Culture Peterborough store clerk charged with aggravated assault after would-be robber beaten with baseball bat - Police chief says while case is 'unusual,' clerk's arrest was 'about the law'

1704980762486.png

A store clerk who allegedly used a baseball bat to hit a man who attempted to rob his convenience store is now facing a charge of aggravated assault, Peterborough police say.

In a news release issued Tuesday, the Peterborough Police Service said officers were called to a convenience store in the King Street and Bethune Street area around 2:30 a.m. on Jan. 5.

Upon arrival, officers learned that a male clerk was helping a customer when a second man entered the store demanding money and brandishing a baseball bat, according to the release.

"A struggle ensued and the clerk was struck with the bat before grabbing the bat away from the suspect," police said.

"The suspect then fled the store. The clerk followed the suspect out of the store and struck him several times with the baseball bat on the sidewalk."

Arrest warrant issued for 37-year-old suspect​

Police said the man who allegedly attempted the robbery suffered head injuries and is in a Toronto hospital receiving treatment, while the clerk was treated at the scene by emergency medical services.

A warrant for arrest was issued for the 37-year-old man who allegedly attempted the robbery for assault with a weapon, possession of weapon, and robbery, police said.

Meanwhile, the 22-year-old clerk from Peterborough was also arrested and charged with aggravated assault. He was held in custody and appeared in court on Jan. 6.

Peterborough police say they would also like to speak with the male customer who was in the store at the time of the incident.

'This case is unusual': police chief​

Daniel Brown, criminal lawyer and past president of the Ontario Criminal Lawyers Association, said the public may have a hard time understanding these charges, as some might think the would-be robber "had it coming.

"The person that went into the store to commit the robbery had premeditated this," Brown said on CBC Radio's Metro Morning.

"The person who was defending themselves — there was no planning, there was no deliberation … so the courts are definitely going to treat this more leniently even if he's found guilty. There are a whole bunch of extenuating circumstances that will come into play."

Brown said the maximum sentence for aggravated assault is 14 years in prison, but that the circumstances in each case do matter when it comes to sentencing.

Peterborough police Chief Stuart Betts also responded to public criticism over the clerk's arrest on Wednesday, saying commentary critical of the arrest is unfair to his officers.

While noting that "this case is unusual," Betts — who has been Chief of the Peterborough Police Service for one year —said people should follow the case in court to see what led to the charges.

"This is not about politics — politics have nothing to do with the facts. This is not about race — as some have suggested. This is not about the perception that criminals go free while victims of crime are penalized — this is about the law," Betts said in a statement posted on X, formerly Twitter.

1704980928002.png

Police are asking anyone with information about the incident to call Peterborough police at 705-876-1122, extension 555, or Crime Stoppers at 1-800-222-8477.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/peterborough-robbery-aggravated-assault-1.7079418 (Archive)
 
There are specialized law firms/legal organizations that deal entirely with self defense cases. I have one of their memership cards in my wallet.

There are so fucking many feral niggers and violent diversity mutts wandering around it's almost irresponsible not to belong to one of these organizations.

The police do not give a fuck.
 
"Not about race." So it is about race. White on brown self-defense isn't allowed, I guess.
It's hard to say. Taking a robber's bat and beating him until he can't remember his own name is based and Dreddpilled. Chasing him down on the street, while still pretty Dreddpilled, is also very obviously crossing the line past self defense, unless the guy was yelling "I'll come back with my homies" or something.

The race angle, you never know. Both parties could be black and twitter might be screaming that the only reason they arrested the clerk was because he Black ✊😞😡😤. They're being very careful to release any descriptions of either party, so you know the robber was black.
 
Chasing him down on the street [...] is also very obviously crossing the line past self defense
Wrong. You and your property were attacked by a person who has clearly demonstrated his ability to harm others. By pursuing him you are protecting yourself and your community from further harm. If you fail to neutralize this threat due to your unwillingness to continue the fight past his attempt to retreat and this criminal goes on to harm your neighbor, how much of that is your fault? I'd argue it would be a non-zero amount.
This is why when police shoot someone, they empty the magazine.
 
"Not about race." So it is about race. White on brown self-defense isn't allowed, I guess.
No it was curry on black violence. The towel head did nothing wrong. He was just sihk of fatherless behavior.

*Edit*
Never mind I got it mixed up with a different case.
 
Wrong. You and your property were attacked by a person who has clearly demonstrated his ability to harm others. By pursuing him you are protecting yourself and your community from further harm. If you fail to neutralize this threat due to your unwillingness to continue the fight past his attempt to retreat and this criminal goes on to harm your neighbor, how much of that is your fault? I'd argue it would be a non-zero amount.
This is why when police shoot someone, they empty the magazine.
You're correct on a moral and rational level, but the law is neither of those things. There's no way he's getting away with a self defense argument, especially in a place like Canada.
 
Wrong. You and your property were attacked by a person who has clearly demonstrated his ability to harm others. By pursuing him you are protecting yourself and your community from further harm. If you fail to neutralize this threat due to your unwillingness to continue the fight past his attempt to retreat and this criminal goes on to harm your neighbor, how much of that is your fault? I'd argue it would be a non-zero amount.
This is why when police shoot someone, they empty the magazine.
I wish the law worked this way. Where I live, we can have guns, but there is also a duty to retreat law. This means there's only a possibility of a successful self-defense claim, even in your own house, if you are cornered and can't get out.
 
It all depends on what state you live in, in SC we have what's called a Castle Law and it allows us to kill someone to protect ourselves, but you have to prove you felt your life was in danger. By chasing the guy down you are no longer in fear of your life so any protection that you would had being in a Castle law state would be worthless once he flees.
It amazes me that 30-40 years ago this store clerk would have been a hero, I have a family member who stopped a robbery with a baseball bat once. He went to work, saw the lights were out hours after it was supposed to be open, grabbed a baseball bat out of his truck then went in the back door, he was able to get behind the robbers who were in the process of robbing all the customers and was able to hit one in the back of the head with the bat, the other one probably saw the blood and got freaked out and ran so he chased him down until the cops got there. The guy that took the bat to the back of the head tried to sue but it was dismissed.

I just thought it was interesting how differently ppl look at basically the same thing happening, the media wrote a story about how my family member was a hero who by stepping in when he did prevented any harm coming to customers or other employees.
 
Last edited:
"This is not about politics — politics have nothing to do with the facts. This is not about race — as some have suggested. This is not about the perception that criminals go free while victims of crime are penalized — this is about the law," Betts said in a statement posted on X, formerly Twitter.
Yeah and our faggot ass laws say that we can't defend ourselves. Fuck the crown
 
"A struggle ensued and the clerk was struck with the bat before grabbing the bat away from the suspect," police said.

"The suspect then fled the store. The clerk followed the suspect out of the store and struck him several times with the baseball bat on the sidewalk."

So I'm guessing the issue here is that he did not use the bat to defend himself but rather he chased down the suspect and hit him with the bat. Also Canada.
 
Back