Dummies, it wasn't "all redacted." Very little was redacted. I just read the whole fucking thing, it took a few hours. I read all of it. Go fucking read the main depositions from the witnesses. The redactions are ALMOST all confined to things that are pretty obvious for why they are being redacted and it's not saving any powerful people...it's a girl's parents' address and neighborhood information, specific medical diagnosis information and treatment protocol for a victim, and similar. However, there is one very significant redaction of a single person accused of wrongdoing...other than this, any redacted name is not at all affiliated with any illegal conduct, which is clear from context. But this person is:
As for people who are directly accused in the documents: It's not good news for Democrats.
Former NM governor Bill Richardson, who died in September, was apparently actively being visited by the pedo express. Multiple people point to him being a client.
Former majority leader George Mitchell of Maine is named multiple times, explicitly as a client.
Tom Pritzker is on there, the Pritzkers are all huge Dem donors.
Alan Dershowitz is really, really guilty.
I did not find any Republicans named other than Trump. While Trump is not accused of particular wrongdoing, Epstein and Maxwell at least claim to the girls they're molesting that he is a personal friend and imply they could drop in on him (but they don't).
The most interesting name is definitely Ehud Barak, former PM of Israel. I feel like this particular inclusion sort of defies the "it was all a Mossad setup" logic, because that would be an odd person to want to throw under the bus if so.
Who does the bar cover? We could probably figure out a character count based on the length of the redaction line. And why did this one particular individual earn such a redaction, when literally all the other directly accused individuals have their names unredacted?
Anyway, there's also some detective work someone could do about the redactions on the long list of potential witnesses to call, because they're in alphabetical order and the redactions are therefore between certain alphabetical ranges for the surnames of the witnesses.
But sure just keep complaining it's all redacted because you don't want to go read 900 pages, whatever. A lot of it is very repetitive (court filings often are) and the real meat is in the depositions.