@Android Raptor Love Thread

I respect your female solidarity here, but it's misguided.
You are dealing with your alogs just fine. One woman against like what, 20 haters?
So you're well equipped to deal with sometimes very harsh "criticism" and attacks and capable to withstand it.
And yet, you're defending a thread that's closed based on sex and kept as a safe space for the most rabid man hating women on the site, so they can continue their hate without repercussions.
Why should they?
You cannot exit this conundrum.
- either you need protections and you're vulnerable to males, so by definition you're not equal
- or you are equal and should withstand the criticisms without any need for safe spaces
Which is it?
Most of that thread is hating on men for being rapists and pedophiles and shit, fyi
 
Do you need it protected based on sex?
Idk, why do men need so many threads seething about one thread, including at least one protected by sex?

There's hate for all groups here, but interesting how one thread hating men continues to cause so much asspain (especially when it's mostly hating men for shit that deserves hate like sexually harassing and raping little girls).
 
Idk, why do men need so many threads seething about one thread, including at least one protected by sex?

There's hate for all groups here, but interesting how one thread hating men continues to cause so much asspain (especially when it's mostly hating men for shit that deserves hate like sexually harassing and raping little girls).
I reject that thread's protections, it was imposed by jannies. The thread should be open to women.
You are NOT answering anything I asked you.
 
Idk, why do men need so many threads seething about one thread, including at least one protected by sex?

There's hate for all groups here, but interesting how one thread hating men continues to cause so much asspain (especially when it's mostly hating men for shit that deserves hate like sexually harassing and raping little girls).
Well, the difference here is that you shit on all men indiscriminately, while they only really have a problem with a handful of female posters on the site.
 
Well, the difference here is that you shit on all men indiscriminately, while they only really have a problem with a handful of female posters on the site.
Really now? Show me the receipts.

You could've fooled me with the last bit since any thread even vaguely related to women in the Thunderdome gets replies full of autists seething about women simply existing (especially existing while not married to a moid and shitting out kids for it).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Thé au lait
Also, each time you are cornered in a debate you react with changing the discussion to your rape, minors and harassment obsessions, as you cannot address any of the issues without admitting that women are unequal to males and require male protections and male-free spaces (maintained by other stronger males).
It's not an intellectually honest position. It's also not sustainable, like all lies.
 
Really now? Show me the receipts.
Well, that didn't take much effort on my part to find:
There's hate for all groups here, but interesting how one thread hating men continues to cause so much asspain (especially when it's mostly hating men for shit that deserves hate like sexually harassing and raping little girls).

You could've fooled me with the last bit since any thread even vaguely related to women in the Thunderdome gets replies full of autists seething about women simply existing (especially existing while not married to a moid and shitting out kids for it).
I don't endorse them. Most people just gave up on them because they are literally too retarded to engage with on any sort of reasonable common ground. I can apply this critique to DMZ and a lot of BP in general too, but in addition to this it's also guarded by mods.
 
I love @Android raptor consuming the attention of so many wonderful spergs

It's pretty funny
Also, each time you are cornered in a debate you react with changing the discussion to your rape, minors and harassment obsessions, as you cannot address any of the issues without admitting that women are unequal to males and require male protections and male-free spaces (maintained by other stronger males).
It's not an intellectually honest position. It's also not sustainable, like all lies.
A woman with a gun is pretty equal to any man, 9mm of protection is usually quite enough
 
Well, that didn't take much effort on my part to find:



I don't endorse them. Most people just gave up on them because they are literally too retarded to engage with on any sort of reasonable common ground. I can apply this critique to DMZ and a lot of BP in general too, but in addition to this it's also guarded by mods.
All men are rapists and thunderdome retards?
Also, each time you are cornered in a debate you react with changing the discussion to your rape, minors and harassment obsessions, as you cannot address any of the issues without admitting that women are unequal to males and require male protections and male-free spaces (maintained by other stronger males).
It's not an intellectually honest position. It's also not sustainable, like all lies.
Samuel Colt made everyone equal. Statistically, the males women need protection from the most are domestic partners and other men they know, not strangers.

Moids chimp strength has not been required for female protection for centuries (if it ever was). History has proven time and time again that male "protection" of women is a protection racket at best the "protector" males use to control and abuse women to their hearts content.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Thé au lait
Samuel Colt made everyone equal. Statistically, the males women need protection from the most are domestic partners and other men they know, not strangers.
Ask Jersh and jannies to open up the thread then, you can use your dumb Amerimutt Colt against males in it, I am sure.
Also, you are still avoiding the subject and you have fully reverted to obsessive-posting, now it's your domestic partner mantra.
Stop repeating the same shit over and over. It's boring. It's the equivalent of inceloid "women are whores" discourse.
 
Ask Jersh and jannies to open up the thread then, you can use your dumb Amerimutt Colt against males in it, I am sure.
Also, you are still avoiding the subject and you have fully reverted to obsessive-posting, now it's your domestic partner mantra.
Stop repeating the same shit over and over. It's boring. It's the equivalent of inceloid "women are whores" discourse.
Most women who are murdered are murdered by a domestic partner or someone else they know. Same with rape. Like child abductions, strangers being the perpetrator are rare.

You know what they say, facts don't care about your feelings.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Thé au lait
Compulsive-obsessive
Nope, just aware of the fact that the men women need the most protection from are their domestic partners and other men they know. The conservative moid fixation on big strong moids protecting women from random strangers (usually of whatever racial minority he dislikes the most) is bizarre and not in line with the actual dangers women face.

Domestic violence and rape crisis centers frequently don't allow any moids for a reason (and are typically created, staffed, and maintained entirely by women). Even crisis hotlines are mostly women, and the few men they have just end up answering calls from dudes jerking off half the time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Thé au lait
There are times when I feel your mental health issues could be easily exaggerated, and then there come these posts with hyper-persistence on very, very specific pet issues, that you would ALWAYS derail a discussion towards when it's not going your way. When you're relaxed, it's all chill and you can have a normal discussion. When you feel threatened, it's back to the carapace of 2010 feminism bullet points, taken straight out of some Skepchick video about "How to Deal with Online Misogynists" or something.
Sad.
 
Back