Unpopular opinions about movies.

Big Lebowski sucked.
It's a shit art piece for shitty art people about shitty characters doing shitty things. Cast is amazing, some good songs in it, everything else is foul. It gives off that creepy California feeling as if satan himself produced and directed that pile of shit.
I expected a funny 90s comedy.
I got some faggy detective story. Napoleon Dynamite was better.
 
Also: How the hell did Kevin Costner become such a big star back in the day? He is so boring and one-note in every film. While I really like Thirteen Days, his Boston accent is so fucking awful, it's hilarious and takes you out of every scene. Someone on set should've hit him in the head each time he opened his mouth trying to emulate that accent.
He is not too bad, and he is a heart throb. You may have heard of as little movie in the 90s he made, fucking BODYGAURD. "Annnndd IIIIIIIIIII" is burned into my head, as it was a huge pop hit in the 90s.

His Robin Hood movie did good as well. I know its wank and critically shat upon, but I seem to recall it did well enough. That Bryan Adams song also hit the number one spot, the one featured for the movie.

Field of Dreams as well, forgot that one. Another movie thats a hit with the ladies and old people. He cornered that market, its a solid and dependable market to corner. Yellowstone is kinda along the same lines.

But yes he isnt special as an actor, about on par with Michael Dudikoff, but Mike did better movies like American Ninja.
 
Big Lebowski sucked.
It's a shit art piece for shitty art people about shitty characters doing shitty things. Cast is amazing, some good songs in it, everything else is foul. It gives off that creepy California feeling as if satan himself produced and directed that pile of shit.
I expected a funny 90s comedy.
I got some faggy detective story. Napoleon Dynamite was better.
I completely understand what you mean by "creepy California feeling". Something about that entire state - especially the desert - gives me the feeling the land itself is possessed by the devil.

Big Lebowski is great though.
 
It's funny that someone would think of the Big Lebowski as an art film, since back in my day, me and the bro-y-ist of bro-friends would watch that shit before going on pub crawls. I mean sure, I'm a fart huffing cinephile, but those guys loved it as much as I did, and they certainly weren't.
 
It's funny that someone would think of the Big Lebowski as an art film, since back in my day, me and the bro-y-ist of bro-friends would watch that shit before going on pub crawls. I mean sure, I'm a fart huffing cinephile, but those guys loved it as much as I did, and they certainly weren't.
It's absolutely an art film. Way back in my college days I knew a lot of those hippie, leftie, proto feminist libertine art school weirdos who were all about that quirky Clockwork Orange colorful, random esthetic and borderline nonsensical presentation of random bullshit. Every single one of them were into Lebowski, which is why I thought it must be a great movie for all these years, never having watched it since yesternight.
Same things appeal to different people for different reasons though.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: byuuWasTaken
I kind of hate when people always gotta throw "realism" arguments into this. Kind like giant monster or shrink movies where they claim that the "Square Cubic law would kill them", its like saying that if you did half the shit the Jackass crew did, you would die, yeah, no shit but thats not why we are watching the movie now, is it? I dont mind when a movie is unrealistic as long as it follows its own internal logic. An example of that line being cross are the Fast and Furious movies, with how they get more insane with each movie, breaking the little internal logic they had in the previous. In that case, they break their own logic and thus can take you out of the experience but when a movie follows its own internal logic consistently, your brain doesnt mind it. When we see a steam powered robot, we deep down know that they couldnt exist IRL but as long the setting keeps it believable within its own confines, there isnt anything wrong with it.

I dont mind that it doesnt make sense IRL, simply that they make sure it makes sense in their world in a way my mind can still remain engaged.

Feels like its "Cinema Sins" culture where people think being the movie nitpicker makes you cool and smart when C.S probably made that persona as the guy that isnt invited to parties because he exclaims "Thats wrong!" at everything in the movie.
 
An unpopular take on Alien I posted in A&N:

The chestburster is so ingrained in pop culture, when I saw it I actually thought it was pretty tame. The stuff with Ash, I had no idea that was coming. It's more prolonged and I think a lot more effective. I think seeing a human(oid) character become inhuman and violent can be scarier than an inhuman monster being violent.
Can't complain too much about a truly great movie but: I thought the Ash stuff is the part of the movie that's aged the most, and I don't mean the special effects (but that too). It is a pretty random subplot to have in a movie that's already about something else, and the characters take the time to explain what's going on as though we've never seen such a thing before (not likely for 70s audiences and definitely not now).

The chestburster still works for me, and I saw Spaceballs first. Really puts the HURT in John Hurt.

Poor Things was fucking horrendous and I feel like that's only unpopular amongst pedophilic film critics because it was an overly long, boring wank with nothing interesting to say and basically just an excuse for the director to broadcast his perversions to the world.
It's a feminist movie, from the perspective that feminism is about women being able to ram as many things as possible into their vaginas, and any man who has feels affection for a woman is a clingy loser and a patriarchal oppressor. If it was supposed to appeal to straight males, I guess I'm a fag, because it was about as erotic as an autopsy. It's Current Year as hell, if the critics don't like it I'm surprised. The part where the guy said "retard" was based though. I miss that in films.
 
Hacksaw Ridge is better than Saving Private Ryan.
Both are great movies, but one is a greatly fictionalized story for drama, the other is real shit washed down because based Mel thought nobody would believe the full story. Hacksaw also had a cute girl in it.
You are wrong, SPR is a monumental piece of shit.

The first 5 minutes of this film are good, after that, you MUST turn that shit off because it's the biggest bore of all time.
 
You really need to watch 1 then 2 in that order. Dark Fate was pretty shit compared to the original.
What none of the other terminator films understood is that Terminator was basically a horror flick. It was an 80's slasher movie with a robot instead of a zombie man. The final action scene in the original with a defleshed terminator coming out of the fire and chasing the protagonists ranks up there with any horror scene ever, made even more unnerving by the jarring effects of the pre-cgi stop motion photography
 
I love Silence of the Lambs, as I love Manhunter, but Hopkins is the most boring aspect of the former film, and his character spoils Red Dragon. Buffalo Bill and The Tooth Fairy are far more interesting to think in terms of motivations and desires. In Lambs, Lector works as someone to play with Clarice's naïve moral compass. She is interested because Lector is so willing to play with her. It benefits her character. In Manhunter, Lector works as a side character because the interesting serial killer is within Graham's character. It is why Graham does not humour Lector because Graham knows how close they are to being the same. And why he is so good at his job. And it is why the Tooth Fairy is a tragic figure.

Manhunter is the Crime & Punishment of the 1980s. Michael Mann is a fucking genius.
 
Hacksaw Ridge is better than Saving Private Ryan.
Both are great movies, but one is a greatly fictionalized story for drama, the other is real shit washed down because based Mel thought nobody would believe the full story. Hacksaw also had a cute girl in it.
I think that SPR is more comparable to Fury as opposed to Hacksaw Ridge. Both are fictionalized stories about WWII, incredibly gory, and don't shy away from the brutality of mid -twentieth century warfare.

I do think that Fury is the better movie because it does a good job of portraying the fact that atrocities were committed by both major factions of that war. Plus, it doesn't get nearly so emotionally manipulative as SPR does.

While I'm on the subject of SPR though, Captain Miller is a great character, but pretty bad at battlefield strategy. Having your unarmed medic take part in an assault on a fortified Jerry MG nest is utterly foolhardy at best. Especially when you have a skilled marksman with a scoped rifle at your disposal.
 
Poor Things was fucking horrendous and I feel like that's only unpopular amongst pedophilic film critics because it was an overly long, boring wank with nothing interesting to say and basically just an excuse for the director to broadcast his perversions to the world.
Is that unpopular? Every review I read was very negative.

I don't read normie sites though so maybe basic bitches loved it idk.
 
Is that unpopular? Every review I read was very negative.

I don't read normie sites though so maybe basic bitches loved it idk.
A lot of Oscar buzz for the film. Emma Stone may win Best Actress for it. The director's previous film The Favourite won Olivia Coleman it. Not that means anything to the public anymore.

I can't finish any of the director's, Yorgos Lanthimos, films. The Killing of a Sacred Deer was weird for its own sake and said nothing. The Favourite was a poor man's Barry Lyndon. I imagine a few here will defend Dogtooth and I know a few good defences already so I'll leave it at that.

To parapharse Armond White, a Hitchcock knock-off like Charade, Wait Until Dark, and Disturbia are still usually fun to watch. Kubrick knock-offs like Yorgos' work are never fun. What all of them lack is the humanity that Kubrick does have beyond his negative exterior: Lyndon's complexity during the duel. The betrayal George Peatty's feels from his wife in The Killing. The sing-along in Paths of Glory. The dying Vietnamese woman in Full Metal Jacket. Whilst his films are often sterile, Kubrick was able to stir emotions beyond cynical mockery. There was a man behind the aloof director. The humour in Lanthimos is so distasteful that I wish every character was dead, like a poorly written horror film. Dr Strangelove, more or less an Ealing comedy, is funny enough to want me to ask for more of Ripper or Turgidson talk and argue. It is dark but I enjoy being in that world and always feel it ends prematurely.

frankenhooker.png


Frankenhooker is seriously a good film, one of the best Frankenstein films.
 

Why people defend this performance? Its hammy as fuck and its surprising to see people prefering The Bunker over Downfall. Bruno Ganz was able to portray a Hitler that was both evil but concerningly human (I think it might be the first ever portrayal of the character that doesnt feel needlessly exaggerated). Anthony Hopkins is a great actor but he clearly was told to just make Hitler seem crazy and thats really it.

Can't complain too much about a truly great movie but: I thought the Ash stuff is the part of the movie that's aged the most, and I don't mean the special effects (but that too). It is a pretty random subplot to have in a movie that's already about something else, and the characters take the time to explain what's going on as though we've never seen such a thing before (not likely for 70s audiences and definitely not now).

It did add an original (at the time) twist to a very familiar formula. Turning out this was all "part of the plan" and that it recontextualizes any action from Ash, showing that any wrong decision wasnt merely lack of understanding or incompetence, nah, he was on the Alien's side technically. It did introduce a human threat element in Alien that the sequels and expanded material gladly built upon.

Frankenhooker is seriously a good film, one of the best Frankenstein films.

Frankenhooker is at least honest in its absurdity. It winks at you and tells you to have fun, watch it with friends and enjoy the show. Poor Things try to be pretty pretentious about it.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: byuuWasTaken
Interstellar is a bad movie. It is a stupid person's idea of what a smart movie looks like. It would have been a solidly mid movie if not for the ending, but the ending is nonsensical garbage that ruined anything redeeming about the film.

For some reason people love this film and I get shit on if I even suggest I don't think it was a masterpiece.
 
Interstellar is a bad movie. It is a stupid person's idea of what a smart movie looks like. It would have been a solidly mid movie if not for the ending, but the ending is nonsensical garbage that ruined anything redeeming about the film.

For some reason people love this film and I get shit on if I even suggest I don't think it was a masterpiece.
I really enjoyed Interstellar. It was visually appealing and had extremely accurate depictions of how isolation and stress drives the human animal into horrific acts.

Do I think it was the best movie ever made? Absolutely not. Did it change my life? In no way, shape, manner or form. Was it original? Ha ha ha, no. But I liked it. I shed a few tears at the end, and moved on.
 
What none of the other terminator films understood is that Terminator was basically a horror flick. It was an 80's slasher movie with a robot instead of a zombie man. The final action scene in the original with a defleshed terminator coming out of the fire and chasing the protagonists ranks up there with any horror scene ever, made even more unnerving by the jarring effects of the pre-cgi stop motion photography
100% with you, and I feel the same about Alien. That one is more obviously a horror movie, but the same thing happened with the sequels: they turned them into action movies.
T1 and Alien are both fantastic horror movies, but somehow T2 and Aliens are the ones most people consider the best (which, though great, they aren't), and every subsequent sequel dug the grave deeper and deeper in trying to follow them.

---Unrelated---

This will probably be the least unpopular opinion ever posted here, but for the last 2 days, I started doing something I'd promised myself I would do for years now:
Watching The Lord of the Rings trilogy, for each movie, first the theatrical, then the extended.
Yesterday I watched Fellowship theatrical, today Fellowship extended.

And man, such wonderful movies they are.
I found myself tearing up multiple times at various scenes, both days. Didn't matter that I saw the scenes yesterday, they got to me today as well. That's how good these movies are.
In the coming days (probably not tomorrow or the day after), I'll do the same for Two Towers, and then Return of the King.
 
Last edited:
100% with you, and I feel the same about Alien. That one is more obviously a horror movie, but the same thing happened with the sequels: they turned them into action movies.
T1 and Alien are both fantastic horror movies, but somehow T2 and Aliens are the ones most people consider the best (which, though great, they aren't), and every subsequent sequel dug the grave deeper and deeper in trying to follow them.
Yeah. While T2 is a great movie, you can see the trend starting with it, esp with the introduction of some humour. What is worse is that the story is complete at the end of terminator 2, yet they kept rehashing the same shit instead of giving us what we really wanted, an exceeding desperate and grim tale of how john connor rose to greatness during the machine war.

We wanted this:


and got this:

 
Back