Opinion So you’d never wear a skirt in public? Men, you don’t know what you’re missing

Link (Archive)

So you’d never wear a skirt in public? Men, you don’t know what you’re missing​

My sister has three questions she asks men who say they’re feminists. It only takes one “yes” to pass her test, and yet few do. The questions are: if you get married to a woman, would you (and any kids) take her surname? If you had children with a woman, would you step back from your career to be their primary carer? And, simplest of all, would you wear a skirt in public?

The questions are lighthearted, and not intended to truly cut to the heart of feminist issues, but it’s interesting to see how many men sheepishly give three “no” answers nonetheless. Despite much apparent progress towards gender equity, some conventions around how men feel they must act and dress differently to women are stubbornly persistent, from family to fashion.

Baby names and childcare arrangements are inherently fraught topics, but I’m surprised how many men say they’d never even consider wearing a skirt. Twenty years ago, the curator Andrew Bolton noted that “while women enjoy most of the advantages of a man’s wardrobe, men enjoy few of the advantages of a woman’s wardrobe”, and that “nowhere is this asymmetry more apparent than in the taboo surrounding men in skirts”. While a few celebrities, such as Brad Pitt and LA Lakers basketball player Russell Westbrook, have worn skirts to red carpet events, it’s still vanishingly rare to see normal men wear normal skirts day to day.

Blokes, you’re missing out! I began wearing skirts six years ago to see if my sister had a point, and it’s only since then I realised what I’d been missing. Skirts are fantastically versatile: thick, pleated and cosy in the winter, light and breezy for summer. They come in a vast array of shapes and characterful styles, leaving the frigid palette of blacks, blues and browns that dominates most male fashion in the dust. You’ll easily find more panache in the skirts section of M&S than in its entire menswear department.

Men who’ve never worn them will often claim skirts are impractical, but this simply isn’t true. Free from complex gussets, skirts are less likely to tear than trousers, but easier to mend and usually straightforward to adapt. “What about pockets?” you cry. True, there’s a long and sexist history in women’s fashion of clothes made without pockets, but times have changed.
Margaret Howell and Vivienne Westwood were putting pockets in their skirts decades ago – and these days you can find skirts with decent pockets in Toast, LK Bennett, Cos, and even H&M.

Male fashion is hardly rooted in practicality, either. I love a snappy tie, but it’s hard to think of a more ostentatiously impractical garment than a silk scarf elaborately knotted around the neck. And while blue jeans were once tough workwear, the pairs men buy today are pre-bleached and distressed in factories, with rivets added purely for show. Ultimately, men’s fashion is just as much about aesthetics as women’s, so why not have more fun with it?
7EC2F535-8024-4FF0-952D-52506A0A26C9.jpeg
Men have tried to normalise skirts before. The Men’s Dress Reform party (MDRP) was an interwar British social movement that campaigned for “healthier and better clothes for men”. Condemning the strict social conventions and “rather sad colours” dominating male fashion, the group argued that many men were made “hot, uncomfortable, tired and badly tempered” by the clothes they were obliged to wear.

But in general, it has been women who have fought – often at great cost – to embrace a fuller spectrum of outfits. In the 1930s, California kindergarten teacher Helen Hulick went to jail rather than change out of trousers to testify as a witness in a burglary case. “You tell the judge I will stand on my rights,” she told the Los Angeles Times. “If he orders me to change into a dress I won’t do it. I like slacks.” Women have risked social ostracism and even prison to dismantle the rules governing gendered fashion – isn’t it time the rest of us did our bit?

Skirt life isn’t perfect. Even in London I’ve occasionally been spat at in the street and heckled from cars while wearing one. Learning to navigate the infamously changeable sizing system of women’s clothes is tedious too, but the frequent perks of skirts far outweigh the rare downsides.

Dancing in skirts is infinitely more fun than constricting trousers, and it’s hard not to feel buoyed up by the compliments. At a Royal Academy Summer Exhibition dinner, George Passmore of artist duo Gilbert and George told me my white tie and floaty Toast midi skirt combo was “the best menswear of the evening”, which, given Grayson Perry was also in the room, felt pretty good!

Skirts are practical, expressive and, when worn by men, mark a small step towards gender equality no less valuable than women’s long-fought battle to wear trousers. If you need a gateway drug, buy a black kilt on eBay and build your skirt collection from there.

Modern menswear is too often a parade of gloomy conformity, produced by an industry that contemptuously sees male shoppers as predictable and dull. But you don’t have to follow the crowd to be stylish – a man in a skirt signals self-assurance and inner confidence, which are always in fashion.
 
My sister has three questions she asks men who say they’re feminists. It only takes one “yes” to pass her test, and yet few do. The questions are: if you get married to a woman, would you (and any kids) take her surname? If you had children with a woman, would you step back from your career to be their primary carer? And, simplest of all, would you wear a skirt in public?
Your sister sounds like a dumb cunt.
 
The problem with skirts on men is that 99% of the time they just don't look good. The picture provided in the article is an excellent example of that - the skirt with its flowery patterns and bright colours contrasts harshly with the black shirt and boots, making it stick out like a dead fly in a glass of milk. It looks bad for the same reason neckbeards who wear a fedora with a t-shirt and jeans look bad. His outfit looks like it was designed through RNG. If you're going to fight gender roles, just make sure the gender roles don't end up kicking your ass.
 
If I had a specific reason, like some dumb dare or a particular associate message? You could get me into a kilt, sure, but not some flowery ankle length thing like in the article.

As any regular thing, especially when I live in Canada? Fuck off, I don't wear jeans and pants because of cultural obligations, I wear them because they're warm and don't get in my way. Really getting fed up with these spineless twats who bend to every tiny little bit of societal pressure, and therefor feel we all need to change the social structure and expectations to accommodate their specific wants and needs. Grow a fucking spine, wear a skirt all you want, I'll generally avoid you and think you're fucking weird, and that's all their needs to be to it.
 
Male fashion is DEFINITELY about practicality, go fuck yourself. Skirts have "decent" pockets now? Then why are women still carrying giant hand bags everywhere? Oh, right, because their pockets suck. You can call it sexist all you want, that doesn't make it any less true. A good pair of pants will hold everything you need in your pockets.

As far as light and breezy, men win again. We have cargo shorts, which are literally the greatest innovation that exists in all of fashion. Not too long, not too short, pockets for days and they look great.

There's a good reason why women poach men's outfits but not the other way around. Its because women's fashion is designed solely to attract men. Then when women need an outfit for practicality they can buy men's clothes. Men could do the same but we don't have any need to attract other men, so we don't.
 
I expected a troony screed about how it's extremely normal and liberating to get a boner from feeling pretty, but I gotta say, even though this guy is clearly a hipster-tier faggot, I like the spirit of his argument. the term "skirt" in American culture at least has a gendered connotation when it's really just a form factor; the most well-known example of a men's skirt is obviously the kilt. I personally would never wear a skirt, especially that hideous neon paisley shit the fag in the picture is showing off, but there are plenty of practical arguments for open legwear, such as heat management for one, or better freedom of movement. unfortunately troonism has basically ruined any chance of this being accepted in the foreseeable future by making gendered clothing a sexual fetish for men. TTD.

for those recoiling from the cringe shit the author is trying to sell in this article, consider this instead:
1704297314552.jpeg1704297370292.jpeg1704297399206.jpeg
1704297473804.jpeg1704297492154.jpeg1704297545989.jpeg
 
Last edited:
but I'm surprised to learn that it was written by a man.
If there is a change of getting pussy in the future, a man can be more radical than the most female feminist existing. If a man claims he is a feminist look at his legs, there is a very high chance he is chained to a vagina.

I will never, ever wear a skirt. I got my balls stuck in a garden chair once when wearing swimming trunks which were way to big for me. I rather face a firing squad than going through that hell again.

Edit: However if this becomes fashionable again, i might change my mind.
il_500x500.2879455037_okgz.jpg
 
Back