Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 17.7%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 93 26.2%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 58 16.3%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 137 38.6%

  • Total voters
    355
Well, I think, as far as Nick's law license is concerned, he's given up on actually practicing law, and he just maintains it so he can legitimately claim he's an attorney and fool stupid people. The appeal to authority fallacy. Although a really weak one, because I don't know who should be convinced that a non-practicing Minnesota attorney is your best bet for facts when discussing Texas law.

I think Eric July's explicit on-stream challenge to his legal authority somewhat broke him from being able to claim expertise. He has really never been the same since and he has pivoted heavily toward presenting himself as a "funny" "internet comedian" who never really did a law show.

Lawtube isn't really there to back him up anymore and nobody with any legal credibility is going to put their neck out for Nick at this point. He can go on streams with EVS or Dax talking about the law. But it doesn't have the same impact it would have had even six months ago. Anyone that Nick tries to target now with his hot takes on the law can rather effectively point to a lolcow non-practicing lawyer to dismiss it.

I dont see any problem with him keeping his law license if he sees value in keeping it. But his credibility is dead and there is no way he will get it back. Even the wine moms have moved on from him. Just like with Dax, anyone who used to be sort of important on the internet will keep a residual audience of low functioning people who aspire to be a Vito or a Reilly or a Spectre or a Cgoody. But its just sad and nobody listens to them. Even EVS is starting to maybe realize that Nick's ability to influence is gone.
 
You'd be maintaining it solely for the status thing of being able to say that you're licenced to practice law, even if you've never actually done it in any meaningful sense.
The epitome of a vanity degree in motion. Not sure I’ve ever seen someone using a practical choice like law, as a vanity signal. It’s usually reserved for majors in the arts & some social studies. Things like having a degree in gender studies or North African percussion. Just trust fund things for Balldo.
 
I'm assuming, and the many lawyers in the thread can correct me if this is wrong, that like with other professional licenses handed out by the state you have to go through the whole application process again if you let it lapse for too long (or at all in some cases I'm sure).
Sometimes you have to let it lapse, for instance if you have a job that precludes legal practice, like many jobs in the judiciary or in politics that make it a bad idea to be a "practicing" lawyer. You generally just maintain bar membership but go on inactive status and it's generally pretty simple to turn it back on.
I think Eric July's explicit on-stream challenge to his legal authority somewhat broke him from being able to claim expertise. He has really never been the same since and he has pivoted heavily toward presenting himself as a "funny" "internet comedian" who never really did a law show.
It's a funny thing to get totally buck-broken over. Being a legal commentator and actually practicing are two different things that have very little to do with each other. Obviously there are crossover skills, but you have academics who mostly talk about or teach theory and you have practitioners who are probably generally more useful for trial commentary, although just watching a lot of trials and doing your homework can qualify you for it just fine.

Nick at this point is a physical and mental wreck, doesn't do his homework, worse, outright lies and tries to deceive his audience, and on top of that is so drunk he's rarely even funny except at his own expense.
 
Last edited:
To be completely fair to Nick, the other reason he does it is so it doesn't lapse and become a pain in the ass to get again. I'm assuming, and the many lawyers in the thread can correct me if this is wrong, that like with other professional licenses handed out by the state you have to go through the whole application process again if you let it lapse for too long (or at all in some cases I'm sure).
Doesn't seem to be that bad in Minnesota. If you don't meet your CLE requirements you go on Involuntary Restricted status:
Involuntary Restricted (IR) status: The status of a lawyer licensed in Minnesota who is not in compliance with the educational and reporting requirements of the CLE Rules and who has been involuntarily placed in that status by order of the Court. Lawyers on IR status are not authorized to practice law. See Rule 12 for additional provisions.
Going from Involuntary Restricted back to active seems fairly simple, and basically just involves you doing what you were supposed to in the first place:
D. Transfer from Involuntary Restricted Status to Active Status.


(1) Notice to Director and Fee. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, a lawyer on involuntary restricted status who desires to resume active status shall notify the Director in writing of the lawyer’s intention to resume active status and submit a transfer fee of $250.


(2) Transfer Requirements. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, the Director shall recommend to the Court that a lawyer on involuntary restricted status be transferred to active status upon the Director’s determination that the lawyer has completed the number of CLE hours that the lawyer would have had to complete to meet reporting requirements and to be current on a proportional basis had the lawyer not been placed on involuntary restricted status, or that the lawyer has completed such lesser requirements as the Director determines are adequate provided that the number of hours completed total no fewer than 45 hours during the 3 years immediately preceding transfer. The Director will specify no more than 90 hours. The Director may recommend to the Court that a lawyer on involuntary restricted status be transferred to active status when the lawyer has fulfilled appropriate CLE conditions precedent or agreed to fulfill appropriate CLE conditions subsequent as determined by the Director. In making such a recommendation, the Director will take into consideration the discretionary transfer criteria in section (C)(2)(c) of this Rule.


(3) Appeal to the Board. Upon written request from a lawyer, the Board shall review the Director’s determination of transfer requirements and notify the lawyer in writing regarding the outcome of that review.
 
Sometimes you have to let it lapse, for instance if you have a job that precludes legal practice, like many jobs in the judiciary or in politics that make it a bad idea to be a "practicing" lawyer. You generally just maintain bar membership but go on inactive status and it's generally pretty simple to turn it back on.

It's a funny thing to get totally buck-broken over. Being a legal commentator and actually practicing are two different things that have very little to do with each other. Obviously there are crossover skills, but you have academics who mostly talk about or teach theory and you have practitioners who are probably generally more useful for trial commentary, although just watching a lot of trials and doing your homework can qualify you for it just fine.

Nick at this point is a physical and mental wreck, doesn't do his homework, worse, outright lies and tries to deceive his audience, and on top of that is so drunk he's rarely even funny except at his own expense.
Hes been a comedian this whole time terrorist stalker.
 
The epitome of a vanity degree in motion. Not sure I’ve ever seen someone using a practical choice like law, as a vanity signal.

You'd be surprised at the number of people who qualify but never go on to actually practice, or practice for a little while and then decide it isn't for them. I'm pretty sure the same thing is true of medicine as well. They do all the grind, get through the course, qualify and think that it's going to be a key to the magic kingdom whereas for most people, it's just a key to a door that leads to more grind.

I know somebody who had a stellar CV (UCLA, LSE, Harvard Law.) Qualified. Got their first job with a Hollywood entertainment law firm on stupid money. Lasted one year. Hasn't practiced since.
 
Circling back for a moment, I found it funny that Nick said that Masterson is a better friend than July because Masterson would suck his dick on command, whereas July wouldn't (his metaphors, as usual, are extremely homosexual).

I dunno about July, but if Nick dropped dead tomorrow, Masterson would feign sadness for all of 48 hours and then go back to ACKing it up with Vito about child rape.

There is precedent for this in the forms of Asterios Kokkinos and Digibro. Dick's good friend Digibro can be found homeless of the streets of Tulsa OK right now.

A person like Dick isn't a loyal friend. He's an enabler. He uses people. His using Nick's law license to give his terror campaign against July credibility.


Nick is MAN-D.

Okay, not really, but they both seem to have the same persecution fantasy. I think MAN-D has figured out that claiming that they are under attack by KF is a good way to score sympathy points with the nose.
Anyone who thinks Masterson is a loyal friend needs to get their head examined, but we know how that would look, Nick’s brain has more holes than Swiss cheese.
 
Sean had potentially future Mrs Martin 2.0 on last night, and she was active in chat. Say what you will about Sean, but I don't see the gf/fiancee putting up with that shit- she already jokes she is Sean's fed handler.

Bringing it back to Balldoman, I hope he spared his family the misery of his company this year at Christmas, and instead drove north until he found a frozen lake to launch both himself and the Balldomobile into.
Sean had to go and get a beard so I would stop thirsting for him. I'm okay, just heartbroken...

Kidding, of course. Grats you two
 
  • Islamic Content
Reactions: Thorndyke Special
It's not just Cynthia. All the parasocial parasite hags are there. Carimachet, Egalitarian Bitch, etc etc. Nick cultivated these hags and then like usual, neglected his 'project'.
So, as soon as Nick identifies them as being a Piece of Work, he sees the word "work" and one of his many allergies immediately kicks in. Ironically here, for once, that was a good call.

The same formula didn't apply to Mandy, however, maybe because "Mandy" was too busy LARPing as the submissive toy in his toychest to give any kind of impression there would ever be actual work involved...

I think I finally get the purpose of CGoody... he's the "hag wrangler" for when Nick gets tired of playing with his toys. He's what "Adoring Fan" becomes if the main player could somehow accept him as a permanent follower. It explains why he can't get rid of him too:
> If the Adoring Fan dies when he is following you, when he respawns he'll appear and continue to follow you.
 
You know, maybe this is the exact reason that Josh was "retardedly angry" as Nick put it. The faggot was talking in so many circles about things he didn't actually know anything about for two hours, anybody would be pissed if someone wasted two hours of their time with lies and attempts at manipulation.
Having been a forum admin in the past, if someone told me that serious rule breaking was going on in said forum, but refused to say who was doing it, what was being said/done, or where it was being said/done, I'd tell them to stop being a faggot and wasting my time, if I didn't outright ban them myself.

You don't bring up allegations of serious shit going on to a forum admin without expecting something to be done about it, fuck off with, "I didn't want anyone to be banned."

That is the correct response to someone whining to you while making it functionally impossible to help them. Fuck off, I have better shit to do.

Null handled him with kid gloves as far as I'm concerned.
 
Kids are inherently pretty traditional. They will be literally traumatized by discovering that one or both parents are looking to others outside the marriage for sexual titillation or even “just” flirting. I can’t imagine how fucking devastated Nick’s kids would be to see the video of their father slobbering at the thought of fucking some catfish so hard he’d “wreck” her, adding in that mommy would join in to “fawn” for good measure.

Nick can call it pearl clutching and “concern trolling” to be disgusted at the spectacle of him and Kayla acting like out and proud sexual degenerates on the public internet. But I can’t imagine any of my friends NOT being repulsed by these pieces of trash who give zero shits about the repercussions their children will suffer as a result of their parents being shameless animals.

Would you even let Kayla or Nick drive your kids for carpool, let alone babysit? I sure as shit wouldn’t.
Who the fuck wants to think about their parents sex life? You'd just hope everything is good on that front and leave it at that. But then mommy and daddy start going to gay bars, taking drugs and swinging at Jamacia nudist beaches. It'd make you sick right?

I think the worst part though is the drinking and drugs. Nick is too drunk to eat and spends most of his day screaming into a mic about guys called Josh, Eric and Schneider. Kayla is spaced out 24/7 on pills so she doesn't have a breakdown. You can practically read the r/raisedbynarcissists post their kids are going to be writing in the future.
 
Circling back for a moment, I found it funny that Nick said that Masterson is a better friend than July because Masterson would suck his dick on command, whereas July wouldn't (his metaphors, as usual, are extremely homosexual).

I dunno about July, but if Nick dropped dead tomorrow, Masterson would feign sadness for all of 48 hours and then go back to ACKing it up with Vito about child rape.

There is precedent for this in the forms of Asterios Kokkinos and Digibro. Dick's good friend Digibro can be found homeless of the streets of Tulsa OK right now.

A person like Dick isn't a loyal friend. He's an enabler. He uses people. His using Nick's law license to give his terror campaign against July credibility.


Nick is MAN-D.

Okay, not really, but they both seem to have the same persecution fantasy. I think MAN-D has figured out that claiming that they are under attack by KF is a good way to score sympathy points with the nose.
48 hours in being generous, because at this point I’m convinced Dax is actively trying to get Riley shot/arrested/attacked just so he can use it to scream accusations at July. Man doesn’t seem to have friends, just people he thinks he can use.
 
My mind works in odd ways. One of the only things I remember from the Metokur stream on Murphy is a quote from Murphy`s camshow where he states that he "Likes big burly muscular men or boys / college students". Nick is neither, but he is so past the point of twink death that the "boy" option seems unlikely. In other words there needs to be at least a preliminary six months long steroid and booze bonanza cycle for Nick in order to get Murphy in the mood for the occasion.
Balldo is on that Amy Winehouse diet, so maybe he's trying to lure in Jack Murphy so they can swap wives and cultivate erotic energies in unexpected ways?
 
Quiet sometime ago in one of his shows, I remember him saying they do not do the traditional Christmas. He specifically said he told the kids early on there is no Santa because saying so would be lying to them.
Thats clearly not the reason Nick's enough of a narc he couldn't stand a fictional character taking the credit for his gift giving.

Yeah, I’ll cut that guy some slack because it seems like Rekieta doesn’t want to do the required work for training someone to the point of not needing input from him after the process is refined.

I’ve worked for small business God Kings (either founders or inheritors) who basically have no idea how to run shit beyond being vaguely nice and then flying off the handle at the smallest provocation.
we've all seen that MDE skit.
Fine on its own except he follows it up with "As a joke, it's funny to me." What the fuck kind of brain damage are we dealing with here?

Also, while I'm here, in that stream he admits that he got the "I wish I did ____" denial from daddy Dick.
Its bizarre how Nick keeps using the same lines over and over. it reminds me of a barely trainable autistic learning how to talk. or like an autistic person taking a comedy class. Dick told him "sometimes people need an indicator to know when to laugh because i'm so ridiculous so i say "its funny to me' or i laugh at my own jokes" and Nick decided that its needed for everything. Its a blatant crutch too as we saw with the gun guys, because dick only hangs out around idiots at bars its not noticeable but if you examine it at all "whats funny about that" it destroys the guy. same with the "i wish", its a baby's first come back but like everything in Dick's life, he never moved beyond the novice stage of defending himself so tricks that only work on the naïve or devoted are easily seen through by literally anyone else.
but if Nick dropped dead tomorrow, Masterson would feign sadness for all of 48 hours and then go back to ACKing it up with Vito about child rape.

There is precedent for this in the forms of Asterios Kokkinos and Digibro. Dick's good friend Digibro can be found homeless of the streets of Tulsa OK right now.

A person like Dick isn't a loyal friend. He's an enabler. He uses people. His using Nick's law license to give his terror campaign against July credibility.
This isn't even a "what if" look at Cripp Daddy literally during the announcement of him dying on the dick show, dick was already making fun of him. Its obvious from his antics he would just move on, the only reason he'd show up to the funeral is to try to fuck Kayla, even now she looks better than most of the women we know dick has fucked. Even beyond the fact dick is an enabler, he's too stupid to try to be anything he's not. look at how he completely forced nick to look like an asshole during the episode he was on. Nick was giving all these defenses and dick was like "nope, i'm doing this to ruin his life, fuck this guy, i'm doing it because its funny to ruin people's lives" Making Nick look like the biggest piece of shit for spending 20 hours coming up with anything resembling an argument in his favor. He couldn't even use Nick's lawyer tactics correctly, all he did by going "i am proudly fucking this guy's business over. ain't i a stinker" was destroy Nick's reputation especially on the farms with not a single thing gained for either of them. In fact quite the opposite, that admission probably was the proof Maddox needed to start his own documentary and be able to convince the farms: "hey remember when i said dick would make shit up to destroy people's lives? See what he's doing now? here's a trip down memory lane" And despite what retards here say, the IBS climate at the time combined with Dick's own reputation 100% prove the doc would have failed and been mocked even on the farms if he released it back in 2016. Only after watching Dick use THE EXACT SAME PLAYBOOK on Eric July did people start to realize he does this shit constantly and up until now got away with it. even you remember how hard Nick would guard against even the Juju the cow accusations.

Nick's loyalty is even worse than Asterios or Digibro because at least those two got paid and laid. Nick is literally DOING IT FOR FREE
I check up on Nick Rackets every few days and I can’t keep with Nicky’s fuck ups. There’s always 15-20 new pages on lore or stupid shit Nick says/does.

This man is a total wreck. The booze has aged him 20 years in one year
he's averaged 6 pages a day for awhile now. one of the fastest threads of the year. if those PFG fags don't swarm our poll like they did with Terry Clifford then Nick easily wins lolcow of the year. the way Nick's been just this year is too much content for even a joon the king style doc, we're looking at a comprehensive history multi-hour saga where each hour we can only cover a month of this guy's life.
Ethan Ralph never was able to stay this much of a trashfire for this long. a month of Nick is like a third of a year of Ethan at this point.
 
The longer Rackets remains twitter silent the stronger my suspicion grows that he actually fucking did it and finally wrapped the Rustang around a tree. He probably never got winter tires and because it's been Christmas time he's probably been drunker than usual.
Dude it's Christmas time/the holidays, the entire internet is fucking slow because people are actually with family and stuff. If he An Heroed on Christmas night, that'll be a complete surprise, even for a drunk like him
 
Having been a forum admin in the past, if someone told me that serious rule breaking was going on in said forum, but refused to say who was doing it, what was being said/done, or where it was being said/done, I'd tell them to stop being a faggot and wasting my time, if I didn't outright ban them myself.
Especially when you consider the limited rule set imposed on Kiwi Farms and the purpose of those rules. Nick claimed he feels the website, in specific, has threads that reach the point of line-crossing harassment. That rule is one of the most important on the website. If he truly believes this, then there is no justification for withholding the details. It would benefit everyone except the rule breaker for Nick to name names. Unless Nick disagrees and sees it as advantageous for this line-crossing harassment to be perpetuated. Except he's insinuated he's the target, so that doesn't make sense either.

The cherry on top that he's only ever brought it up because he "just wants Josh to know" (despite originally bringing this up on a public livestream), to me, proves he's lying.
 
2. Work with people to tear down July so that he can go back to being king of the sektur, and everybody will have to wait 700 years for the next issue of Cyberfrog if they want an alternative to Marvel and DC that will save western civilization (or some shit).
Your brain on this part of the internet I guess. EVS must have thought the IBS route of "epically own someone online and absorb their audience/success" was the gameplay to make in regard to July without realizing that going into an industry like that a background in gay internet spats won't help you much.
 
Back