Erin Reed / Anthony Reed II / @ErinInTheMorn / @ErinInTheMorning / @ErinInTheNight / _supernovasky_ / beholderseye / realitybias / AnonymousRabbit - post-op transbian Twitter/TikTok "activist" with bad fashion, giant Reddit tattoo. Former drug dealer with felony. Married to Zooey Simone Zephyr / Zachary Todd Raasch.

I'd argue gaslighting is the wrong word only because it implies consciously lying when you know better.

Tony is the very personification of the half-informed Reddit midwit, to the point he had the mascot tattooed on his body. He honestly thinks he's qualified to speak on medicine, law, politics, etc., despite never having finished a relevant degree in any of those subjects. He can't gaslight because he doesn't even know what the fuck he's talking about in the first place.

Someone once said (I forgot who exactly) that Derrida was "not even wrong". Tony's not even gaslighting.
Definitely agree with this. The thing that is interesting to me is Tony has become very agressive in citing himself as an authoritative source on a wide range of topics he is wholly unqualified to speak on and he has been doing so with increasing frequency.
 
I love the idea that the "gender affirming care" has suicidality rates and regret rates because that's what I look for when I go to the doctor. What's the suicide rate on physical therapy or a bottle of ibuprofen for my flu I wonder?

I would not have the patience to argue with Tony. Imagine having the audacity to say "listen, our gender affirming care has gotten better, people want to kill themselves less now! yay!".

How do you even measure the success of gender affirming care? Do you have to measure how well they pass and divide that for the amount of times during the day they want to kill themselves? Is chopping off a perfectly functional body part considered a success? Total lunacy. This is why people become violent against them.
 
Last edited:
I love the idea that the "gender affirming care" has suicidality rates and regret rates because that's what I look for when I go to the doctor.

I would not have the patience to argue with Tony. Imagine having the audacity to say "listen, our gender affirming care has gotten better, people want to kill themselves less now! yay!".

How do you even measure the success of gender affirming care? Do you have to measure how well they pass and divide that for the amount of times during the day they want to kill themselves? Is chopping off a perfectly functional body part considered a success? Total lunacy. This is why people become violent against them.
Isn't Tony (and TRAs in general) excuse for why the suicide rate is still high even after transitioning is because of "discrimination" and "lack of acceptance"?Tony, and TRAs claim gender affirming care reduces suicide rates, and improves mental health, but then they turn around and blame transphobes for why the suicide rate is still high even after.We've seen posts by troons where they state their mental health declines whenever they get misgendered, someone refuses to date them, or a tiny part of their body makes them dysphoric.The body part one interests me because its evidence of the theory that gender affirming care is only a band aid to the main problem with a troon.Troons maybe happy at first, but then as time goes on there'll be another part of their body that'll make them dysphoric and suicidal.They'll keep repeating this process until they realize that its impossible to be the opposite sex.Just like we've seen posts on the trans subreddits.
 
Isn't Tony (and TRAs in general) excuse for why the suicide rate is still high even after transitioning is because of "discrimination" and "lack of acceptance"?Tony, and TRAs claim gender affirming care reduces suicide rates, and improves mental health, but then they turn around and blame transphobes for why the suicide rate is still high even after.We've seen posts by troons where they state their mental health declines whenever they get misgendered, someone refuses to date them, or a tiny part of their body makes them dysphoric.The body part one interests me because its evidence of the theory that gender affirming care is only a band aid to the main problem with a troon.Troons maybe happy at first, but then as time goes on there'll be another part of their body that'll make them dysphoric and suicidal.They'll keep repeating this process until they realize that its impossible to be the opposite sex.Just like we've seen posts on the trans subreddits.

One thing that boggles the mind and Tony never adresses is that papers which purportedly show a mental health benefit still have a post troon out suicidality rate that is some 800% higher than for normies.
 
How is it misleading Tony? We need a lot more than "because I said so."

View attachment 5606704
This is a better description of "gender affirming care" which has two false premises in its name unlike "evidence based medicine" which is an accurate description of the perhaps impossible goal.

Tony got taken to school by Dr. Cantor. His only retort was another ad hominem attack.

View attachment 5606998

After getting dragged Tony doubled down on his false claim and cited court rulings that have been overturned on appeal.

View attachment 5607074

View attachment 5607003

James: SOME low risk interventions with low risk evidence are okay.
Tony: 90% of pediatric care has low quality evidence, so tranny surgery is fine for minors.

Tony, those aren't even in the same universe. How can anyone read Tony's quote, then what Cantor said and still believe this nigger knows what he's talking about.

This is probably the most blatant attempt as gaslighting (or whatever you'd like to call it, gaslighting might not be the correct word) he's ever done.

I'd argue gaslighting is the wrong word only because it implies consciously lying when you know better.

Tony is the very personification of the half-informed Reddit midwit, to the point he had the mascot tattooed on his body. He honestly thinks he's qualified to speak on medicine, law, politics, etc., despite never having finished a relevant degree in any of those subjects. He can't gaslight because he doesn't even know what the fuck he's talking about in the first place.

Someone once said (I forgot who exactly) that Derrida was "not even wrong". Tony's not even gaslighting.
This is correct. Tony did not understand what Cantor said originally so he spent all day trying to find "gotchas" on words and phrases taken out of context. Cantor was too smart and knew exactly what Tony did not understand. He even helpfully explained it to Tony a few times but Tony was already blind with rage at being challenged and euphoric from getting such a big name to pay attention to him so he never noticed the off ramps he was being provided. He, of course, was never going to realize that he was wrong, let alone accept it, but his arrogant ignorance demanded he not even see the outs at all.

Tony's not avoiding the question because he doesn't want to answer it, he's avoiding it because he can't because he doesn't comprehend it. He thought this GRADE talking point was a banger the instant he heard it just like when he thought the Miller test was such a banger he should awkwardly ramble about it to some local government where he didn't live in a way that wouldn't convince them of anything. It works on people who don't know anything about GRADE or EBM or medicine in general. Tony assumes he's understood it so he assumes those people will just agree with him not that they actually know what it means and he doesn't.

I don't think Tony is actually capable of it but he clearly has no interest of actually coming to understand things how others do, he feels entitled to lecture anyone no matter what and believes his entitlement alone is what should convince them to accept what he says. (Unless they want to reveal themselves as a fascist TERF.) He continues to be a personification of the reddit rules lawyer methodology built around assuming that anyone who disagrees with you has built their entire worldview on an incredibly flimsy and dishonest house of cards that will crumble the instant you find one tiny little card to pull out of it even if you have to force that card into it first. A top of his field person like Cantor is supposed to go "oh my gosh, you're right, I've never seen the obvious contradiction between these two things if they're described in a way that supports your position inherently even if that's not how they work or anyone understands them, thank you for helping me to see the light, Erin Reed, greatest person in all of human history!" Then Tony says "no, thank you, James, for giving me another chance to help people and humanity." Then all the lesbians (except the fat and ugly ones) take off their clothes and spread their legs.
 
Someone needs to do research on the number needed to treat and number needed to harm when it comes to pediatric gender medicine (or gender medicine at all). NNT is a derived statistic that tells how many patients must receive a particular treatment for 1 additional patient to experience a favorable outcome such as treatment response. And NNH is derived statistic that tells us how many patients must receive a particular treatment for 1 additional patient to experience a particular adverse outcome. - https://www.psychiatrist.com/jcp/numbers-needed-treat-harm-nnt-nnh-statistics-tell/

How many dicks do you have to cut off for patients to have a favourable outcome versus how many patients are damaged by cutting off their dick?

Mindfulness is very unlikely to cure your cancer, but it’s also unlikely to cause you any permanent harm.
 
Could some of Tony's claims, in his recent meltdowns, open him up to libel litigation in the USA? The statements he makes on Twitter about other people's work (as in research papers, not TV or other media troons think is reality) are so incorrect as to appear nigh-fraudulent to my 100% not-a-lawyer's eye.
 
Could some of Tony's claims, in his recent meltdowns, open him up to libel litigation in the USA? The statements he makes on Twitter about other people's work (as in research papers, not TV or other media troons think is reality) are so incorrect as to appear nigh-fraudulent to my 100% not-a-lawyer's eye.
Doubtful, it's obvious to even the most casual observer that those are his opinions, and I doubt anyone that matters really care about what he says. Also a waste of cash
 
Could some of Tony's claims, in his recent meltdowns, open him up to libel litigation in the USA? The statements he makes on Twitter about other people's work (as in research papers, not TV or other media troons think is reality) are so incorrect as to appear nigh-fraudulent to my 100% not-a-lawyer's eye.
As with many lolcows I'm struggling to get past the "reasonable person" standard. It's certainly not impossible and I'm not suggesting it would be entirely futile but the burden of building a case that enough people believe Tony's tweets seems too high. The irony is that if Tony continues to build the "career" he desires this would be easier and easier. Especially since he makes so many claims of his expertise and accuracy. And many journalists seem to believe them to where they use him as a quoted source. At the current juncture, I would recommend suing any outlets that quote Tony making such claims for not knowing better or checking his claims, especially since they have money and larger platforms.

I think Alex is the superior defamation target because it'd be easier to make the case that he has a professional duty to stop saying clearly false things (not that lawyers actually have such a duty but jurors wouldn't know that) and his job (and the fake one journalists keep giving him as a "civil rights lawyer" and sometimes "law professor") and employer is much more prestigious.

edit: That said, I do love the idea of Tony having to hear his lawyer saying his best defense is saying nobody believes his shit.
 
Last edited:
How many dicks do you have to cut off for patients to have a favourable outcome versus how many patients are damaged by cutting off their dick?
Among adult troons in Sweden, the number of dicks need to chop in order to forestall one new case of psychiatric consultation (NOT death by suicide) is 49.

It is absolutely laughable that Tony keeps chanting about GRADE GRADE GRADE as if it were some mantra that opens the gate to medical nirvanah. Yes, a lot of medical decisions are algorithmic, following guidelines that authorities make. Such authorities, in turn, must formulate guidelines by assessing the level of evidence of various studies. But if you restrict clinical practice to what are unequivocally supported by loads of randomized control trails and metaanalyses, you have to forego a lot of medicine.

What is the GRADE of dick-chop anyway? Or even more pointedly: what is the GRADE of penile inversion vs sigmoid colon vaginoplasty vs peritoneal vaginoplasty?

P.S. Can anyone remind me where did Tony's "90% of all Pediatric care are of low-quality GRADE" come from? And even granting that this statement is true, it doesn't follow that "any unproven practice is allowable in Pediatrics".
 
Last edited:
Tony just doesn't know when to stop, does he? Given he has no example, he could have just ignored Cantor's first request and gone about his day, maybe taken a walk with his son or something, but instead he just makes himself look more and more like an idiot.

Cantor politely, repeatedly asking for a single comparable example and not getting a single one is the perfect way to show how empty Tony's claims are.
Tony isn’t trying to prove a point he genuinely believes, but to win. Very masculine behaviour. This will provide further material for my own academic paper, “Troons are just men who couldn’t hack it lol.”


I don't agree with all of James views, but I love that he's a classic acerbic homosexual. Honestly most gay guys, myself included, can be total cunts verbally when they want to be. Tony ( the larper/prison gay) can't keep up and it's a delight to see.
Tony is desperately trying to divert his attention and failing. It probably works for most people - get them worked up about irrelevant crap and claim victory when they can’t respond.

I'd argue gaslighting is the wrong word only because it implies consciously lying when you know better.

Tony is the very personification of the half-informed Reddit midwit, to the point he had the mascot tattooed on his body. He honestly thinks he's qualified to speak on medicine, law, politics, etc., despite never having finished a relevant degree in any of those subjects. He can't gaslight because he doesn't even know what the fuck he's talking about in the first place.

Someone once said (I forgot who exactly) that Derrida was "not even wrong". Tony's not even gaslighting.
He is the embodiment of why social media is bad for society (he said on a forum). His thing is boiling concepts down so they fit into a handful of tweets or a one-minute video, aimed at an audience that’s already biased in his favour. Terrible formats for intelligent discussion, perfect formats for liars, bullshitters, conmen and midwits.

Ultimately, though, hormones and surgery shouldn’t work at all. You’re not fundamentally altering the body’s structure, you’re just making it look a bit more female. The fact that all troons with no exceptions whatsoever are rage-filled or miserable demonstrates this.
 
The body part one interests me because its evidence of the theory that gender affirming care is only a band aid to the main problem with a troon.Troons maybe happy at first, but then as time goes on there'll be another part of their body that'll make them dysphoric and suicidal.
Anecdotal but some anorexics will hyper-fixate on one body part until it meets a certain bodycheck requirement. Once that one is achieved, they will hyper-fixate on another. What is the GRADE of providing liposuction on each area? Oh, we don't have one cos encouraging such behaviour is lunacy.

I know the analogy has been used over and over again, but that is because it is so apt.

Tony isn’t trying to prove a point he genuinely believes, but to win.
Agree. He doesn't understand that winning in an argument based on fact, isn't to beat your opponent into submission (which is not actually winning), but to provide facts that prove your point.

Can't believe how long he kept this one up. He could have perfected his Doboz torte and Souffle skills in that time. Or spent it with his son or fiance.
 
Tony's GRADE nonsense reminds me of my last hospital stay. They had a nice priest fella who was going round offering to pray for people and I said 'dya know what sure, it's not really my belief but it'll make him happy and it won't hurt'

Tony apparently thinks this is me giving my consent to inverting my dick because "ITS ALL LOW QUALITY EVIDENCE!!!!!!"

Him continually jumping at Dr Cantor because he was literally the only person who couldn't see he was getting slapped about with minimal effort was just perfect.
 
e.png
How many boxes do you check Kiwis? Do we need to chase you around with a estrogen needler?
 
Last edited:
How many boxes do you check Kiwis? Do we need to chase you around with a estrogen needler?
Wait, I'm sure Tony claims it isn't a mental illness and that's why all therapy is "conversion therapy" but now he's citing the DSM-V. What other conditions in the DSM-V require removal of healthy organs for treatment? And if it is a mental disorder, doesn't that mean that they aren't actually a true and honest member of the opposite sex?

Tony's cycle of fallacies and lack of coherence with things he's previously said never fails to amuse me.

My mate's son loves his sparkly shoes, not sure how I'm gonna break the news to her.

@Positron can't quote cos this is an edit, didn't see your post before, They may as well have added "being a human being" to that list its so broad.
 
If you need more boxes, just ask:
View attachment 5608681
“Dear Mermaids, my son is 12 and I’m worried that he’s going to start masturbating and looking at girls and not wanting to spend time with his mother. Getting his cock cut off would be the perfect solution, but he hasn’t expressed any girly feelings.”
“Not to worry, these are also signs of gender dysphoria.”
“Those look like typical teenage emotions.”
“Then how do you explain the fact that they are found in 100% of transgender teens?”
“Oh, well, that’s different. But when I asked, he said that he didn’t suffer from dysphoria.”
“Not suffering from dysphoria is a key symptom of dysphoria! We’ll schedule his castration for next week.”

Fucking munchie parents.
Wait, I'm sure Tony claims it isn't a mental illness and that's why all therapy is "conversion therapy" but now he's citing the DSM-V. What other conditions in the DSM-V require removal of healthy organs for treatment? And if it is a mental disorder, doesn't that mean that they aren't actually a true and honest member of the opposite sex?

Tony's cycle of fallacies and lack of coherence with things he's previously said never fails to amuse me.

My mate's son loves his sparkly shoes, not sure how I'm gonna break the news to her.
There is no justification for GRS that fits Tony’s agenda. If it’s a mental disorder, it should never be treated with surgery. If it’s a physical disorder, there should be presenting physical symptoms that disappear or reduce after treatment. But most troons seem content to keep it vague - some kind of unspecified essence that is the opposite sex. Which is totally outside the realms of medicine.
 
View attachment 5608638
How many boxes do you check Kiwis? Do we need to chase you around with a estrogen needler?
Why is he bringing that up?No one denies gender dysphoria exists.What people deny is this whole idea of being born in the wrong body and having the opposite sex's brain.Again tony would send articles about trans brains existing and yet him and other TIPs refuse to get MRI brain scans and post the results to prove their lady brains.In fact i had a TIP tell me MRI scans aren't FDA approved for diagnosis because maybe scans have too many flaws.If that's the case then why should we trust any study in regards to trans brains?Funny enough the troon in question believes that MRI scans will be common practice in a decade once its approved by the FDA and it'll shut transphobes up.
 
Back