Diseased Open Source Software Community - it's about ethics in Code of Conducts

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Very surprised that nobody talks about Linux for Niggers - THE FIRST OPERATING SYSTEM MADE SPECIFICALLY FOR BLACK PEOPLE.
Never made it past the first version. Not a surprise. Them white folk don't like it when when we try to get ahead.
 
Very surprised that nobody talks about Linux for Niggers - THE FIRST OPERATING SYSTEM MADE SPECIFICALLY FOR BLACK PEOPLE.
Never made it past the first version. Not a surprise. Them white folk don't like it when when we try to get ahead.
Certified hood classic:
edu_computers_nigger_racist.jpg
 
Very surprised that nobody talks about Linux for Niggers - THE FIRST OPERATING SYSTEM MADE SPECIFICALLY FOR BLACK PEOPLE.
Never made it past the first version. Not a surprise. Them white folk don't like it when when we try to get ahead.
Linux for Niggers thankfully compresses extremely well so here's a copy for all the niggers in the thread to enjoy.
 

Attachments

Today is the last day of the 37'th Chaos Communication Congress (37c3) and some people got pissed off that Jacob Applebaum (ioerror) has been allowed to attend. Applebaum is one of the WikiLeaks founder and former TOR project developers who was canceled over rape allegations around 2016. The rape situation is unclear. There was no investigation under German law, but the law in 2016 required the victim to fight back in order to be classified as rape.


1703944939250.png1703945077553.png1703945100470.png
Archive / original

Later in this Mastodon thread the geekfeminism wiki page was posted which copies (but does not link archives to most of the tweets) to twitter posts regarding the rape alegations at the time they happened:

1703945433977.png1703945453210.png
archive / original

That eaon guy later wrote an elaborate thread on Applebaum and how the CCC staff handled it
1703947314164.png1703947343665.png1703947369849.png1703947418366.png
This manchild is crying because the CCC organizers did not ban Applebaum from future events. The rest of the thread has comedic value:
1703947504918.png
1703947535719.png
archive / original
At this point it's mostly two groups flinging old shit at eachother.

CCC tickets are bearer-issued, meaning that you can attend it without giving away your name to the Club (unless you pay by credit card). This mechanism prevents validating the guest attendees and changing it would require strict control which is against the idea behind CCC. Or at least was, because a lot of the troons running CCC today would be happy with a police state, as long as they were the police.

Hacker cons are starting to turn into drama shows in recent years. CCC started to host some nontechnical talks on how corporations are le evil or how capitalism is reposnsible for the global warming. DEFCON is following track, it's hard to find a decent large con that is not overrun with manchild faggots or troons.

For example, this 36c3 (last year) workshop on anal stretching (Chaos Coomer Club)
1703946771770.png
archive / original

And (also 36c3) Drachenlord (Rainer Winkler) autograph meeting
1703946835155.png
original / archive
 
Lol!

Gotta love a bunch of nerds sperg about rape “keeping the event safe”… WHEN THERE ARE ZERO WOMEN THERE. (Probably plenty of trannies though)

It’s such a weird, bizarro performative ally/feminist shtick.

You’re not going to get laid my guy. No matter how many women you “keep safe” in your own mind.
 
There was no investigation under German law, but the law in 2016 required the victim to fight back in order to be classified as rape.
This sounds like a retcon to me (and a misrepresentation of the law, but the 2016 reform borders on incomprehensible, thanks Heiko Maas :politisperg:). If I remember correctly, the reasoning why they didn't report it back then was some bullshit about how they're anarchists and vulnerable minorities blah blah and so the police can't be trusted. A fair few of the rape claims turned out to be bullshit too, with the supposed "victims" coming forward and saying that their story was blown out of proportion without their knowledge or against their will. The whole thing was seedy as shit and it's honestly kind of unreal to see them Literally Shaking™ over this in 2023.
 
Gotta love a bunch of nerds sperg about rape “keeping the event safe”… WHEN THERE ARE ZERO WOMEN THERE. (Probably plenty of trannies though)
Back in 2016 there could be actual women there, in the hacking scene there are not many of them but it's not like it's a male only space. The amount of trannies and men in dresses has been skyrocketing in the recent years, so a lot of real women likely left.
If I remember correctly, the reasoning why they didn't report it back then was some bullshit about how they're anarchists and vulnerable minorities blah blah and so the police can't be trusted.
This sounds plausible given the community this was happening. Pretty sure that as a WL founder and a TOR project member, Applebaum had a lot of enemies, some of them state-level, so this could be just a gayop targeted against him. I took the remark about german law change at face value because I could not be bothered to check that. I'm leaning towards the belief that Jacob Applebaum liked to fuck whoever was happy to fuck in these anarchist hacker circles, and some group (other hackers, feds, whatever) decided to use it against him.
 
Pretty sure that as a WL founder and a TOR project member, Applebaum had a lot of enemies, some of them state-level, so this could be just a gayop targeted against him.
That was the theory back when the accusations dropped. The Tor Project board seems to disagree with the initial values of the project these days.
 
That was the theory back when the accusations dropped. The Tor Project board seems to disagree with the initial values of the project these days.
Someone repost them sneeding about us on twitter. You know, the guys who make the child porn internet tool.*

*not anymore if pamperchu is to be believed but feel free to try any of the "dark web" search engines and see what comes up for plenty of common queries like "chan", "wiki" etc.
 
That was the theory back when the accusations dropped. The Tor Project board seems to disagree with the initial values of the project these days.
I think it's extremely likely those rape accusations are a fed op, considering that's basically the pretext they used to lock up Julian Assange, the WikiLeaks founder.
 
I think it's extremely likely those rape accusations are a fed op, considering that's basically the pretext they used to lock up Julian Assange, the WikiLeaks founder.
It’s hardly a secret that “sexual assault” is basically meaningless today.

It went from meaning “omg! Rape!” to groping, to basically in any way make someone “uncomfortable”.

Whether looking (le male gaze), accidentally brushing up against someone, a bad joke etc.

Hence it’s a perfect weapon to get rid of someone, especially if they’re an awkward nerd.
 
It’s hardly a secret that “sexual assault” is basically meaningless today.

It went from meaning “omg! Rape!” to groping, to basically in any way make someone “uncomfortable”.

Whether looking (le male gaze), accidentally brushing up against someone, a bad joke etc.

Hence it’s a perfect weapon to get rid of someone, especially if they’re an awkward nerd.
The reason for abandoning "rape" as a general term isn't pure wokeshit. It's becuase "rape" carried a bunch of common law baggage with archaic definitions that don't really cover the kind of conduct that is today proscribed. It used to be that the elements of the crime of rape included that the victim have been previously chaste, as well as having physically resisted (even if that would have just gotten them killed).

It was essentially a sort of property crime where the real victim was the father who now had an unmarriageable daughter.

So "sexual assault" is generally just sexual acts committed without consent, and it's fairly recent that some form of affirmative consent is required. Even though "consent to have sex forms signed in triplicate" or even "yes I want to have sex" spoken verbally is not a legal requirement, some form of indication of consent is necessary.

A major problem is people don't actually act this way in reality.

A good rule of thums is if you're going to do something sexual to someone, know them damn well first or you're gambling. And take the warning signs you're dealing with a lunatic seriously. They often involve things like unnatural hair colors.
I remember thinking Donglegate was retarded. Oh what a simpler time it was.
That was pure retardation. And what we have now is even worse.

And again, a rule of thumb is if you're in an elevator, anyone in it with you is trapped until it gets where it's going, and there's a button to stop it. Be on your best behavior. Stuff you might do that would be okay in an open environment, where people could just walk away if they don't like it, can freak people out.

Like don't fart for instance. (And if you do look accusingly at the guy next to you and back away from him.)
 
Back