Designated Whiner Shitting Street - General non DSP-specific discussion and stupid questions goes here

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Whoa, are you telling me that the inherently threatening and dangerous act known as "doXXing" that is used as a retributive punishment is allowed on this site?!?
@Shirō Ishii How could. . what kind of a person would. . .oh, wait. What's this?
Dozens of photos doxxing a literal minutes old infant in only a diaper? And it's a featured post?
Oh, well nevermind then. I guess I have a lot of learning to do so I can integrate into this site better.

Hopefully our new mod will be able to clear up this whole 'Is doxxing allowed on KiwiFarms?' kerfuffle. I wish they would have mentioned it when you sign up for an account or something. Geez *sigh*
 
The DSP subforum has always been incredibly insular, any and all criticism would get moved to the whiner thread within 10 minutes and the vultures would swarm in and gloat. Thin-skinned faggots hiding behind enabler jannies.
That was Clothes contribution. He was a dent and will not br missed.
 
Doxing kids is crazy enough, but half-naked pictures of children is fucking unhinged. @Shirō Ishii bro wtf happened?

You should really see the Becca thread then, would really blow your mind.

ACKSUALLY, while I’d hate for any of you faggots to get a heart attack, there’s a picture of a newborn baby on the front page. (And not just mentioned like in Nigel’s post.)

WHAAAAA?!? A PICTURE OF A NEWBORN?! Why, Null is unhinged and out of control! Won’t somebody think of the children?!

To sum up: Getting mad over doxxing, a totally legal practice, on what is widely described as “a doxxing forum” is retarded.
 
Last edited:
Before, I was not convinced that there was a systemic problem with users on the DSP subforum, their attitude towards the site, and towards lolcows. Now I am. This change is not because of Null. It's because of what I started reading here, based on facts and posts from the subforum itself, and the subsequent response to justified reactions to it above. If you cannot see any issues whatsoever with this clear-cut example of unhinged behaviour, and can only react with indignation, then log off the Internet for a while and reflect on what you are actually condoning here, because this is not healthy. This is deranged.
 
Last edited:
Before, I was not convinced that there was a systemic problem with users on the DSP subforum, their attitude towards the site, and towards lolcows. Now I am. This change is not because of Null. It's because of what I started reading here, based on facts and posts from the subforum itself, and the subsequent response to justified reactions to it above. If you cannot see any issues whatsoever with this clear-cut example of unhinged behaviour, and can only react with indignation, then you have no sympathy from me. It's not in line with what this site is about.
Amen. Here, all these scattered examples have been gathered up and put into a quite ugly picture. If you cannot see that picture, and why doxing BABIES 3x removed from Phil is wrong and immoral, you hate this guy way too much
 
You should really see the Becca thread then, would really blow your mind.

ACKSUALLY, while I’d hate for any of you faggots to get a heart attack, there’s a picture of a newborn baby on the front page. (And not just mentioned like in Nigel’s post.)

WHAAAAA?!? A PICTURE OF A NEWBORN?! Why, Null is unhinged and out of control! Won’t somebody think of the children?!

To sum up: Getting mad over doxxing, a totally legal practice, on what is widely described as “a doxxing forum” is retarded.
The only thing you faggots have is whataboutisms and false equivalencies.

One is the child of a main person of interest for a thread, where the images/information on the child is coming directly from the person of interest. Very relevant to the topic of the thread.

The other is the child of the sister of an ex-moderator. Completely irrelevant to the thread.
 
Last edited:
Dozens of photos doxxing a literal minutes old infant in only a diaper? And it's a featured post?
Oh, well nevermind then. I guess I have a lot of learning to do so I can integrate into this site better.
based midwit who uses ralph's beatdown as justification to draw attention to children. no matter how many times it's explained, you people never listen.
 
based midwit who uses ralph's beatdown as justification to draw attention to children. no matter how many times it's explained, you people never listen.
He's referring the ArchivistBech, who is the subject of her own thread, and knows her accounts are being monitored by forum users. She posted pictures of her newborn daughter to her Xitter.

Not Ralph, but still a gay false equivalency.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Product Placement
He's referring the ArchivistBech, who is the subject of her own thread, and knows her accounts are being monitored by forum users. She posted pictures of her newborn daughter to her Xitter.

Not Ralph, but still a gay false equivalency.
Tell me your not a parent without telling me you aren't a parent. Time was fathers carried pictures of they kids in they wallet, parents are proud of having children and want the world to know; times have just changed so that anyone can look up photos on social media.
 
He's referring the ArchivistBech, who is the subject of her own thread, and knows her accounts are being monitored by forum users. She posted pictures of her newborn daughter to her Xitter.
And that's why the "whataboutism" is so stupid. At best, it makes the argument that both instances are fucked up. People in general shouldn't post photos of their newborns or their babies because creeps exploit it; then you see that the creep exploiting it in this context is a DSP a-log. It's revolting.

But that's how the goalposts move:

>We just point and laugh
>We never actually touch the cow
>We don't condone touching the cow
>Only throwaway accounts touch the cow
>We touch the cow, but we don't deplatform the cow
>We deplatformed the cow, but we never illegally interfere with their work
>We illegally interfered with the cow's job, but the board didn't like it
>We did like interfering with the cow's job. but we lie about it to others
>We monetize the cow's misfortunes to enrich ourselves
>We illegally interfere in the cow's court proceedings
>We dox babies the cow knows, but it's okay because other cow's babies are doxed too
>We dox babies the cow doesn't even know
<=== YOU ARE HERE
>We physically assault the cow to extract justice
 
Tell me your not a parent without telling me you aren't a parent. Time was fathers carried pictures of they kids in they wallet, parents are proud of having children and want the world to know; times have just changed so that anyone can look up photos on social media.
But why are you? Because their father interviewed a fat Italian? Does this really deserve your support on the forum about laughing at retards? What do the children have to do with DSP?
I have no problem agreeing that doxing is generally acceptable, since it's legal and so is owning a gun. But the only reason you have qualms about conceding anything is that doxing the child of the man who interviewed DSP might in some way damage or fuck with DSP, either by intimidating him directly, or by preventing people from associating with him in the future. Either one is gay. Accept it.
 
But why are you? Because their father interviewed a fat Italian? Does this really deserve your support on the forum about laughing at retards? What do the children have to do with DSP?
I have no problem agreeing that doxing is generally acceptable, since it's legal and so is owning a gun. But the only reason you have qualms about conceding anything is that doxing the child of the man who interviewed DSP might in some way damage or fuck with DSP, either by intimidating him directly, or by preventing people from associating with him in the future. Either one is gay. Accept it.
i have an issue with doxxing other people's kids, my point is that parents dox their own kids every day, that's why boomers use facebook, to see new relatives that live away from them.
 
i have an issue with doxxing other people's kids, my point is that parents dox their own kids every day, that's why boomers use facebook, to see new relatives that live away from them.
Yes, parents dox their kids. The subforum seeking it out is different. It's intent. And the intent of the DSP subforum is to burn Phil and anyone that's had contact with him to the ground.
 
Yes, parents dox their kids. The subforum seeking it out is different. It's intent. And the intent of the DSP subforum is to burn Phil and anyone that's had contact with him to the ground.
there was Nigel and Hadide (Shiro) that doxxed people tangentially related to DSP at best, the fact that they got little pushback from users here, doesn't produce intent for the subforum as a whole. What's left of this subforum userbase seems happy to laugh at the little fuckups DSP does daily on his own, like being unable to play Baldur's Gate 3 without most of his stream is looking to chat for answers on how to play the game.
 
I just catched up to what amounts to a crazed funeral reunion it seems?

Null you run your site however you want, you clearly hate this board and paint it's users with a very broad brush. Each time you interact it's very antagonistic and the clout chasers following the posts just spit venom at anything with a pulse. People tried to reason but your mind seem set on the issue.

Not even the tamest point and laugh users ( Which is 95% of the people that posts here ) feel welcome and it's been on the decline for years.

Big ups to the legendary mods that spent so much time here; actually and many others maintained a super fun board for many years.

I would recomend sticking to your gun and nuking discussion on DSP altogether instead of the #3 forced zombie thread, you shot the deer and life support is not very interesting.

I'll hang around on the other boards like Jack Scalfani as always until they are deemed problematic like this one.

See ya around but I'm done here ❤️
 
there was Nigel and Hadide (Shiro) that doxxed people tangentially related to DSP at best, the fact that they got little pushback from users here, doesn't produce intent for the subforum as a whole. What's left of this subforum userbase seems happy to laugh at the little fuckups DSP does daily on his own, like being unable to play Baldur's Gate 3 without most of his stream is looking to chat for answers on how to play the game.
Nigel got over 70 stickers, all of which were positive on trying to get DSP's account banned. And tangentially? Nigga, you guys doxed a baby down to its birth weight. Could have left it out but you guys didn't. It says a lot
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Product Placement
there was Nigel and Hadide (Shiro) that doxxed people tangentially related to DSP at best, the fact that they got little pushback from users here, doesn't produce intent for the subforum as a whole
I see your point, but still disagree here. They were both friends with the moderators. Baby doxer appeared repeatedly on Agent Proper's monetized streams, and one of the three instances where Agent Proper was encouraging people to harass Phil in real life and vandalize his home, it was directly inspired by the fake British dude. Closeted mod was encouraging the Comcast criminal and sweeping up for baby doxer. Their questionable posts were all showered almost exclusively with praise.

I'm not saying literally every soul in the subforum is complicit, but if you choose to ignore the pathology of this pervasive issue then you can never hope to solve it. I'm glad that at least we can respectfully share our perspectives in peace now. That's one problem solved!
 
YOU DOXED A BABY?!
1705509081263.png
 
Back