Are you lost needing femoid advice post here - For the poor bastard's who dare or are just curious

I don't need to. His will was weak. He would have used his intelligence if he was strong. His words mean nothing to me because his murderous actions speak of a man that did not believe in their power.
Please. Murderers of this sort are just murderers. The "why" is at most marginally interesting. And 99% of them have no true set of values, just self-absorption, nothing of value to dig into. Ted may be somewhat an outlier on that front by having some sort of principled, analytical basis for his point of view, but his choices of action were wholly inexcusable and wrong. Tl; dr: he was fucked up mentally, intellectual capacity aside, and however he got to where he got, he was a terrible person and an idiot.

You don't have to condone their murderous actions but to wilfully ignore the causes is pretty callous especially when the system will produce more of them because the root causes aren't being addressed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lowlife Adventures
First, strength is not everything. Second, self-sufficient life in the woods is proof of strength.
Killing innocents is not though. His strategy here was the easy way to publicity and I don't approve of it.
Agreement. He took the easy way out. If he had just gotten it published normally, never killed anyone, I'd praise him. I just can't. It wasn't just the people he killed, but who he mangled. The bombs were so poorly constructed they were more damaging than lethal. People were crippled for life because he wouldn't talk to a book publisher.
They're not. Any attractiveness - physical, intellectual, otherwise - is nulled and voided when they choose to do low shit like mailing bombs or picking off innocent people in some actualized sniper fantasy.
I've just noticed the phenomenon of shooters and such getting lots of love letters. It's weird.
 
Any validity in his ideas is eviscerated by his murderous actions.
Full disagree.
We need to separate good parts from lunacy.
I am 110% against shit like "Well that dude was evil in some way, so all he said is null and void".
I am fairly sure most humans are severely flawed, and some of us are just missing the self-control/inhibiting parts, but they might have something else to offer.
Mathematical genius is extremely rare and highly valuable.
Once the spirits calm down, smart people need to analyze things detached from these emotions.
Weak, and whiny. I expect better from you.
None's perfect. He compensated in other ways. That does not excuse his actions, so prison was fully justified.
 
We need to separate good parts from lunacy.
I am 110% against shit like "Well that dude was evil in some way, so all he said is null and void".
It's an annoying trait that people have and it's in the same vein as libtards cancelling concepts because of association.

I am fairly sure most humans are severely flawed, and some of us are just missing the self-control/inhibiting parts, but they might have something else to offer.
He was subjected to MK Ultra, was bullied by his peers and then went off to live in the woods to be away from people. Then they built a road through his place.

I mean, his political views don't align with mine but he's written some stuff that is insightful:
Imagine a society that subjects people to conditions that make them terribly unhappy then gives them the drugs to take away their unhappiness. Science fiction It is already happening to some extent in our own society. Instead of removing the conditions that make people depressed modern society gives them antidepressant drugs. In effect antidepressants are a means of modifying an individual's internal state in such a way as to enable him to tolerate social conditions that he would otherwise find intolerable.
 
Last edited:
It's an annoying trait that people have and it's in the same vein as libtards cancelling concepts because of association.
He was subjected to MK Ultra, was bullied by his peers and then went off to live in the woods to be away from people. Then they built a road through his place.
I mean, his political views don't align with mine but he's written some stuff that he's written is insightful:
His views are quite contrary to mine; I'm a technology enthusiast, but I know it's very dangerous and has to be kept under control. I'm not an anarchist either, leaning a lot towards the opposite end of the spectrum.
People are severely lacking in ability to balance things out. It's either full glorification and "he did nothing wrong" or full condemnation and "monster without any redeeming qualities".
 
You don't have to condone their murderous actions but to wilfully ignore the causes is pretty callous especially when the system will produce more of them because the root causes aren't being addressed.
Idgaf about the causes of certain people whose bad acts have greater impact than their good ideas. And I definitely don't fret over being "callous" with respect to a dead man who killed a few people, injured more, and reasonably terrified millions.

Full disagree.
We need to separate good parts from lunacy.
I am 110% against shit like "Well that dude was evil in some way, so all he said is null and void".
I am fairly sure most humans are severely flawed, and some of us are just missing the self-control/inhibiting parts
I'm pretty sure I've seen you condemn and dismiss people for having a lack of self-control. But I look forward to hearing you echo this for less smart idiots who do bad or dumb things, or who refuse to improve their lives/perspectives.

, but they might have something else to offer.
Mathematical genius is extremely rare and highly valuable.
His bombs were the most impactful thing he ever did. Valueless. Whatever good he may have had to offer the world he squandered and mocked. Being a genius is wonderful, but pragmatically useless if nothing good is done with it. One might even say that an additional sin is squandering aptitude, genius, and talent.

I've known a lot of truly brilliant people. Their quality and human value depends on more than their intellect. Brilliance isn't a moral carte blanche to be a shithead. Many brilliant people have been shitheads, and I do look past a fair amount of it, but Ted K. ultimately contributed nothing good to the world, and certainly nothing that outweighed his other actions. And see again
my comment about squandering talent. Spitting in God's eye, as they say, really.

Once the spirits calm down, smart people need to analyze things detached from these emotions.
If you mean me, I've got no emotion about the man. He was a negative-value human being, on balance, that's all.

OK, I'll give him back a half a point, because he was clearly mentally very unwell and delusional, and as such, perhaps he was so addled he wasn't in full control.

None's perfect. He compensated in other ways.
Which ways? How are we improved by his existence? Whose lives did he save? Because he ruined a bunch of them.

It's an annoying trait that people have and it's in the same vein as libtards cancelling concepts because of association.
Meh. People do that, but same outcomes don't necessarily mean same thought process. As I noted above, I (personally) enjoy and appreciate genius, even when that genius person has done dicey or bad things. There are many geniuses in their fields or generally who do bad things, even unrepentantly, but the worthwhile ones are the ones who actually contributed something. Picasso was a prick, for example, but net-net it honestly doesn't interfere with my appreciation and admiration of what he gave the world.

I mean, his political views don't align with mine but he's written some stuff that he's written is insightful:
Fair observation of his, but too broad by far. And though I doubt he meant it literally and in every single case, dummies will pick it up and try to do just that, because they don't understand context, just slogans.
 
I'm pretty sure I've seen you condemn and dismiss people for having a lack of self-control.
Yes, but most people are peons and near-worthless plebe. I have a special respect for mathematical minds, maybe because it was so hard for me to deal with it in a diluted form within physics and chemistry. We need better systems to discover these autists and channel their energies towards improving things, instead of mocking them and estranging them.
Minds like his are getting rarer and rarer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Justa Grata Honoria
Its a stat from the states, it doesnt necessarily apply everywhere. I dont want sex before marriage because Im not a deranged coomer who lacks self control and gives in to loneliness. I want a relationship first sex second. I dont think thats the same as incels who are sitting addicted to the screen.
Pssst, buddy, you can have sex and not be a coomer or whore.
Friend of mine dated 8 people, only 2 got to the serious phase. she didn't fuck anyone until she was almost 25.
For as many people there are that brag about a body count, there's probably 5 more that just quietly live their life. You don't think about it, but sexual compatability is legit important in a relationship. It is FAR from the end all be all of course, there are people who rarely, if ever fuck. But in most relationships, it's a bit important.
 
Pssst, buddy, you can have sex and not be a coomer or whore.
Friend of mine dated 8 people, only 2 got to the serious phase. she didn't fuck anyone until she was almost 25.
For as many people there are that brag about a body count, there's probably 5 more that just quietly live their life. You don't think about it, but sexual compatability is legit important in a relationship. It is FAR from the end all be all of course, there are people who rarely, if ever fuck. But in most relationships, it's a bit important.
Okay let me clarify that, I just believe its something special but secondary to the metaphysical connection. Its meant as something supplementary for the relationship and I dont want to fuck around to find out sexual compatibility cause I feel like thats wasting it. Im gonna have one maybe two relationships tops over my lifetime and Im not really seeking perfection, I just want the partner to be physically and mentally compatible and most importantly being capable of self improvement cause I feel thats most essential, wanting to make the other person happy (also cause those are the things I offer as well, I dont want to seek things which I cannot give, thats unfair to the lady). Im not so concerned about having a good sex life or ephemeral things like that, even in that case amicability is probably more important than being a hot bod or something.
 
Okay let me clarify that, I just believe its something special but secondary to the metaphysical connection. Its meant as something supplementary for the relationship and I dont want to fuck around to find out sexual compatibility cause I feel like thats wasting it. Im gonna have one maybe two relationships tops over my lifetime and Im not really seeking perfection, I just want the partner to be physically and mentally compatible and most importantly being capable of self improvement cause I feel thats most essential, wanting to make the other person happy (also cause those are the things I offer as well, I dont want to seek things which I cannot give, thats unfair to the lady). Im not so concerned about having a good sex life or ephemeral things like that, even in that case amicability is probably more important than being a hot bod or something.
I will say expecting 2 relationships is a bit... unrealistic. It's much more common to go through a minimum of like 3 or 4 partners, some even more if they attract a certain type. However I genuinely wish you luck on that, nobody enjoys the dating phase, it's annoying as fuck and stressful.
 
No. I don't. I think I'm beneath the standard caste of Human that you may not be. Aka humans with empathy reception.
Your problem isn’t lacking empathy, lots of us lack empathy, it’s how stubborn you are about not putting effort into fixing yourself. I get that it’s a mental thing, but so many autists and psychos learn to pass for normal you wouldn’t believe how many there are, just blending into society. You seem intelligent enough that I believe you can do it too. Start with the easy stuff, and simply mirror the behaviour of those around you. Understanding will come to you naturally. Yeah it won’t be real, but you’ll eventually have a deep enough understanding of how people emotionally react to things that it would take a skilled psychologist to tell that you’re doing consciously what normies do subconsciously.
Also you think money buys happiness. That is... shortsighted.
Whoever says money can’t solve your problems simply doesn’t have enough money to solve them.
 
First, strength is not everything. Second, self-sufficient life in the woods is proof of strength.
Killing innocents is not though. His strategy here was the easy way to publicity and I don't approve of it.
ngl if instead of killing random computer shop owners he'd killed [REDACTED] he'd be the greatest. Imagine a world without [REDACTED] and his shitty computers that have monopolized the business market
I'm a technology enthusiast
:deagleleft::blart:
 
I think I'm beneath the standard caste of Human
Modern medicine has a cure for that.
a-man-having-a-hair-transplant-and-hopefully-it-will-work.jpg
 
I will say expecting 2 relationships is a bit... unrealistic. It's much more common to go through a minimum of like 3 or 4 partners, some even more if they attract a certain type. However I genuinely wish you luck on that, nobody enjoys the dating phase, it's annoying as fuck and stressful.
I will try my best. My cousins getting married in couple months and she never had a relationship but seems quite happy in her current one, my neighbours kid got married to his best friend from middle school so on and so forth. It's not exactly common since people here are getting westernised as well, stuff like this happens to only 1 in 4 1 in 5 but I hope I'm able to get that last chopper. This is also considering I explored the neighborhood a bit in the past month and a half based on advice i got from here, it's still pretty dead unless I'm willing to engage in clubs, bars, dating apps and the like.
 
Your problem isn’t lacking empathy, lots of us lack empathy, it’s how stubborn you are about not putting effort into fixing yourself. I get that it’s a mental thing, but so many autists and psychos learn to pass for normal you wouldn’t believe how many there are, just blending into society. You seem intelligent enough that I believe you can do it too.
You overestimate my intelligence. It's below average. Just because I can type fancy words and say all this shit, doesn't mean shit. Make no mistake, I am retarded full stop.
Whoever says money can’t solve your problems simply doesn’t have enough money to solve them.
I agree with this. And also, it ties into THIS:
Modern medicine has a cure for that.
View attachment 5601995
WOW thanks bro, let me just get the money (That I totally have) and go travel to those places that do that (With the traveling opportunities I TOTALLY have) get it done, and come back. "Wow Guys, appreciate it for the life change"

I guess I'll go tell people with cancer to stop having cancer while I'm at it? This is literally the most lazy copypasted advice. When someone goes to a fucking cancer or AIDs website and just copypastes from MayoClinic. Fuck off.
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: dick brain
Back