US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
Well, the powers that be have decided that they're tired of those pesky citizens deciding that they can patrol their own neighborhoods and try to enforce law and order.

Enter: https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/6981/all-info

Addition to House Bill 6981

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit unauthorized private paramilitary activity, and for other purposes.


All Information (Except Text) for H.R.6981 - To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit unauthorized private paramilitary activity, and for other purposes.​


It's got some interesting repercussions.

Supposedly this covers neighborhood watch and other community efforts.

Gonna be interesting to see if this gets amended and what its going to lead to.
Of course it's authored by Ed Markey and Jamie Ratskin.
‘‘(a) OFFENSE.—It shall be unlawful to knowingly, in a circumstance described in subsection (b), while acting as part of or on behalf of a private paramilitary organization and armed with a firearm, explosive or incendiary de8 vice, or other dangerous weapon—
‘‘(1) publically patrol, drill, or engage in techniques capable of causing bodily injury or death;
‘‘(2) interfere with, interrupt, or attempt to interfere with or interrupt government operations or a government proceeding;
‘‘(3) interfere with or intimidate another person in that person’s exercise of any right under the Constitution of the United States;
‘‘(4) assume the functions of a law enforcement officer, peace officer, or public official, whether or not acting under color of law, and thereby assert authority or purport to assert authority over another person without the consent of that person; or
‘‘(5) train to engage in any activity described in paragraphs (1) through (4).
This would no doubt be used against the next Kyle Rittenhouse. Can't have people defending themselves against the Mostly Peaceful Attack Dogs.

Part 5 would make your backyard range a "paramilitary training ground".

And all of this will be federal, so they can hold your trial in New York or DC even if you don't live there.

ETA: and it will magically not apply when BLM, Antifa, or the Dune Coon Dickriders do it.
 
Last edited:
Well, the powers that be have decided that they're tired of those pesky citizens deciding that they can patrol their own neighborhoods and try to enforce law and order.

Enter: https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/6981/all-info

Addition to House Bill 6981

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit unauthorized private paramilitary activity, and for other purposes.


All Information (Except Text) for H.R.6981 - To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit unauthorized private paramilitary activity, and for other purposes.​


It's got some interesting repercussions.

Supposedly this covers neighborhood watch and other community efforts.

Gonna be interesting to see if this gets amended and what its going to lead to.
no way this will apply anywhere outside of blue hell holes. Insane power grabs like this are usually never followed through at the local or state level depending on location.
 
no way this will apply anywhere outside of blue hell holes. Insane power grabs like this are usually never followed through at the local or state level depending on location.

State and municipal governments aren't responsible for enforcing federal law. What this means is that during the next BLM riots, if you and your buddies organize with rifles to watch your neighborhood, the FBI will round everyone up, and under this statute, you will have engaged in illegal paramilitary activity. The feds were extremely frustrated that they didn't have even a fig leaf of legality to lock up Kyle Rittenhouse or do anything about the neighborhood watches that met BLM/Antifa rioters here and there.

Note this violates the Second Amendment. You have the right to keep and bear arms. Of course, total toss-up as to whether the courts will respect that.
 
State and municipal governments aren't responsible for enforcing federal law. What this means is that during the next BLM riots, if you and your buddies organize with rifles to watch your neighborhood, the FBI will round everyone up, and under this statute, you will have engaged in illegal paramilitary activity. The feds were extremely frustrated that they didn't have even a fig leaf of legality to lock up Kyle Rittenhouse or do anything about the neighborhood watches that met BLM/Antifa rioters here and there.

Note this violates the Second Amendment. You have the right to keep and bear arms. Of course, total toss-up as to whether the courts will respect that.
I don't think it will go the way they expect it seems like a desperation move that will get shot down at some level like the vax mandate or pretty much all gun control since the 90s has been. Rate me optimistic but they very rarely win on blatant retarded powergrabs like this these days
 
State and municipal governments aren't responsible for enforcing federal law. What this means is that during the next BLM riots, if you and your buddies organize with rifles to watch your neighborhood, the FBI will round everyone up, and under this statute, you will have engaged in illegal paramilitary activity. The feds were extremely frustrated that they didn't have even a fig leaf of legality to lock up Kyle Rittenhouse or do anything about the neighborhood watches that met BLM/Antifa rioters here and there.

Note this violates the Second Amendment. You have the right to keep and bear arms. Of course, total toss-up as to whether the courts will respect that.
Well, with Trump now being declared an "insurrectionist" without a criminal trial, they'll probably try to have anyone who votes against this be declared an "insurrection enabler".

It chaps my asscrack knowing how predictable they are.
 
‘‘(2) interfere with, interrupt, or attempt to interfere with or interrupt government operations or a government proceeding;
‘‘(3) interfere with or intimidate another person in that person’s exercise of any right under the Constitution of the United States;

Doesn't the refusal for citizens to defend themselves interfere with the Constitution itself? This is already contradicting itself.
 
It will come down to the SCotUS no doubt.

I'm not a Yanker but I'm pretty sure that the Constitution says something about militia group being allowed and some Dem Lib trying to make protecting yourself extra illegal probably won't fly.

But we are in Clown World 2.0 so all bets are off, shit is so crazy now that who know what will happen for what reasons. The Left has won in the sense the rules really don't mean very much anymore, it's all about what you have the power to get away with.
 
I don't think it will go the way they expect it seems like a desperation move that will get shot down at some level like the vax mandate or pretty much all gun control since the 90s has been. Rate me optimistic but they very rarely win on blatant retarded powergrabs like this these days
think if democrats win everything this year, it will 100% be passed and implemented. Their goal for over a decade has been to make "we the people" completely reliant on the state for everything from food to housing to security. TPTB are still using the "citizens who are terrorized turn to the government for security" playbook from the early 2000's to grab power. A citizen who can provide his own security doesn't need more 3 letter agency funding and doesn't need the money printer to go brrrrr to feel safe. That's why they hate Rittenhouse with a passion. He (intentionally or not) showed people that self reliance for security is a viable option as opposed to relying on the state.
 
We will see, like I said, I gave 2 scenarios, lawfare and outright combat. I don't think the biden admin is going to allow Abbot to stay in the governor's mansion over this open defyment of federal supremacy and their human and drug trafficking operation.

I dont put it past the feds to attack American citizens/nasty gurls if given the slightest opportunity, or to claim they were fired upon and "thankfully" they had a MK.19 to  ambush defend themselves from a group of Texas National Guard soldiers.

You know, I was amazed to learn how few feds their truly are. Apparently the entire FBI is fewer than 40,000 and most of them are house cats. I agree that the Biden admin could and would use lawfare, but I'm skeptical how effective a federal military intervention would be.
 
State and municipal governments aren't responsible for enforcing federal law. What this means is that during the next BLM riots, if you and your buddies organize with rifles to watch your neighborhood, the FBI will round everyone up, and under this statute, you will have engaged in illegal paramilitary activity. The feds were extremely frustrated that they didn't have even a fig leaf of legality to lock up Kyle Rittenhouse or do anything about the neighborhood watches that met BLM/Antifa rioters here and there.

Note this violates the Second Amendment. You have the right to keep and bear arms. Of course, total toss-up as to whether the courts will respect that.
All I'll say to amerimutts is if this seems like it will pass through, you better remember the real reason the 2nd exists, because this shit would void it in prety much any practical term.
 
Well, the powers that be have decided that they're tired of those pesky citizens deciding that they can patrol their own neighborhoods and try to enforce law and order.

Enter: https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/6981/all-info

Addition to House Bill 6981

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit unauthorized private paramilitary activity, and for other purposes.


All Information (Except Text) for H.R.6981 - To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit unauthorized private paramilitary activity, and for other purposes.​


It's got some interesting repercussions.

Supposedly this covers neighborhood watch and other community efforts.

Gonna be interesting to see if this gets amended and what its going to lead to.

Doesn't the "Unauthorized" here imply that there are ways to be a AUTHORIZED paramilitariy? There you go, that is your BLM/Antifa fig leaf. They got a piece of paper from some glownigger saying they can, and you will never be allowed the same piece of paper because it is handed out by a glownigger who hates you.

So, the Border Patrol union is siding with Governor Hotwheels....


View attachment 5630713

Well that is a twist I didn't see coming. Too bad the actual people in charge don't give a shit, they never wanted Border Patrol to do their jobs so this makes them even madder.
 
"Where three or more are gathered with guns, there is an unlawful paramilitary."

So a family of 4 who own guns are now Al Qaeda.

Why is cancer taking Paul Harrell from us before Jamie Raskin?

View attachment 5630844
Meanwhile, ANTIFA is recognized as a terrorist organization but not enforced because it's "just an idea." I hope to God this doesn't pass. Actually, the people that drafted this bill should be ceded for treason.
 
I think we are all jumping the gun a wee bit here. This is just a bill some random wackos are trying to get put forward. Chances are this shit bill gets buried and forgotten.

At least until after the election.
Yeah, I doubt it'll pass either chamber. It's just Ratface and Masshole Markey virtue-signaling.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back