- Joined
- Oct 6, 2021
I would like to preface this post by stating that I am by no means an engineer and I have only the vaguest notions as to how fluid dynamics in relation to suppressor construction works.I want to start an epic keyboard smashing debate here:
I don't think modern silencer baffle design does that much, and I am willing to be proved wrong.
I think the best answer to the gas expansion problem is large volume and easy flow, and that thin baffles with large expansion chambers beat the odd squares and triangles in modern cans. See figure 1.
View attachment 5640500
The hypothesis that odd and irregular shapes disrupt gas flow is true, of course, but I think what would be more helpful is a reduction of exhaust gasses to atmospheric temperature and pressure before they escape the end of the gun. Cars have RPMs higher than machine guns, but are quieter than most silenced rifles. I was inspired by what turned out to be a mistaken view of car mufflers on my part, which is amusing if you know the history of how those came to be.
The real problem with suppressor design is that suppressors must be balancing acts or entirely lopsided in their performance. If you want full auto rated, 400 rounds of magdumped belted 5.56 capability, your suppressor is going to be heavy and probably sizable, you will need it to be made of comparatively exotic materials using complex manufacturing methods. If you want your suppressor to be very lightweight you will have to use titanium (or even aluminum in the case of rimfire but aluminum comes with it's own bevy of problems), it will most certainly not be full auto rated, hell it may not even be rapid semi auto rated, it will be expensive and it will spark if the baffles are not sufficiently coated in carbon. But departing from material choices there are even decisions regarding baffle types that must be made, Baffles designed around bolt guns/maximum suppression will look like traffic cones, the baffles on the SOCOM RC2 look like washers with little dents in them but I believe also have vents in some of them.
The other problem with suppressor design is that it has been retarded for so long by culture and legislation , that, and the fundamental limits of physics. Kevin Brittingham of AAC/Q describes that an original Maxim .22 Silencer is not all that much inferior in performance than that of an unspecified modern .22 suppressor.
Here's the problem with all other ccw cartridges that are not 9mm, they are not 9mm.I'm looking to purchase a new ccw. I've been watching alot of videos on .357 sig and I really like the performance from everything I've seen. But I keep hearing it's a round that is being phased out and theres really only two companies even making modern pistols chambering the thing: Glock and Sig. Not to mention that the price of even the cheap stuff is quite high. What are your guys thoughts on it? Am I better off sticking with 9mm? Or would something like 40 s&w be a wiser choice? Like I said I've looked into quite a bit but I always appreciate input from other Farmers
Every person actually qualified to speak on the subject (shooting instructor, wound scientist, surgeon, doctor, ballisitc researcher etc etc) will tell you two things in regards to handgun wounding potential
1. Up to a certain point, handgun "power factor" (fps and ftlbs) is kind of a meme (While yes a .44 Mag out of an 8'' handcannon will in fact kill you deader than a .380 from a 3'' mouse gun it will not kill you deader enough that you need to carry one to effectively defend yourself)
2. The more holes, the better. Bullets that do not impact the Central Nervous System (CNS) incapacitate either by pain response or exsanguation (a meth head can't peel your face off if his heart isn't beating due to lack of blood). A contributing factor to putting more holes in a threat in a given amount of time (in a defensive shooting you have distance and time, the distance between you and your attacker(s), the time it will take them to get to you and the time it will take them to be rendered nonthreatening if they are struck but not immediately incapacitated) is the recoil of your cartridge, it's a fact that smaller cartidges with less recoil are easier to shoot quickly and accurately for most people. There is a reason that almost every western LE/Mil/CT etc organization that matters either is currently using or is adopting 9mm handguns potentially after a period of playing with .40 S&W.
So in addition to being cheaper, more readily available, having better support (in 10 years time, will you be able to buy a replacement .357 Glock barrel? You will be able to buy a replacement Glock 19 barrel) .357 doesn't really kick 9mm's ass ballistically either as shown below
Handgun Self-Defense Ammunition - Ballistic Testing Data
Lucky Gunner tests more than 110 different 9mm, 45 ACP, 40 S&W and 380 ACP handgun self-defense ammunition loads in ballistic gel with analysis and video.
Governor of Montana, Greg Gianforte fires the Olympus Arms Vulcan long recoil rifle. Apparently Olympus is investing $50M dollars in the state (That doesn't sound right to me but okay)
ATF Los Angeles reveals that ATF has seized 31,000 illicit machineguns in the "last 5 years" (2018-2023? they're still quoting seizure numbers from 2021 in some press conferences)
New Holosun SCS Carry (enclosed version of the earlier SCS)

The SCS line is also expanding to the CZ P10

Guerilla 3012, by the Black Lotus Coalition

I have discovered a bizzare youtube channel that features homemade firearms among other content

FGC-9 seized in the zionist entity (you may know it as i*rael)
Looks to be outfitted for use by Tunnel Jews engaging in subterranean warfare

What was then, What is now.

Машина смерти (Шепчущийся)

There's something about an AK-74 with no accessories but a suppressor that is left in the white



AGCast has released his This Month in Beta video for December, only two designs are covered and both are suppressors