Alejandra Caraballo / Alex Caraballo / @Esqueer_ - Twitter trans rights activist, cyberlaw teacher who doesn't understand cyberlaw, mass flaggot, humiliated in congress by a real woman.

Plagiarism is a death penalty offense academically. These people are abject morons or, more likely, just liars.
I want to understand how it's evaluated, is it on a sentence level or word level or structural level or logical level. Most plagiarism stuff online seems like taking sentences from other people and changing few verbs and nouns where applicable. If I were to take a sentence wholesale and convert more than 50% of stuff, would it be considered plagiarism. It loops back to fair use and copyright as well for some reason. Ofc troons are a hivemind so ofc they probably plagiarised especially if they're influencers. It is funny to me after the hbomb video dropped so many people pulled takes out their ass about plagiarism, the same people who want to abolish copyright protections.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Coo Coo Bird
I want to understand how it's evaluated, is it on a sentence level or word level or structural level or logical level.
When it comes to a head, it's never borderline stuff. It's always shit-tons of it, absolutely blatant, like in this case 50+ instances admitted to.

Lesser offenses can cause a scandal even if they don't result in getting tenure yanked, i.e. "self-plagiarism" where you recycle your own shit.

She's really getting off easy even being allowed to teach any more at all.
 
Same guy who things 50 acts of plagiarism is a "minor academic transgression."

View attachment 5610790
Big Al responds to Hobbes's tweet.
gay2.jpg

I want to understand how it's evaluated, is it on a sentence level or word level or structural level or logical level. Most plagiarism stuff online seems like taking sentences from other people and changing few verbs and nouns where applicable.
Washington Beacon shown that Gay lifted wholesale from other peoples' works, transposing a word or a phrase here and there. If not for her vagina and her skin color, Gay would never even have graduated college.

BTW. A troon shot up school. Big Al is quick to come up with a spin.
al.png
 
Last edited:
Same bullshit artists, different day. The game for the cult is to pretend there is some sort of shortage of qualified professionals.

Screenshot 2024-01-05 165743.png

Screenshot 2024-01-05 165709.png

Screenshot 2024-01-05 171243.png


 
Last edited:
"Most clinic providers do not have an endocrinologist or psychiatrist on staff" - that's exactly the problem, the bulk of hormone scripts are being written by people who don't have relevant expertise.

It's one thing to get an interim script from a GP because the specialists are all backlogged or the patient lost his/her meds but that isn't what's going on here, Big Gay Al is mad because Ohio is cracking down on glorified prescription mills. It's also hard not to notice that gender medicine is the only field with this problem, most specialists will give you a weird look and a referral if you ask them for something well outside their specialty.

Edit to add: And if anyone can claim to be an ethicist, how is that an obstacle to getting treatment? Even if the ethicist can't be the same person as the psychiatrist or endocrinologist a gender clinic could just designate a nurse who already works there as an ethicist and have him/her sit through a few ethics lectures to head off questions from the medical board.
 
Last edited:
"Most clinic providers do not have an endocrinologist or psychiatrist on staff" - that's exactly the problem, the bulk of hormone scripts are being written by people who don't have relevant expertise.

It's one thing to get an interim script from a GP because the specialists are all backlogged or the patient lost his/her meds but that isn't what's going on here, Big Gay Al is mad because Ohio is cracking down on glorified prescription mills. It's also hard not to notice that gender medicine is the only field with this problem, most specialists will give you a weird look and a referral if you ask them for something well outside their specialty.

Edit to add: And if anyone can claim to be an ethicist, how is that an obstacle to getting treatment? Even if the ethicist can't be the same person as the psychiatrist or endocrinologist a gender clinic could just designate a nurse who already works there as an ethicist and have him/her sit through a few ethics lectures to head off questions from the medical board.
Why would every doctor that is involved in such a complicated process be under one roof in the first place? Clinics don't have a surgeon in the office either, that doesn't stop people from getting referred to a different office to get horrifying procedures done.
 
Most plagiarism stuff online seems like taking sentences from other people and changing few verbs and nouns where applicable.
it's never borderline stuff. It's always shit-tons of it, absolutely blatant,
I'm not sure what's taught now in what passes for composition classes, but I was taught two main approaches that reduced the likelihood of plagiarism. One was the direct quote with an end note: According to Smith and Jones, "Legal clinicians from Harvard are not very trustworthy. (23)" And the other was paraphrasing with a different sentence structure than the original: Smith and Jones' own research into the matter confirmed a lack of trust in Harvard's legal clinicians. (23)

@AnOminous is right though: Those caught in plagiarism, especially those in prominent positions, have generally done so in a rather blatant way.

Big Gay Al is mad because Ohio is cracking down on glorified prescription mills.
It's kind of funny how the general consensus is prescription pill mills need to be stopped because they give people unfettered access to dangerous meds such as oxy. Meanwhile, A.C. likens pill mill crackdowns to trans genocide if the crackdown affects HRT availability in any sort of way.
 
I want to understand how it's evaluated, is it on a sentence level or word level or structural level or logical level. Most plagiarism stuff online seems like taking sentences from other people and changing few verbs and nouns where applicable. If I were to take a sentence wholesale and convert more than 50% of stuff, would it be considered plagiarism. It loops back to fair use and copyright as well for some reason. Ofc troons are a hivemind so ofc they probably plagiarised especially if they're influencers. It is funny to me after the hbomb video dropped so many people pulled takes out their ass about plagiarism, the same people who want to abolish copyright protections.
On the graduate or PhD level, you are taught that you are responsible for properly citing your sources, and any failure to do so could constitute plagiarism. This effectively means that it is better to err on the side of caution and cite everything that did not directly come from your own head.

For an undergrad, plagiarism never gets addressed beyond lifting someone else's work and putting your own name on it. The further you go in academia, more stringent the rules become. Paraphrasing someone else's argument must be cited. Using someone else's thoughts must also be properly cited. Combining someone else's work with your own must be properly cited. That is why if you ever read any scholarly sources, they have dozens, sometimes hundreds, of footnotes of citations.

You have to accurately attribute every thought that is not your own to the original author, no matter how much you alter it. Failure to do to is a cardinal academic sin. Gay should consider herself lucky she is a black woman. Anyone else would have have failed to get a degree, let alone been able to to work in the Ivy League.

It's also telling that all the people jumping to Gay's defense are pro-Hamas. They don't care one bit about academic integrity; they just don't want Gay to be crucified for humiliating herself in front of Congress.
 
I'm not sure what's taught now in what passes for composition classes, but I was taught two main approaches that reduced the likelihood of plagiarism. One was the direct quote with an end note: According to Smith and Jones, "Legal clinicians from Harvard are not very trustworthy. (23)" And the other was paraphrasing with a different sentence structure than the original: Smith and Jones' own research into the matter confirmed a lack of trust in Harvard's legal clinicians. (23)
And if you find yourself unable to paraphrase it without wrecking it, just use the quotation marks.

Funny thing, the legal profession has almost the opposite rule. If the language worked last case, just cut and paste it in.
Gay should consider herself lucky she is a black woman.
She should have realized her coon armor is vulnerable to jew-jitsu.
 
purge.png (archived 4 minutes ago am I about to get ninja'd)
purged2.png (archive)
Congrats to Destiny and his fandom for the squirrel pelt. Lol at Keffals/Thwomp's ballwasher journoid and Pisspiggranddad getting the boot.

Also Alex is retarded, the journoid's name is Steven Monacelli. His twitter handle was @Stevanzetti for some reason I don't care enough to learn.
Fy7TCZ7WcAQyruA.jpg
Aww, who's a big tough guy on the internet? You are! You are!
 
View attachment 5623074 (archived 4 minutes ago am I about to get ninja'd)
View attachment 5623083 (archive)
Congrats to Destiny and his fandom for the squirrel pelt. Lol at Keffals/Thwomp's ballwasher journoid and Pisspiggranddad getting the boot.

Also Alex is retarded, the journoid's name is Steven Monacelli. His twitter handle was @Stevanzetti for some reason I don't care enough to learn.
View attachment 5623088
Aww, who's a big tough guy on the internet? You are! You are!
And nothing of value was lost
 
"Trans child"? That sure is a weird way of saying "grooming victim". And yes, troons deserve the millstone treatment.
"Supporting?" That sure is a weird way of saying "brainwashing someone else's child into taking experimental drugs with irreversible effects and castrating himself and cutting his dick off."
 
Back