Jackie Singh / Jacqueline Singh / Jacqueline Anne Stokes / Jax / @find_evil / HackingButLegal / @HackingButLegal / piggytomlinson - Cybersecurity "expert," wannabe journoscum, former "hacker"; gunt guards Patrick Tomlinson, currently picking a fight with ONA Forums, GNAA Groupie

John Andrews Stan said:
She’s so transparently an amateur pretending to be a grown-up professional. Reminds me of when toddlers pretend to be waitresses taking your order and get very angry if you break character.
Click to expand...
This is actually a perfect description of the whole Patsphere. I wish I had thought of it so I'm going to steal it without attribution. (Please don't tell Harvard.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Caverlock, An automatic clown, Lord Xenu and 3 others
ChromaQuack said:
If Accenture over in the US works the same as Accenture in LATAM then she was making the same money as a junior code chimp and getting "amazing" seniority perks like a gym time card that went obviously unused.
Click to expand...
Her title may have had “senior” in it but that was a misnomer given in lieu of decent compensation. The first years working for a management consultancy are usually spent immersed in spreadsheets and never leaving your desk except to fly to another client. Sure, the company lets you expense dinner and a Uber home when you work past 8, but that’s small consolation when you work past 8 every night. There’s no way this dipshit could cut it in a job requiring actual work. Jackie’s a grifter, not a grafter.
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Caverlock, An automatic clown, Wy4M and 1 other person
Around Jax, guard your snacks!
1704461329747.png
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Feels
Reactions: Joe_Welch, Alex Jones' Fancy Cat, Ihascat and 36 others
John Andrews Stan said:
Her title may have had “senior” in it but that was a misnomer given in lieu of decent compensation. The first years working for a management consultancy are usually spent immersed in spreadsheets and never leaving your desk except to fly to another client. Sure, the company lets you expense dinner and a Uber home when you work past 8, but that’s small consolation when you work past 8 every night. There’s no way this dipshit could cut it in a job requiring actual work. Jackie’s a grifter, not a grafter.
Click to expand...
No wonder she got fired if they had to pay for the dinners of this hambeast, not even the Accenture leprechauns with their pots o' gold could afford that.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Caverlock, An automatic clown, Wy4M and 1 other person
Jackie is depressed because it's January 6. She's also going to make more AI art.
xitter.png
Please post it for us, Jackie.

While we were fighting for Patrick's lolcow of the year award, Jackie kindly posted her greatest hits (Nitter/Archive Part 1/Archive Part 2). Buckle up boys, this is a long one.


First, her ego was stroked.
year1.png

She talks about Michael Hastings' death (he was going to drop a damning report on the CIA/FBI when he died in a suspicious car accident. Months later, Wikileaks revealed that the CIA/FBI can remotely control your car.) Jackie wishes she was half the journalist Hastings was.
year2.png

She totally helped national security, guys.
year3.png
Please note that the Hastings thing was in January, and this was in April. Her sperging picks up immensely after this, as this is when she stumbled upon Patrick and the Pests.

Speaking of, she's still standing by her claim Torswats is Swedish.
year4.png
Maybe she should follow the tranny example and crib our research. She'll look less stupid.

Still pushing her gay anagram.
year5.png

She stands by her faildoxes. Surely that won't come back to bite her.
year6.png

People can call me retarded now! DAMN YOU ELON MUSK!
year7.png

More impotent rage at Elon.
year8.png

She writes about what she wishes she was smart enough to do.
year9.png

She claims to seek the harsh truth while firmly holding onto beautiful lies.
year10.png

"Twitter censorship is bad when they don't censor the stuff I hate!"
year11.png

The government refuses to grant extraconstitutional authority to the Secretary of Commerce.
year12.png

"Guns are just bad, mkay?"
year13.png

She hopes and prays someone brings down ONA and Kiwi Farms before people learn about her connections with weev.
year14.png

Look, crypto nerd stuff! See, she's totally a hacker!
year15.png

The first thing she wrote!
year16.png
Step 1: suck the right dicks.

We're totally psychopaths because she shopped around for the one shrink that would agree with her.
year17.png

Cow crossover with fake geek girl Naomi Wu.
year18.png

She migrated her articles to Substack, a website known for hosting the cheese-fueled musings of internet supervillain Joshua Moon.
year19.png

She claims to have published a browser extension. If it's anything like her previous work, it's hamfisted code at best.
year20.png

She criticizes CloudFlare for protecting ONA. Sorry, Snackie, but it's a legal website.
year21.png

Talks about the computer work someone else did. Really showing your diversity hire chops there, Jax!
year22.png

She wrote a summary of the previous month. Nothing about her $100,000+ debt being dug up, though.
year23.png

Big company faces lawsuit from disgruntled employee. Jackie can relate, I'm sure.
year24.png

The international courts won't go after ONA because they pick on one fat man in Wisconsin.
year25.png

Jackie: (Posts nude pictures of herself online)
Internet: (Spreads those pictures around)
Jackie: (Surprised Pikachu Face)
year26.png

Look, she went onto a tiny podcast so you know she's totally legit!
year27.png

Reposting an article from 2015. Guess that podcast ate up too much of her time.
year28.png

More disgruntled grumbling.
year28.5.png

Bloomberg Law has fallen far if they consider her an expert.
year29.png

"TAKE MY ACRONYM SERIOUSLY GUYS"
year30.png
(To be honest, I wouldn't be surprised if it caught on. The absurdities of today are the uncontested realities of tomorrow!)

Jackie speculates, because nobody with any sense lets her near anything important.
year31.png

Sam Altman's sister weighs in on her brother's misfortune.
year32.png

"Watch my video! Like my posts! Validate me, dammit!"
year33.png

Another podcast.
year34.png

Wonder what she gave in return for a glowing revue from Rep. Santos?
year35.png

"Why does Telegram continue to host that rascally Joshua Moon! That makes me so mad I'm going to write a think piece!"
year36.png

Jackie "ideated" a concept for a clearweb version of SecureDrop (.onion link).
year37.png

We too wait with baited breath to see how CloudFlare handles one angry fat lady with an ego to match!
year38.png

Gimme money.
year39.png
 
  • Informative
  • Lunacy
  • Like
Reactions: Ihascat, Caverlock, 102 and 36 others
She boasted about being shouted out by George Santos? Did Jackie not get the memo?

Not about the endemic dishonesty, fabricated life, embezzled public funds, sexual assault allegations and extraordinary bipartisan expulsion, but something far worse.

noooojackie.jpg

NO JACKIE, THE FASCISM! NEHOOOO!

no.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Caverlock and Hitlerswag420
Kendall Motor Oil said:
She reminds me of all those wannabe cybersec "professionals" who incessantly post opinion pieces on LinkedIn.
Click to expand...
At this point I think that one guy should have just taken a shit on that persons desk so it would have least been funny.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wy4M
Sexy Senior Citizen said:
Still pushing her gay anagram.
year5.png
Click to expand...
I'm sure she'll keep pulling more bullshit acronyms and "frameworks" out of her ass. It is the natural way of the kind of halfwit huckster who thinks faux-terminology and jargon make her sound credible.

Case in point:

Sexy Senior Citizen said:
We're totally psychopaths because she shopped around for the one shrink that would agree with her.
year17.png
Click to expand...
lol this is great. "Original research and open source work" a.k.a. "peer review? what's that?"

I went down the rabbit hole a bit while looking into this guy she's quoting. Michael Nuccitelli is a crank who's been trying (and failing) to brand himself as some kind of cyberbullying expert for more than a decade. He is actually a licensed psychologist with a doctoral degree, but that's more an indictment of the educational system than an endorsement of his abilities. This is the kind of shit he comes up with:

Screenshot 2024-01-07 at 23.46.23.jpg

Well, you can't fault the guy for being unambitious. Supposedly his "iPredopathy" (2009 called, they said you're a faggot) not even supplements but entirely replaces the notions of sociopathy and psychopathy.

Screenshot 2024-01-07 at 23.51.59.jpg

The fuck am I reading here, is he pitching a Beast Wars reboot?

The source for everything this guy writes seems to be crack_pipe.jpg. Just constant sweeping statements with nary an anecdote to back it up, let alone any real research or data. I guess you can see why Jackie would be a fan.

I also love that his "psychopathy checklist" that Jackie posted on her blog definitely classifies herself and Fatrick as likely psychopaths. To be fair, the list is so hilariously badly designed that any random Facebook boomer probably qualifies too.

  • Depending on level of interpersonal dexterity, tends to have intermittent to frequent online verbal outbursts.
  • Although comfortable in dispensing online criticism, quickly becomes uncomfortable and angry if he/she is criticized by online users.
  • Has a history of poor employment behavior that is either communicated to others online or evidenced by online employment task ineptitude.
  • Easily offended and reacts aggressively online.
  • Expects total online victim submission, but at the same time, seek acceptance and admiration for his/her tyrannical tactics.
  • Engages in the defense mechanism of projection online by accusing others of faults and weaknesses that are his/her own.
  • Exhibits a distorted sense of reality confirmed by online users.
  • In addition to being unable to accept responsibility or blame for his/her online actions, he/she is described as in denial by online users.
  • Unable or unwilling to accept personal responsibility for their online actions.
  • Interprets offline/online communications in “black or white”.
  • Moderate to severe obsessive-compulsive needs for online stimulation.
  • Interprets most online user communications with a sense of paranoia.
  • If deemed insignificant, easily becomes enraged, which is communicated in online environments.
  • Denies being dysfunctional in online environments unless part of deceptive strategy.
  • Described by online users as a “human paradox” by being logical and coherent, while at same time, exhibiting attitudes and behaviors that are opposite.
  • Twists and distorts offline facts presented by online users to mimic his/her online image.
  • Described by online users as being arrogant.
  • Demands absolute loyalty from online users and views constructive criticism as a personal assault.
  • Described by online users as being covertly and overtly domineering.
  • Exhibits online or offline neuropsychological deficits.
  • Unable to accept responsibility for his/her inappropriate online actions.
  • Habitually disputes the qualities, abilities and personalities of other online users.
  • Concurrent with grandiosity, exhibits a grossly inflated view of his/her abilities and self-worth in online environments.
  • Described by online users in online social forums as compulsively lecturing others until agreed with by respondents.
  • Has deficits in affective and interpersonal online functioning.
  • Obsessively engages in online reputation management [ORM].
  • Has poor behavioral control that may or may not be evidenced online.
  • Has deep seated rage exhibited online that is intentional and unintentional.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Lunacy
Reactions: Caverlock, AmateurComedicTaxidermist, male pattern malding and 12 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back