US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
Why does this picture bug me so much? There's just something about the Ralph Lauren sweater that seems so out of place. Especially when you're at her level of politics and making a scheduled public appearance.
View attachment 5594921
Republican presidential candidate Nikki Haley speaks during a town hall, Dec. 18, 2023, in Nevada, Iowa. (AP Photo/Charlie Neibergall, File)
Her face from that angle, with that expression, makes her look like a witch or an angry schoolmarm.
 
Yeah, not 100% sure why we even tried to help France with its little wayward colony problem. Maybe because we felt sorry for them?
Slim edge of the wedge/domino thinking

It was assumed in three state dept that if Vietnam fell to the Comms, then the movement would roll down the coast, Malaysia, Cambodia, Indonesia etc

After the French got kicked, it's possible the division of the country on the 17th parallel would have been maintained but the US backed the wrong horse Dinh Diem, alienated the Buddhist majority providing fertile ground for ho chi to grow the rebellion in the south
 
We could possibly have won in Nam, but the cost would have been so astronomically high it wouldn't have been worth it. And I'm not just talking about the cost in troops and equipment, but the fact that public sentiment had already turned against the war. Prolonging it could have lead to some very turbulent times for the nation. Plus the possibility of China or the Soviets eventually entering the fight would grow the longer we were involved.

It was really just best to cut our losses at that point because the reward was not worth the risks.
 
These people are so set in their worldview that to them Russia = Bad therefore if you can show Russians believes something then you're bad if you agree. That really is their logic.

Last I checked more than half the adult population of the USA believes there was significant fraud in the 2020 election and a pretty sizeable proportion of that believe it was enough to change the outcome. Endlessly they present this as some minority belief. But here's the the less obvious trick. They frame it as if it's on other people to prove that the outcome was affected. That's not how elections work, that's how jury trials work where Innocent Until Proven Guilty makes sense because you need a default outcome and you need to pick the one which is best. But an election has no default outcome nor should it. An election is not whoever the WSJ says won unless you can prove otherwise. It's on those running the election to be able to prove the outcome with auditable ballots, chains of custody, evidence that ballots were cast by the voter themselves and in an environment where coercion wasn't taking place. The 2020 election was a shambles.
 
Wasn't the reason the US fucked over Ho Chi Minh was because the Americans believed he was communist? (He was definitely close to the reds at the time, though more because they were one of the few that actively supported his cause than any true loyalty.)
Supposedly, Ho Chi Minh was on the fence but favored the Americans, but because the U.S. backed the French to try and keep Vietnam, he went hat in hand to the Reds.

Thanks a fucking lot, State Department.
 
There was ample evidence demonstrating these POWs were alive even into the 1980s. However there was one dipshit Senator who stopped at nothing to ensure neither the POWs got returned or their families got closure when they did eventually die: Maverick John McCain.

This was going to be one of those scandals that would sink the retard in 2008 but the economy was starting to go tits up and by that point there was no way in hell McCain was going to win anyway. There’s a special level of hell for pieces of shit like that to burn in.

Here we go: https://www.nationalalliance.org/hot-topics/mccain-and-the-pow-cover-up

There is a second reason as well for why it was never exposed: M.A.D.

Remember how a few months ago Tucker interviewed a guy who claimed he had gay sex with Obama? That dude has been telling that story since the late 1990s. It has been a rumor that also circulated around the 2008 election, but no one dared touch it, not even most alternative media right wingers would touch it back in the day.

This is why. Both McCain and Obama, GOP and DNC, had a explosive nuke for a October surprise in case their opponent broke the seal first.

70% last I checked, with a huge plurality of Democrats in there.

And here is the thing that these "people" who insist there was no fraud keep ignoring: Even if we assume every single vote for Biden was legit, true and honest. Even if we assume that every mail in ballot was a valid vote from a real voter. Even if we assume there was exactly 0 attempts to defraud the votes...

THEY STILL ENGAGED IN THE BIGGEST CENSORSHIP OPERATION OF THE 21st CENTURY TO BURY THE LAPTOP FROM HELL!

The margins of win for Biden in a majority of the states was tiny. Absolutely knife edge. If only one in seven thousand votes in 2020 had been flipped from Biden to Trump it would mean that Trump would have won. And a massive amount of people, far more than the literal 0.01% of this 1 in 7000 needed, said later on when the laptop was proven true in 2021 that they would have voted differently if they knew.

They had glowniggers lie out of their asses that it was fake. They had a entire newspaper that is hundreds of years old all but censored off the internet. They had their friends in big tech violate the 4th amendment to open virtual letters and cut off the words in the messages to censor the links to the story.

This is the true fraud, the big one. All the other fraud shit was secondary to this and relied on this first hijacking to work.
 
THEY STILL ENGAGED IN THE BIGGEST CENSORSHIP OPERATION OF THE 21st CENTURY TO BURY THE LAPTOP FROM HELL!
Even if the vote counts were legit, it was not a free or fair election. The government and its hired guns in Silicon Valley put their thumbs on the scales for Biden.
 
Last edited:
'member that big Chips Act from Joepedo last year, where we would bribe people to come to America to build their semiconductor facilities? Oopsie!

00133.png

Meatball has gone full democrat

00137.png

Lauren Boebert is moving congressional districts to make it easier to win

00135.png

Milei in Argentina is doing something that should be replicated:

00136.png


In case you were lucky to avoid it, outside of Meatball's TDS there is a new forced conflict of gay in the conservative side, all over some retarded "pinup" calendar of conservative women for a shitty ConInc. beer. tldr; conservative women are upset men like to look at pretty things, the pinup women themselves are being generic thots wanting attention even though many of them are married, and the photos just aren't that impressive. Nothing says pinup like wasted space with below a-cups and a TDS RINO holding guns. Everyone on all sides of this are fake and gay.

link

00142.png

00139.png

00138.png


Why is this going on? Because it's easier for the fags at the Daily Wire to talk about than replacement practice:

00140.png
 

I remember back in 2016, if you said that too many migrants could overwhelm local resources, they said you were a racist, because everyone knows migrants only strengthen your society and increase GDP. "There's no such thing as too many migrants," they said. "Migrants only do good things," they said.
 
'member that big Chips Act from Joepedo last year, where we would bribe people to come to America to build their semiconductor facilities? Oopsie!

00133.png
making sure the new semiconductor factories are able to start on time = :disagree:
making sure our railroads are safe = :disagree:
making sure children are hopped up on life-ruining medication simply because they played with a Barbie doll instead of a monster truck = :agree:

I hate the fucking Antichrist. *sigh*
 
These people are so set in their worldview that to them Russia = Bad therefore if you can show Russians believes something then you're bad if you agree. That really is their logic.

Last I checked more than half the adult population of the USA believes there was significant fraud in the 2020 election and a pretty sizeable proportion of that believe it was enough to change the outcome. Endlessly they present this as some minority belief. But here's the the less obvious trick. They frame it as if it's on other people to prove that the outcome was affected. That's not how elections work, that's how jury trials work where Innocent Until Proven Guilty makes sense because you need a default outcome and you need to pick the one which is best. But an election has no default outcome nor should it. An election is not whoever the WSJ says won unless you can prove otherwise. It's on those running the election to be able to prove the outcome with auditable ballots, chains of custody, evidence that ballots were cast by the voter themselves and in an environment where coercion wasn't taking place. The 2020 election was a shambles.
Someone else said that literally no one outside the U.S believes the 2020 election was legit and I believe it.

My cousin Mishka said virtually no one in Poland thinks Biden is a real president.
 
In Brazil most people were just shocked at how the elections were conducted. Among the people who actually look most question the results, but most have no real opinion other than clowning on the fact the USA uses paper ballots so much instead of machines like we do.

However most people aren't aware of the real depths of US voting hell and their clowning on the machines dies a sudden death once I tell them these are 3rd party, privately hired ones that change from city to city. In Brazil we use electronic machines but they are all from a single manufacturer and they pass rigorous checking by the TSE (Electoral org). For comparison when our own machines had their quality questioned by the Bolsonaro people they used the publicly provided voting rolls (which records each vote in the machine) and asked for a specific model and firmware used in a number of municipalities to have the result ignored as untrustworthy due to many of them having unusual high or 100% Lula votes.

The fact there is no universal I.D. also shocks people here. Our I.Ds are free if you are poor, and if you have money they are still a pittance. They are your proof of citizenship when voting, and they allow you to vote on ONE machine which is tied to a single electoral section which is where you always vote (unless you move, on which case you can apply and change to a new machine somewhere else. This also changes who you can vote for local offices depending on your new place)

Our media has been doing overtime to cover for Lula now so there is little time to prop up Biden, and they tend to go for a "out of sight out of mind" approach now showing only really short clips with a reporter narrating instead of subtitling the old fool.
 
Why does this picture bug me so much? There's just something about the Ralph Lauren sweater that seems so out of place. Especially when you're at her level of politics and making a scheduled public appearance.
View attachment 5594921
Republican presidential candidate Nikki Haley speaks during a town hall, Dec. 18, 2023, in Nevada, Iowa. (AP Photo/Charlie Neibergall, File)
For me it's how nauseatingly fake it is. She's clearly trying to appeal to the "Everyman" class for whom Ralph Lauren is thought of as a fancy label but still one even blue collar workers can have some of. She's trying to pretend she's middle class.
 
The fact there is no universal I.D. also shocks people here.

Euros get legit confused by this. The American media says that Republicans want super-racist anti-negro voter ID laws, and they believe everything the media says, but then it's hard for them to understand that most states have no ID requirement to vote. But yeah, a state ID isn't hard to get here. Democrats just like to pretend black people can't get them because better record-keeping makes it harder to commit fraud.
 
The fact there is no universal I.D. also shocks people here. Our I.Ds are free if you are poor, and if you have money they are still a pittance.
Bring this up in burgerland and you'll be screamed at by some blue-haired retard about how you're trying to disenfranchise {insert minority group here} voters from exercising their constitutional 'rights'. It's a lie on two counts:

Lie one is that you need an ID to do most adult things including buying alcohol or even fucking compressed gas dusters at any fucking store. Nobody is screaming in wypipos cracker face about how {insert minority group here} can't buy beer at a gas station because they don't have unexpired identification. But it suddenly matters when it's time to vote. To that end, I completely understand why we need stronger voter ID laws and that we should absolutely handle elections better. We won't and will continue to be the laughing stock of the world for being prissy faggots. But it doesn't matter because...

Lie two is that the right to choose between two uniparty niggerfaggots with different colored ties isn't a right at all.
 
We don't have ID laws because negro districts commit massive amounts of fraud. Actual black turnout in any election is much lower than white turnout, so in lots of black areas, once the polls close, the poll workers vote on behalf of the no-shows. They also bus voters around multiple districts to vote on behalf of no-shows. ID laws would create a hard-to-falsify records of who actually voted, meaning this tactic wouldn't work. When Wisconsin introduced ID laws, Republicans started winning. Of course, ID requirements were waived during the lockdowns, because don't you believe the soyence?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back