"Current year" terms that piss you off

  • Thread starter Thread starter AF 802
  • Start date Start date
I honestly dont know if I have commented this here before but it still really annoys me every fucking day and I want to vent.
I hate the word 'unironically' now. Just omit it. Example: "I unironically enjoyed that." ---> "I enjoyed that." So much more confidence in the second sentence and it is straight to the point.

Using 'unironically' feels like someone is embarrassed or ashamed of the thing they like or dislike and want to signal that they are enjoying the thing genuinely although many people pretend to enjoy the same thing for a weird social clout. Using 'unironically' sounds like they want approval from their peers for having an actual interest, but only can enjoy their interest if their peers approve and are aware of the potential uncoolness, like a trigger warning or something. "I unironically love decorating for Christmas (its a genuine love and I am definitiely not one of those cringey pinterest girls who waste thousands of dollars on plastic santas so it looks like I have a personality, please accept me I am desperate to have my interests accepted by you but I acknowledge that this interest of mine might seem like I am lower on the social ladder or be annoying to you but please please please still love me please? I swear I have a real personality aside from my unironic enjoyment of Christmas decor)"
Retards miss the nuance and turn it into an affectation in their speech. Just like the word "literally" which not only became an affectation, but also completely changed the meaning.

I do unironically enjoy these movies. I don't know how else to describe it when a lot of people ironically enjoy them. I know they're bad, but I enjoy their honest naivety. I don't like them because haw haw bad movie is bad. You know?
 
I do unironically enjoy these movies. I don't know how else to describe it when a lot of people ironically enjoy them. I know they're bad, but I enjoy their honest naivety. I don't like them because haw haw bad movie is bad. You know?
Hey, Troll 1 is awesome. I have no idea why retards always pan that movie. Fight me.
 
Male leftist speech (and writing) patterns are nauseating to me. Some observations:


University women and low-T lefty men have a tendency to use two adjectives when one will suffice. Example:

Leftist man: I just think what you're saying is degrading and demeaning to those people.

Man: I just think what you're saying is degrading to those people.

Educated women and lefty men also have a very strong tendency to use more words than is necessary much more generally. So we get something like:

Leftist man: Considering the rhetoric you use and all of the implications entailed within that rhetoric, wouldn't it therefore be fair to say that harm is being done to students and that they might have concerns and apprehensions about attending your classes?

Man: Given the kind of things you say, wouldn't it be fair to say that some students might have concerns about attending your class.

And one more observation which doesn't require an example: I've noticed that when debating, everything lefty men say tends to be overlain with a sort female cattiness, whereas normal men tend more towards diplomacy and gentlemanly sportsmanship.

This is, of course, all in addition to upward inflection, nasal vocalisation, speed-talking, Orwellian vocabulary and so on.

It's nails on a chalkboard as soon as these fannies open their mouths.
 
>scrunkly scrimbli bimblo creecher that's so gender big mood funky little guy gremlin such babygirl widdle eepy
i am filled with hatred
I think anyone with half a brain – finding themselves living in a world where the citizenry are more worried about "oh, you misgendered me" than about niggers being given slaps on the wrist whenever they commit crimes – would be filled with hatred too.
 
Using the term 'human' in contexts where 'person' would work just as well. Anyone that looks at reddit knows exactly what I mean. Weird how the people that clamor for language to be as inoffensive and inclusive as possible somehow manage to come up with the most dehumanizing shit in fucking existence.
In my experience, some of the most dehumanizing rhetoric comes from school administrators who think that the slightest deviation from the progressive norm means they get to treat a student like a future shooter. It's no wonder in that case that modern youth are fucked in the head.
 
I think anyone with half a brain – finding themselves living in a world where the citizenry are more worried about "oh, you misgendered me" than about niggers being given slaps on the wrist whenever they commit crimes – would be filled with hatred too.
are you lost

Using the term 'human' in contexts where 'person' would work just as well. Anyone that looks at reddit knows exactly what I mean. Weird how the people that clamor for language to be as inoffensive and inclusive as possible somehow manage to come up with the most dehumanizing shit in fucking existence.
tbf, i think the "human" thing (aside from trying to sound like hippie nonsense 'were all humans maaaaang') is more of an attempt to be quirky than inclusive
like "haha us humans. us human beans. that heckin pupper. that little tiny human person. that crotch goblin" acting like those cats in memes who call their owner 'hooman'
 
Male leftist speech (and writing) patterns are nauseating to me. Some observations:


University women and low-T lefty men have a tendency to use two adjectives when one will suffice. Example:

Leftist man: I just think what you're saying is degrading and demeaning to those people.

Man: I just think what you're saying is degrading to those people.

Educated women and lefty men also have a very strong tendency to use more words than is necessary
Leftists are the 'overly verbose' meme incarnate. College essays require them to fill out pages with repetitive bs. Memes come down to 'words words'. Comics nothing but speech bubbles. I see this in "news" articles too. The same thing being said in the headline and following three paragraphs, just slightly different phrasing.
 
"Affordable housing" itself is not a bad thing. It's the association with affordable housing and a certain demographic that makes a novel concept sound bad in practice. Nobody wants to talk about how flawed affordable housing is with little enforcement, accountability or return of investment FROM that demographic. Property values diminish with "affordable housing" because the majority of people that LIVE there don't care about themselves or the land around them.
 
Back