Serious LGBT Discussion

Any of you fags ever wish you were women sometimes?
Nope, I’m comfortable in my masculinity and being a man. Never had any desire to be a chick, and the only time I ever really “camp it up” is just to have fun and bullshit around poking fun at the whole thing, it’s nothing I take seriously.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Mesh Gear Fox
So does murder.
Are you a psychopath or just an edgelord?
suspicious cat.jpg
 
That's like the one thing Russia does well.
Let's hope they keep at it. While you might not be able to fix homosexuality, you can most definitely marginalize it and ostracize its practitioners.
More importantly, the reason I asked this question is because I know we have people claiming to be right wing, or even pro-Russia, that are gay. Well, this is your future if such a system takes root in the West. That's going to be your fate under an actual right wing regime.
So, ideally, the gays would be honest with themselves and us, and just acknowledge their lives would turn to complete shit without liberalism.
It's not a contradiction to acknowledge something to be good for society while being bad for you personally.
 
It's not a contradiction to acknowledge something to be good for society while being bad for you personally.
If you mean this as an explanation of gays supporting anti-LGBTQ regimes, to me it smells like self-hatred and severe ideological inconsistencies.
Not unlike those manifested by drug addicts or alcoholics.
 
So does heroin, but I'd rather it be banned as well.

Impressive that some people would willingly suffer incontinence and higher susceptibility to STIs in order to stimulate an organ that's otherwise well out of the way.

People wouldn't even know about prostate stimulation were it not for dangerous and unnecessary experimentation with the body's garbage chute.

Besides, the fact that some men want women to engage in the degrading act is proof that it's not prostate stimulation per-say that is the draw to anal sex. It's that it's an inherently dehumanizing practice, and that's hot to them.
 
Impressive that some people would willingly suffer incontinence and higher susceptibility to STIs in order to stimulate an organ that's otherwise well out of the way.

People wouldn't even know about prostate stimulation were it not for dangerous and unnecessary experimentation with the body's garbage chute.

Besides, the fact that some men want women to engage in the degrading act is proof that it's not prostate stimulation per-say that is the draw to anal sex. It's that it's an inherently dehumanizing practice, and that's hot to them.
When you tell gay men (or even people who support them) how disgusting, unsanitary and unhealthy anal sex is one of the common reflexes is "Oh yeah? What about straight couples who do it? Checkmate atheist."

As if that's somehow a Royal Flush slam dunk instead of a further Indictment of a pornsick society where even members who have nothing to gain and everything to lose (in this case women) practice it because its been so normalized.
 
So does heroin, but I'd rather it be banned as well.
I can't remember anyone ever butt fucking next to me on the subway, or anyone attacking me while they had a dick in their ass. You can want them both banned, but you can't pretend they're on the same level.
People wouldn't even know about prostate stimulation were it not for dangerous and unnecessary experimentation with the body's garbage chute.
Oh come on, you don't have to take a dick up the butt to learn it feels good. Men would stumble upon that one way or another, be it their own finger or a doctor's.
 
Back