolom skier. Whether it's TOR or Clearnet, it's fast as fuck.

 

[AnOminous]

Question for the class. I've not paid attention to how Wikipedia structures things. How did Fong get editor status with Wikipedia?

He's a troon.

Does this position confer some sort of Agency liability?

He's a troon.

One of Wikipedias biggest defenses is its a platform where all users (which can be anyone with an internet connection) can edit pages.

You mean anyone who is a troon.

Meaning nothing in Wikipedia is necessarily the Wikipedia Foundation saying it.

It means anything on Wikipedo is endorsed by a troon.

Are editors a kind of super user who are given official authority by the Foundation?

Yes but only if they cut their dicks off and claim to be female. It's run by troons.

Or is it more a kind of "blue check mark" on Twitter

It's more of a kind of being a troon thing.

You might think I'm joking but I'm not.

 

[Cryogonal2]

who was previously molested in a consent accident by long dong fong.

You'd need proof to back that up, and I do not think Null is willing to go to such lengths for the Farms.

 

[DootSkeleton]

They're publicly traded, $CCOI. Make a big enough stink in the right places and they are legally obligated to relent for fear of their stock price being affected.

This is likely the best and most direct way to go about it.
If you own at least one share of Cogent stock, you can sit in on their shareholder meetings and may even be able to ask questions to the execs directly.

 

[Tetragrammaton]

i knew wikipedia was a mess but holy fuck its actually worse than i could ever imagine. i would much rather take a source from encyclopedia dramatica or urban dictionary as absolute fact compared to wikipedia.

it seems like most of their editors are either troons or troon supporters that do absolutely nothing else with their lives aside from police wikipedia edits.

just imagine trying to edit something that has a very obvious bias and all of a sudden this guy shows up and tells you how thats not allowed.

 

[innocent jogger]

i would much rather take a source from encyclopedia dramatica or urban dictionary as absolute fact compared to wikipedia.

If you know how read between the jokes and exaggerations ED is actually more factually relevant these days. Wikipedo is really only useful for episode guides and other shit. TTD please.

 

[mindlessobserver]

I remember when we all laughed about "conservapedia" as it screamed into the void about Wikipedia.

We could not see past "Jesus riding a Dinosaur" bros. The Clown wasn't making a joke, he was warning us! We didn't listen!

 

[dick brain]

You'd need proof to back that up,

Would you though?

 

[ToroidalBoat]

maybe in some shitholes but the US is not.

I think there can be places in the USA where it's illegal to "misgender" someone (mainly "blue cities"?), but that's not everywhere.

 

[Null]

I think there can be places in the USA where it's illegal to "misgender" someone (mainly "blue cities"?), but that's not everywhere.

No. You may be get charged with harassment, but it would have been harassment with other kinds of language at that point.

 

[Ol' Slag]

I wish Null would just make us an actual religion already.

He could be our pope and the admins the "clergy". It would have to afford us some protections.